Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina

Autores
Alaoui, Abdallah; Christ, Florian; Abrantes, Nelson; Silva, Vera; González, Neus; Gai, Lingtong; Harkes, Paula; Navarro, Irene; De la Torre, Adrián; Martínez, María Ángeles; Nørgaard, Trine; Vested, Anne; Schlünssen, Vivi; Aparicio, Virginia Carolina; Campos, Isabel; Pasković, Igor; Polić Pasković, Marija; Glavan, Matjaž; Ritsema, Coen; Geissen, Violette
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The widespread and extensive use of pesticides in European crop production to reduce losses from weeds, diseases, and insects may have serious consequences on the ecosystem and human health. This study aimed to identify 20 active substances of high health risk, based on their detection frequency within and across the environmental matrices (soil, crop, water, and sediment) and to identify their associated hazardous effects. A sampling campaign was conducted across 10 case study sites in Europe and 1 in Argentina and included conventional and organic farming systems. In 31% of cases, the detected substances were found at a higher concentration in the soil than in the corresponding crops, 93% of the compounds were fungicides, and the remainder were insecticides. 43% of the substances, 57% of which were insecticides, were detected only in soil. There was a clear relationship between soils and crops in terms of contamination, but not between water and sediment. Portuguese soil (wine grapes) had the highest number of substances (12) with average concentrations (AC) varying between 1 and 162 μg/kg, followed by French (11 substances in wine grapes) (1≤AC≤64 μg/kg) and Spanish soils (9 substances in vegetables) (3≤AC≤59 μg/kg). The crops corresponding to these soils contained a relatively high number of detected substances and several in high average concentrations (AC). The risk quotient was consistently higher for conventional farms than for organic farms. For the soils from conventional farms, 5 active substances (chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, boscalid, difenoconazole, lambda-cyhalothrin, and one metabolite: AMPA) were considered high risk. For water samples, 2 substances (dieldrin and terbuthylazine) found were high risk, and for sediment, there were 3 substances (metalaxyl-M, spiroxamine, and lambda-cyhalothrin). There were 6 substances detected in crops that are suspected to cause human health effects. Uncontaminated soil is a prerequisite for the adoption of sustainable alternatives to pesticides. Efforts are needed to elucidate the unknown effects of mixtures, including biocides and banned compounds in addition to the substances used in agriculture.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Alaoui, Abdallah. University of Bern. Institute of Geography; Suiza
Fil: Christ, Florian. University of Bern. Institute of Geography; Suiza
Fil: Abrantes, Nelson. University of Aveiro. CESAM and Department of Biology; Portugal
Fil: Silva, Vera. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: González, Neus. Universitat Rovira i Virgili; España
Fil: Gai, Lingtong. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: Harkes, Paula. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: Navarro, Irene. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; España
Fil: De la Torre, Adrián. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; España
Fil: Martínez, María Ángeles. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; España
Fil: Nørgaard, Trine. Aarhus University. Department of Agroecology; Dinamarca
Fil: Vested, Anne. Aarhus University. Danish Ramazzini Centre; Dinamarca
Fil: Schlünssen, Vivi. Aarhus University; Dinamarca
Fil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Campos, Isabel. University of Aveiro. CESAM and Department of Environment and Planning, Portugal
Fil: Pasković, Igor. Institute of Agriculture and Tourism. Department of Agriculture and Nutrition; Croacia
Fil: Polić Pasković, Marija. Institute of Agriculture and Tourism. Department of Agriculture and Nutrition; Croacia
Fil: Glavan, Matjaž. University of Ljubljana. Biotechnical Faculty; Eslovenia
Fil: Ritsema, Coen. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: Geissen, Violette. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fuente
Environmental Pollution 363, Part 1 : 125056 (December 2024)
Materia
Suelo
Cultivos
Agua
Residuos de Plaguicidas
Evaluación de Riesgos
Europa
Argentina
Soil
Crops
Water
Pesticide Residues
Risk Assessment
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/19951

id INTADig_0f7904edfc7d2e2b3f33249477d47268
