Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis

Autores
Gatica, Gabriel; Fernandez, María Elena; Juliarena, Maria Paula; Gyenge, Javier
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Evidence suggests that tree plantations change soil methane (CH4) fluxes (magnitude and/or direction of the fluxes) compared to herbaceous land (i.e. afforestation effect) due to the effect of trees increasing methanotroph bacteria abundance and enhancing soil gas diffusivity. However, the magnitude of this afforestation effect is highly variable across studies. Here, we evaluated whether the variation in the afforestation effect depends on forestry management strategies, described by stand age and density, as well as taxonomic identity of the tree species, and the interaction with climatic conditions. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis using 47 paired samples of afforested and contiguous herbaceous land from 14 studies located in different biomes worldwide. We found that afforestation predominantly increases the capacity of soil net CH4 uptake (i.e. more negative fluxes) compared to herbaceous land, but the magnitude of this effect was highly heterogeneous across paired samples. This heterogeneity was explained by environmental conditions, but significant effects of forest stand age and density were also found proving the importance of forest management on this ecological service. Soil net CH4 uptake following afforestation increases with increasing stand age. Although the stand stocking effect could be tested with a limited number of studies (24 out of the 47 paired samples), the results suggest that net CH4 uptake decreases with tree stocking (stand density) in the range of values up to 1500 individuals per ha. No change in CH4 fluxes was observed above this high stand density. Contrary to our expectations, no effect of taxonomic identity of the trees considering the most planted genera (Pinus and Eucalyptus) was observed in the average soil CH4 fluxes. Furthermore, a significant correlation between the afforestation effect on soil water content and CH4 flux suggests that the most plausible cause of the increased soil net CH4 uptake is driven by the forest impact on soil desiccation, which in turn increases in sites with higher water limitation (i.e. higher potential evapotranspiration and high temporal rainfalls variations within the ranges of the available studies). Finally, our study provides evidence that by modifying rotation time and stand stocking, afforested land may increase its environmental service as a sink of atmospheric CH4.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Gatica, Gabriel. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
Fil: Juliarena, María Paula. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Gyenge, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
Fuente
Forest Ecology and Management 507: 120009 (March 2022)
Materia
Mitigación del Cambio Climático
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Contenido de Agua en el Suelo
Metano
Forestación
Climate Change Mitigation
Greenhouse Gases
Soil Water Content
Methane
Forestation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/15579

id INTADig_32ec2c55762d3582246406dc752bece2
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/15579
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysisGatica, GabrielFernandez, María ElenaJuliarena, Maria PaulaGyenge, JavierMitigación del Cambio ClimáticoGases de Efecto InvernaderoContenido de Agua en el SueloMetanoForestaciónClimate Change MitigationGreenhouse GasesSoil Water ContentMethaneForestationEvidence suggests that tree plantations change soil methane (CH4) fluxes (magnitude and/or direction of the fluxes) compared to herbaceous land (i.e. afforestation effect) due to the effect of trees increasing methanotroph bacteria abundance and enhancing soil gas diffusivity. However, the magnitude of this afforestation effect is highly variable across studies. Here, we evaluated whether the variation in the afforestation effect depends on forestry management strategies, described by stand age and density, as well as taxonomic identity of the tree species, and the interaction with climatic conditions. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis using 47 paired samples of afforested and contiguous herbaceous land from 14 studies located in different biomes worldwide. We found that afforestation predominantly increases the capacity of soil net CH4 uptake (i.e. more negative fluxes) compared to herbaceous land, but the magnitude of this effect was highly heterogeneous across paired samples. This heterogeneity was explained by environmental conditions, but significant effects of forest stand age and density were also found proving the importance of forest management on this ecological service. Soil net CH4 uptake following afforestation increases with increasing stand age. Although the stand stocking effect could be tested with a limited number of studies (24 out of the 47 paired samples), the results suggest that net CH4 uptake decreases with tree stocking (stand density) in the range of values up to 1500 individuals per ha. No change in CH4 fluxes was observed above this high stand density. Contrary to our expectations, no effect of taxonomic identity of the trees considering the most planted genera (Pinus and Eucalyptus) was observed in the average soil CH4 fluxes. Furthermore, a significant correlation between the afforestation effect on soil water content and CH4 flux suggests that the most plausible cause of the increased soil net CH4 uptake is driven by the forest impact on soil desiccation, which in turn increases in sites with higher water limitation (i.e. higher potential evapotranspiration and high temporal rainfalls variations within the ranges of the available studies). Finally, our study provides evidence that by modifying rotation time and stand stocking, afforested land may increase its environmental service as a sink of atmospheric CH4.EEA BalcarceFil: Gatica, Gabriel. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.Fil: Juliarena, María Paula. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.Fil: Gyenge, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.Elsevier2023-10-18T15:58:04Z2023-10-18T15:58:04Z2022-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15579https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03781127220000320378-1127 (print)1872-7042 (online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120009Forest Ecology and Management 507: 120009 (March 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-16T09:31:20Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/15579instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:31:20.445INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
title Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
spellingShingle Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
Gatica, Gabriel
Mitigación del Cambio Climático
