Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison

Autores
Peri, Pablo Luis; Costa Varella, Alexandre; Lucas, R. J.; Moot, Derrick.
Año de publicación
2001
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Plant and animal production from cocksfoot pasture and lucerne under 10-11 year-old radiata pine trees (200 stems/ha) and from adjacent open pastures (without trees) were measured from the Lincoln University Silvopastoral Experiment. Light intensity under trees was 50-60% of the open pasture. Liveweight gain (LWG) from lucerne was 220 g/hd/d in the open and 158 g/hd/d under trees. On cocksfoot, LWG was 132 g/hd/d in the open and 100 g/hd/d under trees. When converted to LWG/ha, lamb production from open pastures was double that from shaded pastures for lucerne (5.1 and 2.5 kg/ha/d) and cocksfoot (3.4 and 1.7 kg/ha/ d). Lucerne produced 11.2 t DM/ha in the open and 7.9 t DM/ha under trees which was 58% and 76% more than cocksfoot in the open and under trees, respectively. However, from September to November, when soil moisture was non-limiting, the lucerne DM production was 36% lower under tree shade than in the open. In comparison, the reduction was only 20% for cocksfoot, which confirms its greater 'shade tolerance'. The reduced lamb LWG produced from lambs on shaded pastures was attributed to the reduced pre-grazing pasture mass and pasture bulk density, leading to reduced apparent intakes. Crude protein and digestibility values were not influenced by shade, and clover content in cocksfoot pastures were low (<7%). It was concluded that: i) shaded pastures in silvopastoral systems limited animal production compared with open pastures owing to lower DM production rates which lowered pre-grazing pasture mass and reduced bulk density from the etiolated pasture; ii) the suitability of species for silvopastoral systems should be assessed from total plant and animal production and species persistence rather than 'shade tolerance', which only examines the relative decline in DM production under shade compared with unshaded situations. Keywords: cocksfoot, Dactylis glomerata, lamb liveweight gain, lucerne, Medicago sativa, pasture production, Pinus radiata, shade tolerance, silvopastoralism.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA); Argentina
Fil: Costa Varella, Alexandre. Lincoln University. Plant, Soil and Ecological Sciences Division; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Lucas, R. J. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture an Life Science; Nueva Zelanda
Fuente
Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 63: 139-147. (2001)
Materia
Silvopastoral Systems
Lambs
Live Weight
Pastures
Shade Tolerance
Sistema Silvopascícola
Dactylis glomerata
Medicago sativa
Pinus radiata
Lolium perenne
Trifolium repens
Cordero
Peso Vivo
Pasturas
Tolerancia a la Sombra
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/26336

id INTADig_dbbdd1922f1f2f3022a6c87c27ca4d78
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/26336
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparisonPeri, Pablo LuisCosta Varella, AlexandreLucas, R. J.Moot, Derrick.Silvopastoral SystemsLambsLive WeightPasturesShade ToleranceSistema SilvopascícolaDactylis glomerataMedicago sativaPinus radiataLolium perenneTrifolium repensCorderoPeso VivoPasturasTolerancia a la SombraPlant and animal production from cocksfoot pasture and lucerne under 10-11 year-old radiata pine trees (200 stems/ha) and from adjacent open pastures (without trees) were measured from the Lincoln University Silvopastoral Experiment. Light intensity under trees was 50-60% of the open pasture. Liveweight gain (LWG) from lucerne was 220 g/hd/d in the open and 158 g/hd/d under trees. On cocksfoot, LWG was 132 g/hd/d in the open and 100 g/hd/d under trees. When converted to LWG/ha, lamb production from open pastures was double that from shaded pastures for lucerne (5.1 and 2.5 kg/ha/d) and cocksfoot (3.4 and 1.7 kg/ha/ d). Lucerne produced 11.2 t DM/ha in the open and 7.9 t DM/ha under trees which was 58% and 76% more than cocksfoot in the open and under trees, respectively. However, from September to November, when soil moisture was non-limiting, the lucerne DM production was 36% lower under tree shade than in the open. In comparison, the reduction was only 20% for cocksfoot, which confirms its greater 'shade tolerance'. The reduced lamb LWG produced from lambs on shaded pastures was attributed to the reduced pre-grazing pasture mass and pasture bulk density, leading to reduced apparent intakes. Crude protein and digestibility values were