Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method

Autores
Villarreal, Rafael; Soracco, Carlos Germán; Lozano, Luis Alberto; Melani, Esteban; Sarli, Guillermo Oliverio
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Soil water sorptivity (S) is an important property that measures the soil capacity to take water rapidly under capillary forces. Usually S is not included in soil laboratory routine experiments because there is not a widely accepted methodology for its determination. The objectives of this work were: i) to propose a modification on the Leeds-Harrison et al. (1994) method (LH) to determine S in undisturbed soil samples; and ii) to determine the temporal variation of S and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0) in a soil under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) treatments. Additionally, the influence of soil pore size distribution (PoSD) on S was analyzed. Undisturbed soil samples (5 cm height, 5 cm diameter) were collected from the upper 10 depth cm of each plot, from each treatment at four different times during a maize growing season (before seeding (BS), 6 leaf stage (V6), physiological maturity (R5) and after harvest (AH)). PoSD was determined in a sand box apparatus. After that, S was determined in the same samples using a modified Leeds-Harrison approach. For the proposed modification the difference between initial and final water content was actually gravimetrically measured in each sample, rather than considering it equal to the total porosity (TP). The proposed improvement was validated comparing the obtained S values with those calculated using standard one-dimension horizontal infiltration in sieved soil (0.098 vs 0.079 cm s−1/2, respectively) and in calibrated sand (0.041 vs 0.040 cm s−1/2, respectively). These differences were not significant. Both S and K0 were significantly affected by the sampling time in both treatments (mean values ranged between 0.022 and 0.077 cm s−1/2 and 1.57 and 3.75 cm s−1 respectively). We did not find a significant dependence of S with three pore size ranges analyzed. The proposed improvement of the Leeds-Harrison method allowed determining the temporal variation of S in representative undisturbed soil samples.
EEA Cuenca del Salado
Fil: Villarreal, Rafael. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Soracco, Carlos Germán. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lozano, Luis Alberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Melani, Esteban. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Cuenca del Salado. Agencia de Extensión Rural Chascomus; Argentina
Fil: Sarli, Guillermo Oliverio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina
Fuente
Soil and tillage research 168 : 92-98. (May 2017)
Materia
Suelo
Labranza Convencional
Cero-labranza
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Retención de Agua por el Suelo
Porosidad del Suelo
Soi
Conventional Tillage
Zero Tillage
Laboratory Experimentation
Soil Water Retention
Soil Porosity
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2579
Acceder
id INTADig_2510db3903eec307065b3474e1f9a0b1
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2579
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory methodVillarreal, RafaelSoracco, Carlos GermánLozano, Luis AlbertoMelani, EstebanSarli, Guillermo OliverioSueloLabranza ConvencionalCero-labranzaExperimentación en LaboratorioRetención de Agua por el SueloPorosidad del SueloSoiConventional TillageZero TillageLaboratory ExperimentationSoil Water RetentionSoil PorositySoil water sorptivity (S) is an important property that measures the soil capacity to take water rapidly under capillary forces. Usually S is not included in soil laboratory routine experiments because there is not a widely accepted methodology for its determination. The objectives of this work were: i) to propose a modification on the Leeds-Harrison et al. (1994) method (LH) to determine S in undisturbed soil samples; and ii) to determine the temporal variation of S and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0) in a soil under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) treatments. Additionally, the influence of soil pore size distribution (PoSD) on S was analyzed. Undisturbed soil samples (5 cm height, 5 cm diameter) were collected from the upper 10 depth cm of each plot, from each treatment at four different times during a maize growing season (before seeding (BS), 6 leaf stage (V6), physiological maturity (R5) and after harvest (AH)). PoSD was determined in a sand box apparatus. After that, S was determined in the same samples using a modified Leeds-Harrison approach. For the proposed modification the difference between initial and final water content was actually gravimetrically measured in each sample, rather than considering it equal to the total porosity (TP). The proposed improvement was validated comparing the obtained S values with those calculated using standard one-dimension horizontal infiltration in sieved soil (0.098 vs 0.079 cm s−1/2, respectively) and in calibrated sand (0.041 vs 0.040 cm s−1/2, respectively). These differences were not significant. Both S and K0 were significantly affected by the sampling time in both treatments (mean values ranged between 0.022 and 0.077 cm s−1/2 and 1.57 and 3.75 cm s−1 respectively). We did not find a significant dependence of S with three pore size ranges analyzed. The proposed improvement of the Leeds-Harrison method allowed determining the temporal variation of S in representative undisturbed soil samples.EEA Cuenca del SaladoFil: Villarreal, Rafael. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Soracco, Carlos Germán. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Lozano, Luis Alberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Melani, Esteban. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Cuenca del Salado. Agencia de Extensión Rural Chascomus; ArgentinaFil: Sarli, Guillermo Oliverio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina2018-06-08T14:44:12Z2018-06-08T14:44:12Z2017-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198716302707http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/25790167-1987https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.12.013Soil and tillage research 168 : 92-98. (May 2017)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:47:19Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2579instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:20.251INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
title Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
spellingShingle Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
Villarreal, Rafael
Suelo
Labranza Convencional
Cero-labranza
