Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation
- Autores
- Edelman, Diana V.; Levin, Christoph; Knauf, E. Axel; Amit, Yairah; Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne; Bolin, Thomas M.; Adam, Klaus Peter; Römer, Thomas; Linville, James R.
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- libro
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Fil: Edelman, Diana V. Trinity College; Irlanda
Fil: Levin, Christoph. Ludwig Maximilian University; Alemania
Fil: Knauf, E. Axel. University of Bern; Suiza
Fil: Amit, Yairah. Tel Aviv University; Israel
Fil: Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne. Catholic-Theological Private University of Linz; Austria
Fil: Bolin, Thomas M. St. Norbert College; Estados Unidos
Fil: Adam, Klaus Peter. Lutheran School of Theology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Römer, Thomas. University of Lausanne; Suiza
Fil: Römer, Thomas. Collège de France; Francia
Fil: Linville, James R. University of Lethbridge; Canadá
Introducción: The existence of a “Deuteronomistic History,” consisting of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings, is under review.1 Is this scholarly construct an accurate understanding of what ancient writers of the Hebrew Bible conceived to be a coherent sequence of books that should be read together? Did the books ever form an independent collection, without Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers prefixed, or without Genesis- Numbers prefixed? If we are not as certain as past generations that they ever formed a recognized literary unit,2 why ask what was deemed authoritative about these five books in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods, by which time it is generally agreed they existed close to their current final forms? The purpose of the present volume is not to focus on the important debate about the status of the so-called Deuteronomistic History, though the results might contribute toward framing arguments on one side or the other. Instead, it is to try to understand the element of authority in relation to each book, which can be construed in two different ways. On the one hand, it can lead us to ask why we have each of the five individual books and what concerns led to their creation using which older materials to address those issues, because these earlier traditions carried some weight of authority for the community of scribes who penned the narratives as well as for their implied target audience(s). Currently, the dates of composition for the various books are generally assigned to the late monarchic period, the Neo-Babylonian period, or the early Persian period. In all three cases, a second question naturally arises then that needs a reasoned response: once created, why would the concerns addressed have had ongoing relevance and resonance for audiences in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods? - Fuente
- Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014
Ancient Near East Monographs - Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente. 2014, 6 - Materia
-
LIBROS SAGRADOS
Biblia. A.T.
ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO
HELENISMO
PERSAS
AUTORIDAD
Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio
Biblia. A.T. Josué
Biblia. A.T. Samuel
Biblia. A.T. Jueces
Biblia. A.T. Reyes - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ucacris:123456789/8008
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
RIUCA_61594fd288a3393a8b20fe5e13062a3c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ucacris:123456789/8008 |
network_acronym_str |
RIUCA |
repository_id_str |
2585 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) |
spelling |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversationEdelman, Diana V.Levin, ChristophKnauf, E. AxelAmit, YairahGillmayr Bucher, SusanneBolin, Thomas M.Adam, Klaus PeterRömer, ThomasLinville, James R.LIBROS SAGRADOSBiblia. A.T.ANTIGUO TESTAMENTOHELENISMOPERSASAUTORIDADBiblia. A.T. DeuteronomioBiblia. A.T. JosuéBiblia. A.T. SamuelBiblia. A.T. JuecesBiblia. A.T. ReyesFil: Edelman, Diana V. Trinity College; IrlandaFil: Levin, Christoph. Ludwig Maximilian University; AlemaniaFil: Knauf, E. Axel. University of Bern; SuizaFil: Amit, Yairah. Tel Aviv University; IsraelFil: Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne. Catholic-Theological Private University of Linz; AustriaFil: Bolin, Thomas M. St. Norbert College; Estados UnidosFil: Adam, Klaus Peter. Lutheran School of Theology; Estados UnidosFil: Römer, Thomas. University of Lausanne; SuizaFil: Römer, Thomas. Collège de France; FranciaFil: Linville, James R. University of Lethbridge; CanadáIntroducción: The existence of a “Deuteronomistic History,” consisting of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings, is under review.1 Is this scholarly construct an accurate understanding of what ancient writers of the Hebrew Bible conceived to be a coherent sequence of books that should be read together? Did the books ever form an independent collection, without Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers prefixed, or without Genesis- Numbers prefixed? If we are not as certain as past generations that they ever formed a recognized literary unit,2 why ask what was deemed authoritative about these five books in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods, by which time it is generally agreed they existed close to their current final forms? The purpose of the present volume is not to focus on the important debate about the status of the so-called Deuteronomistic History, though the results might contribute toward framing arguments on one side or the other. Instead, it is to try to understand the element of authority in relation to each book, which can be construed in two different ways. On the one hand, it can lead us to ask why we have each of the five individual books and what concerns led to their creation using which older materials to address those issues, because these earlier traditions carried some weight of authority for the community of scribes who penned the narratives as well as for their implied target audience(s). Currently, the dates of composition for the various books are generally assigned to the late monarchic period, the Neo-Babylonian period, or the early Persian period. In all three cases, a second question naturally arises then that needs a reasoned response: once created, why would the concerns addressed have had ongoing relevance and resonance for audiences in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods?Society of Biblical LiteraturePontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia de Antiguo OrienteEdelman, Diana V., (ed.)2014info:eu-repo/semantics/bookinfo:ar-repo/semantics/libroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33application/pdfhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008978-1-58983-739-3Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation [en línea]. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014Ancient Near East Monographs - Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente. 2014, 6reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA)instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2025-07-03T10:56:40Zoai:ucacris:123456789/8008instacron:UCAInstitucionalhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/Universidad privadaNo correspondehttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/oaiclaudia_fernandez@uca.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:25852025-07-03 10:56:40.866Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentinafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation |
