Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production

Autores
Scheneiter, Jorge Omar; Camarasa, Jonatan Nicolás; Aperlo, Daniel; Ferrari, Martín Alejandro; Nalino, Martín; Beribe, Maria Jose
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Tall fescue is the main perennial grass of the pastures of the temperate region of Argentina. However, after flowering in spring, tall fescue loses productivity and quality. Based on this, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different post‐grazing mechanical cutting managements on the forage mass, leaf proportion, stocking rate, liveweight gain and liveweight production of tall fescue pastures. The treatments were post‐grazing mechanical cutting at anthesis (FC), post‐grazing mechanical cutting throughout spring and summer (SSC), and no post‐grazing mechanical cutting (NC). The experiment was performed from 2011 to 2014 in Argentina. The greatest and lowest forage mass were determined in September–November and May–September respectively. The leaf proportion of the SSC treatment was greater than that of the NC treatment, except in September–November. NC had higher stocking rate and lower liveweight gain than SSC, and neither NC nor SSC differed from FC. The liveweight production of the treatments was characterized by a trade off between stocking rate and liveweight gain. We conclude that FC is an attractive management because, with a single post‐grazing cutting, swards remain productive and leafy.
EEA Pergamino
Fil: Scheneiter, Jorge Omar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA). Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias, Naturales y Ambientales(ECANA); Argentina
Fil: Camarasa, Jonatan Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA). Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias, Naturales y Ambientales(ECANA); Argentina
Fil: Aperlo, Daniel. Private Company, Chacabuco, Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Ferrari, Martín Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Pedro; Argentina
Fil: Nalino, Martín. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Beribe, María José. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Estadística; Argentina
Fuente
Grass and forage science 74 (3) : 1-9. (September 2019)
Materia
Forrajes
Pastoreo
Festuca arundinacea
Floración
Calidad
Forage
Grazing
Flowering
Quality
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5879
Acceder
id INTADig_7640e5455c6e14cde1ec764a8a365b8e
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5879
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight productionScheneiter, Jorge OmarCamarasa, Jonatan NicolásAperlo, DanielFerrari, Martín AlejandroNalino, MartínBeribe, Maria JoseForrajesPastoreoFestuca arundinaceaFloraciónCalidadForageGrazingFloweringQualityTall fescue is the main perennial grass of the pastures of the temperate region of Argentina. However, after flowering in spring, tall fescue loses productivity and quality. Based on this, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different post‐grazing mechanical cutting managements on the forage mass, leaf proportion, stocking rate, liveweight gain and liveweight production of tall fescue pastures. The treatments were post‐grazing mechanical cutting at anthesis (FC), post‐grazing mechanical cutting throughout spring and summer (SSC), and no post‐grazing mechanical cutting (NC). The experiment was performed from 2011 to 2014 in Argentina. The greatest and lowest forage mass were determined in September–November and May–September respectively. The leaf proportion of the SSC treatment was greater than that of the NC treatment, except in September–November. NC had higher stocking rate and lower liveweight gain than SSC, and neither NC nor SSC differed from FC. The liveweight production of the treatments was characterized by a trade off between stocking rate and liveweight gain. We conclude that FC is an attractive management because, with a single post‐grazing cutting, swards remain productive and leafy.EEA PergaminoFil: Scheneiter, Jorge Omar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA). Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias, Naturales y Ambientales(ECANA); ArgentinaFil: Camarasa, Jonatan Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA). Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias, Naturales y Ambientales(ECANA); ArgentinaFil: Aperlo, Daniel. Private Company, Chacabuco, Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Ferrari, Martín Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Pedro; ArgentinaFil: Nalino, Martín. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Beribe, María José. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Estadística; Argentina2019-09-16T18:29:09Z2019-09-16T18:29:09Z2019-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gfs.12447http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/58791365-2494 (online)https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12447Grass and forage science 74 (3) : 1-9. (September 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:45Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/5879instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:46.084INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
title Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
spellingShingle Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
Scheneiter, Jorge Omar
Forrajes
Pastoreo
Festuca arundinacea
Floración
Calidad
Forage
Grazing
Flowering
Quality
title_short Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
title_full Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
title_fullStr Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
title_full_unstemmed Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
title_sort Post-grazing cutting management in tall fescue affects the sward structure, forage and liveweight production
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Scheneiter, Jorge Omar
Camarasa, Jonatan Nicolás
Aperlo, Daniel
Ferrari, Martín Alejandro
Nalino, Martín
Beribe, Maria Jose
author Scheneiter, Jorge Omar
author_facet Scheneiter, Jorge Omar
Camarasa, Jonatan Nicolás
Aperlo, Daniel
Ferrari, Martín Alejandro
Nalino, Martín
Beribe, Maria Jose
author_role author
author2 Camarasa, Jonatan Nicolás
Aperlo, Daniel
Ferrari, Martín Alejandro
Nalino, Martín
Beribe, Maria Jose
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Forrajes
Pastoreo
Festuca arundinacea
Floración
Calidad
Forage
Grazing
Flowering
Quality
topic Forrajes
Pastoreo
Festuca arundinacea
Floración
Calidad
Forage
Grazing
Flowering
Quality
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Tall fescue is the main perennial grass of the pastures of the temperate region of Argentina. However, after flowering in spring, tall fescue loses productivity and quality. Based on this, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different post‐grazing mechanical cutting managements on the forage mass, leaf proportion, stocking rate, liveweight gain and liveweight production of tall fescue pastures. The treatments were post‐grazing mechanical cutting at anthesis (FC), post‐grazing mechanical cutting throughout spring and summer (SSC), and no post‐grazing mechanical cutting (NC). The experiment was performed from 2011 to 2014 in Argentina. The greatest and lowest forage mass were determined in September–November and May–September respectively. The leaf proportion of the SSC treatment was greater than that of the NC treatment, except in September–November. NC had higher stocking rate and lower liveweight gain than SSC, and neither NC nor SSC differed from FC. The liveweight production of the treatments was characterized by a trade off between stocking rate and liveweight gain. We conclude that FC is an attractive management because, with a single post‐grazing cutting, swards remain productive and leafy.
EEA Pergamino
Fil: Scheneiter, Jorge Omar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA). Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias, Naturales y Ambientales(ECANA); Argentina
Fil: Camarasa, Jonatan Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA). Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias, Naturales y Ambientales(ECANA); Argentina
Fil: Aperlo, Daniel. Private Company, Chacabuco, Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Ferrari, Martín Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Pedro; Argentina
Fil: Nalino, Martín. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Beribe, María José. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Estadística; Argentina
description Tall fescue is the main perennial grass of the pastures of the temperate region of Argentina. However, after flowering in spring, tall fescue loses productivity and quality. Based on this, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different post‐grazing mechanical cutting managements on the forage mass, leaf proportion, stocking rate, liveweight gain and liveweight production of tall fescue pastures. The treatments were post‐grazing mechanical cutting at anthesis (FC), post‐grazing mechanical cutting throughout spring and summer (SSC), and no post‐grazing mechanical cutting (NC). The experiment was performed from 2011 to 2014 in Argentina. The greatest and lowest forage mass were determined in September–November and May–September respectively. The leaf proportion of the SSC treatment was greater than that of the NC treatment, except in September–November. NC had higher stocking rate and lower liveweight gain than SSC, and neither NC nor SSC differed from FC. The liveweight production of the treatments was characterized by a trade off between stocking rate and liveweight gain. We conclude that FC is an attractive management because, with a single post‐grazing cutting, swards remain productive and leafy.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-16T18:29:09Z
2019-09-16T18:29:09Z
2019-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gfs.12447
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5879
1365-2494 (online)
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12447
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gfs.12447
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5879
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12447
identifier_str_mv 1365-2494 (online)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Grass and forage science 74 (3) : 1-9. (September 2019)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619137462042624
score 12.559606

Publicaciones similares