Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo

Autores
Irizar, Alicia Beatriz; Andriulo, Adrián; Cosentino, Diego Julián; Améndola, Catalina
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Fil: Irizar, Alicia Beatriz. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Andriulo, Adrián. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Améndola, Catalina. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Regression analysis was used to compare particulate organic carbon (COP) and light carbon (Cs) concentrations obtained by size (fraction greather than 53 um) and density fractionation (liquor density = 2 g cm-3) methods, respectively. The soil samples were taken from a long-term experiment located at the EEA-INTA Pergamino comparing four cropping sequences and two tillage systems. Both methods were linearly and positively correlated to depths of 0-5 and 5-10 cm and the y-intercept did not differ from zero, indicating that both methods resulted in a similar estimate for labile C. As the slopes did not different from unity, the differences between the two methods remained constant throughout all the labile range measured. There was no correlation for a depth of 10-20 cm, and Cs concentrations were higher and less variable than those of COP. The liquor density used might explain the obtention of similar or greater amounts of Cs than of COP because of the important contribution of the organomineral complex to the light fraction.
Fuente
Ciencia del suelo : revista de la Asociación Argentina de la Ciencia del Suelo
Vol.28, no.1
115-121
http://www.suelos.org.ar/
Materia
DENSITY FRACTIONATION
LABILE ORGANIC MATTER
PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
acceso abierto
Repositorio
FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA)
Institución
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía
OAI Identificador
snrd:2010Irizar

id FAUBA_9fd821c3c662d6d2745b0eb28bc5a63c
oai_identifier_str snrd:2010Irizar
network_acronym_str FAUBA
repository_id_str 2729
network_name_str FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA)
spelling Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del sueloIrizar, Alicia BeatrizAndriulo, AdriánCosentino, Diego JuliánAméndola, CatalinaDENSITY FRACTIONATIONLABILE ORGANIC MATTERPARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONATIONFil: Irizar, Alicia Beatriz. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Andriulo, Adrián. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.Fil: Améndola, Catalina. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Regression analysis was used to compare particulate organic carbon (COP) and light carbon (Cs) concentrations obtained by size (fraction greather than 53 um) and density fractionation (liquor density = 2 g cm-3) methods, respectively. The soil samples were taken from a long-term experiment located at the EEA-INTA Pergamino comparing four cropping sequences and two tillage systems. Both methods were linearly and positively correlated to depths of 0-5 and 5-10 cm and the y-intercept did not differ from zero, indicating that both methods resulted in a similar estimate for labile C. As the slopes did not different from unity, the differences between the two methods remained constant throughout all the labile range measured. There was no correlation for a depth of 10-20 cm, and Cs concentrations were higher and less variable than those of COP. The liquor density used might explain the obtention of similar or greater amounts of Cs than of COP because of the important contribution of the organomineral complex to the light fraction.2010articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfissn:0326-3169http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/collection/arti/document/2010IrizarCiencia del suelo : revista de la Asociación Argentina de la Ciencia del SueloVol.28, no.1115-121http://www.suelos.org.ar/reponame:FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA)instname:Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomíaspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessopenAccesshttp://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/page/biblioteca#section42025-09-04T09:45:13Zsnrd:2010Irizarinstacron:UBA-FAUBAInstitucionalhttp://ri.agro.uba.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/oaiserver?verb=ListSetsmartino@agro.uba.ar;berasa@agro.uba.ar ArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:27292025-09-04 09:45:14.733FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA) - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomíafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
title Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
spellingShingle Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
Irizar, Alicia Beatriz
DENSITY FRACTIONATION
LABILE ORGANIC MATTER
PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONATION
title_short Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
title_full Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
title_fullStr Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
title_full_unstemmed Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
title_sort Comparación de dos métodos de fraccionamiento físico de la materia orgánica del suelo
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Irizar, Alicia Beatriz
Andriulo, Adrián
Cosentino, Diego Julián
Améndola, Catalina
author Irizar, Alicia Beatriz
author_facet Irizar, Alicia Beatriz
Andriulo, Adrián
Cosentino, Diego Julián
Améndola, Catalina
author_role author
author2 Andriulo, Adrián
Cosentino, Diego Julián
Améndola, Catalina
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DENSITY FRACTIONATION
LABILE ORGANIC MATTER
PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONATION
topic DENSITY FRACTIONATION
LABILE ORGANIC MATTER
PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONATION
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Fil: Irizar, Alicia Beatriz. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Andriulo, Adrián. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Cosentino, Diego Julián. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fil: Améndola, Catalina. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Regression analysis was used to compare particulate organic carbon (COP) and light carbon (Cs) concentrations obtained by size (fraction greather than 53 um) and density fractionation (liquor density = 2 g cm-3) methods, respectively. The soil samples were taken from a long-term experiment located at the EEA-INTA Pergamino comparing four cropping sequences and two tillage systems. Both methods were linearly and positively correlated to depths of 0-5 and 5-10 cm and the y-intercept did not differ from zero, indicating that both methods resulted in a similar estimate for labile C. As the slopes did not different from unity, the differences between the two methods remained constant throughout all the labile range measured. There was no correlation for a depth of 10-20 cm, and Cs concentrations were higher and less variable than those of COP. The liquor density used might explain the obtention of similar or greater amounts of Cs than of COP because of the important contribution of the organomineral complex to the light fraction.
description Fil: Irizar, Alicia Beatriz. INTA. EEA Pergamino. Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv issn:0326-3169
http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/collection/arti/document/2010Irizar
identifier_str_mv issn:0326-3169
url http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/collection/arti/document/2010Irizar
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
openAccess
http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/page/biblioteca#section4
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv openAccess
http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/page/biblioteca#section4
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciencia del suelo : revista de la Asociación Argentina de la Ciencia del Suelo
Vol.28, no.1
115-121
http://www.suelos.org.ar/
reponame:FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA)
instname:Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía
reponame_str FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA)
collection FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA)
instname_str Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía
repository.name.fl_str_mv FAUBA Digital (UBA-FAUBA) - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía
repository.mail.fl_str_mv martino@agro.uba.ar;berasa@agro.uba.ar
_version_ 1842340873952559104
score 12.623145