title |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation |
spellingShingle |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation Edelman, Diana V. LIBROS SAGRADOS Biblia. A.T. ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO HELENISMO PERSAS AUTORIDAD Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio Biblia. A.T. Josué Biblia. A.T. Samuel Biblia. A.T. Jueces Biblia. A.T. Reyes |
title_short |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation |
title_full |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation |
title_fullStr |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation |
title_sort |
Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Edelman, Diana V. Levin, Christoph Knauf, E. Axel Amit, Yairah Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne Bolin, Thomas M. Adam, Klaus Peter Römer, Thomas Linville, James R. |
author |
Edelman, Diana V. |
author_facet |
Edelman, Diana V. Levin, Christoph Knauf, E. Axel Amit, Yairah Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne Bolin, Thomas M. Adam, Klaus Peter Römer, Thomas Linville, James R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Levin, Christoph Knauf, E. Axel Amit, Yairah Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne Bolin, Thomas M. Adam, Klaus Peter Römer, Thomas Linville, James R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Edelman, Diana V., (ed.) |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
LIBROS SAGRADOS Biblia. A.T. ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO HELENISMO PERSAS AUTORIDAD Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio Biblia. A.T. Josué Biblia. A.T. Samuel Biblia. A.T. Jueces Biblia. A.T. Reyes |
topic |
LIBROS SAGRADOS Biblia. A.T. ANTIGUO TESTAMENTO HELENISMO PERSAS AUTORIDAD Biblia. A.T. Deuteronomio Biblia. A.T. Josué Biblia. A.T. Samuel Biblia. A.T. Jueces Biblia. A.T. Reyes |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Fil: Edelman, Diana V. Trinity College; Irlanda Fil: Levin, Christoph. Ludwig Maximilian University; Alemania Fil: Knauf, E. Axel. University of Bern; Suiza Fil: Amit, Yairah. Tel Aviv University; Israel Fil: Gillmayr Bucher, Susanne. Catholic-Theological Private University of Linz; Austria Fil: Bolin, Thomas M. St. Norbert College; Estados Unidos Fil: Adam, Klaus Peter. Lutheran School of Theology; Estados Unidos Fil: Römer, Thomas. University of Lausanne; Suiza Fil: Römer, Thomas. Collège de France; Francia Fil: Linville, James R. University of Lethbridge; Canadá Introducción: The existence of a “Deuteronomistic History,” consisting of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings, is under review.1 Is this scholarly construct an accurate understanding of what ancient writers of the Hebrew Bible conceived to be a coherent sequence of books that should be read together? Did the books ever form an independent collection, without Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers prefixed, or without Genesis- Numbers prefixed? If we are not as certain as past generations that they ever formed a recognized literary unit,2 why ask what was deemed authoritative about these five books in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods, by which time it is generally agreed they existed close to their current final forms? The purpose of the present volume is not to focus on the important debate about the status of the so-called Deuteronomistic History, though the results might contribute toward framing arguments on one side or the other. Instead, it is to try to understand the element of authority in relation to each book, which can be construed in two different ways. On the one hand, it can lead us to ask why we have each of the five individual books and what concerns led to their creation using which older materials to address those issues, because these earlier traditions carried some weight of authority for the community of scribes who penned the narratives as well as for their implied target audience(s). Currently, the dates of composition for the various books are generally assigned to the late monarchic period, the Neo-Babylonian period, or the early Persian period. In all three cases, a second question naturally arises then that needs a reasoned response: once created, why would the concerns addressed have had ongoing relevance and resonance for audiences in the late Persian and early Hellenistic periods? |
description |
Fil: Edelman, Diana V. Trinity College; Irlanda |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/book info:ar-repo/semantics/libro info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33 |
format |
book |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008 978-1-58983-739-3 Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation [en línea]. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008 |
url |
https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008 |
identifier_str_mv |
978-1-58983-739-3 Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation [en línea]. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/8008 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Society of Biblical Literature Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia de Antiguo Oriente |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Society of Biblical Literature Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia de Antiguo Oriente |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Edelman, D.V. (ed.). Deuteronomy-Kings as emerging authoritative books : a conversation. Atlanta; Buenos Aires: Society of Biblical Literature; Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2014 Ancient Near East Monographs - Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente. 2014, 6 reponame:Repositorio Institucional (UCA) instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) |
collection |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional (UCA) - Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
claudia_fernandez@uca.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1836638345661251584 |
score |
13.070432 |