Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)

Autores
Guzzo, María Carla; Costamagna, Carla; Salloum, María Soraya; Rotundo, Jose Luis; Monteoliva, Mariela Ines; Luna, Celina Mercedes
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión aceptada
Descripción
Drought is currently a major constraint to soybean production worldwide and is becoming more widespread due to increased aridity and warmer temperatures in the context of global climate change. In this context, breeding for soybean varieties more tolerant to drought stress is critical and requires efficient screening techniques. To find traits associated with droughttolerance in the vegetative stage which are still present at the reproductive stage, we evaluated morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits, in two soybean genotypes contrasting in their response to drought stress. Under drought stress at the vegetative stage, the tolerant A 5009 RG genotype showed higher proline and chlorophyll contents, and early activation of the enzymatic antioxidant system compared with well-watered plants. On the other hand, the sensitive ADM 50048 genotype increased malondialdehyde (oxidative damage marker) and non-enzymatic antioxidant response under stress. Manipulative field assays under contrasting levels of water availability at the reproductive stage mimicked the biochemical patterns observed in the greenhouse tests for the sensitive and tolerant genotypes. A principal component analysis of parameters from vegetative and reproductive stages revealed proline and chlorophyll contents as drought-tolerance traits in soybean. We found those traits useful to classify 14 genotypes from the INTA germplasm bank, identifying two new drought-tolerant genotypes (PI548510 and PI200492). We propose proline and chlorophylls as a useful tool to classify soybean genotypes according to its drought responses in early developmental stages, potentially reducing breeding times.
Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales
Fil: Guzzo, María Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina
Fil: Costamagna, Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina
Fil: Salloum, Maria Soraya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina
Fil: Rotundo, José Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina . Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Monteoliva, Mariela Ines. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Luna, Celina Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fuente
Crop Science (August 2020)
Materia
Legumes
Abiotic Stress
Proline
Soybeans
Chlorophylls
Soja
Estrés Abiótico
Leguminosas
Prolina
Water Deficit
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7945
Acceder
id INTADig_e22e34efcecb3b03d96e75556fa8dcd5
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7945
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)Guzzo, María CarlaCostamagna, CarlaSalloum, María SorayaRotundo, Jose LuisMonteoliva, Mariela InesLuna, Celina MercedesLegumesAbiotic StressProlineSoybeansChlorophyllsSojaEstrés AbióticoLeguminosasProlinaWater DeficitDrought is currently a major constraint to soybean production worldwide and is becoming more widespread due to increased aridity and warmer temperatures in the context of global climate change. In this context, breeding for soybean varieties more tolerant to drought stress is critical and requires efficient screening techniques. To find traits associated with droughttolerance in the vegetative stage which are still present at the reproductive stage, we evaluated morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits, in two soybean genotypes contrasting in their response to drought stress. Under drought stress at the vegetative stage, the tolerant A 5009 RG genotype showed higher proline and chlorophyll contents, and early activation of the enzymatic antioxidant system compared with well-watered plants. On the other hand, the sensitive ADM 50048 genotype increased malondialdehyde (oxidative damage marker) and non-enzymatic antioxidant response under stress. Manipulative field assays under contrasting levels of water availability at the reproductive stage mimicked the biochemical patterns observed in the greenhouse tests for the sensitive and tolerant genotypes. A principal component analysis of parameters from vegetative and reproductive stages revealed proline and chlorophyll contents as drought-tolerance traits in soybean. We found those traits useful to classify 14 genotypes from the INTA germplasm bank, identifying two new drought-tolerant genotypes (PI548510 and PI200492). We propose proline and chlorophylls as a useful tool to classify soybean genotypes according to its drought responses in early developmental stages, potentially reducing breeding times.Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos VegetalesFil: Guzzo, María Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); ArgentinaFil: Costamagna, Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); ArgentinaFil: Salloum, Maria Soraya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; ArgentinaFil: Rotundo, José Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina . Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Monteoliva, Mariela Ines. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Luna, Celina Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentinainfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2021-09-222020-09-22T14:52:28Z2020-09-22T14:52:28Z2020-08-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7945https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csc2.203140011-183X1435-0653 (online)https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20314Crop Science (August 2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:45:01Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/7945instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:01.829INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
title Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
spellingShingle Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
