Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential o...

Autores: del Prado, Agustín; Vibart, Ronaldo; Bilotto, Franco; Faverin, Claudia; García, Florencia; Henrique, Fábio; Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo; Mazzetto, Andre; Ridoutt, Bradley; Yáñez Ruiz, David; Bannink, André
Año de publicación: 2025
Idioma: inglés
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado: versión publicada
Descripción: Recent advances in our understanding of methanogenesis have led to the development of antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA) that can reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions to varying extents, via direct targeting of methanogens, alternative electron acceptors, or altering the rumen environment. Here we examine current and new approaches used for the accounting (i.e., quantification) of enteric CH4 abatement by the use of AMFA in the livestock sector from the individual animal to the global scale. Along with this process, recommendations are provided on how to account for the mitigation potential at the animal level, as well as in farm-scale models, emissions trading schemes, life cycle assessment, and carbon (C) footprinting tools, and in regional and national inventories. In addition, an assessment of uncertainties and potential trade-offs and off-setting with the use of AMFA (i.e., efficacy vs. effectiveness, upstream and downstream emissions) is provided. The accounting of on-farm enteric CH4 emissions and benefits from the use of AMFA starts with the ruminant animal (with estimates obtained from a range of approaches, from simple empirical emission factors or equations to complex process-based models) and goes all the way to national and supranational accounting. The choice of methodologies and levels of complexity to account for mitigation of enteric CH4 (or total GHG) emissions in livestock systems must be tailored to the scale of analysis aimed, the availability of input data to represent contextualized conditions, and the accounting objectives (e.g., academic exercise vs. producer's GHG certification vs. national GHG inventory). The accounting of enteric CH4 mitigating effects needs to consider the AMFA delivery methods and synergies and trade-offs of GHG emissions at levels before and beyond (upstream and downstream) the animal to fully assess the impact of AMFA use. At large, the accounting of methane abatement by feed additives remains to be fully assessed beyond experimental results (efficacy) to address pragmatism (effectiveness), potential for adoption, and societal acceptance.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: del Prado, Agustin. Basque Centre for Climate Change; España
Fil: del Prado, Agustin. Ikerbasque. Basque Foundation of Science; España
Fil: Vibart, Ronaldo. AgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Bilotto, Franco. Cornell University. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Department of Global Development; Estados Unidos
Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: García, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina
Fil: Henrique, Fábio. University of the Republic. College of Veterinary Medicine. Department of Biosciences; Uruguay
Fil: Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Mazzetto, Andre M. AgResearch. Lincoln Research Centre; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Ridoutt, Bradley. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Agriculture and Food; Australia
Fil: Ridoutt, Bradley. University of the Free State. Department of Agricultural Economics; Sudáfrica
Fil: Yáñez-Ruiz, David. Estación Experimental del Zaidín; España
Fil: Bannink, André. Wageningen University & Research; Paises Bajos
Fuente: Journal of Dairy Science 108 (1) : 411-429 (January 2025)
Materia: Aditivo Alimentario
Huella de Carbono
Modelización
Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Rumiante
Emisión de Metano
Food Additives
Carbon Footprint
Modelling
Greenhouse Gases
Ruminants
Methane Emission
Nivel de accesibilidad: acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
Institución: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador: oai:localhost:20.500.12123/23007

