Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves

Autores
Di Giacomo, Sebastián; Brito, Barbara Patricia; Perez, A.M.; Bucafusco, Danilo; Pega, Juan Franco; Rodríguez, L.; Borca, Manuel Victor; Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are routinely used as effective control tools in large regions worldwide and to limit outbreaks during epidemics. Vaccine‐induced protection in cattle has been largely correlated with the FMD virus (FMDV)‐specific antibodies. Genetic control of cattle immune adaptive responses has been demonstrated only for peptide antigens derived from FMDV structural proteins. Here, we quantify the heterogeneity in the antibody response of cattle primo‐vaccinated against FMD and study its association with the genetic background in Holstein and Jersey sires. A total of 377 FMDV‐seronegative calves (122 and 255 calves from 16 and 15 Holstein and Jersey sires, respectively) were included in the study. Samples were taken the day prior to primo‐vaccination and 45 days post‐vaccination (dpv). Animals received commercial tetravalent FMD single emulsion oil vaccines formulated with inactivated FMDV. Total FMDV‐specific antibody responses were studied against three viral strains included in the vaccine, and antibody titres were determined by liquid‐phase blocking ELISA. Three linear hierarchical mixed regression models, one for each strain, were formulated to assess the heterogeneity in the immune responses to vaccination. The dependent variables were the antibody titres induced against each FMDV strain at 45 dpv, whereas sire's ‘breed’ was included as a fixed effect, ‘sire’ was included as a random effect, and ‘farm’ was considered as a hierarchical factor to account for lack of independence of within herd measurements. A significant association was found between anti‐FMDV antibody responses and sire's breed, with lower immune responses found in the Jersey sires’ offspring compared with those from Holstein sires. No significant intrabreed variation was detected. In addition, farm management practices were similar in this study, and results of the serological assays were shown to be repeatable. It therefore seems plausible that differences in the immune response may be expected in the event of a mass vaccination campaigns.
Instituto de Virología
Fil: Di Giacomo, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina
Fil: Brito, Barbara Patricia. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Perez, A.M. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Bucafusco, Danilo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pega, Juan Franco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Rodríguez, L. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Borca, Manuel Victor. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina 
Fuente
Transboundary and emerging diseases 62 (3) : 280-287. (June 2015)
Materia
Ternero
Enfermedades de los Animales
Fiebre Aftosa
Vacunación
Anticuerpos
Calves
Animal Diseases
Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccination
Antibodies
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2510

id INTADig_32a242898334196b58f82f9f159c1409
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2510
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calvesDi Giacomo, SebastiánBrito, Barbara PatriciaPerez, A.M.Bucafusco, DaniloPega, Juan FrancoRodríguez, L.Borca, Manuel VictorPerez Filgueira, Daniel MarianoTerneroEnfermedades de los AnimalesFiebre AftosaVacunaciónAnticuerposCalvesAnimal DiseasesFoot and Mouth DiseaseVaccinationAntibodiesFoot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are routinely used as effective control tools in large regions worldwide and to limit outbreaks during epidemics. Vaccine‐induced protection in cattle has been largely correlated with the FMD virus (FMDV)‐specific antibodies. Genetic control of cattle immune adaptive responses has been demonstrated only for peptide antigens derived from FMDV structural proteins. Here, we quantify the heterogeneity in the antibody response of cattle primo‐vaccinated against FMD and study its association with the genetic background in Holstein and Jersey sires. A total of 377 FMDV‐seronegative calves (122 and 255 calves from 16 and 15 Holstein and Jersey sires, respectively) were included in the study. Samples were taken the day prior to primo‐vaccination and 45 days post‐vaccination (dpv). Animals received commercial tetravalent FMD single emulsion oil vaccines formulated with inactivated FMDV. Total FMDV‐specific antibody responses were studied against three viral strains included in the vaccine, and antibody titres were determined by liquid‐phase blocking ELISA. Three linear hierarchical mixed regression models, one for each strain, were formulated to assess the heterogeneity in the immune responses to vaccination. The dependent variables were the antibody titres induced against each FMDV strain at 45 dpv, whereas sire's ‘breed’ was included as a fixed effect, ‘sire’ was included as a random effect, and ‘farm’ was considered as a hierarchical factor to account for lack of independence of within herd measurements. A significant association was found between anti‐FMDV antibody responses and sire's breed, with lower immune responses found in the Jersey sires’ offspring compared with those from Holstein sires. No significant intrabreed variation was detected. In addition, farm management practices were similar in this study, and results of the serological assays were shown to be repeatable. It therefore seems plausible that differences in the immune response may be expected in the event of a mass vaccination campaigns.Instituto de VirologíaFil: Di Giacomo, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; ArgentinaFil: Brito, Barbara Patricia. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados UnidosFil: Perez, A.M. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Bucafusco, Danilo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Pega, Juan Franco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Rodríguez, L. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados UnidosFil: Borca, Manuel Victor. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados UnidosFil: Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina 2018-05-29T15:52:23Z2018-05-29T15:52:23Z2015-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tbed.12130http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/25101865-16741865-1682https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12130Transboundary and emerging diseases 62 (3) : 280-287. (June 2015)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-23T11:16:32Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2510instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:16:32.724INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
spellingShingle Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
Di Giacomo, Sebastián
Ternero
Enfermedades de los Animales
Fiebre Aftosa
Vacunación
Anticuerpos
Calves
Animal Diseases
Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccination
Antibodies
title_short Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_full Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_sort Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Di Giacomo, Sebastián
Brito, Barbara Patricia
Perez, A.M.