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/19951
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and ArgentinaAlaoui, AbdallahChrist, FlorianAbrantes, NelsonSilva, VeraGonzález, NeusGai, LingtongHarkes, PaulaNavarro, IreneDe la Torre, AdriánMartínez, María ÁngelesNørgaard, TrineVested, AnneSchlünssen, ViviAparicio, Virginia CarolinaCampos, IsabelPasković, IgorPolić Pasković, MarijaGlavan, MatjažRitsema, CoenGeissen, VioletteSueloCultivosAguaResiduos de PlaguicidasEvaluación de RiesgosEuropaArgentinaSoilCropsWaterPesticide ResiduesRisk AssessmentThe widespread and extensive use of pesticides in European crop production to reduce losses from weeds, diseases, and insects may have serious consequences on the ecosystem and human health. This study aimed to identify 20 active substances of high health risk, based on their detection frequency within and across the environmental matrices (soil, crop, water, and sediment) and to identify their associated hazardous effects. A sampling campaign was conducted across 10 case study sites in Europe and 1 in Argentina and included conventional and organic farming systems. In 31% of cases, the detected substances were found at a higher concentration in the soil than in the corresponding crops, 93% of the compounds were fungicides, and the remainder were insecticides. 43% of the substances, 57% of which were insecticides, were detected only in soil. There was a clear relationship between soils and crops in terms of contamination, but not between water and sediment. Portuguese soil (wine grapes) had the highest number of substances (12) with average concentrations (AC) varying between 1 and 162 μg/kg, followed by French (11 substances in wine grapes) (1≤AC≤64 μg/kg) and Spanish soils (9 substances in vegetables) (3≤AC≤59 μg/kg). The crops corresponding to these soils contained a relatively high number of detected substances and several in high average concentrations (AC). The risk quotient was consistently higher for conventional farms than for organic farms. For the soils from conventional farms, 5 active substances (chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, boscalid, difenoconazole, lambda-cyhalothrin, and one metabolite: AMPA) were considered high risk. For water samples, 2 substances (dieldrin and terbuthylazine) found were high risk, and for sediment, there were 3 substances (metalaxyl-M, spiroxamine, and lambda-cyhalothrin). There were 6 substances detected in crops that are suspected to cause human health effects. Uncontaminated soil is a prerequisite for the adoption of sustainable alternatives to pesticides. Efforts are needed to elucidate the unknown effects of mixtures, including biocides and banned compounds in addition to the substances used in agriculture.EEA BalcarceFil: Alaoui, Abdallah. University of Bern. Institute of Geography; SuizaFil: Christ, Florian. University of Bern. Institute of Geography; SuizaFil: Abrantes, Nelson. University of Aveiro. CESAM and Department of Biology; PortugalFil: Silva, Vera. Wageningen University and Research; Países BajosFil: González, Neus. Universitat Rovira i Virgili; EspañaFil: Gai, Lingtong. Wageningen University and Research; Países BajosFil: Harkes, Paula. Wageningen University and Research; Países BajosFil: Navarro, Irene. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; EspañaFil: De la Torre, Adrián. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; EspañaFil: Martínez, María Ángeles. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; EspañaFil: Nørgaard, Trine. Aarhus University. Department of Agroecology; DinamarcaFil: Vested, Anne. Aarhus University. Danish Ramazzini Centre; DinamarcaFil: Schlünssen, Vivi. Aarhus University; DinamarcaFil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Campos, Isabel. University of Aveiro. CESAM and Department of Environment and Planning, PortugalFil: Pasković, Igor. Institute of Agriculture and Tourism. Department of Agriculture and Nutrition; CroaciaFil: Polić Pasković, Marija. Institute of Agriculture and Tourism. Department of Agriculture and Nutrition; CroaciaFil: Glavan, Matjaž. University of Ljubljana. Biotechnical Faculty; EsloveniaFil: Ritsema, Coen. Wageningen University and Research; Países BajosFil: Geissen, Violette. Wageningen University and Research; Países BajosElsevier2024-10-29T10:06:05Z2024-10-29T10:06:05Z2024-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/19951https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S02697491240177180269-7491 (print)1873-6424 (online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125056Environmental Pollution 363, Part 1 : 125056 (December 2024)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-16T09:31:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/19951instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:31:59.3INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
title Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
spellingShingle Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
Alaoui, Abdallah
Suelo
Cultivos
Agua
Residuos de Plaguicidas
Evaluación de Riesgos
Europa
Argentina
Soil
Crops
Water
Pesticide Residues
Risk Assessment
title_short Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
title_full Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
title_fullStr Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
title_sort Assessing pesticide residue occurrence and risks in the environment across Europe and Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alaoui, Abdallah
Christ, Florian
Abrantes, Nelson
Silva, Vera
González, Neus
Gai, Lingtong
Harkes, Paula
Navarro, Irene
De la Torre, Adrián
Martínez, María Ángeles
Nørgaard, Trine
Vested, Anne
Schlünssen, Vivi
Aparicio, Virginia Carolina
Campos, Isabel
Pasković, Igor
Polić Pasković, Marija
Glavan, Matjaž
Ritsema, Coen
Geissen, Violette
author Alaoui, Abdallah
author_facet Alaoui, Abdallah
Christ, Florian
Abrantes, Nelson
Silva, Vera
González, Neus
Gai, Lingtong
Harkes, Paula
Navarro, Irene
De la Torre, Adrián
Martínez, María Ángeles
Nørgaard, Trine
Vested, Anne
Schlünssen, Vivi
Aparicio, Virginia Carolina
Campos, Isabel
Pasković, Igor
Polić Pasković, Marija
Glavan, Matjaž
Ritsema, Coen
Geissen, Violette
author_role author
author2 Christ, Florian
Abrantes, Nelson
Silva, Vera
González, Neus
Gai, Lingtong
Harkes, Paula
Navarro, Irene
De la Torre, Adrián
Martínez, María Ángeles
Nørgaard, Trine
Vested, Anne
Schlünssen, Vivi
Aparicio, Virginia Carolina
Campos, Isabel
Pasković, Igor
Polić Pasković, Marija
Glavan, Matjaž
Ritsema, Coen
Geissen, Violette
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Suelo
Cultivos
Agua
Residuos de Plaguicidas
Evaluación de Riesgos
Europa
Argentina
Soil
Crops
Water
Pesticide Residues
Risk Assessment
topic Suelo
Cultivos
Agua
Residuos de Plaguicidas
Evaluación de Riesgos
Europa
Argentina
Soil
Crops
Water
Pesticide Residues
Risk Assessment
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The widespread and extensive use of pesticides in European crop production to reduce losses from weeds, diseases, and insects may have serious consequences on the ecosystem and human health. This study aimed to identify 20 active substances of high health risk, based on their detection frequency within and across the environmental matrices (soil, crop, water, and sediment) and to identify their associated hazardous effects. A sampling campaign was conducted across 10 case study sites in Europe and 1 in Argentina and included conventional and organic farming systems. In 31% of cases, the detected substances were found at a higher concentration in the soil than in the corresponding crops, 93% of the compounds were fungicides, and the remainder were insecticides. 43% of the substances, 57% of which were insecticides, were detected only in soil. There was a clear relationship between soils and crops in terms of contamination, but not between water and sediment. Portuguese soil (wine grapes) had the highest number of substances (12) with average concentrations (AC) varying between 1 and 162 μg/kg, followed by French (11 substances in wine grapes) (1≤AC≤64 μg/kg) and Spanish soils (9 substances in vegetables) (3≤AC≤59 μg/kg). The crops corresponding to these soils contained a relatively high number of detected substances and several in high average concentrations (AC). The risk quotient was consistently higher for conventional farms than for organic farms. For the soils from conventional farms, 5 active substances (chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, boscalid, difenoconazole, lambda-cyhalothrin, and one metabolite: AMPA) were considered high risk. For water samples, 2 substances (dieldrin and terbuthylazine) found were high risk, and for sediment, there were 3 substances (metalaxyl-M, spiroxamine, and lambda-cyhalothrin). There were 6 substances detected in crops that are suspected to cause human health effects. Uncontaminated soil is a prerequisite for the adoption of sustainable alternatives to pesticides. Efforts are needed to elucidate the unknown effects of mixtures, including biocides and banned compounds in addition to the substances used in agriculture.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Alaoui, Abdallah. University of Bern. Institute of Geography; Suiza
