Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries
- Autores
- Zumarraga, Martin Jose; Arriaga, Camila; Barandiaran, Soledad; Cobos-Marín, Laura; de Waard, Jacobus; Estrada-Garcia, Iris; Figueiredo, Telma; Figueroa, Alvaro; Gimenez, Francisco; Gomes, Harrison M.; Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A.; Macías, Analía; Milián-Suazo, Feliciano; Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales; Santillán, Marco Antonio; Suffys, Philip Noel; Trangoni, Marcos David; Zarraga, Ana Maria; Cataldi, Angel Adrian
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Spoligotyping is the most frequently used method for genotyping isolates of Mycobacterium bovis worldwide. In the current work, we compared spoligotypes from 1684 M. bovis isolates from Argentina (816), Brazil (412), Chile (66), Mexico (274) and Venezuela (116), obtained from cattle, humans, pigs, wild boars, farmed deer, goats, buffaloes, cats, and wild animals. A total of 269 different spoligotypes were found: 142 (8.4%) isolates presented orphan spoligotypes, whereas 1542 (91.6%) formed 113 different clusters. In cattle, SB0140 was the most representative spoligotype with 355 (24.6%) isolates, followed by SB0121 with 149 (10.3%) isolates. Clustering of spoligotypes ranged from 95.2% in Argentina to 85.3% in Mexico. Orphan spoligotypes were also variable, ranging from 23.7% in Mexico to 4.1% in Brazil. A large proportion of spoligotypes were common to the neighboring countries Argentina, Brazil and Chile. In conclusion, despite the diversity of spoligotypes found in the five countries studied, there are major patterns that predominate in these neighboring countries. These clusters may reflect a long-lasting active transmission of bovine tuberculosis or common historical origins of infection.
Instituto de Biotecnología
Fil: Zumarraga, Martin Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina
Fil: Arriaga, Camila. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Microbiología Animal; México
Fil: Barandiaran, Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina
Fil: Cobos-Marín, Laura. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia; México
Fil: de Waard, Jacobus. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; Venezuela
Fil: Estrada-Garcia, Iris. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; México
Fil: Figueiredo, Telma. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasil
Fil: Figueroa, Alvaro. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica; Chile
Fil: Gimenez, Francisco. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; Venezuela
Fil: Gomes, Harrison M. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasil
Fil: Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; México
Fil: Macias, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria; Argentina
Fil: Milián-Suazo, Feliciano. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; México
Fil: Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal; Brasil
Fil: Santillán, Marco Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; México
Fil: Suffys, Philip Noel. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasil
Fil: Trangoni, Marcos David. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina
Fil: Zarraga, Ana Maria. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología; Chile
Fil: Cataldi, Angel Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina - Fuente
- Research in Veterinary Science 94 (1) : 9-21 (Febrero 2013)
- Materia
-
Tuberculosis
Mycobacterium bovis
Muestreo Cluster
Ganado Bovino
Cluster Sampling
Cattle
Latin American Countries
Países Latinoamericanos - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8315
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
INTADig_64c944c799078323cee4a675b7153093 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8315 |
| network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
| repository_id_str |
l |
| network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| spelling |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American CountriesZumarraga, Martin JoseArriaga, CamilaBarandiaran, SoledadCobos-Marín, Laurade Waard, JacobusEstrada-Garcia, IrisFigueiredo, TelmaFigueroa, AlvaroGimenez, FranciscoGomes, Harrison M.Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A.Macías, AnalíaMilián-Suazo, FelicianoRodríguez, Cesar Alejandro RosalesSantillán, Marco AntonioSuffys, Philip NoelTrangoni, Marcos DavidZarraga, Ana MariaCataldi, Angel AdrianTuberculosisMycobacterium bovisMuestreo ClusterGanado BovinoCluster SamplingCattleLatin American CountriesPaíses LatinoamericanosSpoligotyping is the most frequently used method for genotyping isolates of Mycobacterium bovis worldwide. In the current work, we compared spoligotypes from 1684 M. bovis isolates from Argentina (816), Brazil (412), Chile (66), Mexico (274) and Venezuela (116), obtained from cattle, humans, pigs, wild boars, farmed deer, goats, buffaloes, cats, and wild animals. A total of 269 different spoligotypes were found: 142 (8.4%) isolates presented orphan spoligotypes, whereas 1542 (91.6%) formed 113 different clusters. In cattle, SB0140 was the most representative spoligotype with 355 (24.6%) isolates, followed by SB0121 with 149 (10.3%) isolates. Clustering of spoligotypes ranged from 95.2% in Argentina to 85.3% in Mexico. Orphan spoligotypes were also variable, ranging from 23.7% in Mexico to 4.1% in Brazil. A large proportion of spoligotypes were common to the neighboring countries Argentina, Brazil and Chile. In conclusion, despite the diversity of spoligotypes found in the five countries studied, there are major patterns that predominate in these neighboring countries. These clusters may reflect a long-lasting active transmission of bovine tuberculosis or common historical origins of infection.Instituto de BiotecnologíaFil: Zumarraga, Martin Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; ArgentinaFil: Arriaga, Camila. