A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries

Autores
Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar; Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo; Adeyemi, Maxwell Adebayo; Sarker, AhadJahin; Cambareri, Gustavo Sebastián; Faverin, Claudia; Tieri, Maria Paz; Castillo Zacarías, Carlos; Melchor Martínez, Elda; Parra Saldivar, Roberto; Iqbal, Hafiz M.
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Global land use changes that tend to satisfy the food needs of augmenting population is provoking agricultural soils to act as a carbon (C) source rather than sink. Agricultural management practices are crucial to offset the anthropogenic C emission; hence, Carbon sequestration (CS) in agriculture is a viable option for reversing this cycle, but it is based on hypotheses that must be questioned in order to contribute to the development of new agricultural techniques. This review summarizes a global perspective focusing on 5 developing countries (DC) (Bangladesh, Brazil, Argentina, Nigeria and Mexico) because of their importance on global C budget and on the agricultural sector as well as the impact produced by several global practices such as tillage, agroforestry systems, silvopasture, 4p1000 on CO2 sequestration. We also discussed about global policies regarding CS and tools available to measure CS. We found that among all practices agroforestry deemed to be the most promising approach and conversion from pasture to agroforestry will be favorable to both farmers and in changing climate, (e.g., agroforestry systems can generate 725 Euroeq C credit in EU) while some strategies (e.g. no-tillage) supposed to be less promising and over-hyped. In terms of conservative tillage (no-, reduced-, and minimal tillage systems), global and DC's land use increased. However, the impact of no-tillage is ambiguous since the beneficial impact is only limited to top soil (0–10 cm) as opposed to conventional mechanisms. Grasses, cereals and cover crops have higher potential of CS in their soils. While the 4p1000 initiative appears to be successful in certain areas, further research is needed to validate this possible mode of CS. Furthermore, for effective policy design and implementation to obtain more SOC stock, we strongly emphasize to include farmers globally as they are the one and only sustainable driver, hence, government and associated authorities should take initiatives (e.g., stimulus incentives, C credits) to form C market and promote C plantings. Otherwise, policy failure may occur. Moreover, to determine the true effect of these activities or regulations on CS, we must concurrently analyze SOC stock adjustments using models or direct measurements. Above all, SOC is the founding block of sustainable agriculture and inextricably linked with food security. Climate-smart managing of agriculture is very crucial for a massive SOC stock globally especially in DC's.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar. Bangladesh Agricultural University. Faculty of Agriculture. Department of Agronomy; Bangladesh.
Fil: Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo. Federal Fluminense University. Chemistry Institute. Geochemistry Department; Brasil.
Fil: Adeyemi, Maxwell Adebayo. OlusegunAgagu University of Science and Technology. School of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources; Nigeria.
Fil: Sarker, AhadJahin. Bangladesh Agricultural University. Faculty of Animal Husbandry; Bangladesh.
Fil: Cambareri, Gustavo Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Tieri, María Paz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina.
Fil: Castillo Zacarías, Carlos. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
Fil: Melchor Martínez, Elda. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
Fil: Parra Saldivar, Roberto. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
Fil: Iqbal, Hafiz M.N. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
Fuente
Science of The Total Environment 790 : 148169 (October 2021)
Materia
Impacto Ambiental
Calentamiento Global
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Prácticas Agrícolas
Secuestro de Carbono
Environmental Impact
Global Warming
Greenhouse Gases
Agricultural Practices
Carbon Sequestration
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10702

id INTADig_edd67359b8acd6426cdfcf915c2b6372
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10702
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countriesBhattacharyya, Siddhartha ShankarLeite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja DorilêoAdeyemi, Maxwell AdebayoSarker, AhadJahinCambareri, Gustavo SebastiánFaverin, ClaudiaTieri, Maria PazCastillo Zacarías, CarlosMelchor Martínez, EldaParra Saldivar, RobertoIqbal, Hafiz M.Impacto AmbientalCalentamiento GlobalGases de Efecto InvernaderoPrácticas AgrícolasSecuestro de CarbonoEnvironmental ImpactGlobal WarmingGreenhouse GasesAgricultural PracticesCarbon SequestrationGlobal land use changes that tend to satisfy the food needs of augmenting population is provoking agricultural soils to act as a carbon (C) source rather than sink. Agricultural management practices are crucial to offset the anthropogenic C emission; hence, Carbon sequestration (CS) in agriculture is a viable option for reversing this cycle, but it is based on hypotheses that must be questioned in order to contribute to the development of new agricultural techniques. This review summarizes a global perspective focusing on 5 developing countries (DC) (Bangladesh, Brazil, Argentina, Nigeria and Mexico) because of their importance on global C budget and on the agricultural sector as well as the impact produced by several global practices such as tillage, agroforestry systems, silvopasture, 4p1000 on CO2 sequestration. We also discussed about global policies regarding CS and tools available to measure CS. We found that among all practices agroforestry deemed to be the most promising approach and conversion from pasture to agroforestry will be favorable to both farmers and in changing climate, (e.g., agroforestry systems can generate 725 Euroeq C credit in EU) while some strategies (e.g. no-tillage) supposed to be less promising and over-hyped. In terms of conservative tillage (no-, reduced-, and minimal tillage systems), global and DC's land use increased. However, the impact of no-tillage is ambiguous since the beneficial impact is only limited to top soil (0–10 cm) as opposed to conventional mechanisms. Grasses, cereals and cover crops have higher potential of CS in their soils. While the 4p1000 initiative appears to be successful in certain areas, further research is needed to validate this possible mode of CS. Furthermore, for effective policy design and implementation to obtain more SOC stock, we strongly emphasize to include farmers globally as they are the one and only sustainable driver, hence, government and associated authorities should take initiatives (e.g., stimulus incentives, C credits) to form C market and promote C plantings. Otherwise, policy failure may occur. Moreover, to determine the true effect of these activities or regulations on CS, we must concurrently analyze SOC stock adjustments using models or direct measurements. Above all, SOC is the founding block of sustainable agriculture and inextricably linked with food security. Climate-smart managing of agriculture is very crucial for a massive SOC stock globally especially in DC's.EEA BalcarceFil: Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar. Bangladesh Agricultural University. Faculty of Agriculture. Department of Agronomy; Bangladesh.Fil: Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo. Federal Fluminense University. Chemistry Institute. Geochemistry Department; Brasil.Fil: Adeyemi, Maxwell Adebayo. OlusegunAgagu University of Science and Technology. School of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources; Nigeria.Fil: Sarker, AhadJahin. Bangladesh Agricultural University. Faculty of Animal Husbandry; Bangladesh.Fil: Cambareri, Gustavo Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Tieri, María Paz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina.Fil: Castillo Zacarías, Carlos. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.Fil: Melchor Martínez, Elda. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.Fil: Parra Saldivar, Roberto. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.Fil: Iqbal, Hafiz M.N. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.Elsevier2021-11-05T16:50:49Z2021-11-05T16:50:49Z2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10702https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972103240X0048-9697https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148169Science of The Total Environment 790 : 148169 (October 2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:49:10Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/10702instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:10.99INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
title A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
spellingShingle A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar
Impacto Ambiental
Calentamiento Global
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Prácticas Agrícolas
Secuestro de Carbono
Environmental Impact
Global Warming
Greenhouse Gases
Agricultural Practices
Carbon Sequestration
title_short A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
title_full A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
title_fullStr A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
title_full_unstemmed A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
title_sort A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming – With the emphasis on developing countries
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar
Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo
Adeyemi, Maxwell Adebayo
Sarker, AhadJahin
Cambareri, Gustavo Sebastián
Faverin, Claudia
Tieri, Maria Paz
Castillo Zacarías, Carlos
Melchor Martínez, Elda
Parra Saldivar, Roberto
Iqbal, Hafiz M.
author Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar
author_facet Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar
Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo
Adeyemi, Maxwell Adebayo
Sarker, AhadJahin
Cambareri, Gustavo Sebastián
Faverin, Claudia
Tieri, Maria Paz
Castillo Zacarías, Carlos
Melchor Martínez, Elda
Parra Saldivar, Roberto
Iqbal, Hafiz M.
