Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.

Autores
Alvarez, Estefanía; Cardoso, Marcelo Leandro; Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique; Castellari, Claudia Carla; De La Torre, Diego; Erreguerena, Ignacio Antonio; Abadia, María Bernadette
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión aceptada
Descripción
Corn, the main crop in Argentina, is normally harvested and stored in silo bags above the safe storage moisture content for 3-6 months, and faces high risk of quality losses. The evaluation of fungicidal/fungistatic products that could potentially be used to protect wet grain stored in silo bags, has not been widely studied. Thus, the objective of this study was to make a preliminary in-vitro comparative evaluation of four different fungicidal treatments in corn: 1) propionic acid (3 L/t); 2) a quaternary ammonium compound (3 L/t, diluted 1:25 with water); 3) sulfur dioxide (initial dose: 15% v/v); 4) phosphine (initial dose: 6.6 g/m3) along with their respective controls (non-treated). In treatments 1 and 2 (liquids) corn was sprayed with the product and then stored in a sterilized glass jar. In treatment 3, sulfur dioxide was injected into a previously sealed glass jar. In treatment 4, glass jars were placed inside a plastic drum of 60 L capacity with two aluminum phosphide tablets (0.2 g phosphine each) and closed. Both liquids and the phosphine treatments had an exposure time of 15 d (at 25 ± 1°C), while in the sulfur dioxide treatment, three exposure times were evaluated (5 min, 5 and 24 h, all at the same temperature). After the various treatments, the fungal biota (molds and yeasts) was evaluated. The results showed that the propionic acid treatment achieved a total control of fungal biota. Treatment with sulfur dioxide showed a reduction of 2-3 log10 (CFU/g DM) compared to non-treated samples. Finally, the quaternary ammonium compound and phosphine treatments only achieved a reduction in the number of colonies of 1 log10 (CFU/g DM). Based on the results of this study, propionic acid seems to be a good solution for improving the storability of wet corn in silo bags. Nevertheless, more information should be generated at laboratory and full scales.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Alvarez, Estefanía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Cardoso, Leandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Castellari, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: De la Torre, Diego. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Erreguerena, Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Abadía, María Bernadette. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fuente
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products. Canadá, 22-27 august de 2021
Materia
Granos
Fungicidas
Ácido Propiónico
Dióxido de Azufre
Fosfina
Hongos
Grain
Fungicides
Proponic Acid
Sulphur Dioxide
Fosfin
Fungi
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10485

id INTADig_55dbf8895c99bb9f98769f98dc60513b
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/10485
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.Alvarez, EstefaníaCardoso, Marcelo LeandroBartosik, Ricardo EnriqueCastellari, Claudia CarlaDe La Torre, DiegoErreguerena, Ignacio AntonioAbadia, María BernadetteGranosFungicidasÁcido PropiónicoDióxido de AzufreFosfinaHongosGrainFungicidesProponic AcidSulphur DioxideFosfinFungiCorn, the main crop in Argentina, is normally harvested and stored in silo bags above the safe storage moisture content for 3-6 months, and faces high risk of quality losses. The evaluation of fungicidal/fungistatic products that could potentially be used to protect wet grain stored in silo bags, has not been widely studied. Thus, the objective of this study was to make a preliminary in-vitro comparative evaluation of four different fungicidal treatments in corn: 1) propionic acid (3 L/t); 2) a quaternary ammonium compound (3 L/t, diluted 1:25 with water); 3) sulfur dioxide (initial dose: 15% v/v); 4) phosphine (initial dose: 6.6 g/m3) along with their respective controls (non-treated). In treatments 1 and 2 (liquids) corn was sprayed with the product and then stored in a sterilized glass jar. In treatment 3, sulfur dioxide was injected into a previously sealed glass jar. In treatment 4, glass jars were placed inside a plastic drum of 60 L capacity with two aluminum phosphide tablets (0.2 g phosphine each) and closed. Both liquids and the phosphine treatments had an exposure time of 15 d (at 25 ± 1°C), while in the sulfur dioxide treatment, three exposure times were evaluated (5 min, 5 and 24 h, all at the same temperature). After the various treatments, the fungal biota (molds and yeasts) was evaluated. The results showed that the propionic acid treatment achieved a total control of fungal biota. Treatment with sulfur dioxide showed a reduction of 2-3 log10 (CFU/g DM) compared to non-treated samples. Finally, the quaternary ammonium compound and phosphine treatments only achieved a reduction in the number of colonies of 1 log10 (CFU/g DM). Based on the results of this study, propionic acid seems to be a good solution for improving the storability of wet corn in silo bags. Nevertheless, more information should be generated at laboratory and full scales.EEA BalcarceFil: Alvarez, Estefanía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Cardoso, Leandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Castellari, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: De la Torre, Diego. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Erreguerena, Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Abadía, María Bernadette. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.University of Manitoba, Canadá2021-10-14T11:00:29Z2021-10-14T11:00:29Z2021-08info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10485Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products. Canadá, 22-27 august de 2021reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:49:08Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/10485instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:09.195INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
title Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
spellingShingle Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
Alvarez, Estefanía
Granos
Fungicidas
Ácido Propiónico
Dióxido de Azufre
Fosfina
Hongos
Grain
Fungicides
Proponic Acid
Sulphur Dioxide
Fosfin
Fungi
title_short Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
title_full Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
title_fullStr Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
title_sort Evaluation of fungicidal action of four products on external fungal biota of grains.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alvarez, Estefanía
Cardoso, Marcelo Leandro
Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique
Castellari, Claudia Carla
De La Torre, Diego
Erreguerena, Ignacio Antonio
Abadia, María Bernadette
author Alvarez, Estefanía
author_facet Alvarez, Estefanía
Cardoso, Marcelo Leandro
Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique
Castellari, Claudia Carla
De La Torre, Diego
Erreguerena, Ignacio Antonio
Abadia, María Bernadette
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, Marcelo Leandro
Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique
Castellari, Claudia Carla
De La Torre, Diego
Erreguerena, Ignacio Antonio
Abadia, María Bernadette
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Granos
Fungicidas
Ácido Propiónico
Dióxido de Azufre
Fosfina
Hongos
Grain
Fungicides
Proponic Acid
Sulphur Dioxide
Fosfin
Fungi
topic Granos
Fungicidas
Ácido Propiónico
Dióxido de Azufre
Fosfina
Hongos
Grain
Fungicides
Proponic Acid
Sulphur Dioxide
Fosfin
Fungi
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Corn, the main crop in Argentina, is normally harvested and stored in silo bags above the safe storage moisture content for 3-6 months, and faces high risk of quality losses. The evaluation of fungicidal/fungistatic products that could potentially be used to protect wet grain stored in silo bags, has not been widely studied. Thus, the objective of this study was to make a preliminary in-vitro comparative evaluation of four different fungicidal treatments in corn: 1) propionic acid (3 L/t); 2) a quaternary ammonium compound (3 L/t, diluted 1:25 with water); 3) sulfur dioxide (initial dose: 15% v/v); 4) phosphine (initial dose: 6.6 g/m3) along with their respective controls (non-treated). In treatments 1 and 2 (liquids) corn was sprayed with the product and then stored in a sterilized glass jar. In treatment 3, sulfur dioxide was injected into a previously sealed glass jar. In treatment 4, glass jars were placed inside a plastic drum of 60 L capacity with two aluminum phosphide tablets (0.2 g phosphine each) and closed. Both liquids and the phosphine treatments had an exposure time of 15 d (at 25 ± 1°C), while in the sulfur dioxide treatment, three exposure times were evaluated (5 min, 5 and 24 h, all at the same temperature). After the various treatments, the fungal biota (molds and yeasts) was evaluated. The results showed that the propionic acid treatment achieved a total control of fungal biota. Treatment with sulfur dioxide showed a reduction of 2-3 log10 (CFU/g DM) compared to non-treated samples. Finally, the quaternary ammonium compound and phosphine treatments only achieved a reduction in the number of colonies of 1 log10 (CFU/g DM). Based on the results of this study, propionic acid seems to be a good solution for improving the storability of wet corn in silo bags. Nevertheless, more information should be generated at laboratory and full scales.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Alvarez, Estefanía. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Cardoso, Leandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Castellari, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: De la Torre, Diego. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Erreguerena, Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Abadía, María Bernadette. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
description Corn, the main crop in Argentina, is normally harvested and stored in silo bags above the safe storage moisture content for 3-6 months, and faces high risk of quality losses. The evaluation of fungicidal/fungistatic products that could potentially be used to protect wet grain stored in silo bags, has not been widely studied. Thus, the objective of this study was to make a preliminary in-vitro comparative evaluation of four different fungicidal treatments in corn: 1) propionic acid (3 L/t); 2) a quaternary ammonium compound (3 L/t, diluted 1:25 with water); 3) sulfur dioxide (initial dose: 15% v/v); 4) phosphine (initial dose: 6.6 g/m3) along with their respective controls (non-treated). In treatments 1 and 2 (liquids) corn was sprayed with the product and then stored in a sterilized glass jar. In treatment 3, sulfur dioxide was injected into a previously sealed glass jar. In treatment 4, glass jars were placed inside a plastic drum of 60 L capacity with two aluminum phosphide tablets (0.2 g phosphine each) and closed. Both liquids and the phosphine treatments had an exposure time of 15 d (at 25 ± 1°C), while in the sulfur dioxide treatment, three exposure times were evaluated (5 min, 5 and 24 h, all at the same temperature). After the various treatments, the fungal biota (molds and yeasts) was evaluated. The results showed that the propionic acid treatment achieved a total control of fungal biota. Treatment with sulfur dioxide showed a reduction of 2-3 log10 (CFU/g DM) compared to non-treated samples. Finally, the quaternary ammonium compound and phosphine treatments only achieved a reduction in the number of colonies of 1 log10 (CFU/g DM). Based on the results of this study, propionic acid seems to be a good solution for improving the storability of wet corn in silo bags. Nevertheless, more information should be generated at laboratory and full scales.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-14T11:00:29Z
2021-10-14T11:00:29Z
2021-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10485
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10485
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Manitoba, Canadá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Manitoba, Canadá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products. Canadá, 22-27 august de 2021
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341391420620800
score 12.623145