Acceder

id	INTADig_213036e08d572fae4890bf48820a8282
oai_identifier_str	oai:localhost:20.500.12123/23007
network_acronym_str	INTADig
repository_id_str	l
network_name_str	INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additivesdel Prado, AgustínVibart, RonaldoBilotto, FrancoFaverin, ClaudiaGarcía, FlorenciaHenrique, FábioLeite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja DorilêoMazzetto, AndreRidoutt, BradleyYáñez Ruiz, DavidBannink, AndréAditivo AlimentarioHuella de CarbonoModelizaciónGases de Efecto InvernaderoRumianteEmisión de MetanoFood AdditivesCarbon FootprintModellingGreenhouse GasesRuminantsMethane EmissionRecent advances in our understanding of methanogenesis have led to the development of antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA) that can reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions to varying extents, via direct targeting of methanogens, alternative electron acceptors, or altering the rumen environment. Here we examine current and new approaches used for the accounting (i.e., quantification) of enteric CH4 abatement by the use of AMFA in the livestock sector from the individual animal to the global scale. Along with this process, recommendations are provided on how to account for the mitigation potential at the animal level, as well as in farm-scale models, emissions trading schemes, life cycle assessment, and carbon (C) footprinting tools, and in regional and national inventories. In addition, an assessment of uncertainties and potential trade-offs and off-setting with the use of AMFA (i.e., efficacy vs. effectiveness, upstream and downstream emissions) is provided. The accounting of on-farm enteric CH4 emissions and benefits from the use of AMFA starts with the ruminant animal (with estimates obtained from a range of approaches, from simple empirical emission factors or equations to complex process-based models) and goes all the way to national and supranational accounting. The choice of methodologies and levels of complexity to account for mitigation of enteric CH4 (or total GHG) emissions in livestock systems must be tailored to the scale of analysis aimed, the availability of input data to represent contextualized conditions, and the accounting objectives (e.g., academic exercise vs. producer's GHG certification vs. national GHG inventory). The accounting of enteric CH4 mitigating effects needs to consider the AMFA delivery methods and synergies and trade-offs of GHG emissions at levels before and beyond (upstream and downstream) the animal to fully assess the impact of AMFA use. At large, the accounting of methane abatement by feed additives remains to be fully assessed beyond experimental results (efficacy) to address pragmatism (effectiveness), potential for adoption, and societal acceptance.EEA BalcarceFil: del Prado, Agustin. Basque Centre for Climate Change; EspañaFil: del Prado, Agustin. Ikerbasque. Basque Foundation of Science; EspañaFil: Vibart, Ronaldo. AgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre; Nueva ZelandaFil: Bilotto, Franco. Cornell University. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Department of Global Development; Estados UnidosFil: Faverin, Claudia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Faverin, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: García, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; ArgentinaFil: Henrique, Fábio. University of the Republic. College of Veterinary Medicine. Department of Biosciences; UruguayFil: Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Mazzetto, Andre M. AgResearch. Lincoln Research Centre; Nueva ZelandaFil: Ridoutt, Bradley. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Agriculture and Food; AustraliaFil: Ridoutt, Bradley. University of the Free State. Department of Agricultural Economics; SudáfricaFil: Yáñez-Ruiz, David. Estación Experimental del Zaidín; EspañaFil: Bannink, André. Wageningen University & Research; Paises BajosElsevier2025-07-14T10:44:32Z2025-07-14T10:44:32Z2025-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23007https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(24)01405-X/fulltexthttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002203022401405X0022-03021525-3198 (Online)https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25044Journal of Dairy Science 108 (1) : 411-429 (January 2025)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:47:24Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/23007instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:47:24.77INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives
title	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives
spellingShingle	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives del Prado, Agustín Aditivo Alimentario Huella de Carbono Modelización Gases de Efecto Invernadero Rumiante Emisión de Metano Food Additives Carbon Footprint Modelling Greenhouse Gases Ruminants Methane Emission
title_short	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives
title_full	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives
title_fullStr	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives
title_full_unstemmed	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives
title_sort	Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential of using antimethanogenic feed additives
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv	del Prado, Agustín Vibart, Ronaldo Bilotto, Franco Faverin, Claudia García, Florencia Henrique, Fábio Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo Mazzetto, Andre Ridoutt, Bradley Yáñez Ruiz, David Bannink, André
author	del Prado, Agustín
author_facet	del Prado, Agustín Vibart, Ronaldo Bilotto, Franco Faverin, Claudia García, Florencia Henrique, Fábio Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo Mazzetto, Andre Ridoutt, Bradley Yáñez Ruiz, David Bannink, André
author_role	author
author2	Vibart, Ronaldo Bilotto, Franco Faverin, Claudia García, Florencia Henrique, Fábio Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo Mazzetto, Andre Ridoutt, Bradley Yáñez Ruiz, David Bannink, André
author2_role	author author author author author author author author author author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Aditivo Alimentario Huella de Carbono Modelización Gases de Efecto Invernadero Rumiante Emisión de Metano Food Additives Carbon Footprint Modelling Greenhouse Gases Ruminants Methane Emission
topic	Aditivo Alimentario Huella de Carbono Modelización Gases de Efecto Invernadero Rumiante Emisión de Metano Food Additives Carbon Footprint Modelling Greenhouse Gases Ruminants Methane Emission