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Microbiología Animal; MéxicoFil: Barandiaran, Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Cobos-Marín, Laura. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia; MéxicoFil: de Waard, Jacobus. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; VenezuelaFil: Estrada-Garcia, Iris. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; MéxicoFil: Figueiredo, Telma. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; BrasilFil: Figueroa, Alvaro. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica; ChileFil: Gimenez, Francisco. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; VenezuelaFil: Gomes, Harrison M. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; BrasilFil: Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; MéxicoFil: Macias, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria; ArgentinaFil: Milián-Suazo, Feliciano. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; MéxicoFil: Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal; BrasilFil: Santillán, Marco Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; MéxicoFil: Suffys, Philip Noel. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; BrasilFil: Trangoni, Marcos David. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; ArgentinaFil: Zarraga, Ana Maria. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología; ChileFil: Cataldi, Angel Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; ArgentinaElsevier2020-11-24T16:27:12Z2020-11-24T16:27:12Z2013-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8315https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00345288120022021532-2661https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.07.012Research in Veterinary Science 94 (1) : 9-21 (Febrero 2013)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/AERG-232121/AR./Desarrollo de métodos de diagnóstico molecular aplicados a la detección y tipificación de microorganismos patógenosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:45:04Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/8315instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:05.084INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries |
| title |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries |
| spellingShingle |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries Zumarraga, Martin Jose Tuberculosis Mycobacterium bovis Muestreo Cluster Ganado Bovino Cluster Sampling Cattle Latin American Countries Países Latinoamericanos |
| title_short |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries |
| title_full |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries |
| title_fullStr |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries |
| title_sort |
Understanding the relationship between Mycobacterium bovis spoligotypes from cattle in Latin American Countries |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Zumarraga, Martin Jose Arriaga, Camila Barandiaran, Soledad Cobos-Marín, Laura de Waard, Jacobus Estrada-Garcia, Iris Figueiredo, Telma Figueroa, Alvaro Gimenez, Francisco Gomes, Harrison M. Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A. Macías, Analía Milián-Suazo, Feliciano Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales Santillán, Marco Antonio Suffys, Philip Noel Trangoni, Marcos David Zarraga, Ana Maria Cataldi, Angel Adrian |
| author |
Zumarraga, Martin Jose |
| author_facet |
Zumarraga, Martin Jose Arriaga, Camila Barandiaran, Soledad Cobos-Marín, Laura de Waard, Jacobus Estrada-Garcia, Iris Figueiredo, Telma Figueroa, Alvaro Gimenez, Francisco Gomes, Harrison M. Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A. Macías, Analía Milián-Suazo, Feliciano Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales Santillán, Marco Antonio Suffys, Philip Noel Trangoni, Marcos David Zarraga, Ana Maria Cataldi, Angel Adrian |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Arriaga, Camila Barandiaran, Soledad Cobos-Marín, Laura de Waard, Jacobus Estrada-Garcia, Iris Figueiredo, Telma Figueroa, Alvaro Gimenez, Francisco Gomes, Harrison M. Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A. Macías, Analía Milián-Suazo, Feliciano Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales Santillán, Marco Antonio Suffys, Philip Noel Trangoni, Marcos David Zarraga, Ana Maria Cataldi, Angel Adrian |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Tuberculosis Mycobacterium bovis Muestreo Cluster Ganado Bovino Cluster Sampling Cattle Latin American Countries Países Latinoamericanos |
| topic |
