Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique

Autores
Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela; Berentsen, Paul; Oude Lansink, Alfons
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
reseña artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification.
EEA Salta
Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina
Fil: Berentsen, Paul. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
Fil: Oude Lansink,Alfons. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
Fuente
Agricultural Systems 111 : 53–62. (September 2012)
Materia
Tabaco
Diversificación
Sistemas de Cultivo
Tobacco
Diversification
Cropping Systems
Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/22607
Acceder
id INTADig_ea02a83cfec8ad57a400a88a5b1d22df
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/22607
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) techniqueChavez Clemente, Maria DanielaBerentsen, PaulOude Lansink, AlfonsTabacoDiversificaciónSistemas de CultivoTobaccoDiversificationCropping SystemsAnalytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification.EEA SaltaFil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; ArgentinaFil: Berentsen, Paul. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países BajosFil: Oude Lansink,Alfons. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países BajosFil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos2025-06-10T13:04:41Z2025-06-10T13:04:41Z2012-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22607https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X120008440308-521Xhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006Agricultural Systems 111 : 53–62. (September 2012)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:47:20Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/22607instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:47:20.394INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
title Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
spellingShingle Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela
Tabaco
Diversificación
Sistemas de Cultivo
Tobacco
Diversification
Cropping Systems
Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)
title_short Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
title_full Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
title_fullStr Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
title_sort Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela
Berentsen, Paul
Oude Lansink, Alfons
author Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela
author_facet Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela
Berentsen, Paul
Oude Lansink, Alfons
author_role author
author2 Berentsen, Paul
Oude Lansink, Alfons
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Tabaco
Diversificación
Sistemas de Cultivo
Tobacco
Diversification
Cropping Systems
Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)
topic Tabaco
Diversificación
Sistemas de Cultivo
Tobacco
Diversification
Cropping Systems
Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification.
EEA Salta
Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina
Fil: Berentsen, Paul. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
Fil: Oude Lansink,Alfons. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
description Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-25
2025-06-10T13:04:41Z
2025-06-10T13:04:41Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/review
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format review
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22607
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X12000844
0308-521X
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22607
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X12000844
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006
identifier_str_mv 0308-521X
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agricultural Systems 111 : 53–62. (September 2012)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619204545740800
score 12.558318

Publicaciones similares