Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)

Autores
Gómez del Campo, María; Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael; Connor, David J.
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In 2008, two experimental plots, oriented NS and EW, respectively, were established in Puebla de Montalbán, Toledo, Spain, at seven row spacings: 2.5, 2.75, 3.25, 3.75, 4.25, 4.75 and 5.0 m, all with same intra-row spacing of 1.3 m. Fruit characteristics (number, size and oil concentration) and an alternate bearing index were evaluated during years 3–11 after planting. Incident and intercepted canopy radiation were simulated with a mathematical model. During the first three harvests, fruit characteristics and oil production/tree were not significantly affected by row spacing such that both fruit and oil production/ha were directly related to tree density per ha. Subsequently, individual trees in the closer-spaced hedgerows developed fewer fruits (56 %), larger fruits (15 %) with greater oil concentration (3 %) than the more-spaced trees providing a partial compensation of fruit and oil production/ha. During 8–11 years after planting, when all hedgerows had similar structure, fruit (R2 = 0.86–0.93) and oil (R2 = 0.79–0.92) production/tree were strongly and linearly related to row spacing with differences between orientations that decreased markedly as spacing increased. Whereas fruit production/ha (R2 = 0.97–0.98) retained a linear response across all row widths, oil production/ha remained constant at the three closest spacings (2.50–3.25 m), then decreasing linearly (R2 = 0.84–0.98) to the widest spacing. Differences in oil yield between orientations at close spacing (2.9 and 2.5 t/ha, EW and NS, respectively) were lost at the widest spacing. Fruit but not oil production per orchard area was linearly related with spacing and intercepted radiation. A reduction of 1 m of spacing from 5.0 to 3.25 m increased interception by 12 % and oil production by 0.32 and 0.48 t oil/ha in NS and EW, respectively. When data from the two orientations were normalized and pooled in a single relationship, oil production increased linearly (R2 = 0.89) with interception to a maximum of 65 % (reached in spacing 3.6 m in NS and 3.3 m in EW) of incident radiation revealing the impact of lower transmission of radiation within closely spaced hedgerows.
EEA Junín
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. School of Agriculture and Food; Australia
Fuente
Scientia Horticulturae 272 : 109583 (October 2020)
Materia
Olea europaea
Variedades
Espaciamiento
Producción
Cultivo entre Líneas
Varieties
Spacing
Production
Alley Cropping
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7551

id INTADig_fee0949c6d1c62512f2e23c3539e0853
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7551
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)Gómez del Campo, MaríaTrentacoste, Eduardo RafaelConnor, David J.Olea europaeaVariedadesEspaciamientoProducciónCultivo entre LíneasVarietiesSpacingProductionAlley CroppingOlivoVariedad ArbequinaIn 2008, two experimental plots, oriented NS and EW, respectively, were established in Puebla de Montalbán, Toledo, Spain, at seven row spacings: 2.5, 2.75, 3.25, 3.75, 4.25, 4.75 and 5.0 m, all with same intra-row spacing of 1.3 m. Fruit characteristics (number, size and oil concentration) and an alternate bearing index were evaluated during years 3–11 after planting. Incident and intercepted canopy radiation were simulated with a mathematical model. During the first three harvests, fruit characteristics and oil production/tree were not significantly affected by row spacing such that both fruit and oil production/ha were directly related to tree density per ha. Subsequently, individual trees in the closer-spaced hedgerows developed fewer fruits (56 %), larger fruits (15 %) with greater oil concentration (3 %) than the more-spaced trees providing a partial compensation of fruit and oil production/ha. During 8–11 years after planting, when all hedgerows had similar structure, fruit (R2 = 0.86–0.93) and oil (R2 = 0.79–0.92) production/tree were strongly and linearly related to row spacing with differences between orientations that decreased markedly as spacing increased. Whereas fruit production/ha (R2 = 0.97–0.98) retained a linear response across all row widths, oil production/ha remained constant at the three closest spacings (2.50–3.25 m), then decreasing linearly (R2 = 0.84–0.98) to the widest spacing. Differences in oil yield between orientations at close spacing (2.9 and 2.5 t/ha, EW and NS, respectively) were lost at the widest spacing. Fruit but not oil production per orchard area was linearly related with spacing and intercepted radiation. A reduction of 1 m of spacing from 5.0 to 3.25 m increased interception by 12 % and oil production by 0.32 and 0.48 t oil/ha in NS and EW, respectively. When data from the two orientations were normalized and pooled in a single relationship, oil production increased linearly (R2 = 0.89) with interception to a maximum of 65 % (reached in spacing 3.6 m in NS and 3.3 m in EW) of incident radiation revealing the impact of lower transmission of radiation within closely spaced hedgerows.EEA JunínFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; EspañaFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; ArgentinaFil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. School of Agriculture and Food; AustraliaElsevier2020-07-14T17:08:12Z2020-07-14T17:08:12Z2020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7551https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03044238203041180304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109583Scientia Horticulturae 272 : 109583 (October 2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:51Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/7551instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:51.343INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
title Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
spellingShingle Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
Gómez del Campo, María
Olea europaea
Variedades
Espaciamiento
Producción
Cultivo entre Líneas
Varieties
Spacing
Production
Alley Cropping
