The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void

Autores
Manzo, Silvia
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged.
Fil: Manzo, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.
Fuente
Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2(2), 9-34. (2013)
ISSN 2286-0290
Materia
Filosofía
Void and self-preservation of the whole
Particular nature and universal nature
Experiments on the void
Llate medieval natural philosophy
Late scholasticism
Renaissance natural philosophy
Early modern natural philosophy
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
OAI Identificador
oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr10044

id MemAca_96bd48cb5cd0875402cead8958c0d7da
oai_identifier_str oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr10044
network_acronym_str MemAca
repository_id_str 1341
network_name_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
spelling The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the VoidManzo, SilviaFilosofíaVoid and self-preservation of the wholeParticular nature and universal natureExperiments on the voidLlate medieval natural philosophyLate scholasticismRenaissance natural philosophyEarly modern natural philosophyThis study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged.Fil: Manzo, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.2013info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.10044/pr.10044.pdfJournal of Early Modern Studies, 2(2), 9-34. (2013)ISSN 2286-0290reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educacióninstacron:UNLPenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/7722info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2025-10-16T09:28:41Zoai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr10044Institucionalhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicahttps://www.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/oaiserver.cgimemoria@fahce.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13412025-10-16 09:28:43.156Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educaciónfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
title The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
spellingShingle The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
Manzo, Silvia
Filosofía
Void and self-preservation of the whole
Particular nature and universal nature
Experiments on the void
Llate medieval natural philosophy
Late scholasticism
Renaissance natural philosophy
Early modern natural philosophy
title_short The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
title_full The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
title_fullStr The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
title_full_unstemmed The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
title_sort The Preservation of the Whole and the Teleology of Nature in Late Medieval, Renaissance and Early Modern Debates on the Void
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Manzo, Silvia
author Manzo, Silvia
author_facet Manzo, Silvia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Filosofía
Void and self-preservation of the whole
Particular nature and universal nature
Experiments on the void
Llate medieval natural philosophy
Late scholasticism
Renaissance natural philosophy
Early modern natural philosophy
topic Filosofía
Void and self-preservation of the whole
Particular nature and universal nature
Experiments on the void
Llate medieval natural philosophy
Late scholasticism
Renaissance natural philosophy
Early modern natural philosophy
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged.
Fil: Manzo, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.
description This study shows that an important number of late medieval, Renaissance and early modern authors postulated the same teleological principle in order to argue both for and against the existence of the vacuum. That postulate, which I call the "principle of subordination," holds that in order to preserve the good of nature, the particular and specific natures must be subordinated to the common and universal nature. In other words, in order to preserve nature as a whole, the individual tendencies of bodies must be subordinated to the general tendency of nature. Th roughout the wide range of cases addressed in this study, a continuity is observed in the rationales underlying the discussions about the existence of the vacuum. All of them, tacitly or not, ascribed to nature the teleological principle of subordination, mostly by interpreting traditional experimental instances. Although this continuity is clearly recognizable, variations in nuances and details are also present, owing to the various contexts within which each response to the question of the existence of a vacuum emerged.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.10044/pr.10044.pdf
url https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.10044/pr.10044.pdf
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/7722
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2(2), 9-34. (2013)
ISSN 2286-0290
reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
collection Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
repository.mail.fl_str_mv memoria@fahce.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846143181749485568
score 12.712165