Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest

Autores
Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel; Binkley, Dan; Bauerle, William
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that differences in production ecology underlie the observed patterns of growth dominance within stands. We explored the production ecology in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. Growth dominance was strongly negative (−0.22) and was the outcome of a less-than-proportional increase of tree growth as a function of tree size. Dominant trees were almost 5 times larger than suppressed trees (1024 vs. 211 kg tree−1) but grew only about 2 times more than suppressed trees (4.3 vs. 1.9 kg tree−1 year−1). Dominant trees captured a lessthan-proportional amount of light relative to their size (90.4 vs. 20.9 GJ year−1 tree−1) and light use efficiency declined with tree size. Suppressed trees were twice as efficient as dominant trees (0.11 vs. 0.05 kg[wood] GJ [PAR]−1). Our results highlight the link between growth dominance, competition for resources, and the pattern of light use efficiency among large versus small trees.
EEA Delta del Paraná
Fil: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná; Argentina. Colorado State University. Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Binkley, Dan. Northern Arizona University. School of Forestry; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bauerle, William. Colorado State University. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Forest Ecology and Management 460 : 117891 (2020)
Materia
Bosques
Pinus
Pinares
Pinus Ponderosa
Crecimiento
Ecología
Forests
Pine Forests
Growth
Ecology
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6779

id INTADig_73e085582dfe05d191374159ae997e06
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6779
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forestFernandez Tschieder, EzequielBinkley, DanBauerle, WilliamBosquesPinusPinaresPinus PonderosaCrecimientoEcologíaForestsPine ForestsGrowthEcologyThe growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that differences in production ecology underlie the observed patterns of growth dominance within stands. We explored the production ecology in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. Growth dominance was strongly negative (−0.22) and was the outcome of a less-than-proportional increase of tree growth as a function of tree size. Dominant trees were almost 5 times larger than suppressed trees (1024 vs. 211 kg tree−1) but grew only about 2 times more than suppressed trees (4.3 vs. 1.9 kg tree−1 year−1). Dominant trees captured a lessthan-proportional amount of light relative to their size (90.4 vs. 20.9 GJ year−1 tree−1) and light use efficiency declined with tree size. Suppressed trees were twice as efficient as dominant trees (0.11 vs. 0.05 kg[wood] GJ [PAR]−1). Our results highlight the link between growth dominance, competition for resources, and the pattern of light use efficiency among large versus small trees.EEA Delta del ParanáFil: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná; Argentina. Colorado State University. Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology; Estados UnidosFil: Binkley, Dan. Northern Arizona University. School of Forestry; Estados UnidosFil: Bauerle, William. Colorado State University. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; Estados UnidosElsevier2020-02-17T14:21:27Z2020-02-17T14:21:27Z2020-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6779https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03781127193232050378-1127https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117891Forest Ecology and Management 460 : 117891 (2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:52Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/6779instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:53.158INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
spellingShingle Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
Bosques
Pinus
Pinares
Pinus Ponderosa
Crecimiento
Ecología
Forests
Pine Forests
Growth
Ecology
title_short Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_full Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_fullStr Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_full_unstemmed Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_sort Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
Binkley, Dan
Bauerle, William
author Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
author_facet Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
Binkley, Dan
Bauerle, William
author_role author
author2 Binkley, Dan
Bauerle, William
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bosques
Pinus
Pinares
Pinus Ponderosa
Crecimiento
Ecología
Forests
Pine Forests
Growth
Ecology
topic Bosques
Pinus
Pinares
Pinus Ponderosa
Crecimiento
Ecología
Forests
Pine Forests
Growth
Ecology
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that differences in production ecology underlie the observed patterns of growth dominance within stands. We explored the production ecology in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. Growth dominance was strongly negative (−0.22) and was the outcome of a less-than-proportional increase of tree growth as a function of tree size. Dominant trees were almost 5 times larger than suppressed trees (1024 vs. 211 kg tree−1) but grew only about 2 times more than suppressed trees (4.3 vs. 1.9 kg tree−1 year−1). Dominant trees captured a lessthan-proportional amount of light relative to their size (90.4 vs. 20.9 GJ year−1 tree−1) and light use efficiency declined with tree size. Suppressed trees were twice as efficient as dominant trees (0.11 vs. 0.05 kg[wood] GJ [PAR]−1). Our results highlight the link between growth dominance, competition for resources, and the pattern of light use efficiency among large versus small trees.
EEA Delta del Paraná
Fil: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná; Argentina. Colorado State University. Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Binkley, Dan. Northern Arizona University. School of Forestry; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bauerle, William. Colorado State University. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; Estados Unidos
description The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that differences in production ecology underlie the observed patterns of growth dominance within stands. We explored the production ecology in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. Growth dominance was strongly negative (−0.22) and was the outcome of a less-than-proportional increase of tree growth as a function of tree size. Dominant trees were almost 5 times larger than suppressed trees (1024 vs. 211 kg tree−1) but grew only about 2 times more than suppressed trees (4.3 vs. 1.9 kg tree−1 year−1). Dominant trees captured a lessthan-proportional amount of light relative to their size (90.4 vs. 20.9 GJ year−1 tree−1) and light use efficiency declined with tree size. Suppressed trees were twice as efficient as dominant trees (0.11 vs. 0.05 kg[wood] GJ [PAR]−1). Our results highlight the link between growth dominance, competition for resources, and the pattern of light use efficiency among large versus small trees.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-17T14:21:27Z
2020-02-17T14:21:27Z
2020-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6779
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112719323205
0378-1127
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117891
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6779
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112719323205
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117891
identifier_str_mv 0378-1127
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Forest Ecology and Management 460 : 117891 (2020)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619142131351552
score 12.559606