High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage

Autores
Lopez, Agustin; Arroquy, Jose Ignacio; Juárez Sequeira, Ana Verónica; DiLorenzo, Nicolas; Barrionuevo, M.C.; Distel, Roberto Alejandro
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Twenty Hampshire lambs (31 ± 4 kg BW) in individual metabolism cages were used in a 10-treatment by 2-period (n = 4) trial to evaluate the interaction between protein supplementation and sulfate water on intake and metabolic responses when lambs were fed low-quality grass hay (Megathyrsus maximus; 6.4% CP, 79.5% NDF). The treatment structure was a 2 × 5 factorial: 2 water qualities (WQ; low-sulfate [LS] and high-sulfate [HS]; 442 and 8,358 mg/kg total dissolved solids, respectively) and 5 soybean meal levels (SBM; 0%, 0.25%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1.00% BW/d). After 15 d of adaptation, periods consisted of 5 d for determination of forage and water intake, nitrogen balance, and digestion measurements (d 16 to 20) and 1 d for blood sampling and determination of ruminal hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentration (d 21). Supplemental SBM × WQ interactions were significant for forage OM intake (P = 0.04) and total OM intake (P = 0.04), whereas a tendency was observed for total tract digestible OM intake (P = 0.07). Intake values of LS lambs were higher than those of HS lambs (P < 0.05) in only the first and second levels of SBM. Water intake increased linearly (P < 0.01) with SBM level but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.39). Water quality and SBM supplementation affected total tract OM digestibility (TTOMD; P < 0.01); LS lambs had lower TTOMD than HS lambs (P < 0.01). Plasma urea N increased linearly in response to SBM (P < 0.01) but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.11). Nitrogen balance was not affected by SBM × WQ interaction (P > 0.12), except for N utilization (N retained/N intake ratio; P < 0.01). Regardless of WQ, N intake (P > 0.01), N urine (P > 0.01), and N balance increased linearly (P > 0.01) with SBM level. Water quality adversely affected N intake and N balance, although at the highest level of SBM no differences in N balance were observed between LS and HS lambs (P = 0.85). No changes due to WQ were observed for either urea reabsorbed by kidneys (P = 0.63) or glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.30), but renal function was affected by SBM level (P < 0.01). There was a supplemental SBM × WQ interaction for ruminal H2S concentration (P < 0.01) due mainly to a greater concentration from 0.25% BW SBM in HS than in LS lambs. In conclusion, these results confirmed the existence of an interaction between sulfate water and supplemental protein, which alters intake and metabolic responses when lambs are fed low-quality grass hay.
EEA Santiago del Estero
Fil: López, Agustín. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina
Fil: Arroquy, Jose Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Juárez Sequeira, A.V. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: DiLorenzo, N. University of Florida. North Florida Research and Education Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Barrionuevo, M.C. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina
Fil: Distel, Roberto Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
Fuente
Journal of animal science 95 (5) : 2111–2120 (May 2017)
Materia
Cordero
Absorción de Agua
Sulfatos
Metabolismo
Forrajes
Lambs
Water Uptake
Sulphates
Metabolism
Forage
Consumo de Agua (animales)
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2610

id INTADig_ed570bb39d432954e0ca909f51ccae63
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2610
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forageLopez, AgustinArroquy, Jose IgnacioJuárez Sequeira, Ana VerónicaDiLorenzo, NicolasBarrionuevo, M.C.Distel, Roberto AlejandroCorderoAbsorción de AguaSulfatosMetabolismoForrajesLambsWater UptakeSulphatesMetabolismForageConsumo de Agua (animales)Twenty Hampshire lambs (31 ± 4 kg BW) in individual metabolism cages were used in a 10-treatment by 2-period (n = 4) trial to evaluate the interaction between protein supplementation and sulfate water on intake and metabolic responses when lambs were fed low-quality grass hay (Megathyrsus maximus; 6.4% CP, 79.5% NDF). The treatment structure was a 2 × 5 factorial: 2 water qualities (WQ; low-sulfate [LS] and high-sulfate [HS]; 442 and 8,358 mg/kg total dissolved solids, respectively) and 5 soybean meal levels (SBM; 0%, 0.25%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1.00% BW/d). After 15 d of adaptation, periods consisted of 5 d for determination of forage and water intake, nitrogen balance, and digestion measurements (d 16 to 20) and 1 d for blood sampling and determination of ruminal hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentration (d 21). Supplemental SBM × WQ interactions were significant for forage OM intake (P = 0.04) and total OM intake (P = 0.04), whereas a tendency was observed for total tract digestible OM intake (P = 0.07). Intake values of LS lambs were higher than those of HS lambs (P < 0.05) in only the first