author_role author
author2 Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo
Adeyemi, Maxwell Adebayo
Sarker, AhadJahin
Cambareri, Gustavo Sebastián
Faverin, Claudia
Tieri, Maria Paz
Castillo Zacarías, Carlos
Melchor Martínez, Elda
Parra Saldivar, Roberto
Iqbal, Hafiz M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Impacto Ambiental
Calentamiento Global
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Prácticas Agrícolas
Secuestro de Carbono
Environmental Impact
Global Warming
Greenhouse Gases
Agricultural Practices
Carbon Sequestration
topic Impacto Ambiental
Calentamiento Global
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Prácticas Agrícolas
Secuestro de Carbono
Environmental Impact
Global Warming
Greenhouse Gases
Agricultural Practices
Carbon Sequestration
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Global land use changes that tend to satisfy the food needs of augmenting population is provoking agricultural soils to act as a carbon (C) source rather than sink. Agricultural management practices are crucial to offset the anthropogenic C emission; hence, Carbon sequestration (CS) in agriculture is a viable option for reversing this cycle, but it is based on hypotheses that must be questioned in order to contribute to the development of new agricultural techniques. This review summarizes a global perspective focusing on 5 developing countries (DC) (Bangladesh, Brazil, Argentina, Nigeria and Mexico) because of their importance on global C budget and on the agricultural sector as well as the impact produced by several global practices such as tillage, agroforestry systems, silvopasture, 4p1000 on CO2 sequestration. We also discussed about global policies regarding CS and tools available to measure CS. We found that among all practices agroforestry deemed to be the most promising approach and conversion from pasture to agroforestry will be favorable to both farmers and in changing climate, (e.g., agroforestry systems can generate 725 Euroeq C credit in EU) while some strategies (e.g. no-tillage) supposed to be less promising and over-hyped. In terms of conservative tillage (no-, reduced-, and minimal tillage systems), global and DC's land use increased. However, the impact of no-tillage is ambiguous since the beneficial impact is only limited to top soil (0–10 cm) as opposed to conventional mechanisms. Grasses, cereals and cover crops have higher potential of CS in their soils. While the 4p1000 initiative appears to be successful in certain areas, further research is needed to validate this possible mode of CS. Furthermore, for effective policy design and implementation to obtain more SOC stock, we strongly emphasize to include farmers globally as they are the one and only sustainable driver, hence, government and associated authorities should take initiatives (e.g., stimulus incentives, C credits) to form C market and promote C plantings. Otherwise, policy failure may occur. Moreover, to determine the true effect of these activities or regulations on CS, we must concurrently analyze SOC stock adjustments using models or direct measurements. Above all, SOC is the founding block of sustainable agriculture and inextricably linked with food security. Climate-smart managing of agriculture is very crucial for a massive SOC stock globally especially in DC's.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha Shankar. Bangladesh Agricultural University. Faculty of Agriculture. Department of Agronomy; Bangladesh.
Fil: Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo. Federal Fluminense University. Chemistry Institute. Geochemistry Department; Brasil.
Fil: Adeyemi, Maxwell Adebayo. OlusegunAgagu University of Science and Technology. School of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources; Nigeria.
Fil: Sarker, AhadJahin. Bangladesh Agricultural University. Faculty of Animal Husbandry; Bangladesh.
Fil: Cambareri, Gustavo Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Tieri, María Paz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina.
Fil: Castillo Zacarías, Carlos. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
Fil: Melchor Martínez, Elda. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
Fil: Parra Saldivar, Roberto. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
Fil: Iqbal, Hafiz M.N. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. School of Engineering and Science; México.
description Global land use changes that tend to satisfy the food needs of augmenting population is provoking agricultural soils to act as a carbon (C) source rather than sink. Agricultural management practices are crucial to offset the anthropogenic C emission; hence, Carbon sequestration (CS) in agriculture is a viable option for reversing this cycle, but it is based on hypotheses that must be questioned in order to contribute to the development of new agricultural techniques. This review summarizes a global perspective focusing on 5 developing countries (DC) (Bangladesh, Brazil, Argentina, Nigeria and Mexico) because of their importance on global C budget and on the agricultural sector as well as the impact produced by several global practices such as tillage, agroforestry systems, silvopasture, 4p1000 on CO2 sequestration. We also discussed about global policies regarding CS and tools available to measure CS. We found that among all practices agroforestry deemed to be the most promising approach and conversion from pasture to agroforestry will be favorable to both farmers and in changing climate, (e.g., agroforestry systems can generate 725 Euroeq C credit in EU) while some strategies (e.g. no-tillage) supposed to be less promising and over-hyped. In terms of conservative tillage (no-, reduced-, and minimal tillage systems), global and DC's land use increased. However, the impact of no-tillage is ambiguous since the beneficial impact is only limited to top soil (0–10 cm) as opposed to conventional mechanisms. Grasses, cereals and cover crops have higher potential of CS in their soils. While the 4p1000 initiative appears to be successful in certain areas, further research is needed to validate this possible mode of CS. Furthermore, for effective policy design and implementation to obtain more SOC stock, we strongly emphasize to include farmers globally as they are the one and only sustainable driver, hence, government and associated authorities should take initiatives (e.g., stimulus incentives, C credits) to form C market and promote C plantings. Otherwise, policy failure may occur. Moreover, to determine the true effect of these activities or regulations on CS, we must concurrently analyze SOC stock adjustments using models or direct measurements. Above all, SOC is the founding block of sustainable agriculture and inextricably linked with food security. Climate-smart managing of agriculture is very crucial for a massive SOC stock globally especially in DC's.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-05T16:50:49Z
2021-11-05T16:50:49Z
2021-06-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10702
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972103240X
0048-9697
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148169
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10702
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972103240X
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148169
identifier_str_mv 0048-9697
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Science of The Total Environment 790 : 148169 (October 2021)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341392157769728
score 12.623145