Fil: Christ, Florian. University of Bern. Institute of Geography; Suiza
Fil: Abrantes, Nelson. University of Aveiro. CESAM and Department of Biology; Portugal
Fil: Silva, Vera. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: González, Neus. Universitat Rovira i Virgili; España
Fil: Gai, Lingtong. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: Harkes, Paula. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: Navarro, Irene. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; España
Fil: De la Torre, Adrián. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; España
Fil: Martínez, María Ángeles. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas; España
Fil: Nørgaard, Trine. Aarhus University. Department of Agroecology; Dinamarca
Fil: Vested, Anne. Aarhus University. Danish Ramazzini Centre; Dinamarca
Fil: Schlünssen, Vivi. Aarhus University; Dinamarca
Fil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Campos, Isabel. University of Aveiro. CESAM and Department of Environment and Planning, Portugal
Fil: Pasković, Igor. Institute of Agriculture and Tourism. Department of Agriculture and Nutrition; Croacia
Fil: Polić Pasković, Marija. Institute of Agriculture and Tourism. Department of Agriculture and Nutrition; Croacia
Fil: Glavan, Matjaž. University of Ljubljana. Biotechnical Faculty; Eslovenia
Fil: Ritsema, Coen. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
Fil: Geissen, Violette. Wageningen University and Research; Países Bajos
description The widespread and extensive use of pesticides in European crop production to reduce losses from weeds, diseases, and insects may have serious consequences on the ecosystem and human health. This study aimed to identify 20 active substances of high health risk, based on their detection frequency within and across the environmental matrices (soil, crop, water, and sediment) and to identify their associated hazardous effects. A sampling campaign was conducted across 10 case study sites in Europe and 1 in Argentina and included conventional and organic farming systems. In 31% of cases, the detected substances were found at a higher concentration in the soil than in the corresponding crops, 93% of the compounds were fungicides, and the remainder were insecticides. 43% of the substances, 57% of which were insecticides, were detected only in soil. There was a clear relationship between soils and crops in terms of contamination, but not between water and sediment. Portuguese soil (wine grapes) had the highest number of substances (12) with average concentrations (AC) varying between 1 and 162 μg/kg, followed by French (11 substances in wine grapes) (1≤AC≤64 μg/kg) and Spanish soils (9 substances in vegetables) (3≤AC≤59 μg/kg). The crops corresponding to these soils contained a relatively high number of detected substances and several in high average concentrations (AC). The risk quotient was consistently higher for conventional farms than for organic farms. For the soils from conventional farms, 5 active substances (chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, boscalid, difenoconazole, lambda-cyhalothrin, and one metabolite: AMPA) were considered high risk. For water samples, 2 substances (dieldrin and terbuthylazine) found were high risk, and for sediment, there were 3 substances (metalaxyl-M, spiroxamine, and lambda-cyhalothrin). There were 6 substances detected in crops that are suspected to cause human health effects. Uncontaminated soil is a prerequisite for the adoption of sustainable alternatives to pesticides. Efforts are needed to elucidate the unknown effects of mixtures, including biocides and banned compounds in addition to the substances used in agriculture.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-29T10:06:05Z
2024-10-29T10:06:05Z
2024-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/19951
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124017718
0269-7491 (print)
1873-6424 (online)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125056
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/19951
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124017718
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125056
identifier_str_mv 0269-7491 (print)
1873-6424 (online)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Pollution 363, Part 1 : 125056 (December 2024)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143581508599808
score 12.712165