Guzzo, María Carla
Legumes
Abiotic Stress
Proline
Soybeans
Chlorophylls
Soja
Estrés Abiótico
Leguminosas
Prolina
Water Deficit
title_short Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
title_full Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
title_fullStr Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
title_full_unstemmed Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
title_sort Morpho‐physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean (Glycine max L.)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Guzzo, María Carla
Costamagna, Carla
Salloum, María Soraya
Rotundo, Jose Luis
Monteoliva, Mariela Ines
Luna, Celina Mercedes
author Guzzo, María Carla
author_facet Guzzo, María Carla
Costamagna, Carla
Salloum, María Soraya
Rotundo, Jose Luis
Monteoliva, Mariela Ines
Luna, Celina Mercedes
author_role author
author2 Costamagna, Carla
Salloum, María Soraya
Rotundo, Jose Luis
Monteoliva, Mariela Ines
Luna, Celina Mercedes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Legumes
Abiotic Stress
Proline
Soybeans
Chlorophylls
Soja
Estrés Abiótico
Leguminosas
Prolina
Water Deficit
topic Legumes
Abiotic Stress
Proline
Soybeans
Chlorophylls
Soja
Estrés Abiótico
Leguminosas
Prolina
Water Deficit
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Drought is currently a major constraint to soybean production worldwide and is becoming more widespread due to increased aridity and warmer temperatures in the context of global climate change. In this context, breeding for soybean varieties more tolerant to drought stress is critical and requires efficient screening techniques. To find traits associated with droughttolerance in the vegetative stage which are still present at the reproductive stage, we evaluated morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits, in two soybean genotypes contrasting in their response to drought stress. Under drought stress at the vegetative stage, the tolerant A 5009 RG genotype showed higher proline and chlorophyll contents, and early activation of the enzymatic antioxidant system compared with well-watered plants. On the other hand, the sensitive ADM 50048 genotype increased malondialdehyde (oxidative damage marker) and non-enzymatic antioxidant response under stress. Manipulative field assays under contrasting levels of water availability at the reproductive stage mimicked the biochemical patterns observed in the greenhouse tests for the sensitive and tolerant genotypes. A principal component analysis of parameters from vegetative and reproductive stages revealed proline and chlorophyll contents as drought-tolerance traits in soybean. We found those traits useful to classify 14 genotypes from the INTA germplasm bank, identifying two new drought-tolerant genotypes (PI548510 and PI200492). We propose proline and chlorophylls as a useful tool to classify soybean genotypes according to its drought responses in early developmental stages, potentially reducing breeding times.
Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales
Fil: Guzzo, María Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina
Fil: Costamagna, Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina
Fil: Salloum, Maria Soraya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina
Fil: Rotundo, José Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina . Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Monteoliva, Mariela Ines. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Luna, Celina Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA-CONICET); Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Drought is currently a major constraint to soybean production worldwide and is becoming more widespread due to increased aridity and warmer temperatures in the context of global climate change. In this context, breeding for soybean varieties more tolerant to drought stress is critical and requires efficient screening techniques. To find traits associated with droughttolerance in the vegetative stage which are still present at the reproductive stage, we evaluated morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits, in two soybean genotypes contrasting in their response to drought stress. Under drought stress at the vegetative stage, the tolerant A 5009 RG genotype showed higher proline and chlorophyll contents, and early activation of the enzymatic antioxidant system compared with well-watered plants. On the other hand, the sensitive ADM 50048 genotype increased malondialdehyde (oxidative damage marker) and non-enzymatic antioxidant response under stress. Manipulative field assays under contrasting levels of water availability at the reproductive stage mimicked the biochemical patterns observed in the greenhouse tests for the sensitive and tolerant genotypes. A principal component analysis of parameters from vegetative and reproductive stages revealed proline and chlorophyll contents as drought-tolerance traits in soybean. We found those traits useful to classify 14 genotypes from the INTA germplasm bank, identifying two new drought-tolerant genotypes (PI548510 and PI200492). We propose proline and chlorophylls as a useful tool to classify soybean genotypes according to its drought responses in early developmental stages, potentially reducing breeding times.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-22T14:52:28Z
2020-09-22T14:52:28Z
2020-08-26
info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2021-09-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7945
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csc2.20314
0011-183X
1435-0653 (online)
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20314
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7945
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csc2.20314
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20314
identifier_str_mv 0011-183X
1435-0653 (online)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Crop Science (August 2020)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619147416174592
score 12.559606

Publicaciones similares