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
title_short Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
title_full Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
title_fullStr Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
title_full_unstemmed Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
title_sort Long-term effects of row spacing on radiation interception, fruit characteristics and production of hedgerow olive orchard (cv. Arbequina)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gómez del Campo, María
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
author Gómez del Campo, María
author_facet Gómez del Campo, María
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
author_role author
author2 Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Olea europaea
Variedades
Espaciamiento
Producción
Cultivo entre Líneas
Varieties
Spacing
Production
Alley Cropping
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
topic Olea europaea
Variedades
Espaciamiento
Producción
Cultivo entre Líneas
Varieties
Spacing
Production
Alley Cropping
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In 2008, two experimental plots, oriented NS and EW, respectively, were established in Puebla de Montalbán, Toledo, Spain, at seven row spacings: 2.5, 2.75, 3.25, 3.75, 4.25, 4.75 and 5.0 m, all with same intra-row spacing of 1.3 m. Fruit characteristics (number, size and oil concentration) and an alternate bearing index were evaluated during years 3–11 after planting. Incident and intercepted canopy radiation were simulated with a mathematical model. During the first three harvests, fruit characteristics and oil production/tree were not significantly affected by row spacing such that both fruit and oil production/ha were directly related to tree density per ha. Subsequently, individual trees in the closer-spaced hedgerows developed fewer fruits (56 %), larger fruits (15 %) with greater oil concentration (3 %) than the more-spaced trees providing a partial compensation of fruit and oil production/ha. During 8–11 years after planting, when all hedgerows had similar structure, fruit (R2 = 0.86–0.93) and oil (R2 = 0.79–0.92) production/tree were strongly and linearly related to row spacing with differences between orientations that decreased markedly as spacing increased. Whereas fruit production/ha (R2 = 0.97–0.98) retained a linear response across all row widths, oil production/ha remained constant at the three closest spacings (2.50–3.25 m), then decreasing linearly (R2 = 0.84–0.98) to the widest spacing. Differences in oil yield between orientations at close spacing (2.9 and 2.5 t/ha, EW and NS, respectively) were lost at the widest spacing. Fruit but not oil production per orchard area was linearly related with spacing and intercepted radiation. A reduction of 1 m of spacing from 5.0 to 3.25 m increased interception by 12 % and oil production by 0.32 and 0.48 t oil/ha in NS and EW, respectively. When data from the two orientations were normalized and pooled in a single relationship, oil production increased linearly (R2 = 0.89) with interception to a maximum of 65 % (reached in spacing 3.6 m in NS and 3.3 m in EW) of incident radiation revealing the impact of lower transmission of radiation within closely spaced hedgerows.
EEA Junín
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. School of Agriculture and Food; Australia
description In 2008, two experimental plots, oriented NS and EW, respectively, were established in Puebla de Montalbán, Toledo, Spain, at seven row spacings: 2.5, 2.75, 3.25, 3.75, 4.25, 4.75 and 5.0 m, all with same intra-row spacing of 1.3 m. Fruit characteristics (number, size and oil concentration) and an alternate bearing index were evaluated during years 3–11 after planting. Incident and intercepted canopy radiation were simulated with a mathematical model. During the first three harvests, fruit characteristics and oil production/tree were not significantly affected by row spacing such that both fruit and oil production/ha were directly related to tree density per ha. Subsequently, individual trees in the closer-spaced hedgerows developed fewer fruits (56 %), larger fruits (15 %) with greater oil concentration (3 %) than the more-spaced trees providing a partial compensation of fruit and oil production/ha. During 8–11 years after planting, when all hedgerows had similar structure, fruit (R2 = 0.86–0.93) and oil (R2 = 0.79–0.92) production/tree were strongly and linearly related to row spacing with differences between orientations that decreased markedly as spacing increased. Whereas fruit production/ha (R2 = 0.97–0.98) retained a linear response across all row widths, oil production/ha remained constant at the three closest spacings (2.50–3.25 m), then decreasing linearly (R2 = 0.84–0.98) to the widest spacing. Differences in oil yield between orientations at close spacing (2.9 and 2.5 t/ha, EW and NS, respectively) were lost at the widest spacing. Fruit but not oil production per orchard area was linearly related with spacing and intercepted radiation. A reduction of 1 m of spacing from 5.0 to 3.25 m increased interception by 12 % and oil production by 0.32 and 0.48 t oil/ha in NS and EW, respectively. When data from the two orientations were normalized and pooled in a single relationship, oil production increased linearly (R2 = 0.89) with interception to a maximum of 65 % (reached in spacing 3.6 m in NS and 3.3 m in EW) of incident radiation revealing the impact of lower transmission of radiation within closely spaced hedgerows.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-14T17:08:12Z
2020-07-14T17:08:12Z
2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7551
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304423820304118
0304-4238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109583
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7551
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304423820304118
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109583
identifier_str_mv 0304-4238
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae 272 : 109583 (October 2020)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143526573703168
score 12.712165