Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework

Autores
Moguillansky, Martín O.; Rotstein, Nicolás D.; Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
Año de publicación
2008
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this article we present a generalized dynamic argumentation framework that handles arguments expressed in an abstract language assumed to be some first order logic fragment. Once the formalism is presented, we propose a reification to the description logic ALC with the intention to handle ontology debugging. In this sense, since argumentation frameworks reason over graphs that relate arguments through attack, our methodology is proposed to bridge ontological inconsistency sources to attack relations in argumentation. Finally, an argumentation semantics is proposed as a consistency restoration tool to cope with the ontology debugging.
Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
knowledge representation
ontology debugging
semantic web
argumentation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21687
Acceder
id SEDICI_51af40f6d33b01a7e9224c82540e4d0c
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21687
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation frameworkMoguillansky, Martín O.Rotstein, Nicolás D.Falappa, Marcelo AlejandroCiencias Informáticasknowledge representationontology debuggingsemantic webargumentationIn this article we present a generalized dynamic argumentation framework that handles arguments expressed in an abstract language assumed to be some first order logic fragment. Once the formalism is presented, we propose a reification to the description logic ALC with the intention to handle ontology debugging. In this sense, since argumentation frameworks reason over graphs that relate arguments through attack, our methodology is proposed to bridge ontological inconsistency sources to attack relations in argumentation. Finally, an argumentation semantics is proposed as a consistency restoration tool to cope with the ontology debugging.Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2008-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21687enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T10:47:23Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21687Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 10:47:23.886SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
title Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
spellingShingle Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
Moguillansky, Martín O.
Ciencias Informáticas
knowledge representation
ontology debugging
semantic web
argumentation
title_short Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
title_full Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
title_fullStr Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
title_full_unstemmed Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
title_sort Handling inconsistency on ontologies through a generalized dynamic argumentation framework
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Moguillansky, Martín O.
Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
author Moguillansky, Martín O.
author_facet Moguillansky, Martín O.
Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
author_role author
author2 Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
knowledge representation
ontology debugging
semantic web
argumentation
topic Ciencias Informáticas
knowledge representation
ontology debugging
semantic web
argumentation
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this article we present a generalized dynamic argumentation framework that handles arguments expressed in an abstract language assumed to be some first order logic fragment. Once the formalism is presented, we propose a reification to the description logic ALC with the intention to handle ontology debugging. In this sense, since argumentation frameworks reason over graphs that relate arguments through attack, our methodology is proposed to bridge ontological inconsistency sources to attack relations in argumentation. Finally, an argumentation semantics is proposed as a consistency restoration tool to cope with the ontology debugging.
Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes (WASI)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description In this article we present a generalized dynamic argumentation framework that handles arguments expressed in an abstract language assumed to be some first order logic fragment. Once the formalism is presented, we propose a reification to the description logic ALC with the intention to handle ontology debugging. In this sense, since argumentation frameworks reason over graphs that relate arguments through attack, our methodology is proposed to bridge ontological inconsistency sources to attack relations in argumentation. Finally, an argumentation semantics is proposed as a consistency restoration tool to cope with the ontology debugging.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21687
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21687
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846063899278835712
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares