Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops

Autores
Maltese, Nicolás; Melchiori, Ricardo Jose; Maddonni, Gustavo Angel; Ferreyra, J.M.; Caviglia, Octavio
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Late sowing dates of maize are widely adopted in the Pampas region of Argentina, stabilising grain yields due to a more favourable water balance around flowering. However, late-sown crops are exposed to high soil N availabilities (Nav), high temperatures during the pre-flowering period and declining photo-thermal conditions during grain filling, which may affect nitrogen use efficiency (NUE, kg of grain per kg of Nav). These effects could be exerted through nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE, kg of N uptake per kg of Nav) and/or nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE, kg of grain per kg of N uptake). Environmental conditions could affect i) pre (Nuptpre) and/or post-flowering N uptake (Nuptpost) and, consequently, NupE and ii) the determinants of NutE, such as N harvest index (NHI) and N source per grain. Early- and late-sown maize were cropped in order to analyse i) grain yield, Nav and NUE and ii) relationships among NUE and related-N efficiencies. The experiments were carried out in Paraná (31°48′ S 60°32′ W), Argentina, during 2014–2015 and 2015–2016. Treatments were combinations of two sowing dates (early and late), three N rates (0, 90, and 270 kg N ha−1) and two genotypes (DK 70-10 VT3P and DK 73-10 VT3P). NUE decreased in late-sown crops (ca. 32 to 26 kg grain kg Nav−1), mediated by lower grain yields (ca. 8564 kg ha−1 and 7832 kg ha−1 in early- and late-sown crops, respectively) and higher Nav (ca. 267–312 kg Nav ha−1). DK 73-10 VT3P exhibited the highest NUE (ca. 31 kg grain kg Nav−1) and NutE (ca. 63 kg grain kg Nupt−1). N rate affected more strongly Nav than grain yield; and there was a greater association between NUE and NupE (P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.72) relative to NutE (P < 0.01, R2 = 0.65). In both sowing dates, Nuptpre had a positive impact on NupE, which strongly declined with N rate especially in late-sown crops. The lower NutE of late-sown crops (66 vs. 52 kg grain kg Nupt−1 in early and late sowing dates, respectively) was related to the highest post-flowering N source per grain (2.5 vs. 3.5 mg N grain−1). Thus, our study highlights the components of N economy of late-sown crops with the highest impact on NUE, i.e., Nuptpre and NutE. Therefore, nutritional management of late-sown maize crops should be focused on these NUE components. High plant densities could be useful to increase Nuptpre. Finally, the choice of a genotype with high NutE appears as a valid strategy to mitigate NUE reductions, promoted by the high Nav typical of late sowing dates.
EEA Paraná
Fil: Maltese, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina
Fil: Melchiori, Ricardo Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina.
Fil: Maddonni, Gustavo Angel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Fisiología y Ecología Vinculado a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Ferreyra, J.M. Monsanto Argentina. Equipo de Desarrollo Tecnológico; Argentina
Fil: Caviglia, Octavio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina
Fuente
Field Crops Research 231 : 40-50 (February 2019)
Materia
Maíz
Fecha de Siembra
Nitrógeno
Retención Nitrogenada
Rendimiento
Maize
Sowing Date
Nitrogen
Nitrogen Retention
Yields
Siembra Tardía
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3980

id INTADig_836004e28d0da98ed5be9de5c30ab20b
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3980
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize cropsMaltese, NicolásMelchiori, Ricardo JoseMaddonni, Gustavo AngelFerreyra, J.M.Caviglia, OctavioMaízFecha de SiembraNitrógenoRetención NitrogenadaRendimientoMaizeSowing DateNitrogenNitrogen RetentionYieldsSiembra TardíaLate sowing dates of maize are widely adopted in the Pampas region of Argentina, stabilising grain yields due to a more favourable water balance around flowering. However, late-sown crops are exposed to high soil N availabilities (Nav), high temperatures during the pre-flowering period and declining photo-thermal conditions during grain filling, which may affect nitrogen use efficiency (NUE, kg of grain per kg of Nav). These effects could be exerted through nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE, kg of N uptake per kg of Nav) and/or nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE, kg of grain per kg of N uptake). Environmental conditions could affect i) pre (Nuptpre) and/or post-flowering N uptake (Nuptpost) and, consequently, NupE and ii) the determinants of NutE, such as N harvest index (NHI) and N source per grain. Early- and late-sown maize were cropped in order to analyse i) grain yield, Nav and NUE and ii) relationships among NUE and related-N efficiencies. The experiments were carried out in Paraná (31°48′ S 60°32′ W), Argentina, during 2014–2015 and 2015–2016. Treatments were combinations of two sowing dates (early and