and second levels of SBM. Water intake increased linearly (P < 0.01) with SBM level but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.39). Water quality and SBM supplementation affected total tract OM digestibility (TTOMD; P < 0.01); LS lambs had lower TTOMD than HS lambs (P < 0.01). Plasma urea N increased linearly in response to SBM (P < 0.01) but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.11). Nitrogen balance was not affected by SBM × WQ interaction (P > 0.12), except for N utilization (N retained/N intake ratio; P < 0.01). Regardless of WQ, N intake (P > 0.01), N urine (P > 0.01), and N balance increased linearly (P > 0.01) with SBM level. Water quality adversely affected N intake and N balance, although at the highest level of SBM no differences in N balance were observed between LS and HS lambs (P = 0.85). No changes due to WQ were observed for either urea reabsorbed by kidneys (P = 0.63) or glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.30), but renal function was affected by SBM level (P < 0.01). There was a supplemental SBM × WQ interaction for ruminal H2S concentration (P < 0.01) due mainly to a greater concentration from 0.25% BW SBM in HS than in LS lambs. In conclusion, these results confirmed the existence of an interaction between sulfate water and supplemental protein, which alters intake and metabolic responses when lambs are fed low-quality grass hay.EEA Santiago del EsteroFil: López, Agustín. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; ArgentinaFil: Arroquy, Jose Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Juárez Sequeira, A.V. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: DiLorenzo, N. University of Florida. North Florida Research and Education Center; Estados UnidosFil: Barrionuevo, M.C. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; ArgentinaFil: Distel, Roberto Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina2018-06-13T13:00:57Z2018-06-13T13:00:57Z2017-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2610https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/95/5/2111/4703651?redirectedFrom=fulltext0021-88121525-3163https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1264Journal of animal science 95 (5) : 2111–2120 (May 2017)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:12Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2610instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:12.756INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
title High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
spellingShingle High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
Lopez, Agustin
Cordero
Absorción de Agua
Sulfatos
Metabolismo
Forrajes
Lambs
Water Uptake
Sulphates
Metabolism
Forage
Consumo de Agua (animales)
title_short High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
title_full High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
title_fullStr High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
title_full_unstemmed High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
title_sort High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lopez, Agustin
Arroquy, Jose Ignacio
Juárez Sequeira, Ana Verónica
DiLorenzo, Nicolas
Barrionuevo, M.C.
Distel, Roberto Alejandro
author Lopez, Agustin
author_facet Lopez, Agustin
Arroquy, Jose Ignacio
Juárez Sequeira, Ana Verónica
DiLorenzo, Nicolas
Barrionuevo, M.C.
Distel, Roberto Alejandro
author_role author
author2 Arroquy, Jose Ignacio
Juárez Sequeira, Ana Verónica
DiLorenzo, Nicolas
Barrionuevo, M.C.
Distel, Roberto Alejandro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cordero
Absorción de Agua
Sulfatos
Metabolismo
Forrajes
Lambs
Water Uptake
Sulphates
Metabolism
Forage
Consumo de Agua (animales)
topic Cordero
Absorción de Agua
Sulfatos
Metabolismo
Forrajes
Lambs
Water Uptake
Sulphates
Metabolism
Forage
Consumo de Agua (animales)
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Twenty Hampshire lambs (31 ± 4 kg BW) in individual metabolism cages were used in a 10-treatment by 2-period (n = 4) trial to evaluate the interaction between protein supplementation and sulfate water on intake and metabolic responses when lambs were fed low-quality grass hay (Megathyrsus maximus; 6.4% CP, 79.5% NDF). The treatment structure was a 2 × 5 factorial: 2 water qualities (WQ; low-sulfate [LS] and high-sulfate [HS]; 442 and 8,358 mg/kg total dissolved solids, respectively) and 5 soybean meal levels (SBM; 0%, 0.25%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1.00% BW/d). After 15 d of adaptation, periods consisted of 5 d for determination of forage and water intake, nitrogen balance, and digestion measurements (d 16 to 20) and 1 d for blood sampling and determination of ruminal hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentration (d 21). Supplemental SBM × WQ interactions were significant for forage OM intake (P = 0.04) and total OM intake (P = 0.04), whereas a tendency was observed for total tract digestible OM intake (P = 0.07). Intake values of LS lambs were higher than those of HS lambs (P < 0.05) in only the first and second levels of SBM. Water intake increased linearly (P < 0.01) with