not influenced by shade, and clover content in cocksfoot pastures were low (<7%). It was concluded that: i) shaded pastures in silvopastoral systems limited animal production compared with open pastures owing to lower DM production rates which lowered pre-grazing pasture mass and reduced bulk density from the etiolated pasture; ii) the suitability of species for silvopastoral systems should be assessed from total plant and animal production and species persistence rather than 'shade tolerance', which only examines the relative decline in DM production under shade compared with unshaded situations. Keywords: cocksfoot, Dactylis glomerata, lamb liveweight gain, lucerne, Medicago sativa, pasture production, Pinus radiata, shade tolerance, silvopastoralism.EEA Santa CruzFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA); ArgentinaFil: Costa Varella, Alexandre. Lincoln University. Plant, Soil and Ecological Sciences Division; Nueva ZelandaFil: Lucas, R. J. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science; Nueva ZelandaFil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture an Life Science; Nueva ZelandaNew Zealand Grassland Association2026-05-22T14:19:37Z2026-05-22T14:19:37Z2001-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26336https://www.nzgajournal.org.nz/index.php/ProNZGA/article/view/2440Peri P.L; Varella A.C; Lucas R.J.; Moot D.J. (2001) Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata sylvopastoral system: a grazed comparison. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 63: 139-147.2463-28722463-2880https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2001.63.2440Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 63: 139-147. (2001)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2026-05-28T08:47:27Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/26336instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2026-05-28 08:47:27.495INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
title Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
spellingShingle Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
Peri, Pablo Luis
Silvopastoral Systems
Lambs
Live Weight
Pastures
Shade Tolerance
Sistema Silvopascícola
Dactylis glomerata
Medicago sativa
Pinus radiata
Lolium perenne
Trifolium repens
Cordero
Peso Vivo
Pasturas
Tolerancia a la Sombra
title_short Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
title_full Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
title_fullStr Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
title_full_unstemmed Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
title_sort Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Peri, Pablo Luis
Costa Varella, Alexandre
Lucas, R. J.
Moot, Derrick.
author Peri, Pablo Luis
author_facet Peri, Pablo Luis
Costa Varella, Alexandre
Lucas, R. J.
Moot, Derrick.
author_role author
author2 Costa Varella, Alexandre
Lucas, R. J.
Moot, Derrick.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Silvopastoral Systems
Lambs
Live Weight
Pastures
Shade Tolerance
Sistema Silvopascícola
Dactylis glomerata
Medicago sativa
Pinus radiata
Lolium perenne
Trifolium repens
Cordero
Peso Vivo
Pasturas
Tolerancia a la Sombra
topic Silvopastoral Systems
Lambs
Live Weight
Pastures
Shade Tolerance
Sistema Silvopascícola
Dactylis glomerata
Medicago sativa
Pinus radiata
Lolium perenne
Trifolium repens
Cordero
Peso Vivo
Pasturas
Tolerancia a la Sombra
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Plant and animal production from cocksfoot pasture and lucerne under 10-11 year-old radiata pine trees (200 stems/ha) and from adjacent open pastures (without trees) were measured from the Lincoln University Silvopastoral Experiment. Light intensity under trees was 50-60% of the open pasture. Liveweight gain (LWG) from lucerne was 220 g/hd/d in the open and 158 g/hd/d under trees. On cocksfoot, LWG was 132 g/hd/d in the open and 100 g/hd/d under trees. When converted to LWG/ha, lamb production from open pastures was double that from shaded pastures for lucerne (5.1 and 2.5 kg/ha/d) and cocksfoot (3.4 and 1.7 kg/ha/ d). Lucerne produced 11.2 t DM/ha in the open and 7.9 t DM/ha under trees which was 58% and 76% more than cocksfoot in the open and under trees, respectively. However, from September to November, when soil moisture was non-limiting, the lucerne DM production was 36% lower under tree shade than in the open. In comparison, the reduction was only 20% for cocksfoot, which confirms its greater 'shade tolerance'. The reduced lamb LWG produced from lambs on shaded pastures was attributed to the reduced