The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
- Autores
- Manzo, Silvia
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged.
Fil: Manzo, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina. - Fuente
- Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2(2), 9-34. (2013)
ISSN 2286-0290 - Materia
-
Filosofía
Void and self-preservation of the whole
Particular nature and universal nature
Experiments on the void
Llate medieval natural philosophy
Late scholasticism
Renaissance natural philosophy
Early modern natural philosophy - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
- OAI Identificador
- oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr10044
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
MemAca_96bd48cb5cd0875402cead8958c0d7da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr10044 |
network_acronym_str |
MemAca |
repository_id_str |
1341 |
network_name_str |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) |
spelling |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the VoidManzo, SilviaFilosofíaVoid and self-preservation of the wholeParticular nature and universal natureExperiments on the voidLlate medieval natural philosophyLate scholasticismRenaissance natural philosophyEarly modern natural philosophyThis study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged.Fil: Manzo, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.2013info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.10044/pr.10044.pdfJournal of Early Modern Studies, 2(2), 9-34. (2013)ISSN 2286-0290reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educacióninstacron:UNLPenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/7722info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2025-10-16T09:28:41Zoai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr10044Institucionalhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicahttps://www.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/oaiserver.cgimemoria@fahce.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13412025-10-16 09:28:43.156Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educaciónfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void |
title |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void |
spellingShingle |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void Manzo, Silvia Filosofía Void and self-preservation of the whole Particular nature and universal nature Experiments on the void Llate medieval natural philosophy Late scholasticism Renaissance natural philosophy Early modern natural philosophy |
title_short |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void |
title_full |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void |
title_fullStr |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void |
title_sort |
The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Manzo, Silvia |
author |
Manzo, Silvia |
author_facet |
Manzo, Silvia |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Filosofía Void and self-preservation of the whole Particular nature and universal nature Experiments on the void Llate medieval natural philosophy Late scholasticism Renaissance natural philosophy Early modern natural philosophy |
topic |
Filosofía Void and self-preservation of the whole Particular nature and universal nature Experiments on the void Llate medieval natural philosophy Late scholasticism Renaissance natural philosophy Early modern natural philosophy |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged. Fil: Manzo, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina. |
description |
This study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.10044/pr.10044.pdf |
url |
https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.10044/pr.10044.pdf |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/7722 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2(2), 9-34. (2013) ISSN 2286-0290 reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) |
collection |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
memoria@fahce.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1846143181749485568 |
score |
12.712165 |