Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh
- Autores
- Aravindakshan, Sreejith; Krupnik, Timothy J.; Shahrin, Sumona; Tittonell, Pablo Adrian; Siddique, Kadambot H. M.; Ditzler, Lenora; Groot, Jeroen C.J.
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Appreciating and dealing with the plurality of farmers’ perceptions and their contextual knowledge and perspectives of the functioning and performance of their agroecosystems— in other words, their ‘mental models’—is central for appropriate and sustainable agricultural development. In this respect, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) aim to eradicate poverty and food insecurity by 2030 by envisioning social inclusivity that incorporates the preferences and knowledge of key stakeholders, including farmers. Agricultural development interventions and policies directed at sustainable intensification (SI), however, do not sufficiently account for farmers’ perceptions, beliefs, priorities, or interests. Considering two contrasting agroecological systems in coastal Bangladesh, we used a fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM)-based simulation and sensitivity analysis of mental models of respondents of different farm types from 240 farm households. The employed FCM mental models were able to (1) capture farmers’ perception of farming system concepts and relationships for each farm type and (2) assess the impact of external interventions (drivers) on cropping intensification and food security. We decomposed the FCM models’ variance into the first-order sensitivity index (SVI) and total sensitivity index (TSI) using a winding stairs algorithm. Both within and outside polder areas, the highest TSIs (35–68%) were observed for effects of agricultural extension on changes in other concepts in the map, particularly food security and income (SI indicators), indicating the importance of extension programs for SI. Outside polders, drainage and micro-credit were also influential; within polders, the availability of micro-credit appears to affect farmer perceptions of SI indicators more than drainage. This study demonstrated the importance of reflection on the differing perspectives of farmers both within and outside polders to identify entry points for development interventions. In addition, the study underscores the need for micro-farming systems-level research to assess the context-based feasibility of introduced interventions as perceived by farmers of different farm types.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche
Fil: Aravindakshan, Sreejith. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda
Fil: Krupnik, Timothy J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; Bangladesh
Fil: Shahrin, Sumona. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda
Fil: Shahrin, Sumona. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; Bangladesh
Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Groningen University. Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences; Holanda
Fil: Siddique, Kadambot H. M. University of Western Australia. The UWA Institute of Agriculture; Australia
Fil: Ditzler, Lenora. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda
Fil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda
Fil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. Bioversity International; Italia
Fil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; Mexico - Fuente
- Environment, Development and Sustainability 23 : 16588–16616 (2021)
- Materia
-
Agroecosistemas
Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
Sostenibilidad
Agricultura Sostenible
Agroecosystems
Sustainable Development Goals
Sustainability
Sustainable Agriculture
Percepciones de los Agricultores - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10770
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_9dad92aa6693e02fa6e034cf25096f8b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10770 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal BangladeshAravindakshan, SreejithKrupnik, Timothy J.Shahrin, SumonaTittonell, Pablo AdrianSiddique, Kadambot H. M.Ditzler, LenoraGroot, Jeroen C.J.AgroecosistemasObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleSostenibilidadAgricultura SostenibleAgroecosystemsSustainable Development GoalsSustainabilitySustainable AgriculturePercepciones de los AgricultoresAppreciating and dealing with the plurality of farmers’ perceptions and their contextual knowledge and perspectives of the functioning and performance of their agroecosystems— in other words, their ‘mental models’—is central for appropriate and sustainable agricultural development. In this respect, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) aim to eradicate poverty and food insecurity by 2030 by envisioning social inclusivity that incorporates the preferences and knowledge of key stakeholders, including farmers. Agricultural development interventions and policies directed at sustainable intensification (SI), however, do not sufficiently account for farmers’ perceptions, beliefs, priorities, or interests. Considering two contrasting agroecological systems in coastal Bangladesh, we used a fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM)-based simulation and sensitivity analysis of mental models of respondents of different farm types from 240 farm households. The employed FCM mental models were able to (1) capture farmers’ perception of farming system concepts and relationships for each farm type and (2) assess the impact of external interventions (drivers) on cropping intensification and food security. We decomposed the FCM models’ variance into the first-order sensitivity index (SVI) and total sensitivity index (TSI) using a winding stairs algorithm. Both within and outside polder areas, the highest TSIs (35–68%) were observed for effects of agricultural extension on changes in other concepts in the map, particularly food security and income (SI indicators), indicating the importance of extension programs for SI. Outside polders, drainage and micro-credit were also influential; within polders, the availability of micro-credit appears to affect farmer perceptions of SI indicators more than drainage. This study demonstrated the importance of reflection on the differing perspectives of farmers both within and outside polders to identify entry points for development interventions. In addition, the study underscores the need for micro-farming systems-level research to assess the context-based feasibility of introduced interventions as perceived by farmers of different farm types.Estación Experimental Agropecuaria BarilocheFil: Aravindakshan, Sreejith. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; HolandaFil: Krupnik, Timothy J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; BangladeshFil: Shahrin, Sumona. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; HolandaFil: Shahrin, Sumona. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; BangladeshFil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Groningen University. Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences; HolandaFil: Siddique, Kadambot H. M. University of Western Australia. The UWA Institute of Agriculture; AustraliaFil: Ditzler, Lenora. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; HolandaFil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; HolandaFil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. Bioversity International; ItaliaFil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; MexicoSpringer2021-11-15T10:33:38Z2021-11-15T10:33:38Z2021-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10770https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-021-01342-y1387-585X1573-2975https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01342-yEnvironment, Development and Sustainability 23 : 16588–16616 (2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología AgropecuariaengBangladesh .......... (nation) (World, Asia)1000105info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:45:24Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/10770instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:24.989INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh |
