Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela

Autores
Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
tesis doctoral
Estado
versión aceptada
Colaborador/a o director/a de tesis
Cousiño Valdés, Carlos
Crespo Martínez, Ismael
Descripción
The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis.
Fil: Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales; Argentina
Fuente
Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo (2016) Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela. Universidad Católica de Córdoba [Tesis Doctoral].
Materia
JA Ciencias políticas (General)
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
Repositorio
Producción Académica (UCC)
Institución
Universidad Católica de Córdoba
OAI Identificador
oai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:4791

id PAUCC_bc89fb6f1e62b8567d1cc896927c0c5a
oai_identifier_str oai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:4791
network_acronym_str PAUCC
repository_id_str 2718
network_name_str Producción Académica (UCC)
spelling Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y VenezuelaPoblete Vásquez, Mario EduardoJA Ciencias políticas (General)The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis.Fil: Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales; ArgentinaCousiño Valdés, CarlosCrespo Martínez, Ismael2016-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06info:ar-repo/semantics/tesisDoctoralapplication/pdfhttp://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/1/TD_Poblete.pdf Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo (2016) Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela. Universidad Católica de Córdoba [Tesis Doctoral]. reponame:Producción Académica (UCC)instname:Universidad Católica de Córdobaspahttp://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es2025-09-29T14:29:57Zoai:pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar:4791instacron:UCCInstitucionalhttp://pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/Universidad privadaNo correspondehttp://pa.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/cgi/oai2bibdir@uccor.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:27182025-09-29 14:29:57.611Producción Académica (UCC) - Universidad Católica de Córdobafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
title Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
spellingShingle Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo
JA Ciencias políticas (General)
title_short Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
title_full Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
title_fullStr Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
title_full_unstemmed Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
title_sort Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo
author Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo
author_facet Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Cousiño Valdés, Carlos
Crespo Martínez, Ismael
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv JA Ciencias políticas (General)
topic JA Ciencias políticas (General)
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis.
Fil: Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo. Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales; Argentina
description The phenomenon of populism is very difficult to grasp. However, in an academic sense, populism can be classified into two main criteria. In the historical-geographical field, it is possible to identify different categories of populism such as: the Russian agricultural populism of nardonik intellectuals; the Latin American populism that arose in the middle of the 20th Century and endures to the present time; and the so called neopopulism which started in Europe in the seventies. Also another regional populism can be found in Eastern Europe and Africa. In the epistemological field, populism has been studied from different perspectives, and one of these is the structuralist one. Mainly developed for Latin American cases, in this perspective, populism is associated with the development of some countries that live in a state of social exclusion. Another is an exclusively economic approach which is focused on excessive public expenditure and finding monetarist solutions to social problems. There are also political approaches that have a charismatic leader with broad social support as a central figure whose main characteristic is the use of neoliberal policies. It is possible to recognize as well other approaches in which populism is seen as party organization; or as a political style, among others. Another epistemological approach asserts that populism is not a structure, but a discourse. Thus, populism has been understood as an ideology or even as a syndrome. Nowadays three main strands of research can be identified: post-Marxist theory, quantitative approach, and a hybrid analysis that combines quantitative criteria with a qualitative discourse analysis.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
info:ar-repo/semantics/tesisDoctoral
format doctoralThesis
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/1/TD_Poblete.pdf
url http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/1/TD_Poblete.pdf
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://pa.bibdigital.ucc.edu.ar/4791/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Poblete Vásquez, Mario Eduardo (2016) Populismo: un análisis histórico y comparado de Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela. Universidad Católica de Córdoba [Tesis Doctoral].
reponame:Producción Académica (UCC)
instname:Universidad Católica de Córdoba
reponame_str Producción Académica (UCC)
collection Producción Académica (UCC)
instname_str Universidad Católica de Córdoba
repository.name.fl_str_mv Producción Académica (UCC) - Universidad Católica de Córdoba
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibdir@uccor.edu.ar
_version_ 1844621586344181760
score 12.559606