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv	Recent advances in our understanding of methanogenesis have led to the development of antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA) that can reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions to varying extents, via direct targeting of methanogens, alternative electron acceptors, or altering the rumen environment. Here we examine current and new approaches used for the accounting (i.e., quantification) of enteric CH4 abatement by the use of AMFA in the livestock sector from the individual animal to the global scale. Along with this process, recommendations are provided on how to account for the mitigation potential at the animal level, as well as in farm-scale models, emissions trading schemes, life cycle assessment, and carbon (C) footprinting tools, and in regional and national inventories. In addition, an assessment of uncertainties and potential trade-offs and off-setting with the use of AMFA (i.e., efficacy vs. effectiveness, upstream and downstream emissions) is provided. The accounting of on-farm enteric CH4 emissions and benefits from the use of AMFA starts with the ruminant animal (with estimates obtained from a range of approaches, from simple empirical emission factors or equations to complex process-based models) and goes all the way to national and supranational accounting. The choice of methodologies and levels of complexity to account for mitigation of enteric CH4 (or total GHG) emissions in livestock systems must be tailored to the scale of analysis aimed, the availability of input data to represent contextualized conditions, and the accounting objectives (e.g., academic exercise vs. producer's GHG certification vs. national GHG inventory). The accounting of enteric CH4 mitigating effects needs to consider the AMFA delivery methods and synergies and trade-offs of GHG emissions at levels before and beyond (upstream and downstream) the animal to fully assess the impact of AMFA use. At large, the accounting of methane abatement by feed additives remains to be fully assessed beyond experimental results (efficacy) to address pragmatism (effectiveness), potential for adoption, and societal acceptance. EEA Balcarce Fil: del Prado, Agustin. Basque Centre for Climate Change; España Fil: del Prado, Agustin. Ikerbasque. Basque Foundation of Science; España Fil: Vibart, Ronaldo. AgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Bilotto, Franco. Cornell University. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Department of Global Development; Estados Unidos Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Faverin, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: García, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina Fil: Henrique, Fábio. University of the Republic. College of Veterinary Medicine. Department of Biosciences; Uruguay Fil: Leite, Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Mazzetto, Andre M. AgResearch. Lincoln Research Centre; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Ridoutt, Bradley. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Agriculture and Food; Australia Fil: Ridoutt, Bradley. University of the Free State. Department of Agricultural Economics; Sudáfrica Fil: Yáñez-Ruiz, David. Estación Experimental del Zaidín; España Fil: Bannink, André. Wageningen University & Research; Paises Bajos
description	Recent advances in our understanding of methanogenesis have led to the development of antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA) that can reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions to varying extents, via direct targeting of methanogens, alternative electron acceptors, or altering the rumen environment. Here we examine current and new approaches used for the accounting (i.e., quantification) of enteric CH4 abatement by the use of AMFA in the livestock sector from the individual animal to the global scale. Along with this process, recommendations are provided on how to account for the mitigation potential at the animal level, as well as in farm-scale models, emissions trading schemes, life cycle assessment, and carbon (C) footprinting tools, and in regional and national inventories. In addition, an assessment of uncertainties and potential trade-offs and off-setting with the use of AMFA (i.e., efficacy vs. effectiveness, upstream and downstream emissions) is provided. The accounting of on-farm enteric CH4 emissions and benefits from the use of AMFA starts with the ruminant animal (with estimates obtained from a range of approaches, from simple empirical emission factors or equations to complex process-based models) and goes all the way to national and supranational accounting. The choice of methodologies and levels of complexity to account for mitigation of enteric CH4 (or total GHG) emissions in livestock systems must be tailored to the scale of analysis aimed, the availability of input data to represent contextualized conditions, and the accounting objectives (e.g., academic exercise vs. producer's GHG certification vs. national GHG inventory). The accounting of enteric CH4 mitigating effects needs to consider the AMFA delivery methods and synergies and trade-offs of GHG emissions at levels before and beyond (upstream and downstream) the animal to fully assess the impact of AMFA use. At large, the accounting of methane abatement by feed additives remains to be fully assessed beyond experimental results (efficacy) to address pragmatism (effectiveness), potential for adoption, and societal acceptance.
publishDate	2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2025-07-14T10:44:32Z 2025-07-14T10:44:32Z 2025-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format	article
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23007 https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(24)01405-X/fulltext https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002203022401405X 0022-0302 1525-3198 (Online) https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25044
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23007 https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(24)01405-X/fulltext https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002203022401405X https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25044
identifier_str_mv	0022-0302 1525-3198 (Online)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	Journal of Dairy Science 108 (1) : 411-429 (January 2025) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str	INTA Digital (INTA)
collection	INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str	Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv	INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_	1844619206436323328
score	12.559606

Feed additives for methane mitigation: Assessment of feed additives as a strategy to mitigate enteric methane from ruminants. Accounting; How to quantify the mitigating potential o...

Publicaciones similares