pre-grazing pasture mass and pasture bulk density, leading to reduced apparent intakes. Crude protein and digestibility values were not influenced by shade, and clover content in cocksfoot pastures were low (<7%). It was concluded that: i) shaded pastures in silvopastoral systems limited animal production compared with open pastures owing to lower DM production rates which lowered pre-grazing pasture mass and reduced bulk density from the etiolated pasture; ii) the suitability of species for silvopastoral systems should be assessed from total plant and animal production and species persistence rather than 'shade tolerance', which only examines the relative decline in DM production under shade compared with unshaded situations. Keywords: cocksfoot, Dactylis glomerata, lamb liveweight gain, lucerne, Medicago sativa, pasture production, Pinus radiata, shade tolerance, silvopastoralism.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA); Argentina
Fil: Costa Varella, Alexandre. Lincoln University. Plant, Soil and Ecological Sciences Division; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Lucas, R. J. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Moot, Derrick. Lincoln University. Faculty of Agriculture an Life Science; Nueva Zelanda
description Plant and animal production from cocksfoot pasture and lucerne under 10-11 year-old radiata pine trees (200 stems/ha) and from adjacent open pastures (without trees) were measured from the Lincoln University Silvopastoral Experiment. Light intensity under trees was 50-60% of the open pasture. Liveweight gain (LWG) from lucerne was 220 g/hd/d in the open and 158 g/hd/d under trees. On cocksfoot, LWG was 132 g/hd/d in the open and 100 g/hd/d under trees. When converted to LWG/ha, lamb production from open pastures was double that from shaded pastures for lucerne (5.1 and 2.5 kg/ha/d) and cocksfoot (3.4 and 1.7 kg/ha/ d). Lucerne produced 11.2 t DM/ha in the open and 7.9 t DM/ha under trees which was 58% and 76% more than cocksfoot in the open and under trees, respectively. However, from September to November, when soil moisture was non-limiting, the lucerne DM production was 36% lower under tree shade than in the open. In comparison, the reduction was only 20% for cocksfoot, which confirms its greater 'shade tolerance'. The reduced lamb LWG produced from lambs on shaded pastures was attributed to the reduced pre-grazing pasture mass and pasture bulk density, leading to reduced apparent intakes. Crude protein and digestibility values were not influenced by shade, and clover content in cocksfoot pastures were low (<7%). It was concluded that: i) shaded pastures in silvopastoral systems limited animal production compared with open pastures owing to lower DM production rates which lowered pre-grazing pasture mass and reduced bulk density from the etiolated pasture; ii) the suitability of species for silvopastoral systems should be assessed from total plant and animal production and species persistence rather than 'shade tolerance', which only examines the relative decline in DM production under shade compared with unshaded situations. Keywords: cocksfoot, Dactylis glomerata, lamb liveweight gain, lucerne, Medicago sativa, pasture production, Pinus radiata, shade tolerance, silvopastoralism.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-01-01
2026-05-22T14:19:37Z
2026-05-22T14:19:37Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26336
https://www.nzgajournal.org.nz/index.php/ProNZGA/article/view/2440
Peri P.L; Varella A.C; Lucas R.J.; Moot D.J. (2001) Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata sylvopastoral system: a grazed comparison. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 63: 139-147.
2463-2872
2463-2880
https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2001.63.2440
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26336
https://www.nzgajournal.org.nz/index.php/ProNZGA/article/view/2440
https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2001.63.2440
identifier_str_mv Peri P.L; Varella A.C; Lucas R.J.; Moot D.J. (2001) Cocksfoot and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata sylvopastoral system: a grazed comparison. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 63: 139-147.
2463-2872
2463-2880
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv New Zealand Grassland Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv New Zealand Grassland Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 63: 139-147. (2001)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1866437777168531456
score 13.143419