late), three N rates (0, 90, and 270 kg N ha−1) and two genotypes (DK 70-10 VT3P and DK 73-10 VT3P). NUE decreased in late-sown crops (ca. 32 to 26 kg grain kg Nav−1), mediated by lower grain yields (ca. 8564 kg ha−1 and 7832 kg ha−1 in early- and late-sown crops, respectively) and higher Nav (ca. 267–312 kg Nav ha−1). DK 73-10 VT3P exhibited the highest NUE (ca. 31 kg grain kg Nav−1) and NutE (ca. 63 kg grain kg Nupt−1). N rate affected more strongly Nav than grain yield; and there was a greater association between NUE and NupE (P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.72) relative to NutE (P < 0.01, R2 = 0.65). In both sowing dates, Nuptpre had a positive impact on NupE, which strongly declined with N rate especially in late-sown crops. The lower NutE of late-sown crops (66 vs. 52 kg grain kg Nupt−1 in early and late sowing dates, respectively) was related to the highest post-flowering N source per grain (2.5 vs. 3.5 mg N grain−1). Thus, our study highlights the components of N economy of late-sown crops with the highest impact on NUE, i.e., Nuptpre and NutE. Therefore, nutritional management of late-sown maize crops should be focused on these NUE components. High plant densities could be useful to increase Nuptpre. Finally, the choice of a genotype with high NutE appears as a valid strategy to mitigate NUE reductions, promoted by the high Nav typical of late sowing dates.EEA ParanáFil: Maltese, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; ArgentinaFil: Melchiori, Ricardo Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina.Fil: Maddonni, Gustavo Angel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Fisiología y Ecología Vinculado a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Ferreyra, J.M. Monsanto Argentina. Equipo de Desarrollo Tecnológico; ArgentinaFil: Caviglia, Octavio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; ArgentinaElsevier2018-11-28T12:34:54Z2018-11-28T12:34:54Z2018-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429018309560http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/39800378-42901872-6852https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.11.007Field Crops Research 231 : 40-50 (February 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:47:42Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/3980instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:42.95INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
title Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
spellingShingle Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
Maltese, Nicolás
Maíz
Fecha de Siembra
Nitrógeno
Retención Nitrogenada
Rendimiento
Maize
Sowing Date
Nitrogen
Nitrogen Retention
Yields
Siembra Tardía
title_short Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
title_full Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
title_fullStr Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
title_full_unstemmed Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
title_sort Nitrogen economy of early and late-sown maize crops
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Maltese, Nicolás
Melchiori, Ricardo Jose
Maddonni, Gustavo Angel
Ferreyra, J.M.
Caviglia, Octavio
author Maltese, Nicolás
author_facet Maltese, Nicolás
Melchiori, Ricardo Jose
Maddonni, Gustavo Angel
Ferreyra, J.M.
Caviglia, Octavio
author_role author
author2 Melchiori, Ricardo Jose
Maddonni, Gustavo Angel
Ferreyra, J.M.
Caviglia, Octavio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Maíz
Fecha de Siembra
Nitrógeno
Retención Nitrogenada
Rendimiento
Maize
Sowing Date
Nitrogen
Nitrogen Retention
Yields
Siembra Tardía
topic Maíz
Fecha de Siembra
Nitrógeno
Retención Nitrogenada
Rendimiento
Maize
Sowing Date
Nitrogen
Nitrogen Retention
Yields
Siembra Tardía
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Late sowing dates of maize are widely adopted in the Pampas region of Argentina, stabilising grain yields due to a more favourable water balance around flowering. However, late-sown crops are exposed to high soil N availabilities (Nav), high temperatures during the pre-flowering period and declining photo-thermal conditions during grain filling, which may affect nitrogen use efficiency (NUE, kg of grain per kg of Nav). These effects could be exerted through nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE, kg of N uptake per kg of Nav) and/or nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE, kg of grain per kg of N uptake). Environmental conditions could affect i) pre (Nuptpre) and/or post-flowering N uptake (Nuptpost) and, consequently, NupE and ii) the determinants of NutE, such as N harvest index (NHI) and N source per grain. Early- and late-sown maize were cropped in order to analyse i) grain yield, Nav and NUE and ii) relationships among NUE and related-N efficiencies. The experiments were carried out in Paraná (31°48′ S 60°32′ W), Argentina, during 2014–2015 and 2015–2016. Treatments were combinations of two sowing dates (early and late), three N rates (0, 90, and 270 kg N ha−1) and two genotypes (DK 70-10 VT3P and DK 73-10 