Bucafusco, Danilo
Pega, Juan Franco
Rodríguez, L.
Borca, Manuel Victor
Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
author Di Giacomo, Sebastián
author_facet Di Giacomo, Sebastián
Brito, Barbara Patricia
Perez, A.M.
Bucafusco, Danilo
Pega, Juan Franco
Rodríguez, L.
Borca, Manuel Victor
Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
author_role author
author2 Brito, Barbara Patricia
Perez, A.M.
Bucafusco, Danilo
Pega, Juan Franco
Rodríguez, L.
Borca, Manuel Victor
Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ternero
Enfermedades de los Animales
Fiebre Aftosa
Vacunación
Anticuerpos
Calves
Animal Diseases
Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccination
Antibodies
topic Ternero
Enfermedades de los Animales
Fiebre Aftosa
Vacunación
Anticuerpos
Calves
Animal Diseases
Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccination
Antibodies
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are routinely used as effective control tools in large regions worldwide and to limit outbreaks during epidemics. Vaccine‐induced protection in cattle has been largely correlated with the FMD virus (FMDV)‐specific antibodies. Genetic control of cattle immune adaptive responses has been demonstrated only for peptide antigens derived from FMDV structural proteins. Here, we quantify the heterogeneity in the antibody response of cattle primo‐vaccinated against FMD and study its association with the genetic background in Holstein and Jersey sires. A total of 377 FMDV‐seronegative calves (122 and 255 calves from 16 and 15 Holstein and Jersey sires, respectively) were included in the study. Samples were taken the day prior to primo‐vaccination and 45 days post‐vaccination (dpv). Animals received commercial tetravalent FMD single emulsion oil vaccines formulated with inactivated FMDV. Total FMDV‐specific antibody responses were studied against three viral strains included in the vaccine, and antibody titres were determined by liquid‐phase blocking ELISA. Three linear hierarchical mixed regression models, one for each strain, were formulated to assess the heterogeneity in the immune responses to vaccination. The dependent variables were the antibody titres induced against each FMDV strain at 45 dpv, whereas sire's ‘breed’ was included as a fixed effect, ‘sire’ was included as a random effect, and ‘farm’ was considered as a hierarchical factor to account for lack of independence of within herd measurements. A significant association was found between anti‐FMDV antibody responses and sire's breed, with lower immune responses found in the Jersey sires’ offspring compared with those from Holstein sires. No significant intrabreed variation was detected. In addition, farm management practices were similar in this study, and results of the serological assays were shown to be repeatable. It therefore seems plausible that differences in the immune response may be expected in the event of a mass vaccination campaigns.
Instituto de Virología
Fil: Di Giacomo, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina
Fil: Brito, Barbara Patricia. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Perez, A.M. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Bucafusco, Danilo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pega, Juan Franco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Rodríguez, L. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Borca, Manuel Victor. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina 
description Foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are routinely used as effective control tools in large regions worldwide and to limit outbreaks during epidemics. Vaccine‐induced protection in cattle has been largely correlated with the FMD virus (FMDV)‐specific antibodies. Genetic control of cattle immune adaptive responses has been demonstrated only for peptide antigens derived from FMDV structural proteins. Here, we quantify the heterogeneity in the antibody response of cattle primo‐vaccinated against FMD and study its association with the genetic background in Holstein and Jersey sires. A total of 377 FMDV‐seronegative calves (122 and 255 calves from 16 and 15 Holstein and Jersey sires, respectively) were included in the study. Samples were taken the day prior to primo‐vaccination and 45 days post‐vaccination (dpv). Animals received commercial tetravalent FMD single emulsion oil vaccines formulated with inactivated FMDV. Total FMDV‐specific antibody responses were studied against three viral strains included in the vaccine, and antibody titres were determined by liquid‐phase blocking ELISA. Three linear hierarchical mixed regression models, one for each strain, were formulated to assess the heterogeneity in the immune responses to vaccination. The dependent variables were the antibody titres induced against each FMDV strain at 45 dpv, whereas sire's ‘breed’ was included as a fixed effect, ‘sire’ was included as a random effect, and ‘farm’ was considered as a hierarchical factor to account for lack of independence of within herd measurements. A significant association was found between anti‐FMDV antibody responses and sire's breed, with lower immune responses found in the Jersey sires’ offspring compared with those from Holstein sires. No significant intrabreed variation was detected. In addition, farm management practices were similar in this study, and results of the serological assays were shown to be repeatable. It therefore seems plausible that differences in the immune response may be expected in the event of a mass vaccination campaigns.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06
2018-05-29T15:52:23Z
2018-05-29T15:52:23Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tbed.12130
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2510
1865-1674
1865-1682
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12130
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tbed.12130
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2510
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12130
identifier_str_mv 1865-1674
1865-1682
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Transboundary and emerging diseases 62 (3) : 280-287. (June 2015)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846787507164807168
score 12.982451