Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations

Autores
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; García, Alejandro Javier
Año de publicación
2002
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning.
Eje: Lógica e Inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Planning
Defeasible Argumentation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23141

id SEDICI_1ac7740f252ea6439b0e9efccd613847
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23141
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorationsSimari, Guillermo RicardoGarcía, Alejandro JavierCiencias InformáticasARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEPlanningDefeasible ArgumentationThe aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning.Eje: Lógica e Inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2002-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf898-907http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23141enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T10:47:56Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23141Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 10:47:57.114SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
title Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
spellingShingle Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Planning
Defeasible Argumentation
title_short Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
title_full Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
title_fullStr Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
title_full_unstemmed Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
title_sort Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning : Some preliminary explorations
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
García, Alejandro Javier
author Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_facet Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
García, Alejandro Javier
author_role author
author2 García, Alejandro Javier
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Planning
Defeasible Argumentation
topic Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Planning
Defeasible Argumentation
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning.
Eje: Lógica e Inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description The aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing plans. Elsewhere we have introduced a formalism for agents to represent knowledge about their environment in Defeasible Logic Programming, and a set of actions that they are capable of executing in order to change the environment where they are performing their tasks. We have also shown that action selection is more involved than expected when combined with a defeasible argumentation formalism. In this paper we will develop a novel way of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form plans. Since our interest here lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to show meaningful examples where those issues are exhibited and not in improving current planning implementations. Therefore, we will use simple planning algorithms in an effort to reduce the complexity of the examples. Nevertheless, as the different ways of constructing plans introduce interesting details we will be considering progression and regression planning.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23141
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23141
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
898-907
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846063906424881152
score 13.22299