Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources
- Autores
- Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea; Ferreyra, Susana Gisela; Iribas, Francisco Javier; Chimeno, Selva Valeria; Rojo, Cecilia; Casalongue, Claudia; Fontana, Ariel Ramón; Combina, Mariana; Ponsone, María Lorena
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Alternaria alternata is a common fungal pathogen causing postharvest decay in table grapes. This study addressed the potential of autochthonous yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources to act as biocontrol agents (BCAs) against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. With this purpose, 19 yeast capable of growing at 0–1 ◦C were isolated from the surface of Red Globe table grapes. These isolates, along with the pre-isolated strain Metschnikowia pulcherrima RCM2, were evaluated as BCAs in wounded berries. From these results, six yeast isolates were pre-selected to be combined with bioactive compounds of natural sources, like phenolic compounds(PCs) of side streams of wine industry, including bunch stem extract (BSE) (5–25 %), and cane extract (CE) (5–25 %), and functional polysaccharides from shrimp waste such as chitosan (CH) (0.5 %). Then, the biocontrol efficacy of combined treatments beyond individual ones was compared. The results revealed that 4 yeast isolates, namely M. pulcherrima RCM2 and ULA146, and Aureobasidium pullulans FUL14 and FUL18, were the most effective. However, when combined with the natural bioactive compounds, their efficacy against A. alternata did not increase significantly. Notably, ULA146 and FUL18 demonstrated a biocontrol efficacy of 36–37 %, comparable to that of the treatment with commercial doses of SO2, which only showed a 27 % reduction in the lesion diameter. These findings highlight the potential of using psychrotrophic yeasts as BCAs against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. Combining these yeast strains with BSE, CE and CH did not increase BCAs efficacy against this pathogen at the concentrations tested. The development of effective biocontrol strategies for A. alternata could contribute to reducing reliance on chemically synthesized fungicides, promoting sustainable practices, aiming to improve the quality and safety of cold-stored table grapes.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Ferreyra, Susana Gisela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet – Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Ferreyra, Susana Gisela. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Iribas, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Iribas, Francisco Javier. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fil: Chimeno, Selva Valeria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Rojo, María Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Rojo, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Casalongue, Claudia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina.
Fil: Casalongue, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina.
Fil: Fontana, Ariel Ramón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Fontana, Ariel Ramón. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Combina, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Combina, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.
Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. - Fuente
- International Journal of Food Microbiology 415 : 110640. (April 2024)
- Materia
-
Alternaria alternata
Control Biológico
Uvas de Mesa
Compuestos Bioactivos
Almacenamiento en Frío
Biological Control
Table Grapes
Bioactive Compounds
Cold Storage - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/18356
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_4a6ce17a56b345ee82e033cdbe487fce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/18356 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sourcesTorres Palazzolo, Carolina AndreaFerreyra, Susana GiselaIribas, Francisco JavierChimeno, Selva ValeriaRojo, CeciliaCasalongue, ClaudiaFontana, Ariel RamónCombina, MarianaPonsone, María LorenaAlternaria alternataControl BiológicoUvas de MesaCompuestos BioactivosAlmacenamiento en FríoBiological ControlTable GrapesBioactive CompoundsCold StorageAlternaria alternata is a common fungal pathogen causing postharvest decay in table grapes. This study addressed the potential of autochthonous yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources to act as biocontrol agents (BCAs) against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. With this purpose, 19 yeast capable of growing at 0–1 ◦C were isolated from the surface of Red Globe table grapes. These isolates, along with the pre-isolated strain Metschnikowia pulcherrima RCM2, were evaluated as BCAs in wounded berries. From these results, six yeast isolates were pre-selected to be combined with bioactive compounds of natural sources, like phenolic compounds(PCs) of side streams of wine industry, including bunch stem extract (BSE) (5–25 %), and cane extract (CE) (5–25 %), and functional polysaccharides from shrimp waste such as chitosan (CH) (0.5 %). Then, the biocontrol efficacy of combined treatments beyond individual ones was compared. The results revealed that 4 yeast isolates, namely M. pulcherrima RCM2 and ULA146, and Aureobasidium pullulans FUL14 and FUL18, were the most effective. However, when combined with the natural bioactive compounds, their efficacy against A. alternata did not increase significantly. Notably, ULA146 and FUL18 demonstrated a biocontrol efficacy of 36–37 %, comparable to that of the treatment with commercial doses of SO2, which only showed a 27 % reduction in the lesion diameter. These findings highlight the potential of using psychrotrophic yeasts as BCAs against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. Combining these yeast strains with BSE, CE and CH did not increase BCAs efficacy against this pathogen at the concentrations tested. The development of effective biocontrol strategies for A. alternata could contribute to reducing reliance on chemically synthesized fungicides, promoting sustainable practices, aiming to improve the quality and safety of cold-stored table grapes.EEA MendozaFil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Ferreyra, Susana Gisela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet – Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Ferreyra, Susana Gisela. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Iribas, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Iribas, Francisco Javier. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.Fil: Chimeno, Selva Valeria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Rojo, María Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Rojo, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Casalongue, Claudia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina.Fil: Casalongue, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina.Fil: Fontana, Ariel Ramón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Fontana, Ariel Ramón. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Combina, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Combina, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina.Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.Elsevier2024-07-02T11:27:52Z2024-07-02T11:27:52Z2024-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18356https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01681605240008490168-1605https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110640International Journal of Food Microbiology 415 : 110640. (April 2024)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-16T09:31:42Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/18356instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:31:43.326INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources |
