Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories

Autores
Peri, Pablo Luis; Bloomberg, Mark
Año de publicación
2003
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper presents results from a silvopastoral experiment that investigated interactions between four different pasture types and growth and form of five different ‘genotypes’ of radiata pine (four micro-propagated clones and one seedling lot). The five radiata pine tree ‘genotypes’ tested in this experiment displayed differences in growth and form 10 years after planting. However, there were no statistically significant interactions between tree genotype and understorey effects. The two best ‘genotypes’ were superior in nearly all respects (growth, branch size and stem form), on all pasture types. These results concur with other research results that indicate that the best radiata pine genotypes will perform consistently well across a range of environments in New Zealand.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA). Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Argentina
Fil: Bloomberg, Mark. Lincoln University. Soil plant and ecological sciences division. Christchurch; Nueva Zelanda
Fuente
New Zealand Journal of Forestry 48(3): 19-22 (2003)
Materia
Pinus
Pino
Genotipo
Pastizal
Sistema Silvopascícola
Programa de Mejoramiento
Silvicultura
Genotypes
Pastures
Silvopastoral Systems
Breeding Programmes
Silviculture
Radiata Pine
Silvopastoral Systems
Pino Radiata
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/26186
Acceder
id INTADig_cf91d5b982d291a0266976dbb6cb7be5
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/26186
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understoriesPeri, Pablo LuisBloomberg, MarkPinusPinoGenotipoPastizalSistema SilvopascícolaPrograma de MejoramientoSilviculturaGenotypesPasturesSilvopastoral SystemsBreeding ProgrammesSilvicultureRadiata PineSilvopastoral SystemsPino RadiataSistemas SilvopastorilesThis paper presents results from a silvopastoral experiment that investigated interactions between four different pasture types and growth and form of five different ‘genotypes’ of radiata pine (four micro-propagated clones and one seedling lot). The five radiata pine tree ‘genotypes’ tested in this experiment displayed differences in growth and form 10 years after planting. However, there were no statistically significant interactions between tree genotype and understorey effects. The two best ‘genotypes’ were superior in nearly all respects (growth, branch size and stem form), on all pasture types. These results concur with other research results that indicate that the best radiata pine genotypes will perform consistently well across a range of environments in New Zealand.EEA Santa CruzFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA). Santa Cruz; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); ArgentinaFil: Bloomberg, Mark. Lincoln University. Soil plant and ecological sciences division. Christchurch; Nueva ZelandaNew Zealand Institute of Forestry2026-05-13T16:17:32Z2026-05-13T16:17:32Z2003-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26186https://nzif.org.nz/nzif-journal/publications/article/22146Peri P.L.; Bloomberg M. (2003) Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 48(3): 19-221174-7986New Zealand Journal of Forestry 48(3): 19-22 (2003)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2026-05-14T10:43:35Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/26186instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2026-05-14 10:43:35.78INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
title Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
spellingShingle Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
Peri, Pablo Luis
Pinus
Pino
Genotipo
Pastizal
Sistema Silvopascícola
Programa de Mejoramiento
Silvicultura
Genotypes
Pastures
Silvopastoral Systems
Breeding Programmes
Silviculture
Radiata Pine
Silvopastoral Systems
Pino Radiata
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
title_short Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
title_full Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
title_fullStr Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
title_full_unstemmed Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
title_sort Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Peri, Pablo Luis
Bloomberg, Mark
author Peri, Pablo Luis
author_facet Peri, Pablo Luis
Bloomberg, Mark
author_role author
author2 Bloomberg, Mark
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pinus
Pino
Genotipo
Pastizal
Sistema Silvopascícola
Programa de Mejoramiento
Silvicultura
Genotypes
Pastures
Silvopastoral Systems
Breeding Programmes
Silviculture
Radiata Pine
Silvopastoral Systems
Pino Radiata
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
topic Pinus
Pino
Genotipo
Pastizal
Sistema Silvopascícola
Programa de Mejoramiento
Silvicultura
Genotypes
Pastures
Silvopastoral Systems
Breeding Programmes
Silviculture
Radiata Pine
Silvopastoral Systems
Pino Radiata
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper presents results from a silvopastoral experiment that investigated interactions between four different pasture types and growth and form of five different ‘genotypes’ of radiata pine (four micro-propagated clones and one seedling lot). The five radiata pine tree ‘genotypes’ tested in this experiment displayed differences in growth and form 10 years after planting. However, there were no statistically significant interactions between tree genotype and understorey effects. The two best ‘genotypes’ were superior in nearly all respects (growth, branch size and stem form), on all pasture types. These results concur with other research results that indicate that the best radiata pine genotypes will perform consistently well across a range of environments in New Zealand.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA). Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Argentina
Fil: Bloomberg, Mark. Lincoln University. Soil plant and ecological sciences division. Christchurch; Nueva Zelanda
description This paper presents results from a silvopastoral experiment that investigated interactions between four different pasture types and growth and form of five different ‘genotypes’ of radiata pine (four micro-propagated clones and one seedling lot). The five radiata pine tree ‘genotypes’ tested in this experiment displayed differences in growth and form 10 years after planting. However, there were no statistically significant interactions between tree genotype and understorey effects. The two best ‘genotypes’ were superior in nearly all respects (growth, branch size and stem form), on all pasture types. These results concur with other research results that indicate that the best radiata pine genotypes will perform consistently well across a range of environments in New Zealand.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-11
2026-05-13T16:17:32Z
2026-05-13T16:17:32Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26186
https://nzif.org.nz/nzif-journal/publications/article/22146
Peri P.L.; Bloomberg M. (2003) Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 48(3): 19-22
1174-7986
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26186
https://nzif.org.nz/nzif-journal/publications/article/22146
identifier_str_mv Peri P.L.; Bloomberg M. (2003) Comparative performance of radiata pine genotypes with pasture understories. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 48(3): 19-22
1174-7986
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv New Zealand Institute of Forestry
publisher.none.fl_str_mv New Zealand Institute of Forestry
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv New Zealand Journal of Forestry 48(3): 19-22 (2003)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1865182004319879168
score 13.115601

Publicaciones similares