Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization

Autores
Ochoa, Claudio; Maller, Patricio A.; Ruiz de Mendarozqueta, Álvaro
Año de publicación
2002
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The Capability Maturity Model for Software (CMM or SW-CMM) is a framework that describes all the key elements that a process must have in order to be effective, it is organized based on five levels of maturity and covers planning, engineering and management practices for software development and maintenance. It is an incremental path for improvement based on the maturity levels of the model. This model has become an industry standard for Software Development. However, some practitioners look at CMM as a very complex model to be applied to small projects, so applying lightweight methodologies is seen as a way of overcoming this problem. Extreme Programming (XP) constitutes one of the most widely used lightweight methodologies, enabling the development of small projects in record time, fostering total customer satisfaction and being a strong alternative when short cycle time and high quality are sought in a Software project. Nevertheless, at first sight it seems controversial to apply XP in a CMM Level 5 organization, mainly because using XP for software development in a process improvement environment barely touches the management and organizational issues that the Software CMM emphasizes. On the other hand, XP supporters claim that there is a potential possibility of XP losing its characteristics when working on a rigid structure such as CMM. The aim of the paper is to show the possible integration of XP method under the CMM framework. This paper briefly introduces the CMM model and the XP methodology, and gives some guidelines for CMM Level 5 organizations to apply XP to small projects, specifying how CMM KPAs’ goals can be fulfilled even when a lightweight methodology such as XP is being used.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
eXtreme Programming (XP)
Key Process Area (KPA)
XP core practices
CMM Level 5
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/183087

id SEDICI_14eefc95bd10597a91a040aba157afbc
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/183087
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organizationOchoa, ClaudioMaller, Patricio A.Ruiz de Mendarozqueta, ÁlvaroCiencias InformáticasCapability Maturity Model (CMM)eXtreme Programming (XP)Key Process Area (KPA)XP core practicesCMM Level 5The Capability Maturity Model for Software (CMM or SW-CMM) is a framework that describes all the key elements that a process must have in order to be effective, it is organized based on five levels of maturity and covers planning, engineering and management practices for software development and maintenance. It is an incremental path for improvement based on the maturity levels of the model. This model has become an industry standard for Software Development. However, some practitioners look at CMM as a very complex model to be applied to small projects, so applying lightweight methodologies is seen as a way of overcoming this problem. Extreme Programming (XP) constitutes one of the most widely used lightweight methodologies, enabling the development of small projects in record time, fostering total customer satisfaction and being a strong alternative when short cycle time and high quality are sought in a Software project. Nevertheless, at first sight it seems controversial to apply XP in a CMM Level 5 organization, mainly because using XP for software development in a process improvement environment barely touches the management and organizational issues that the Software CMM emphasizes. On the other hand, XP supporters claim that there is a potential possibility of XP losing its characteristics when working on a rigid structure such as CMM. The aim of the paper is to show the possible integration of XP method under the CMM framework. This paper briefly introduces the CMM model and the XP methodology, and gives some guidelines for CMM Level 5 organizations to apply XP to small projects, specifying how CMM KPAs’ goals can be fulfilled even when a lightweight methodology such as XP is being used.Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa2002-09info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf117-129http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/183087enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-1087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:50:03Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/183087Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:50:03.799SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
title Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
spellingShingle Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
Ochoa, Claudio
Ciencias Informáticas
Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
eXtreme Programming (XP)
Key Process Area (KPA)
XP core practices
CMM Level 5
title_short Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
title_full Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
title_fullStr Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
title_sort Guidelines for applying XP in a CMM Level 5 organization
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ochoa, Claudio
Maller, Patricio A.
Ruiz de Mendarozqueta, Álvaro
author Ochoa, Claudio
author_facet Ochoa, Claudio
Maller, Patricio A.
Ruiz de Mendarozqueta, Álvaro
author_role author
author2 Maller, Patricio A.
Ruiz de Mendarozqueta, Álvaro
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
eXtreme Programming (XP)
Key Process Area (KPA)
XP core practices
CMM Level 5
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
eXtreme Programming (XP)
Key Process Area (KPA)
XP core practices
CMM Level 5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Capability Maturity Model for Software (CMM or SW-CMM) is a framework that describes all the key elements that a process must have in order to be effective, it is organized based on five levels of maturity and covers planning, engineering and management practices for software development and maintenance. It is an incremental path for improvement based on the maturity levels of the model. This model has become an industry standard for Software Development. However, some practitioners look at CMM as a very complex model to be applied to small projects, so applying lightweight methodologies is seen as a way of overcoming this problem. Extreme Programming (XP) constitutes one of the most widely used lightweight methodologies, enabling the development of small projects in record time, fostering total customer satisfaction and being a strong alternative when short cycle time and high quality are sought in a Software project. Nevertheless, at first sight it seems controversial to apply XP in a CMM Level 5 organization, mainly because using XP for software development in a process improvement environment barely touches the management and organizational issues that the Software CMM emphasizes. On the other hand, XP supporters claim that there is a potential possibility of XP losing its characteristics when working on a rigid structure such as CMM. The aim of the paper is to show the possible integration of XP method under the CMM framework. This paper briefly introduces the CMM model and the XP methodology, and gives some guidelines for CMM Level 5 organizations to apply XP to small projects, specifying how CMM KPAs’ goals can be fulfilled even when a lightweight methodology such as XP is being used.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
description The Capability Maturity Model for Software (CMM or SW-CMM) is a framework that describes all the key elements that a process must have in order to be effective, it is organized based on five levels of maturity and covers planning, engineering and management practices for software development and maintenance. It is an incremental path for improvement based on the maturity levels of the model. This model has become an industry standard for Software Development. However, some practitioners look at CMM as a very complex model to be applied to small projects, so applying lightweight methodologies is seen as a way of overcoming this problem. Extreme Programming (XP) constitutes one of the most widely used lightweight methodologies, enabling the development of small projects in record time, fostering total customer satisfaction and being a strong alternative when short cycle time and high quality are sought in a Software project. Nevertheless, at first sight it seems controversial to apply XP in a CMM Level 5 organization, mainly because using XP for software development in a process improvement environment barely touches the management and organizational issues that the Software CMM emphasizes. On the other hand, XP supporters claim that there is a potential possibility of XP losing its characteristics when working on a rigid structure such as CMM. The aim of the paper is to show the possible integration of XP method under the CMM framework. This paper briefly introduces the CMM model and the XP methodology, and gives some guidelines for CMM Level 5 organizations to apply XP to small projects, specifying how CMM KPAs’ goals can be fulfilled even when a lightweight methodology such as XP is being used.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/183087
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/183087
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-1087
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
117-129
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616360125005824
score 13.070432