SBM level but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.39). Water quality and SBM supplementation affected total tract OM digestibility (TTOMD; P < 0.01); LS lambs had lower TTOMD than HS lambs (P < 0.01). Plasma urea N increased linearly in response to SBM (P < 0.01) but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.11). Nitrogen balance was not affected by SBM × WQ interaction (P > 0.12), except for N utilization (N retained/N intake ratio; P < 0.01). Regardless of WQ, N intake (P > 0.01), N urine (P > 0.01), and N balance increased linearly (P > 0.01) with SBM level. Water quality adversely affected N intake and N balance, although at the highest level of SBM no differences in N balance were observed between LS and HS lambs (P = 0.85). No changes due to WQ were observed for either urea reabsorbed by kidneys (P = 0.63) or glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.30), but renal function was affected by SBM level (P < 0.01). There was a supplemental SBM × WQ interaction for ruminal H2S concentration (P < 0.01) due mainly to a greater concentration from 0.25% BW SBM in HS than in LS lambs. In conclusion, these results confirmed the existence of an interaction between sulfate water and supplemental protein, which alters intake and metabolic responses when lambs are fed low-quality grass hay.
EEA Santiago del Estero
Fil: López, Agustín. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina
Fil: Arroquy, Jose Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Juárez Sequeira, A.V. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: DiLorenzo, N. University of Florida. North Florida Research and Education Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Barrionuevo, M.C. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina
Fil: Distel, Roberto Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina
description Twenty Hampshire lambs (31 ± 4 kg BW) in individual metabolism cages were used in a 10-treatment by 2-period (n = 4) trial to evaluate the interaction between protein supplementation and sulfate water on intake and metabolic responses when lambs were fed low-quality grass hay (Megathyrsus maximus; 6.4% CP, 79.5% NDF). The treatment structure was a 2 × 5 factorial: 2 water qualities (WQ; low-sulfate [LS] and high-sulfate [HS]; 442 and 8,358 mg/kg total dissolved solids, respectively) and 5 soybean meal levels (SBM; 0%, 0.25%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1.00% BW/d). After 15 d of adaptation, periods consisted of 5 d for determination of forage and water intake, nitrogen balance, and digestion measurements (d 16 to 20) and 1 d for blood sampling and determination of ruminal hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentration (d 21). Supplemental SBM × WQ interactions were significant for forage OM intake (P = 0.04) and total OM intake (P = 0.04), whereas a tendency was observed for total tract digestible OM intake (P = 0.07). Intake values of LS lambs were higher than those of HS lambs (P < 0.05) in only the first and second levels of SBM. Water intake increased linearly (P < 0.01) with SBM level but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.39). Water quality and SBM supplementation affected total tract OM digestibility (TTOMD; P < 0.01); LS lambs had lower TTOMD than HS lambs (P < 0.01). Plasma urea N increased linearly in response to SBM (P < 0.01) but was not affected by WQ (P = 0.11). Nitrogen balance was not affected by SBM × WQ interaction (P > 0.12), except for N utilization (N retained/N intake ratio; P < 0.01). Regardless of WQ, N intake (P > 0.01), N urine (P > 0.01), and N balance increased linearly (P > 0.01) with SBM level. Water quality adversely affected N intake and N balance, although at the highest level of SBM no differences in N balance were observed between LS and HS lambs (P = 0.85). No changes due to WQ were observed for either urea reabsorbed by kidneys (P = 0.63) or glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.30), but renal function was affected by SBM level (P < 0.01). There was a supplemental SBM × WQ interaction for ruminal H2S concentration (P < 0.01) due mainly to a greater concentration from 0.25% BW SBM in HS than in LS lambs. In conclusion, these results confirmed the existence of an interaction between sulfate water and supplemental protein, which alters intake and metabolic responses when lambs are fed low-quality grass hay.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05
2018-06-13T13:00:57Z
2018-06-13T13:00:57Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2610
https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/95/5/2111/4703651?redirectedFrom=fulltext
0021-8812
1525-3163
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1264
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2610
https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/95/5/2111/4703651?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1264
identifier_str_mv 0021-8812
1525-3163
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of animal science 95 (5) : 2111–2120 (May 2017)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143501648003072
score 12.712165