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Retención de Agua por el Suelo
Porosidad del Suelo
Soi
Conventional Tillage
Zero Tillage
Laboratory Experimentation
Soil Water Retention
Soil Porosity
title_short Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
title_full Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
title_fullStr Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
title_full_unstemmed Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
title_sort Temporal variation of soil sorptivity under conventional and no-till systems determined by a simple laboratory method
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Villarreal, Rafael
Soracco, Carlos Germán
Lozano, Luis Alberto
Melani, Esteban
Sarli, Guillermo Oliverio
author Villarreal, Rafael
author_facet Villarreal, Rafael
Soracco, Carlos Germán
Lozano, Luis Alberto
Melani, Esteban
Sarli, Guillermo Oliverio
author_role author
author2 Soracco, Carlos Germán
Lozano, Luis Alberto
Melani, Esteban
Sarli, Guillermo Oliverio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Suelo
Labranza Convencional
Cero-labranza
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Retención de Agua por el Suelo
Porosidad del Suelo
Soi
Conventional Tillage
Zero Tillage
Laboratory Experimentation
Soil Water Retention
Soil Porosity
topic Suelo
Labranza Convencional
Cero-labranza
Experimentación en Laboratorio
Retención de Agua por el Suelo
Porosidad del Suelo
Soi
Conventional Tillage
Zero Tillage
Laboratory Experimentation
Soil Water Retention
Soil Porosity
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Soil water sorptivity (S) is an important property that measures the soil capacity to take water rapidly under capillary forces. Usually S is not included in soil laboratory routine experiments because there is not a widely accepted methodology for its determination. The objectives of this work were: i) to propose a modification on the Leeds-Harrison et al. (1994) method (LH) to determine S in undisturbed soil samples; and ii) to determine the temporal variation of S and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0) in a soil under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) treatments. Additionally, the influence of soil pore size distribution (PoSD) on S was analyzed. Undisturbed soil samples (5 cm height, 5 cm diameter) were collected from the upper 10 depth cm of each plot, from each treatment at four different times during a maize growing season (before seeding (BS), 6 leaf stage (V6), physiological maturity (R5) and after harvest (AH)). PoSD was determined in a sand box apparatus. After that, S was determined in the same samples using a modified Leeds-Harrison approach. For the proposed modification the difference between initial and final water content was actually gravimetrically measured in each sample, rather than considering it equal to the total porosity (TP). The proposed improvement was validated comparing the obtained S values with those calculated using standard one-dimension horizontal infiltration in sieved soil (0.098 vs 0.079 cm s−1/2, respectively) and in calibrated sand (0.041 vs 0.040 cm s−1/2, respectively). These differences were not significant. Both S and K0 were significantly affected by the sampling time in both treatments (mean values ranged between 0.022 and 0.077 cm s−1/2 and 1.57 and 3.75 cm s−1 respectively). We did not find a significant dependence of S with three pore size ranges analyzed. The proposed improvement of the Leeds-Harrison method allowed determining the temporal variation of S in representative undisturbed soil samples.
EEA Cuenca del Salado
Fil: Villarreal, Rafael. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Soracco, Carlos Germán. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lozano, Luis Alberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Melani, Esteban. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Cuenca del Salado. Agencia de Extensión Rural Chascomus; Argentina
Fil: Sarli, Guillermo Oliverio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Argentina
description Soil water sorptivity (S) is an important property that measures the soil capacity to take water rapidly under capillary forces. Usually S is not included in soil laboratory routine experiments because there is not a widely accepted methodology for its determination. The objectives of this work were: i) to propose a modification on the Leeds-Harrison et al. (1994) method (LH) to determine S in undisturbed soil samples; and ii) to determine the temporal variation of S and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0) in a soil under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) treatments. Additionally, the influence of soil pore size distribution (PoSD) on S was analyzed. Undisturbed soil samples (5 cm height, 5 cm diameter) were collected from the upper 10 depth cm of each plot, from each treatment at four different times during a maize growing season (before seeding (BS), 6 leaf stage (V6), physiological maturity (R5) and after harvest (AH)). PoSD was determined in a sand box apparatus. After that, S was determined in the same samples using a modified Leeds-Harrison approach. For the proposed modification the difference between initial and final water content was actually gravimetrically measured in each sample, rather than considering it equal to the total porosity (TP). The proposed improvement was validated comparing the obtained S values with those calculated using standard one-dimension horizontal infiltration in sieved soil (0.098 vs 0.079 cm s−1/2, respectively) and in calibrated sand (0.041 vs 0.040 cm s−1/2, respectively). These differences were not significant. Both S and K0 were significantly affected by the sampling time in both treatments (mean values ranged between 0.022 and 0.077 cm s−1/2 and 1.57 and 3.75 cm s−1 respectively). We did not find a significant dependence of S with three pore size ranges analyzed. The proposed improvement of the Leeds-Harrison method allowed determining the temporal variation of S in representative undisturbed soil samples.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05
2018-06-08T14:44:12Z
2018-06-08T14:44:12Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198716302707
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2579
0167-1987
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.12.013
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198716302707
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2579
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.12.013
identifier_str_mv 0167-1987
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Soil and tillage research 168 : 92-98. (May 2017)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341355555127296
score 12.623145

Publicaciones similares