title |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources |
spellingShingle |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea Alternaria alternata Control Biológico Uvas de Mesa Compuestos Bioactivos Almacenamiento en Frío Biological Control Table Grapes Bioactive Compounds Cold Storage |
title_short |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources |
title_full |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources |
title_fullStr |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources |
title_sort |
Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata in cold-stored table grapes using psychrotrophic yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea Ferreyra, Susana Gisela Iribas, Francisco Javier Chimeno, Selva Valeria Rojo, Cecilia Casalongue, Claudia Fontana, Ariel Ramón Combina, Mariana Ponsone, María Lorena |
author |
Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea |
author_facet |
Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea Ferreyra, Susana Gisela Iribas, Francisco Javier Chimeno, Selva Valeria Rojo, Cecilia Casalongue, Claudia Fontana, Ariel Ramón Combina, Mariana Ponsone, María Lorena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreyra, Susana Gisela Iribas, Francisco Javier Chimeno, Selva Valeria Rojo, Cecilia Casalongue, Claudia Fontana, Ariel Ramón Combina, Mariana Ponsone, María Lorena |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Alternaria alternata Control Biológico Uvas de Mesa Compuestos Bioactivos Almacenamiento en Frío Biological Control Table Grapes Bioactive Compounds Cold Storage |
topic |
Alternaria alternata Control Biológico Uvas de Mesa Compuestos Bioactivos Almacenamiento en Frío Biological Control Table Grapes Bioactive Compounds Cold Storage |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Alternaria alternata is a common fungal pathogen causing postharvest decay in table grapes. This study addressed the potential of autochthonous yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources to act as biocontrol agents (BCAs) against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. With this purpose, 19 yeast capable of growing at 0–1 ◦C were isolated from the surface of Red Globe table grapes. These isolates, along with the pre-isolated strain Metschnikowia pulcherrima RCM2, were evaluated as BCAs in wounded berries. From these results, six yeast isolates were pre-selected to be combined with bioactive compounds of natural sources, like phenolic compounds(PCs) of side streams of wine industry, including bunch stem extract (BSE) (5–25 %), and cane extract (CE) (5–25 %), and functional polysaccharides from shrimp waste such as chitosan (CH) (0.5 %). Then, the biocontrol efficacy of combined treatments beyond individual ones was compared. The results revealed that 4 yeast isolates, namely M. pulcherrima RCM2 and ULA146, and Aureobasidium pullulans FUL14 and FUL18, were the most effective. However, when combined with the natural bioactive compounds, their efficacy against A. alternata did not increase significantly. Notably, ULA146 and FUL18 demonstrated a biocontrol efficacy of 36–37 %, comparable to that of the treatment with commercial doses of SO2, which only showed a 27 % reduction in the lesion diameter. These findings highlight the potential of using psychrotrophic yeasts as BCAs against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. Combining these yeast strains with BSE, CE and CH did not increase BCAs efficacy against this pathogen at the concentrations tested. The development of effective biocontrol strategies for A. alternata could contribute to reducing reliance on chemically synthesized fungicides, promoting sustainable practices, aiming to improve the quality and safety of cold-stored table grapes. EEA Mendoza Fil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Torres Palazzolo, Carolina Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: Ferreyra, Susana Gisela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet – Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Ferreyra, Susana Gisela. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Iribas, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Iribas, Francisco Javier. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil: Chimeno, Selva Valeria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Rojo, María Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Rojo, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Casalongue, Claudia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Fil: Casalongue, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Fil: Fontana, Ariel Ramón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Fontana, Ariel Ramón. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Combina, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Combina, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza; Argentina. Fil: Ponsone, Maria Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. |
description |
Alternaria alternata is a common fungal pathogen causing postharvest decay in table grapes. This study addressed the potential of autochthonous yeasts and bioactive compounds of natural sources to act as biocontrol agents (BCAs) against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. With this purpose, 19 yeast capable of growing at 0–1 ◦C were isolated from the surface of Red Globe table grapes. These isolates, along with the pre-isolated strain Metschnikowia pulcherrima RCM2, were evaluated as BCAs in wounded berries. From these results, six yeast isolates were pre-selected to be combined with bioactive compounds of natural sources, like phenolic compounds(PCs) of side streams of wine industry, including bunch stem extract (BSE) (5–25 %), and cane extract (CE) (5–25 %), and functional polysaccharides from shrimp waste such as chitosan (CH) (0.5 %). Then, the biocontrol efficacy of combined treatments beyond individual ones was compared. The results revealed that 4 yeast isolates, namely M. pulcherrima RCM2 and ULA146, and Aureobasidium pullulans FUL14 and FUL18, were the most effective. However, when combined with the natural bioactive compounds, their efficacy against A. alternata did not increase significantly. Notably, ULA146 and FUL18 demonstrated a biocontrol efficacy of 36–37 %, comparable to that of the treatment with commercial doses of SO2, which only showed a 27 % reduction in the lesion diameter. These findings highlight the potential of using psychrotrophic yeasts as BCAs against A. alternata in cold-stored table grapes. Combining these yeast strains with BSE, CE and CH did not increase BCAs efficacy against this pathogen at the concentrations tested. The development of effective biocontrol strategies for A. alternata could contribute to reducing reliance on chemically synthesized fungicides, promoting sustainable practices, aiming to improve the quality and safety of cold-stored table grapes. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-02T11:27:52Z 2024-07-02T11:27:52Z 2024-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18356 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168160524000849 0168-1605 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110640 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18356 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168160524000849 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110640 |
identifier_str_mv |
0168-1605 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Food Microbiology 415 : 110640. (April 2024) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1846143574929833984 |
score |
12.712165 |