Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon
- Autores
- Pinillos, Daniel; Poccard Chapuis, René; Bianchi, Felix J.J.A.; Corbeels, Marc; Timler, Carl A.; Tittonell, Pablo Adrian; Ramos Ballester, Maria Victoria; Schulte, Rogier P.
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Forest conservation on privately owned lands is a cornerstone of the Brazilian environmental policy framework. Brazilian legislation requires that all farms in the country maintain and protect forest areas known as Legal Reserves. Since Legal Reserves have major implications for forest conservation and agricultural production, it is key that we understand landholders’ perceptions towards Legal Reserves. We applied Q methodology to identify different perspectives of medium and large landholders on Legal Reserves and their relation to agricultural intensification in the municipality of Paragominas, eastern Amazon. We conducted 31 interviews in which landholders sorted 36 statements in a quasi-normal distribution array. Three groups of landholders were identified: 1) Land use planning enthusiasts (n = 16) were interested in zoning initiatives to explore alternative landscape designs and legislation that may deliver better conservation and production outcomes; 2) Agrochemical-based agriculture supporters (n = 7) held the most critical views against Legal Reserves and perceived their costs as higher than the potential environmental and life quality benefits; 3) Policy complacentmarket responders (n = 4) showed no interest in Legal Reserves reforms and were the most market driven group.. While Paragominas has achieved notable successes in halting large-scale deforestation through a social “Green Municipality” pact, addressing persisting forest degradation and fragmentation in the region remains a key priority. Local governance initiatives that account for multi-stakeholder perceptions on forest conservation can foster dialogue and mutual understanding to effectively conserve and restore Legal Reserves. Insights on large landholders’ perceptions on Legal Reserves can inform such governance processes to reconcile forest conservation and sustainable agricultural intensification in Paragominas.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche
Fil: Pinillos, Daniel. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda
Fil: Poccard Chapuis, René. University of Montpellier. Agroecology and Sustainable Intensification of Annual Crops; Francia
Fil: Bianchi, Felix J.J.A. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda
Fil: Corbeels, Marc. University of Montpellier. Agroecology and Sustainable Intensification of Annual Crops; Francia
Fil: Timler, Carl A. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda
Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Ramos Ballester, Maria Victoria. Universidad de Sao Paulo. Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture; Brasil
Fil: Schulte, Rogier P. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda - Fuente
- Forest Policy and Economics 129 : Art. 102504 (Agosto 2021)
- Materia
-
Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica
Protección Forestal
Amazonas (Brasil)
Reservas Forestales
Biodiversity Conservation
Forest Protection
Amazonas (Brazil)
Forest Reserves - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10635
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_7c73d2e4a0cf148d1b4cf13b3b38bae7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10635 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian AmazonPinillos, DanielPoccard Chapuis, RenéBianchi, Felix J.J.A.Corbeels, MarcTimler, Carl A.Tittonell, Pablo AdrianRamos Ballester, Maria VictoriaSchulte, Rogier P.Conservación de la Diversidad BiológicaProtección ForestalAmazonas (Brasil)Reservas ForestalesBiodiversity ConservationForest ProtectionAmazonas (Brazil)Forest ReservesForest conservation on privately owned lands is a cornerstone of the Brazilian environmental policy framework. Brazilian legislation requires that all farms in the country maintain and protect forest areas known as Legal Reserves. Since Legal Reserves have major implications for forest conservation and agricultural production, it is key that we understand landholders’ perceptions towards Legal Reserves. We applied Q methodology to identify different perspectives of medium and large landholders on Legal Reserves and their relation to agricultural intensification in the municipality of Paragominas, eastern Amazon. We conducted 31 interviews in which landholders sorted 36 statements in a quasi-normal distribution array. Three groups of landholders were identified: 1) Land use planning enthusiasts (n = 16) were interested in zoning initiatives to explore alternative landscape designs and legislation that may deliver better conservation and production outcomes; 2) Agrochemical-based agriculture supporters (n = 7) held the most critical views against Legal Reserves and perceived their costs as higher than the potential environmental and life quality benefits; 3) Policy complacentmarket responders (n = 4) showed no interest in Legal Reserves reforms and were the most market driven group.. While Paragominas has achieved notable successes in halting large-scale deforestation through a social “Green Municipality” pact, addressing persisting forest degradation and fragmentation in the region remains a key priority. Local governance initiatives that account for multi-stakeholder perceptions on forest conservation can foster dialogue and mutual understanding to effectively conserve and restore Legal Reserves. Insights on large landholders’ perceptions on Legal Reserves can inform such governance processes to reconcile forest conservation and sustainable agricultural intensification in Paragominas.Estación Experimental Agropecuaria BarilocheFil: Pinillos, Daniel. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; HolandaFil: Poccard Chapuis, René. University of Montpellier. Agroecology and Sustainable Intensification of Annual Crops; FranciaFil: Bianchi, Felix J.J.A. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; HolandaFil: Corbeels, Marc. University of Montpellier. Agroecology and Sustainable Intensification of Annual Crops; FranciaFil: Timler, Carl A. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; HolandaFil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Ramos Ballester, Maria Victoria. Universidad de Sao Paulo. Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture; BrasilFil: Schulte, Rogier P. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; HolandaElsevier2021-11-01T12:17:30Z2021-11-01T12:17:30Z2021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10635https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S13899341210011061389-9341https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102504Forest Policy and Economics 129 : Art. 102504 (Agosto 2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-11T10:23:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/10635instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-11 10:23:58.518INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon |
title |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon |
