Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report

Autores
Stankevicius, Alejandro G.; Capobianco, Marcela; Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Año de publicación
2002
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Logics for nonmonotonic reasoning have often been described by the property they lack-that is, monotonicity-instead of by those they do enjoy. These theories flourished in the early `80s in response to the inconveniences incomplete and changing information posed to classic, monotonic approaches. Several nonmonotonic formalisms were introduced in the literature: inheritance networks, default logic, preferential entailment, autoepistemic logic, and defeasible argumentation among others. The introduction of these proposals in a short span of time made it difficult to decide which approach is best suited for a given context.
Eje: Aspectos teóricos de inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
logical properties
defeasible logic programming
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21812
Acceder
id SEDICI_12c0b017eb2a5b4059df8d460ba7f3f5
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21812
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary reportStankevicius, Alejandro G.Capobianco, MarcelaChesñevar, Carlos IvánCiencias InformáticasARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCElogical propertiesdefeasible logic programmingLogics for nonmonotonic reasoning have often been described by the property they lack-that is, monotonicity-instead of by those they do enjoy. These theories flourished in the early `80s in response to the inconveniences incomplete and changing information posed to classic, monotonic approaches. Several nonmonotonic formalisms were introduced in the literature: inheritance networks, default logic, preferential entailment, autoepistemic logic, and defeasible argumentation among others. The introduction of these proposals in a short span of time made it difficult to decide which approach is best suited for a given context.Eje: Aspectos teóricos de inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2002-05info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf61-66http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21812enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:27:37Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21812Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:27:37.676SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
title Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
spellingShingle Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
logical properties
defeasible logic programming
title_short Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
title_full Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
title_fullStr Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
title_full_unstemmed Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
title_sort Logical properties in defeasible logic programming -a preliminary report
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
Capobianco, Marcela
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
author Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
author_facet Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
Capobianco, Marcela
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
author_role author
author2 Capobianco, Marcela
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
logical properties
defeasible logic programming
topic Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
logical properties
defeasible logic programming
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Logics for nonmonotonic reasoning have often been described by the property they lack-that is, monotonicity-instead of by those they do enjoy. These theories flourished in the early `80s in response to the inconveniences incomplete and changing information posed to classic, monotonic approaches. Several nonmonotonic formalisms were introduced in the literature: inheritance networks, default logic, preferential entailment, autoepistemic logic, and defeasible argumentation among others. The introduction of these proposals in a short span of time made it difficult to decide which approach is best suited for a given context.
Eje: Aspectos teóricos de inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description Logics for nonmonotonic reasoning have often been described by the property they lack-that is, monotonicity-instead of by those they do enjoy. These theories flourished in the early `80s in response to the inconveniences incomplete and changing information posed to classic, monotonic approaches. Several nonmonotonic formalisms were introduced in the literature: inheritance networks, default logic, preferential entailment, autoepistemic logic, and defeasible argumentation among others. The introduction of these proposals in a short span of time made it difficult to decide which approach is best suited for a given context.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21812
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21812
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
61-66
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260114141085696
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares