Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland

Autores
Vangeli, Sebastián; Cardenas, Laura M.; Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela; Chadwick, Dave R.; Krol, Dominika; Thorman, Rachel E.; Lanigan, Gary J.; Misselbrook, Tom H.
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
According to the available guidelines, good practices for calculating nitrous oxide (N2O) emission factors (EFs) for livestock excreta and manure application include that sampling duration should be of at least one year after the nitrogen (N) application or deposition. However, the available experimental data suggest that in many cases most emissions are concentrated in the first months following N application. Therefore resources could be better deployed by measuring more intensively during a shorter period. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the N2O flux in the period directly after N application to the annual net emission. We used a database of 100 year-long plot experiments from different excreted-N sources (dung, urine, farmyard manure and slurry) used to derive EFs for the UK and Ireland. We explored different shorter potential measurement periods that could be used as proxies for cumulative annual emissions. The analysis showed that the majority of emissions occur in the first months after application, especially in experiments that i) had urine as the N source, ii) had spring N application, iii) were conducted on fine-textured soils, or iv) showed high annual emissions magnitude. Experiments that showed a smaller percentage of emissions in the first months also had a low magnitude of annual net emissions (below 370 gN2O–N ha−1 year−1), so the impact of measuring during a shorter period would not greatly influence the calculated EF. Accurate EF estimations were obtained by measuring for at least 60 days for urine (underestimation: 7.1%), 120 days for dung and slurry (4.7 and 5.1%) and 180 days for FYM (1.4%). At least in temperate climates, these results are promising in terms of being able to estimate annual N2O fluxes accurately by collecting data for less than 12 months, with significant resource-saving when conducting experiments towards developing country-specific EFs.
Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Ingenieria Agricola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; Argentina
Fil: Cardenas, Laura. Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department. Rothamsted Research; Reino Unido.
Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Chadwick, Dave R. Bangor University. School of Natural Sciences; Reino Unido
Fil: Krol, Dominika. Johnstown Castle. Environment, Soils and Land Use Department; Irlanda
Fil: Thorman, Rachel E. ADAS Boxworth; Reino Unido.
Fil: Lanigan, Gary J. Johnstown Castle. Environment, Soils and Land Use Department; Irlanda
Fil: Misselbrook, Tom H. Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department. Rothamsted Research; Reino Unido.
Fuente
Journal of Environmental Management 322 : 116037 (November 2022)
Materia
Greenhouse Gases
Climate Change
Nitrogen Cycle
Grasslands
Agriculture
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Cambio Climático
Ciclo del Nitrógeno
Praderas
Agricultura
Inventory
Inventario
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12891

id INTADig_8cd931af64d935a000e20487472888a7
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12891
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and IrelandVangeli, SebastiánCardenas, Laura M.Posse Beaulieu, GabrielaChadwick, Dave R.Krol, DominikaThorman, Rachel E.Lanigan, Gary J.Misselbrook, Tom H.Greenhouse GasesClimate ChangeNitrogen CycleGrasslandsAgricultureGases de Efecto InvernaderoCambio ClimáticoCiclo del NitrógenoPraderasAgriculturaInventoryInventarioAccording to the available guidelines, good practices for calculating nitrous oxide (N2O) emission factors (EFs) for livestock excreta and manure application include that sampling duration should be of at least one year after the nitrogen (N) application or deposition. However, the available experimental data suggest that in many cases most emissions are concentrated in the first months following N application. Therefore resources could be better deployed by measuring more intensively during a shorter period. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the N2O flux in the period directly after N application to the annual net emission. We used a database of 100 year-long plot experiments from different excreted-N sources (dung, urine, farmyard manure and slurry) used to derive EFs for the UK and Ireland. We explored different shorter potential measurement periods that could be used as proxies for cumulative annual emissions. The analysis showed that the majority of emissions occur in the first months after application, especially in experiments that i) had urine as the N source, ii) had spring N application, iii) were conducted on fine-textured soils, or iv) showed high annual emissions magnitude. Experiments that showed a smaller percentage of emissions in the first months also had a low magnitude of annual net emissions (below 370 gN2O–N ha−1 year−1), so the impact of measuring during a shorter period would not greatly influence the calculated EF. Accurate EF estimations were obtained by measuring for at least 60 days for urine (underestimation: 7.1%), 120 days for dung and slurry (4.7 and 5.1%) and 180 days for FYM (1.4%). At least in temperate climates, these results are promising in terms of being able to estimate annual N2O fluxes accurately by collecting data for less than 12 months, with significant resource-saving when conducting experiments towards developing country-specific EFs.Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Ingenieria Agricola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; ArgentinaFil: Cardenas, Laura. Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department. Rothamsted Research; Reino Unido.Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Chadwick, Dave R. Bangor University. School of Natural Sciences; Reino UnidoFil: Krol, Dominika. Johnstown Castle. Environment, Soils and Land Use Department; IrlandaFil: Thorman, Rachel E. ADAS Boxworth; Reino Unido.Fil: Lanigan, Gary J. Johnstown Castle. Environment, Soils and Land Use Department; IrlandaFil: Misselbrook, Tom H. Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department. Rothamsted Research; Reino Unido.Elsevier2022-09-15T13:01:16Z2022-09-15T13:01:16Z2022-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12891https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03014797220161030301-4797https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116037Journal of Environmental Management 322 : 116037 (November 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:45:43Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/12891instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:43.86INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
title Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
spellingShingle Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
Vangeli, Sebastián
Greenhouse Gases
Climate Change
Nitrogen Cycle
Grasslands
Agriculture
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Cambio Climático
Ciclo del Nitrógeno
Praderas
Agricultura
Inventory
Inventario
title_short Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
title_full Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
title_fullStr Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
title_sort Revisiting sampling duration to estimate N2O emission factors for manure application and cattle excreta deposition for the UK and Ireland
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vangeli, Sebastián
Cardenas, Laura M.
Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela
Chadwick, Dave R.
Krol, Dominika
Thorman, Rachel E.
Lanigan, Gary J.
Misselbrook, Tom H.
author Vangeli, Sebastián
author_facet Vangeli, Sebastián
Cardenas, Laura M.
Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela
Chadwick, Dave R.
Krol, Dominika
Thorman, Rachel E.
Lanigan, Gary J.
Misselbrook, Tom H.
author_role author
author2 Cardenas, Laura M.
Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela
Chadwick, Dave R.
Krol, Dominika
Thorman, Rachel E.
Lanigan, Gary J.
Misselbrook, Tom H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Greenhouse Gases
Climate Change
Nitrogen Cycle
Grasslands
Agriculture
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Cambio Climático
Ciclo del Nitrógeno
Praderas
Agricultura
Inventory
Inventario
topic Greenhouse Gases
Climate Change
Nitrogen Cycle
Grasslands
Agriculture
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Cambio Climático
Ciclo del Nitrógeno
Praderas
Agricultura
Inventory
Inventario
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv According to the available guidelines, good practices for calculating nitrous oxide (N2O) emission factors (EFs) for livestock excreta and manure application include that sampling duration should be of at least one year after the nitrogen (N) application or deposition. However, the available experimental data suggest that in many cases most emissions are concentrated in the first months following N application. Therefore resources could be better deployed by measuring more intensively during a shorter period. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the N2O flux in the period directly after N application to the annual net emission. We used a database of 100 year-long plot experiments from different excreted-N sources (dung, urine, farmyard manure and slurry) used to derive EFs for the UK and Ireland. We explored different shorter potential measurement periods that could be used as proxies for cumulative annual emissions. The analysis showed that the majority of emissions occur in the first months after application, especially in experiments that i) had urine as the N source, ii) had spring N application, iii) were conducted on fine-textured soils, or iv) showed high annual emissions magnitude. Experiments that showed a smaller percentage of emissions in the first months also had a low magnitude of annual net emissions (below 370 gN2O–N ha−1 year−1), so the impact of measuring during a shorter period would not greatly influence the calculated EF. Accurate EF estimations were obtained by measuring for at least 60 days for urine (underestimation: 7.1%), 120 days for dung and slurry (4.7 and 5.1%) and 180 days for FYM (1.4%). At least in temperate climates, these results are promising in terms of being able to estimate annual N2O fluxes accurately by collecting data for less than 12 months, with significant resource-saving when conducting experiments towards developing country-specific EFs.
Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Ingenieria Agricola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; Argentina
Fil: Cardenas, Laura. Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department. Rothamsted Research; Reino Unido.
Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Chadwick, Dave R. Bangor University. School of Natural Sciences; Reino Unido
Fil: Krol, Dominika. Johnstown Castle. Environment, Soils and Land Use Department; Irlanda
Fil: Thorman, Rachel E. ADAS Boxworth; Reino Unido.
Fil: Lanigan, Gary J. Johnstown Castle. Environment, Soils and Land Use Department; Irlanda
Fil: Misselbrook, Tom H. Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department. Rothamsted Research; Reino Unido.
description According to the available guidelines, good practices for calculating nitrous oxide (N2O) emission factors (EFs) for livestock excreta and manure application include that sampling duration should be of at least one year after the nitrogen (N) application or deposition. However, the available experimental data suggest that in many cases most emissions are concentrated in the first months following N application. Therefore resources could be better deployed by measuring more intensively during a shorter period. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the N2O flux in the period directly after N application to the annual net emission. We used a database of 100 year-long plot experiments from different excreted-N sources (dung, urine, farmyard manure and slurry) used to derive EFs for the UK and Ireland. We explored different shorter potential measurement periods that could be used as proxies for cumulative annual emissions. The analysis showed that the majority of emissions occur in the first months after application, especially in experiments that i) had urine as the N source, ii) had spring N application, iii) were conducted on fine-textured soils, or iv) showed high annual emissions magnitude. Experiments that showed a smaller percentage of emissions in the first months also had a low magnitude of annual net emissions (below 370 gN2O–N ha−1 year−1), so the impact of measuring during a shorter period would not greatly influence the calculated EF. Accurate EF estimations were obtained by measuring for at least 60 days for urine (underestimation: 7.1%), 120 days for dung and slurry (4.7 and 5.1%) and 180 days for FYM (1.4%). At least in temperate climates, these results are promising in terms of being able to estimate annual N2O fluxes accurately by collecting data for less than 12 months, with significant resource-saving when conducting experiments towards developing country-specific EFs.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-15T13:01:16Z
2022-09-15T13:01:16Z
2022-08-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12891
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722016103
0301-4797
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116037
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12891
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722016103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116037
identifier_str_mv 0301-4797
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Environmental Management 322 : 116037 (November 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619169226555392
score 12.559606