title |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh |
spellingShingle |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh Aravindakshan, Sreejith Agroecosistemas Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Sostenibilidad Agricultura Sostenible Agroecosystems Sustainable Development Goals Sustainability Sustainable Agriculture Percepciones de los Agricultores |
title_short |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh |
title_full |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh |
title_fullStr |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh |
title_full_unstemmed |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh |
title_sort |
Socio‑cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Aravindakshan, Sreejith Krupnik, Timothy J. Shahrin, Sumona Tittonell, Pablo Adrian Siddique, Kadambot H. M. Ditzler, Lenora Groot, Jeroen C.J. |
author |
Aravindakshan, Sreejith |
author_facet |
Aravindakshan, Sreejith Krupnik, Timothy J. Shahrin, Sumona Tittonell, Pablo Adrian Siddique, Kadambot H. M. Ditzler, Lenora Groot, Jeroen C.J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Krupnik, Timothy J. Shahrin, Sumona Tittonell, Pablo Adrian Siddique, Kadambot H. M. Ditzler, Lenora Groot, Jeroen C.J. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Agroecosistemas Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Sostenibilidad Agricultura Sostenible Agroecosystems Sustainable Development Goals Sustainability Sustainable Agriculture Percepciones de los Agricultores |
topic |
Agroecosistemas Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Sostenibilidad Agricultura Sostenible Agroecosystems Sustainable Development Goals Sustainability Sustainable Agriculture Percepciones de los Agricultores |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Appreciating and dealing with the plurality of farmers’ perceptions and their contextual knowledge and perspectives of the functioning and performance of their agroecosystems— in other words, their ‘mental models’—is central for appropriate and sustainable agricultural development. In this respect, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) aim to eradicate poverty and food insecurity by 2030 by envisioning social inclusivity that incorporates the preferences and knowledge of key stakeholders, including farmers. Agricultural development interventions and policies directed at sustainable intensification (SI), however, do not sufficiently account for farmers’ perceptions, beliefs, priorities, or interests. Considering two contrasting agroecological systems in coastal Bangladesh, we used a fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM)-based simulation and sensitivity analysis of mental models of respondents of different farm types from 240 farm households. The employed FCM mental models were able to (1) capture farmers’ perception of farming system concepts and relationships for each farm type and (2) assess the impact of external interventions (drivers) on cropping intensification and food security. We decomposed the FCM models’ variance into the first-order sensitivity index (SVI) and total sensitivity index (TSI) using a winding stairs algorithm. Both within and outside polder areas, the highest TSIs (35–68%) were observed for effects of agricultural extension on changes in other concepts in the map, particularly food security and income (SI indicators), indicating the importance of extension programs for SI. Outside polders, drainage and micro-credit were also influential; within polders, the availability of micro-credit appears to affect farmer perceptions of SI indicators more than drainage. This study demonstrated the importance of reflection on the differing perspectives of farmers both within and outside polders to identify entry points for development interventions. In addition, the study underscores the need for micro-farming systems-level research to assess the context-based feasibility of introduced interventions as perceived by farmers of different farm types. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche Fil: Aravindakshan, Sreejith. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda Fil: Krupnik, Timothy J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; Bangladesh Fil: Shahrin, Sumona. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda Fil: Shahrin, Sumona. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; Bangladesh Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Groningen University. Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences; Holanda Fil: Siddique, Kadambot H. M. University of Western Australia. The UWA Institute of Agriculture; Australia Fil: Ditzler, Lenora. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda Fil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. Wageningen University. Farming Systems Ecology Group; Holanda Fil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. Bioversity International; Italia Fil: Groot, Jeroen C.J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; Mexico |
description |
Appreciating and dealing with the plurality of farmers’ perceptions and their contextual knowledge and perspectives of the functioning and performance of their agroecosystems— in other words, their ‘mental models’—is central for appropriate and sustainable agricultural development. In this respect, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) aim to eradicate poverty and food insecurity by 2030 by envisioning social inclusivity that incorporates the preferences and knowledge of key stakeholders, including farmers. Agricultural development interventions and policies directed at sustainable intensification (SI), however, do not sufficiently account for farmers’ perceptions, beliefs, priorities, or interests. Considering two contrasting agroecological systems in coastal Bangladesh, we used a fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM)-based simulation and sensitivity analysis of mental models of respondents of different farm types from 240 farm households. The employed FCM mental models were able to (1) capture farmers’ perception of farming system concepts and relationships for each farm type and (2) assess the impact of external interventions (drivers) on cropping intensification and food security. We decomposed the FCM models’ variance into the first-order sensitivity index (SVI) and total sensitivity index (TSI) using a winding stairs algorithm. Both within and outside polder areas, the highest TSIs (35–68%) were observed for effects of agricultural extension on changes in other concepts in the map, particularly food security and income (SI indicators), indicating the importance of extension programs for SI. Outside polders, drainage and micro-credit were also influential; within polders, the availability of micro-credit appears to affect farmer perceptions of SI indicators more than drainage. This study demonstrated the importance of reflection on the differing perspectives of farmers both within and outside polders to identify entry points for development interventions. In addition, the study underscores the need for micro-farming systems-level research to assess the context-based feasibility of introduced interventions as perceived by farmers of different farm types. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-15T10:33:38Z 2021-11-15T10:33:38Z 2021-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10770 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-021-01342-y 1387-585X 1573-2975 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01342-y |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10770 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-021-01342-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01342-y |
identifier_str_mv |
1387-585X 1573-2975 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Bangladesh .......... (nation) (World, Asia) 1000105 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Environment, Development and Sustainability 23 : 16588–16616 (2021) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619159995940864 |
score |
12.559606 |