Spatial Variation in Turf Surface Properties of Polo Pitches: A Case Study of Different Handicaps of Argentina

• Autores: Blanco, María Alejandra; Peterson, Michael L.; Cipriotti, Pablo Ariel; Apecechea, Fernando
• Año de publicación: 2026
• Idioma: español castellano
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Fuente: Animals. 2026 16(685)
• Materia: GOLF; CESPED; MONITOREO
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina

Fil: Blanco, María Alejandra. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina
Fil: Peterson, Michael L. University of Kentucky and Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cipriotti, Pablo Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Apecechea, Fernando. Universidad de Morón. Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Informática y Ciencias Agroalimentarias; Argentina
Polo is a high-speed equestrian sport that imposes mechanical demands on horses and turf, yet limited research has examined the functional behavior of polo playing surfaces. This study characterizes the spatial variability of mechanical surface properties across turf polo pitches representing high-, medium-, and low-handicap categories. Three fields were assessed using lightweight field-based instruments, including the Impact Test Device (ITD), Rotational Peak Shear (RPS) tester, Going Stick© for penetration (GSP) and shear (GSS), and a TDR probe for volumetric moisture content (VMC%). A total of 210–223 grid-based sampling points per pitch were analyzed to evaluate mechanical responses under vertical and horizontal loading conditions. Significant differences among pitches were observed, with ITD and VMC emerging as the indicators of surface behaviour. Spatial analysis revealed heterogeneous within-pitch patterns, expressed as directional gradients and localized variability. Linear discriminant analysis demonstrated that the combined measurements could differentiate pitches associated with different handicap levels with high classification accuracy (0.88). Although the applied instruments do not replicate full equine biomechanical loading, they proved effective in detecting spatial variability in surface uniformity, a functional property relevant to performance and equine welfare. These findings support integration of spatially explicit surface assessments into routine turf management practices.