spellingShingle |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon Pinillos, Daniel Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica Protección Forestal Amazonas (Brasil) Reservas Forestales Biodiversity Conservation Forest Protection Amazonas (Brazil) Forest Reserves |
title_short |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon |
title_full |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon |
title_fullStr |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon |
title_full_unstemmed |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon |
title_sort |
Landholders’ perceptions on legal reserves and agricultural intensification: Diversity and implications for forest conservation in the eastern Brazilian Amazon |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pinillos, Daniel Poccard Chapuis, René Bianchi, Felix J.J.A. Corbeels, Marc Timler, Carl A. Tittonell, Pablo Adrian Ramos Ballester, Maria Victoria Schulte, Rogier P. |
author |
Pinillos, Daniel |
author_facet |
Pinillos, Daniel Poccard Chapuis, René Bianchi, Felix J.J.A. Corbeels, Marc Timler, Carl A. Tittonell, Pablo Adrian Ramos Ballester, Maria Victoria Schulte, Rogier P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Poccard Chapuis, René Bianchi, Felix J.J.A. Corbeels, Marc Timler, Carl A. Tittonell, Pablo Adrian Ramos Ballester, Maria Victoria Schulte, Rogier P. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica Protección Forestal Amazonas (Brasil) Reservas Forestales Biodiversity Conservation Forest Protection Amazonas (Brazil) Forest Reserves |
topic |
Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica Protección Forestal Amazonas (Brasil) Reservas Forestales Biodiversity Conservation Forest Protection Amazonas (Brazil) Forest Reserves |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Forest conservation on privately owned lands is a cornerstone of the Brazilian environmental policy framework. Brazilian legislation requires that all farms in the country maintain and protect forest areas known as Legal Reserves. Since Legal Reserves have major implications for forest conservation and agricultural production, it is key that we understand landholders’ perceptions towards Legal Reserves. We applied Q methodology to identify different perspectives of medium and large landholders on Legal Reserves and their relation to agricultural intensification in the municipality of Paragominas, eastern Amazon. We conducted 31 interviews in which landholders sorted 36 statements in a quasi-normal distribution array. Three groups of landholders were identified: 1) Land use planning enthusiasts (n = 16) were interested in zoning initiatives to explore alternative landscape designs and legislation that may deliver better conservation and production outcomes; 2) Agrochemical-based agriculture supporters (n = 7) held the most critical views against Legal Reserves and perceived their costs as higher than the potential environmental and life quality benefits; 3) Policy complacentmarket responders (n = 4) showed no interest in Legal Reserves reforms and were the most market driven group.. While Paragominas has achieved notable successes in halting large-scale deforestation through a social “Green Municipality” pact, addressing persisting forest degradation and fragmentation in the region remains a key priority. Local governance initiatives that account for multi-stakeholder perceptions on forest conservation can foster dialogue and mutual understanding to effectively conserve and restore Legal Reserves. Insights on large landholders’ perceptions on Legal Reserves can inform such governance processes to reconcile forest conservation and sustainable agricultural intensification in Paragominas. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche Fil: Pinillos, Daniel. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda Fil: Poccard Chapuis, René. University of Montpellier. Agroecology and Sustainable Intensification of Annual Crops; Francia Fil: Bianchi, Felix J.J.A. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda Fil: Corbeels, Marc. University of Montpellier. Agroecology and Sustainable Intensification of Annual Crops; Francia Fil: Timler, Carl A. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Tittonell, Pablo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Ramos Ballester, Maria Victoria. Universidad de Sao Paulo. Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture; Brasil Fil: Schulte, Rogier P. Wageningen University & Research. Farming Systems Ecology; Holanda |
description |
Forest conservation on privately owned lands is a cornerstone of the Brazilian environmental policy framework. Brazilian legislation requires that all farms in the country maintain and protect forest areas known as Legal Reserves. Since Legal Reserves have major implications for forest conservation and agricultural production, it is key that we understand landholders’ perceptions towards Legal Reserves. We applied Q methodology to identify different perspectives of medium and large landholders on Legal Reserves and their relation to agricultural intensification in the municipality of Paragominas, eastern Amazon. We conducted 31 interviews in which landholders sorted 36 statements in a quasi-normal distribution array. Three groups of landholders were identified: 1) Land use planning enthusiasts (n = 16) were interested in zoning initiatives to explore alternative landscape designs and legislation that may deliver better conservation and production outcomes; 2) Agrochemical-based agriculture supporters (n = 7) held the most critical views against Legal Reserves and perceived their costs as higher than the potential environmental and life quality benefits; 3) Policy complacentmarket responders (n = 4) showed no interest in Legal Reserves reforms and were the most market driven group.. While Paragominas has achieved notable successes in halting large-scale deforestation through a social “Green Municipality” pact, addressing persisting forest degradation and fragmentation in the region remains a key priority. Local governance initiatives that account for multi-stakeholder perceptions on forest conservation can foster dialogue and mutual understanding to effectively conserve and restore Legal Reserves. Insights on large landholders’ perceptions on Legal Reserves can inform such governance processes to reconcile forest conservation and sustainable agricultural intensification in Paragominas. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-01T12:17:30Z 2021-11-01T12:17:30Z 2021 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10635 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934121001106 1389-9341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102504 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10635 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934121001106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102504 |
identifier_str_mv |
1389-9341 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Forest Policy and Economics 129 : Art. 102504 (Agosto 2021) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842975502471528448 |
score |
12.993085 |