Tuberculosis Mycobacterium bovis Muestreo Cluster Ganado Bovino Cluster Sampling Cattle Latin American Countries Países Latinoamericanos |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Spoligotyping is the most frequently used method for genotyping isolates of Mycobacterium bovis worldwide. In the current work, we compared spoligotypes from 1684 M. bovis isolates from Argentina (816), Brazil (412), Chile (66), Mexico (274) and Venezuela (116), obtained from cattle, humans, pigs, wild boars, farmed deer, goats, buffaloes, cats, and wild animals. A total of 269 different spoligotypes were found: 142 (8.4%) isolates presented orphan spoligotypes, whereas 1542 (91.6%) formed 113 different clusters. In cattle, SB0140 was the most representative spoligotype with 355 (24.6%) isolates, followed by SB0121 with 149 (10.3%) isolates. Clustering of spoligotypes ranged from 95.2% in Argentina to 85.3% in Mexico. Orphan spoligotypes were also variable, ranging from 23.7% in Mexico to 4.1% in Brazil. A large proportion of spoligotypes were common to the neighboring countries Argentina, Brazil and Chile. In conclusion, despite the diversity of spoligotypes found in the five countries studied, there are major patterns that predominate in these neighboring countries. These clusters may reflect a long-lasting active transmission of bovine tuberculosis or common historical origins of infection. Instituto de Biotecnología Fil: Zumarraga, Martin Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina Fil: Arriaga, Camila. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Microbiología Animal; México Fil: Barandiaran, Soledad. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina Fil: Cobos-Marín, Laura. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia; México Fil: de Waard, Jacobus. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; Venezuela Fil: Estrada-Garcia, Iris. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; México Fil: Figueiredo, Telma. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasil Fil: Figueroa, Alvaro. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica; Chile Fil: Gimenez, Francisco. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Instituto de Biomedicina. Laboratorio de Tuberculosis; Venezuela Fil: Gomes, Harrison M. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasil Fil: Gonzalez-y-Merchand, Jorge A. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas; México Fil: Macias, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria; Argentina Fil: Milián-Suazo, Feliciano. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; México Fil: Rodríguez, Cesar Alejandro Rosales. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal; Brasil Fil: Santillán, Marco Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal; México Fil: Suffys, Philip Noel. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Biologia Molecular Aplicada em Micobacterias; Brasil Fil: Trangoni, Marcos David. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina Fil: Zarraga, Ana Maria. Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología; Chile Fil: Cataldi, Angel Adrian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina |
| description |
Spoligotyping is the most frequently used method for genotyping isolates of Mycobacterium bovis worldwide. In the current work, we compared spoligotypes from 1684 M. bovis isolates from Argentina (816), Brazil (412), Chile (66), Mexico (274) and Venezuela (116), obtained from cattle, humans, pigs, wild boars, farmed deer, goats, buffaloes, cats, and wild animals. A total of 269 different spoligotypes were found: 142 (8.4%) isolates presented orphan spoligotypes, whereas 1542 (91.6%) formed 113 different clusters. In cattle, SB0140 was the most representative spoligotype with 355 (24.6%) isolates, followed by SB0121 with 149 (10.3%) isolates. Clustering of spoligotypes ranged from 95.2% in Argentina to 85.3% in Mexico. Orphan spoligotypes were also variable, ranging from 23.7% in Mexico to 4.1% in Brazil. A large proportion of spoligotypes were common to the neighboring countries Argentina, Brazil and Chile. In conclusion, despite the diversity of spoligotypes found in the five countries studied, there are major patterns that predominate in these neighboring countries. These clusters may reflect a long-lasting active transmission of bovine tuberculosis or common historical origins of infection. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02 2020-11-24T16:27:12Z 2020-11-24T16:27:12Z |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8315 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0034528812002202 1532-2661 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.07.012 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8315 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0034528812002202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.07.012 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1532-2661 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/AERG-232121/AR./Desarrollo de métodos de diagnóstico molecular aplicados a la detección y tipificación de microorganismos patógenos |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research in Veterinary Science 94 (1) : 9-21 (Febrero 2013) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
| _version_ |
1844619149029933056 |
| score |
12.558318 |