Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique
- Autores
- Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela; Berentsen, Paul; Oude Lansink, Alfons
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- reseña artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification.
EEA Salta
Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina
Fil: Berentsen, Paul. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
Fil: Oude Lansink,Alfons. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos
Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos - Fuente
- Agricultural Systems 111 : 53–62. (September 2012)
- Materia
-
Tabaco
Diversificación
Sistemas de Cultivo
Tobacco
Diversification
Cropping Systems
Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/22607
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_ea02a83cfec8ad57a400a88a5b1d22df |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/22607 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) techniqueChavez Clemente, Maria DanielaBerentsen, PaulOude Lansink, AlfonsTabacoDiversificaciónSistemas de CultivoTobaccoDiversificationCropping SystemsAnalytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification.EEA SaltaFil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; ArgentinaFil: Berentsen, Paul. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países BajosFil: Oude Lansink,Alfons. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países BajosFil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos2025-06-10T13:04:41Z2025-06-10T13:04:41Z2012-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22607https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X120008440308-521Xhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006Agricultural Systems 111 : 53–62. (September 2012)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:51:06Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/22607instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:51:06.46INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique |
title |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela Tabaco Diversificación Sistemas de Cultivo Tobacco Diversification Cropping Systems Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) |
title_short |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique |
title_full |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique |
title_sort |
Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela Berentsen, Paul Oude Lansink, Alfons |
author |
Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela |
author_facet |
Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela Berentsen, Paul Oude Lansink, Alfons |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Berentsen, Paul Oude Lansink, Alfons |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Tabaco Diversificación Sistemas de Cultivo Tobacco Diversification Cropping Systems Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) |
topic |
Tabaco Diversificación Sistemas de Cultivo Tobacco Diversification Cropping Systems Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification. EEA Salta Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina Fil: Berentsen, Paul. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos Fil: Oude Lansink,Alfons. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos Fil: Chavez Clemente, Maria Daniela. Wageningen University. Department of Social Sciences. Business Economics Group; Países Bajos |
description |
Continuous monocropping of tobacco, excessive tillage and inadequate irrigation management have caused soil degradation in tobacco farms in the Valle de Lerma. Soil degradation due to tobacco monocropping and uncertain economic perspectives for tobacco farming call for diversification strategies for tobacco farmers. The objective of this paper is to develop useful criteria for assessing diversification activities and to provide a ranking of different diversification activities on these criteria. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique is applied to get consistent assessments of criteria and activities from experts and stakeholders. Next, goal programming methods are used to aggregate individual assessments in order to arrive at the final ranking of farming activities for diversification. The five criteria to judge production activities for tobacco diversification are contribution to income, suitability for biophysical conditions, availability of technical information, market feasibility and contribution to soil improvement. The feasibility to market the products stands out with clearly high relative weight, while the other criteria received similar weights. The obtained weights of farming activities showed that especially livestock activities and spring–summer crops are important alternatives for tobacco production. Livestock activities stand out because they have high scores on all criteria. Livestock activities and spring–summer crops will compete with tobacco for resources because tobacco is a spring–summer crop. Therefore, these activities may be more suitable for tobacco farms that operate large area of land. The results of this research can be used in optimization models for determining the optimal mix of farming activities in combination with tobacco production. Such models can provide further insights into factors determining diversification. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-25 2025-06-10T13:04:41Z 2025-06-10T13:04:41Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/review info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
review |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22607 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X12000844 0308-521X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22607 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X12000844 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006 |
identifier_str_mv |
0308-521X |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Agricultural Systems 111 : 53–62. (September 2012) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842341440835813376 |
score |
12.623145 |