Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
- Autores
- Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; García, Alejandro Javier
- Año de publicación
- 2002
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning.
Eje: Lógica e Inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Planning
Defeasible Argumentation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23141
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_1ac7740f252ea6439b0e9efccd613847 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23141 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorationsSimari, Guillermo RicardoGarcía, Alejandro JavierCiencias InformáticasARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEPlanningDefeasible ArgumentationThe aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning.Eje: Lógica e Inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2002-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf898-907http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23141enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T10:47:56Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23141Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 10:47:57.114SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations |
title |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations |
spellingShingle |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations Simari, Guillermo Ricardo Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Planning Defeasible Argumentation |
title_short |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations |
title_full |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations |
title_fullStr |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations |
title_sort |
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo García, Alejandro Javier |
author |
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_facet |
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo García, Alejandro Javier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
García, Alejandro Javier |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Planning Defeasible Argumentation |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Planning Defeasible Argumentation |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning. Eje: Lógica e Inteligencia artificial Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
The aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23141 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23141 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 898-907 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1846063906424881152 |
score |
13.22299 |