Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
- Autores
- Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- tesis doctoral
- Estado
- versión aceptada
- Colaborador/a o director/a de tesis
- Cousiño Valdés, Carlos
Crespo Martínez, Ismael - Descripción
- The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis.
Fil: Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales; Argentina - Fuente
- Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo (2016) Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela. Universidad Católica de Córdoba [Tesis Doctoral].
- Materia
- JA Ciencias políticas (General)
- Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Católica de Córdoba
- OAI Identificador
- oai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:4791
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
PAUCC_bc89fb6f1e62b8567d1cc896927c0c5a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:4791 |
network_acronym_str |
PAUCC |
repository_id_str |
2718 |
network_name_str |
Producción Académica (UCC) |
spelling |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y VenezuelaPoblete Vásquez, Mario EduardoJA Ciencias políticas (General)The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis.Fil: Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales; ArgentinaCousiño Valdés, CarlosCrespo Martínez, Ismael2016-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06info:ar-repo/semantics/tesisDoctoralapplication/pdfhttp://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/1/TD_Poblete.pdf Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo (2016) Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela. Universidad Católica de Córdoba [Tesis Doctoral]. reponame:Producción Académica (UCC)instname:Universidad Católica de Córdobaspahttp://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es2025-09-29T14:29:57Zoai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:4791instacron:UCCInstitucionalhttp://pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/Universidad privadaNo correspondehttp://pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/cgi/oai2bibdir@uccor.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:27182025-09-29 14:29:57.611Producción Académica (UCC) - Universidad Católica de Córdobafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela |
title |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela |
spellingShingle |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo JA Ciencias políticas (General) |
title_short |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela |
title_full |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela |
title_fullStr |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela |
title_full_unstemmed |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela |
title_sort |
Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo |
author |
Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo |
author_facet |
Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Cousiño Valdés, Carlos Crespo Martínez, Ismael |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
JA Ciencias políticas (General) |
topic |
JA Ciencias políticas (General) |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis. Fil: Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales; Argentina |
description |
The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 info:ar-repo/semantics/tesisDoctoral |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
acceptedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/1/TD_Poblete.pdf |
url |
http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/1/TD_Poblete.pdf |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo (2016) Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela. Universidad Católica de Córdoba [Tesis Doctoral]. reponame:Producción Académica (UCC) instname:Universidad Católica de Córdoba |
reponame_str |
Producción Académica (UCC) |
collection |
Producción Académica (UCC) |
instname_str |
Universidad Católica de Córdoba |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Producción Académica (UCC) - Universidad Católica de Córdoba |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibdir@uccor.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844621586344181760 |
score |
12.559606 |