Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America

Autores
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde; Peri, Pablo Luis; Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro; Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz; Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel; Huertas Herrera, Alejandro; Sánchez Jardón, Laura; Lorenzo, Cristian; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión aceptada
Descripción
In recent decades agroforestry has undergone significant development in Latin America. South America generates the most scientific research on the topic in the region. We conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of knowledge production for South American agroforestry that includes livestock grazing, known as agrosilvopastoralism (AS), examining how different sociopolitical factors such as sources of funding, institutional priorities, and international cooperation can bias the direction and objectives of scientific research. We assessed the major attributes of scientific publications on the topic (25 articles per country; overall n = 210) and the potential factors underlying the processes of research and development in the region. The tree component was the most studied, while the livestock component received less attention. Studies were mainly focused on the production of goods and services (monetary or nonmonetary approaches), except in Brazil, where conservation was the major study objective. Stakeholders were involved in more than half of the studies (60%), and they were mostly ranchers and local producers. More than half (70%) of the studies offered recommendations based on their results, and such recommendations were mostly concerned with the management of agrosilvopastoral system components. In general, studies were led just as often by local as foreign first authors and coauthored by more than three people as part of interinstitutional working groups. Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Chile had more frequent cooperation among institutions and countries but mainly used their own funding. In contrast, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru had almost 100% of their studies supported by foreign countries (North America and Europe). Countries with greater internal funding of research generated more long-term studies. Besides this, two clear trends were detected: 1) conservation and social aspects were mainly supported by sources from external countries led by foreign principal investigators, and 2) production issues were supported from sources within countries and supported high levels of cooperation among institutions.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina
Fil: Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Huertas Herrera, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fil: Sánchez Jardón, Laura. Universidad Complutense de Madrir. Department of Ecology; España
Fil: Lorenzo, Cristian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fuente
Rangeland ecology & management. (7 February 2018)
Materia
Sistemas Agrosilvopascícolas
Agroforesteria
Sistemas de Conocimiento e Información
Agrosilvopastoral Systems
Agroforestry
Knowledge and Information Systems
América del Sur
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2552

id INTADig_4a338146ec00bb7e3801b142d140b940
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2552
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South AmericaSoler Esteban, Rosina MatildePeri, Pablo LuisBahamonde, Héctor AlejandroGargaglione, Veronica BeatrizOrmaechea, Sebastián GabrielHuertas Herrera, AlejandroSánchez Jardón, LauraLorenzo, CristianMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséSistemas AgrosilvopascícolasAgroforesteriaSistemas de Conocimiento e InformaciónAgrosilvopastoral SystemsAgroforestryKnowledge and Information SystemsAmérica del SurIn recent decades agroforestry has undergone significant development in Latin America. South America generates the most scientific research on the topic in the region. We conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of knowledge production for South American agroforestry that includes livestock grazing, known as agrosilvopastoralism (AS), examining how different sociopolitical factors such as sources of funding, institutional priorities, and international cooperation can bias the direction and objectives of scientific research. We assessed the major attributes of scientific publications on the topic (25 articles per country; overall n = 210) and the potential factors underlying the processes of research and development in the region. The tree component was the most studied, while the livestock component received less attention. Studies were mainly focused on the production of goods and services (monetary or nonmonetary approaches), except in Brazil, where conservation was the major study objective. Stakeholders were involved in more than half of the studies (60%), and they were mostly ranchers and local producers. More than half (70%) of the studies offered recommendations based on their results, and such recommendations were mostly concerned with the management of agrosilvopastoral system components. In general, studies were led just as often by local as foreign first authors and coauthored by more than three people as part of interinstitutional working groups. Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Chile had more frequent cooperation among institutions and countries but mainly used their own funding. In contrast, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru had almost 100% of their studies supported by foreign countries (North America and Europe). Countries with greater internal funding of research generated more long-term studies. Besides this, two clear trends were detected: 1) conservation and social aspects were mainly supported by sources from external countries led by foreign principal investigators, and 2) production issues were supported from sources within countries and supported high levels of cooperation among institutions.EEA Santa CruzFil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.Fil: Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; ArgentinaFil: Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; ArgentinaFil: Huertas Herrera, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; ArgentinaFil: Sánchez Jardón, Laura. Universidad Complutense de Madrir. Department of Ecology; EspañaFil: Lorenzo, Cristian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; ArgentinaFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina2018-06-05T14:26:55Z2018-06-05T14:26:55Z2018-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074241730180Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/25521550-74241551-5028https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.12.006Rangeland ecology & management. (7 February 2018)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:20Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2552instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:20.467INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
title Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
spellingShingle Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
Sistemas Agrosilvopascícolas
Agroforesteria
Sistemas de Conocimiento e Información
Agrosilvopastoral Systems
Agroforestry
Knowledge and Information Systems
América del Sur
title_short Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
title_full Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
title_fullStr Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
title_sort Assessing Knowledge Production for Agrosilvopastoral Systems in South America
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
Peri, Pablo Luis
Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz
Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel
Huertas Herrera, Alejandro
Sánchez Jardón, Laura
Lorenzo, Cristian
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
author_facet Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
Peri, Pablo Luis
Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz
Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel
Huertas Herrera, Alejandro
Sánchez Jardón, Laura
Lorenzo, Cristian
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_role author
author2 Peri, Pablo Luis
Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz
Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel
Huertas Herrera, Alejandro
Sánchez Jardón, Laura
Lorenzo, Cristian
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Sistemas Agrosilvopascícolas
Agroforesteria
Sistemas de Conocimiento e Información
Agrosilvopastoral Systems
Agroforestry
Knowledge and Information Systems
América del Sur
topic Sistemas Agrosilvopascícolas
Agroforesteria
Sistemas de Conocimiento e Información
Agrosilvopastoral Systems
Agroforestry
Knowledge and Information Systems
América del Sur
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In recent decades agroforestry has undergone significant development in Latin America. South America generates the most scientific research on the topic in the region. We conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of knowledge production for South American agroforestry that includes livestock grazing, known as agrosilvopastoralism (AS), examining how different sociopolitical factors such as sources of funding, institutional priorities, and international cooperation can bias the direction and objectives of scientific research. We assessed the major attributes of scientific publications on the topic (25 articles per country; overall n = 210) and the potential factors underlying the processes of research and development in the region. The tree component was the most studied, while the livestock component received less attention. Studies were mainly focused on the production of goods and services (monetary or nonmonetary approaches), except in Brazil, where conservation was the major study objective. Stakeholders were involved in more than half of the studies (60%), and they were mostly ranchers and local producers. More than half (70%) of the studies offered recommendations based on their results, and such recommendations were mostly concerned with the management of agrosilvopastoral system components. In general, studies were led just as often by local as foreign first authors and coauthored by more than three people as part of interinstitutional working groups. Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Chile had more frequent cooperation among institutions and countries but mainly used their own funding. In contrast, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru had almost 100% of their studies supported by foreign countries (North America and Europe). Countries with greater internal funding of research generated more long-term studies. Besides this, two clear trends were detected: 1) conservation and social aspects were mainly supported by sources from external countries led by foreign principal investigators, and 2) production issues were supported from sources within countries and supported high levels of cooperation among institutions.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Gargaglione, Veronica Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina
Fil: Ormaechea, Sebastián Gabriel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina
Fil: Huertas Herrera, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
Fil: Sánchez Jardón, Laura. Universidad Complutense de Madrir. Department of Ecology; España
Fil: Lorenzo, Cristian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina
description In recent decades agroforestry has undergone significant development in Latin America. South America generates the most scientific research on the topic in the region. We conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of knowledge production for South American agroforestry that includes livestock grazing, known as agrosilvopastoralism (AS), examining how different sociopolitical factors such as sources of funding, institutional priorities, and international cooperation can bias the direction and objectives of scientific research. We assessed the major attributes of scientific publications on the topic (25 articles per country; overall n = 210) and the potential factors underlying the processes of research and development in the region. The tree component was the most studied, while the livestock component received less attention. Studies were mainly focused on the production of goods and services (monetary or nonmonetary approaches), except in Brazil, where conservation was the major study objective. Stakeholders were involved in more than half of the studies (60%), and they were mostly ranchers and local producers. More than half (70%) of the studies offered recommendations based on their results, and such recommendations were mostly concerned with the management of agrosilvopastoral system components. In general, studies were led just as often by local as foreign first authors and coauthored by more than three people as part of interinstitutional working groups. Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Chile had more frequent cooperation among institutions and countries but mainly used their own funding. In contrast, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru had almost 100% of their studies supported by foreign countries (North America and Europe). Countries with greater internal funding of research generated more long-term studies. Besides this, two clear trends were detected: 1) conservation and social aspects were mainly supported by sources from external countries led by foreign principal investigators, and 2) production issues were supported from sources within countries and supported high levels of cooperation among institutions.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-05T14:26:55Z
2018-06-05T14:26:55Z
2018-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074241730180X
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2552
1550-7424
1551-5028
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.12.006
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074241730180X
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2552
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.12.006
identifier_str_mv 1550-7424
1551-5028
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rangeland ecology & management. (7 February 2018)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619122884739072
score 12.559606