Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat
- Autores
- Scursoni, Julio Alejandro; Montoya, Jorgelina Ceferina; Vigna, Mario Raul; Gigon, Ramon; Istilart, Carolina Maria; Renzi Pugni, Juan Pablo; Lopez, Ricardo; Porfiri, Carolina
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Imazapyr and imazamox are frequently applied postemergence to control grass and broadleaf weeds in imidazolinone-resistant sunflower in Argentina. Herbicide carryover to rotational crops represents a disadvantage of these herbicides, particularly in regions with low rainfall during the months prior to rotational crop sowing. Between 2009 and 2012, field and greenhouse studies were conducted on four important sunflower-cropped areas of Argentina. The objective was to quantify the effects of imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr applied in sunflower crops on the subsequent establishment, growth, and yield of barley, oat, and wheat. In all field experiments, imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr were applied at recommended rates (80 gha–1 and 66 plus 30 gha–1, respectively), and also, in some experiments, at double the recommended rates. Soil bioassays were also conducted in the greenhouse to study the effect of these herbicides on barley, oat, and wheat seedlings. The mixture of imazamox plus imazapyr was safer for rotational crops than imazapyr applied alone, because of the reduced rate of imazapyr in the mixture treatments. Barley was more sensitive to imidazolinones, particularly imazapyr, than the other winter cereals. Imazapyr at double rate (160 gha–1) reduced barley yield by 45% when seeds were sown 165 d after herbicide application and with 240 mm rainfall after herbicide application.
EEA Anguil
EEA Bordenave
EEA Barrow
EEA Hilario Ascasubi
Fil: Scursoni, Julio Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Montoya, Jorgelina Ceferina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina
Fil: Vigna, Mario Raúl. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; Argentina
Fil: Gigón, Ramón. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow; Argentina
Fil: Istilart, Carolina Maria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow; Argentina
Fil: Renzi Pugni, Juan Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Hilario Ascasubi; Argentina.
Fil: López, Ricardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; Argentina
Fil: Porfiri, Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina - Fuente
- Weed technology 31 (6) : 838-846. (November-December 2017)
- Materia
-
Imazamox
Herbicidas con Imidazolinona
Imazapir
Herbicidas
Trigo
Cebada
Avenas
Malezas
Imidazolinone Herbicides
Imazapyr
Herbicides
Wheat
Barley
Oats
Weeds
Control de Malezas - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2335
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_f04f680714f8a248ee45ad8fcfea7b29 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2335 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and OatScursoni, Julio AlejandroMontoya, Jorgelina CeferinaVigna, Mario RaulGigon, RamonIstilart, Carolina MariaRenzi Pugni, Juan PabloLopez, RicardoPorfiri, CarolinaImazamoxHerbicidas con ImidazolinonaImazapirHerbicidasTrigoCebadaAvenasMalezasImidazolinone HerbicidesImazapyrHerbicidesWheatBarleyOatsWeedsControl de MalezasImazapyr and imazamox are frequently applied postemergence to control grass and broadleaf weeds in imidazolinone-resistant sunflower in Argentina. Herbicide carryover to rotational crops represents a disadvantage of these herbicides, particularly in regions with low rainfall during the months prior to rotational crop sowing. Between 2009 and 2012, field and greenhouse studies were conducted on four important sunflower-cropped areas of Argentina. The objective was to quantify the effects of imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr applied in sunflower crops on the subsequent establishment, growth, and yield of barley, oat, and wheat. In all field experiments, imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr were applied at recommended rates (80 gha–1 and 66 plus 30 gha–1, respectively), and also, in some experiments, at double the recommended rates. Soil bioassays were also conducted in the greenhouse to study the effect of these herbicides on barley, oat, and wheat seedlings. The mixture of imazamox plus imazapyr was safer for rotational crops than imazapyr applied alone, because of the reduced rate of imazapyr in the mixture treatments. Barley was more sensitive to imidazolinones, particularly imazapyr, than the other winter cereals. Imazapyr at double rate (160 gha–1) reduced barley yield by 45% when seeds were sown 165 d after herbicide application and with 240 mm rainfall after herbicide application.EEA AnguilEEA BordenaveEEA BarrowEEA Hilario AscasubiFil: Scursoni, Julio Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal; ArgentinaFil: Montoya, Jorgelina Ceferina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; ArgentinaFil: Vigna, Mario Raúl. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; ArgentinaFil: Gigón, Ramón. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow; ArgentinaFil: Istilart, Carolina Maria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow; ArgentinaFil: Renzi Pugni, Juan Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Hilario Ascasubi; Argentina.Fil: López, Ricardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; ArgentinaFil: Porfiri, Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina2018-05-07T13:10:56Z2018-05-07T13:10:56Z2017-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-technology/article/impact-of-imazamox-and-imazapyr-carryover-on-wheat-barley-and-oat/AC4793C8B5A52EA25E036AADB472FF1Chttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23350890-037X1550-2740https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.66Weed technology 31 (6) : 838-846. (November-December 2017)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:47:13Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2335instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:13.539INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat |
title |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat |