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Contenido de Agua en el Suelo
Metano
Forestación
Climate Change Mitigation
Greenhouse Gases
Soil Water Content
Methane
Forestation
title_short Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
title_full Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
title_sort Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gatica, Gabriel
Fernandez, María Elena
Juliarena, Maria Paula
Gyenge, Javier
author Gatica, Gabriel
author_facet Gatica, Gabriel
Fernandez, María Elena
Juliarena, Maria Paula
Gyenge, Javier
author_role author
author2 Fernandez, María Elena
Juliarena, Maria Paula
Gyenge, Javier
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Mitigación del Cambio Climático
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Contenido de Agua en el Suelo
Metano
Forestación
Climate Change Mitigation
Greenhouse Gases
Soil Water Content
Methane
Forestation
topic Mitigación del Cambio Climático
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Contenido de Agua en el Suelo
Metano
Forestación
Climate Change Mitigation
Greenhouse Gases
Soil Water Content
Methane
Forestation
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Evidence suggests that tree plantations change soil methane (CH4) fluxes (magnitude and/or direction of the fluxes) compared to herbaceous land (i.e. afforestation effect) due to the effect of trees increasing methanotroph bacteria abundance and enhancing soil gas diffusivity. However, the magnitude of this afforestation effect is highly variable across studies. Here, we evaluated whether the variation in the afforestation effect depends on forestry management strategies, described by stand age and density, as well as taxonomic identity of the tree species, and the interaction with climatic conditions. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis using 47 paired samples of afforested and contiguous herbaceous land from 14 studies located in different biomes worldwide. We found that afforestation predominantly increases the capacity of soil net CH4 uptake (i.e. more negative fluxes) compared to herbaceous land, but the magnitude of this effect was highly heterogeneous across paired samples. This heterogeneity was explained by environmental conditions, but significant effects of forest stand age and density were also found proving the importance of forest management on this ecological service. Soil net CH4 uptake following afforestation increases with increasing stand age. Although the stand stocking effect could be tested with a limited number of studies (24 out of the 47 paired samples), the results suggest that net CH4 uptake decreases with tree stocking (stand density) in the range of values up to 1500 individuals per ha. No change in CH4 fluxes was observed above this high stand density. Contrary to our expectations, no effect of taxonomic identity of the trees considering the most planted genera (Pinus and Eucalyptus) was observed in the average soil CH4 fluxes. Furthermore, a significant correlation between the afforestation effect on soil water content and CH4 flux suggests that the most plausible cause of the increased soil net CH4 uptake is driven by the forest impact on soil desiccation, which in turn increases in sites with higher water limitation (i.e. higher potential evapotranspiration and high temporal rainfalls variations within the ranges of the available studies). Finally, our study provides evidence that by modifying rotation time and stand stocking, afforested land may increase its environmental service as a sink of atmospheric CH4.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Gatica, Gabriel. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
Fil: Juliarena, María Paula. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Gyenge, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
description Evidence suggests that tree plantations change soil methane (CH4) fluxes (magnitude and/or direction of the fluxes) compared to herbaceous land (i.e. afforestation effect) due to the effect of trees increasing methanotroph bacteria abundance and enhancing soil gas diffusivity. However, the magnitude of this afforestation effect is highly variable across studies. Here, we evaluated whether the variation in the afforestation effect depends on forestry management strategies, described by stand age and density, as well as taxonomic identity of the tree species, and the interaction with climatic conditions. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis using 47 paired samples of afforested and contiguous herbaceous land from 14 studies located in different biomes worldwide. We found that afforestation predominantly increases the capacity of soil net CH4 uptake (i.e. more negative fluxes) compared to herbaceous land, but the magnitude of this effect was highly heterogeneous across paired samples. This heterogeneity was explained by environmental conditions, but significant effects of forest stand age and density were also found proving the importance of forest management on this ecological service. Soil net CH4 uptake following afforestation increases with increasing stand age. Although the stand stocking effect could be tested with a limited number of studies (24 out of the 47 paired samples), the results suggest that net CH4 uptake decreases with tree stocking (stand density) in the range of values up to 1500 individuals per ha. No change in CH4 fluxes was observed above this high stand density. Contrary to our expectations, no effect of taxonomic identity of the trees considering the most planted genera (Pinus and Eucalyptus) was observed in the average soil CH4 fluxes. Furthermore, a significant correlation between the afforestation effect on soil water content and CH4 flux suggests that the most plausible cause of the increased soil net CH4 uptake is driven by the forest impact on soil desiccation, which in turn increases in sites with higher water limitation (i.e. higher potential evapotranspiration and high temporal rainfalls variations within the ranges of the available studies). Finally, our study provides evidence that by modifying rotation time and stand stocking, afforested land may increase its environmental service as a sink of atmospheric CH4.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03
2023-10-18T15:58:04Z
2023-10-18T15:58:04Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15579
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112722000032
0378-1127 (print)
1872-7042 (online)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120009
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15579
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112722000032
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120009
identifier_str_mv 0378-1127 (print)
1872-7042 (online)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Forest Ecology and Management 507: 120009 (March 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143564024643584
score 12.712165