VT3P). NUE decreased in late-sown crops (ca. 32 to 26 kg grain kg Nav−1), mediated by lower grain yields (ca. 8564 kg ha−1 and 7832 kg ha−1 in early- and late-sown crops, respectively) and higher Nav (ca. 267–312 kg Nav ha−1). DK 73-10 VT3P exhibited the highest NUE (ca. 31 kg grain kg Nav−1) and NutE (ca. 63 kg grain kg Nupt−1). N rate affected more strongly Nav than grain yield; and there was a greater association between NUE and NupE (P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.72) relative to NutE (P < 0.01, R2 = 0.65). In both sowing dates, Nuptpre had a positive impact on NupE, which strongly declined with N rate especially in late-sown crops. The lower NutE of late-sown crops (66 vs. 52 kg grain kg Nupt−1 in early and late sowing dates, respectively) was related to the highest post-flowering N source per grain (2.5 vs. 3.5 mg N grain−1). Thus, our study highlights the components of N economy of late-sown crops with the highest impact on NUE, i.e., Nuptpre and NutE. Therefore, nutritional management of late-sown maize crops should be focused on these NUE components. High plant densities could be useful to increase Nuptpre. Finally, the choice of a genotype with high NutE appears as a valid strategy to mitigate NUE reductions, promoted by the high Nav typical of late sowing dates.
EEA Paraná
Fil: Maltese, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina
Fil: Melchiori, Ricardo Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina.
Fil: Maddonni, Gustavo Angel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Fisiología y Ecología Vinculado a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Ferreyra, J.M. Monsanto Argentina. Equipo de Desarrollo Tecnológico; Argentina
Fil: Caviglia, Octavio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina
description Late sowing dates of maize are widely adopted in the Pampas region of Argentina, stabilising grain yields due to a more favourable water balance around flowering. However, late-sown crops are exposed to high soil N availabilities (Nav), high temperatures during the pre-flowering period and declining photo-thermal conditions during grain filling, which may affect nitrogen use efficiency (NUE, kg of grain per kg of Nav). These effects could be exerted through nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE, kg of N uptake per kg of Nav) and/or nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE, kg of grain per kg of N uptake). Environmental conditions could affect i) pre (Nuptpre) and/or post-flowering N uptake (Nuptpost) and, consequently, NupE and ii) the determinants of NutE, such as N harvest index (NHI) and N source per grain. Early- and late-sown maize were cropped in order to analyse i) grain yield, Nav and NUE and ii) relationships among NUE and related-N efficiencies. The experiments were carried out in Paraná (31°48′ S 60°32′ W), Argentina, during 2014–2015 and 2015–2016. Treatments were combinations of two sowing dates (early and late), three N rates (0, 90, and 270 kg N ha−1) and two genotypes (DK 70-10 VT3P and DK 73-10 VT3P). NUE decreased in late-sown crops (ca. 32 to 26 kg grain kg Nav−1), mediated by lower grain yields (ca. 8564 kg ha−1 and 7832 kg ha−1 in early- and late-sown crops, respectively) and higher Nav (ca. 267–312 kg Nav ha−1). DK 73-10 VT3P exhibited the highest NUE (ca. 31 kg grain kg Nav−1) and NutE (ca. 63 kg grain kg Nupt−1). N rate affected more strongly Nav than grain yield; and there was a greater association between NUE and NupE (P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.72) relative to NutE (P < 0.01, R2 = 0.65). In both sowing dates, Nuptpre had a positive impact on NupE, which strongly declined with N rate especially in late-sown crops. The lower NutE of late-sown crops (66 vs. 52 kg grain kg Nupt−1 in early and late sowing dates, respectively) was related to the highest post-flowering N source per grain (2.5 vs. 3.5 mg N grain−1). Thus, our study highlights the components of N economy of late-sown crops with the highest impact on NUE, i.e., Nuptpre and NutE. Therefore, nutritional management of late-sown maize crops should be focused on these NUE components. High plant densities could be useful to increase Nuptpre. Finally, the choice of a genotype with high NutE appears as a valid strategy to mitigate NUE reductions, promoted by the high Nav typical of late sowing dates.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-28T12:34:54Z
2018-11-28T12:34:54Z
2018-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429018309560
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3980
0378-4290
1872-6852
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.11.007
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429018309560
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3980
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.11.007
identifier_str_mv 0378-4290
1872-6852
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Field Crops Research 231 : 40-50 (February 2019)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341361210097664
score 12.623145