Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale

Autores
Boshier, David; Broadhurst, Linda; Cornelius, Jonathan; Gallo, Leonardo Ariel; Koskela, Jarkko; Loo, Judy; Petrokofsky, Gillian; St Clair, Bradley
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: Although the importance of using local provenance planting stock for woodland production, habitat conservation and restoration remains contentious, the concept is easy to understand, attractive and easy to ‘sell’. With limited information about the extent and scale of adaptive variation in native trees, discussion about suitable seed sources often emphasises “local” in a very narrow sense or within political boundaries, rather than being based on sound evidence of the scale over which adaptation occurs. Concerns exist over the actual scale (magnitude and spatial scale) of adaptation in trees and the relative dangers of incorrect seed source or restricted seed collection, leading to the establishment of trees with restricted genetic diversity and limited adaptive potential. Tree provenance and progeny field trials in many parts of the world have shown the existence of genotype by environment interaction in many tree species, but have not necessarily looked at whether this is expressed as a home site advantage (i.e. whether provenance performance is unstable across sites, and there is better performance of a local seed source). Methods/design: This review will examine the evidence for local adaptation and its scale in a number of native tree species from different trial sites across the globe (e.g. tropical, Mediterranean, temperate). These trials have been measured and in some cases results published in a range of formats. The data have, however, usually been presented in the form of which provenances grow best at which sites. The review will examine existing data (published and unpublished) in the context of the scale of local adaptation, with the results being presented in two formats: (a) relating survival, performance of provenances (classified by seed zone/provenance region of origin) to seed zone/provenance region of the planting site; (b) plotting survival, performance provenances against the distance (Euclidean/ecological) between the provenance and the trial site.
EEA Bariloche
Fil: Boshier, David. University of Oxford. Department of Plant Sciences; Reino Unido
Fil: Broadhurst, Linda. CSIRO National Research Collections Australia (NRCA). Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research (CANBR); Australia
Fil: Cornelius, Jonathan. International Center for Research in Agroforestry. World Agroforestry Centre; Perú
Fil: Gallo, Leonardo Ariel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Koskela, Jarkko. FAO; Italia
Fil: Loo, Judy. Bioversity International; Italia
Fil: Petrokofsky, Gillian. University of Oxford. Department of Zoology; Reino Unidos
Fil: St Clair, Bradley. US Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Environmental Evidence 4 : 20 (2015)
Materia
Formación Boscosa
Arboles
Adaptación
Medio Ambiente
Woodlands
Trees
Adaptation
Environment
Adaptación Local
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3816

id INTADig_e670a8bb548923630ae9138026557218
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3816
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scaleBoshier, DavidBroadhurst, LindaCornelius, JonathanGallo, Leonardo ArielKoskela, JarkkoLoo, JudyPetrokofsky, GillianSt Clair, BradleyFormación BoscosaArbolesAdaptaciónMedio AmbienteWoodlandsTreesAdaptationEnvironmentAdaptación LocalBackground: Although the importance of using local provenance planting stock for woodland production, habitat conservation and restoration remains contentious, the concept is easy to understand, attractive and easy to ‘sell’. With limited information about the extent and scale of adaptive variation in native trees, discussion about suitable seed sources often emphasises “local” in a very narrow sense or within political boundaries, rather than being based on sound evidence of the scale over which adaptation occurs. Concerns exist over the actual scale (magnitude and spatial scale) of adaptation in trees and the relative dangers of incorrect seed source or restricted seed collection, leading to the establishment of trees with restricted genetic diversity and limited adaptive potential. Tree provenance and progeny field trials in many parts of the world have shown the existence of genotype by environment interaction in many tree species, but have not necessarily looked at whether this is expressed as a home site advantage (i.e. whether provenance performance is unstable across sites, and there is better performance of a local seed source). Methods/design: This review will examine the evidence for local adaptation and its scale in a number of native tree species from different trial sites across the globe (e.g. tropical, Mediterranean, temperate). These trials have been measured and in some cases results published in a range of formats. The data have, however, usually been presented in the form of which provenances grow best at which sites. The review will examine existing data (published and unpublished) in the context of the scale of local adaptation, with the results being presented in two formats: (a) relating survival, performance of provenances (classified by seed zone/provenance region of origin) to seed zone/provenance region of the planting site; (b) plotting survival, performance provenances against the distance (Euclidean/ecological) between the provenance and the trial site.EEA BarilocheFil: Boshier, David. University of Oxford. Department of Plant Sciences; Reino UnidoFil: Broadhurst, Linda. CSIRO National Research Collections Australia (NRCA). Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research (CANBR); AustraliaFil: Cornelius, Jonathan. International Center for Research in Agroforestry. World Agroforestry Centre; PerúFil: Gallo, Leonardo Ariel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Koskela, Jarkko. FAO; ItaliaFil: Loo, Judy. Bioversity International; ItaliaFil: Petrokofsky, Gillian. University of Oxford. Department of Zoology; Reino UnidosFil: St Clair, Bradley. US Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station; Estados Unidos2018-11-07T17:04:59Z2018-11-07T17:04:59Z2015-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/38162047-2382https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3Environmental Evidence 4 : 20 (2015)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:44:29Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/3816instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:29.963INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
title Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
spellingShingle Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
Boshier, David
Formación Boscosa
Arboles
Adaptación
Medio Ambiente
Woodlands
Trees
Adaptation
Environment
Adaptación Local
title_short Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
title_full Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
title_fullStr Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
title_full_unstemmed Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
title_sort Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Boshier, David
Broadhurst, Linda
Cornelius, Jonathan
Gallo, Leonardo Ariel
Koskela, Jarkko
Loo, Judy
Petrokofsky, Gillian
St Clair, Bradley
author Boshier, David
author_facet Boshier, David
Broadhurst, Linda
Cornelius, Jonathan
Gallo, Leonardo Ariel
Koskela, Jarkko
Loo, Judy
Petrokofsky, Gillian
St Clair, Bradley
author_role author
author2 Broadhurst, Linda
Cornelius, Jonathan
Gallo, Leonardo Ariel
Koskela, Jarkko
Loo, Judy
Petrokofsky, Gillian
St Clair, Bradley
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Formación Boscosa
Arboles
Adaptación
Medio Ambiente
Woodlands
Trees
Adaptation
Environment
Adaptación Local
topic Formación Boscosa
Arboles
Adaptación
Medio Ambiente
Woodlands
Trees
Adaptation
Environment
Adaptación Local
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: Although the importance of using local provenance planting stock for woodland production, habitat conservation and restoration remains contentious, the concept is easy to understand, attractive and easy to ‘sell’. With limited information about the extent and scale of adaptive variation in native trees, discussion about suitable seed sources often emphasises “local” in a very narrow sense or within political boundaries, rather than being based on sound evidence of the scale over which adaptation occurs. Concerns exist over the actual scale (magnitude and spatial scale) of adaptation in trees and the relative dangers of incorrect seed source or restricted seed collection, leading to the establishment of trees with restricted genetic diversity and limited adaptive potential. Tree provenance and progeny field trials in many parts of the world have shown the existence of genotype by environment interaction in many tree species, but have not necessarily looked at whether this is expressed as a home site advantage (i.e. whether provenance performance is unstable across sites, and there is better performance of a local seed source). Methods/design: This review will examine the evidence for local adaptation and its scale in a number of native tree species from different trial sites across the globe (e.g. tropical, Mediterranean, temperate). These trials have been measured and in some cases results published in a range of formats. The data have, however, usually been presented in the form of which provenances grow best at which sites. The review will examine existing data (published and unpublished) in the context of the scale of local adaptation, with the results being presented in two formats: (a) relating survival, performance of provenances (classified by seed zone/provenance region of origin) to seed zone/provenance region of the planting site; (b) plotting survival, performance provenances against the distance (Euclidean/ecological) between the provenance and the trial site.
EEA Bariloche
Fil: Boshier, David. University of Oxford. Department of Plant Sciences; Reino Unido
Fil: Broadhurst, Linda. CSIRO National Research Collections Australia (NRCA). Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research (CANBR); Australia
Fil: Cornelius, Jonathan. International Center for Research in Agroforestry. World Agroforestry Centre; Perú
Fil: Gallo, Leonardo Ariel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Koskela, Jarkko. FAO; Italia
Fil: Loo, Judy. Bioversity International; Italia
Fil: Petrokofsky, Gillian. University of Oxford. Department of Zoology; Reino Unidos
Fil: St Clair, Bradley. US Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station; Estados Unidos
description Background: Although the importance of using local provenance planting stock for woodland production, habitat conservation and restoration remains contentious, the concept is easy to understand, attractive and easy to ‘sell’. With limited information about the extent and scale of adaptive variation in native trees, discussion about suitable seed sources often emphasises “local” in a very narrow sense or within political boundaries, rather than being based on sound evidence of the scale over which adaptation occurs. Concerns exist over the actual scale (magnitude and spatial scale) of adaptation in trees and the relative dangers of incorrect seed source or restricted seed collection, leading to the establishment of trees with restricted genetic diversity and limited adaptive potential. Tree provenance and progeny field trials in many parts of the world have shown the existence of genotype by environment interaction in many tree species, but have not necessarily looked at whether this is expressed as a home site advantage (i.e. whether provenance performance is unstable across sites, and there is better performance of a local seed source). Methods/design: This review will examine the evidence for local adaptation and its scale in a number of native tree species from different trial sites across the globe (e.g. tropical, Mediterranean, temperate). These trials have been measured and in some cases results published in a range of formats. The data have, however, usually been presented in the form of which provenances grow best at which sites. The review will examine existing data (published and unpublished) in the context of the scale of local adaptation, with the results being presented in two formats: (a) relating survival, performance of provenances (classified by seed zone/provenance region of origin) to seed zone/provenance region of the planting site; (b) plotting survival, performance provenances against the distance (Euclidean/ecological) between the provenance and the trial site.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10
2018-11-07T17:04:59Z
2018-11-07T17:04:59Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3816
2047-2382
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3
url https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3816
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3
identifier_str_mv 2047-2382
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Evidence 4 : 20 (2015)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619127773200384
score 12.559606