spellingShingle |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat Scursoni, Julio Alejandro Imazamox Herbicidas con Imidazolinona Imazapir Herbicidas Trigo Cebada Avenas Malezas Imidazolinone Herbicides Imazapyr Herbicides Wheat Barley Oats Weeds Control de Malezas |
title_short |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat |
title_full |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat |
title_sort |
Impact of Imazamox and Imazapyr Carryover on Wheat, Barley, and Oat |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Scursoni, Julio Alejandro Montoya, Jorgelina Ceferina Vigna, Mario Raul Gigon, Ramon Istilart, Carolina Maria Renzi Pugni, Juan Pablo Lopez, Ricardo Porfiri, Carolina |
author |
Scursoni, Julio Alejandro |
author_facet |
Scursoni, Julio Alejandro Montoya, Jorgelina Ceferina Vigna, Mario Raul Gigon, Ramon Istilart, Carolina Maria Renzi Pugni, Juan Pablo Lopez, Ricardo Porfiri, Carolina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Montoya, Jorgelina Ceferina Vigna, Mario Raul Gigon, Ramon Istilart, Carolina Maria Renzi Pugni, Juan Pablo Lopez, Ricardo Porfiri, Carolina |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Imazamox Herbicidas con Imidazolinona Imazapir Herbicidas Trigo Cebada Avenas Malezas Imidazolinone Herbicides Imazapyr Herbicides Wheat Barley Oats Weeds Control de Malezas |
topic |
Imazamox Herbicidas con Imidazolinona Imazapir Herbicidas Trigo Cebada Avenas Malezas Imidazolinone Herbicides Imazapyr Herbicides Wheat Barley Oats Weeds Control de Malezas |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Imazapyr and imazamox are frequently applied postemergence to control grass and broadleaf weeds in imidazolinone-resistant sunflower in Argentina. Herbicide carryover to rotational crops represents a disadvantage of these herbicides, particularly in regions with low rainfall during the months prior to rotational crop sowing. Between 2009 and 2012, field and greenhouse studies were conducted on four important sunflower-cropped areas of Argentina. The objective was to quantify the effects of imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr applied in sunflower crops on the subsequent establishment, growth, and yield of barley, oat, and wheat. In all field experiments, imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr were applied at recommended rates (80 gha–1 and 66 plus 30 gha–1, respectively), and also, in some experiments, at double the recommended rates. Soil bioassays were also conducted in the greenhouse to study the effect of these herbicides on barley, oat, and wheat seedlings. The mixture of imazamox plus imazapyr was safer for rotational crops than imazapyr applied alone, because of the reduced rate of imazapyr in the mixture treatments. Barley was more sensitive to imidazolinones, particularly imazapyr, than the other winter cereals. Imazapyr at double rate (160 gha–1) reduced barley yield by 45% when seeds were sown 165 d after herbicide application and with 240 mm rainfall after herbicide application. EEA Anguil EEA Bordenave EEA Barrow EEA Hilario Ascasubi Fil: Scursoni, Julio Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal; Argentina Fil: Montoya, Jorgelina Ceferina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina Fil: Vigna, Mario Raúl. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; Argentina Fil: Gigón, Ramón. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow; Argentina Fil: Istilart, Carolina Maria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow; Argentina Fil: Renzi Pugni, Juan Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Hilario Ascasubi; Argentina. Fil: López, Ricardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; Argentina Fil: Porfiri, Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina |
description |
Imazapyr and imazamox are frequently applied postemergence to control grass and broadleaf weeds in imidazolinone-resistant sunflower in Argentina. Herbicide carryover to rotational crops represents a disadvantage of these herbicides, particularly in regions with low rainfall during the months prior to rotational crop sowing. Between 2009 and 2012, field and greenhouse studies were conducted on four important sunflower-cropped areas of Argentina. The objective was to quantify the effects of imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr applied in sunflower crops on the subsequent establishment, growth, and yield of barley, oat, and wheat. In all field experiments, imazapyr alone and imazamox plus imazapyr were applied at recommended rates (80 gha–1 and 66 plus 30 gha–1, respectively), and also, in some experiments, at double the recommended rates. Soil bioassays were also conducted in the greenhouse to study the effect of these herbicides on barley, oat, and wheat seedlings. The mixture of imazamox plus imazapyr was safer for rotational crops than imazapyr applied alone, because of the reduced rate of imazapyr in the mixture treatments. Barley was more sensitive to imidazolinones, particularly imazapyr, than the other winter cereals. Imazapyr at double rate (160 gha–1) reduced barley yield by 45% when seeds were sown 165 d after herbicide application and with 240 mm rainfall after herbicide application. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12 2018-05-07T13:10:56Z 2018-05-07T13:10:56Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-technology/article/impact-of-imazamox-and-imazapyr-carryover-on-wheat-barley-and-oat/AC4793C8B5A52EA25E036AADB472FF1C http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2335 0890-037X 1550-2740 https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.66 |
url |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-technology/article/impact-of-imazamox-and-imazapyr-carryover-on-wheat-barley-and-oat/AC4793C8B5A52EA25E036AADB472FF1C http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2335 https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.66 |
identifier_str_mv |
0890-037X 1550-2740 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Weed technology 31 (6) : 838-846. (November-December 2017) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842341354317807616 |
score |
12.623145 |