Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field

Autores
Gil, Gaston Julian
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Based on an analysis of how an ethnographic research project was received by ´experts´ in the field, a series of reflections will be put forward on ethnographic fieldwork and some aspects of anthropological knowledge. Developed on the assumption that the vicissitudes of ethnographic practice are central to the process of knowing the ´Other´, this reflexive exercise focuses on how informants may turn into either the ethnographer´s saboteurs or his/her contributors -and even co-authors. As spaces in the academic arena are shared -and somehow disputed- extremely conflictive relationships spring raising fears in the ethnographer, who may suffer direct sabotages in his experience on the field.
Fil: Gil, Gaston Julian. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Materia
COLLABORATION
FIELDWORK
RECEPTION
REFLEXIVITY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242476
Acceder
id CONICETDig_fbafc36231534b00025ad3d77099258a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242476
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the fieldGil, Gaston JulianCOLLABORATIONFIELDWORKRECEPTIONREFLEXIVITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Based on an analysis of how an ethnographic research project was received by ´experts´ in the field, a series of reflections will be put forward on ethnographic fieldwork and some aspects of anthropological knowledge. Developed on the assumption that the vicissitudes of ethnographic practice are central to the process of knowing the ´Other´, this reflexive exercise focuses on how informants may turn into either the ethnographer´s saboteurs or his/her contributors -and even co-authors. As spaces in the academic arena are shared -and somehow disputed- extremely conflictive relationships spring raising fears in the ethnographer, who may suffer direct sabotages in his experience on the field.Fil: Gil, Gaston Julian. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; ArgentinaSAGE Publications2010-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/242476Gil, Gaston Julian; Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field; SAGE Publications; Qualitative Research; 10; 1; 2-2010; 49-691741-3109CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468794109348682info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/1468794109348682info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:00:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242476instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:00:00.459CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
title Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
spellingShingle Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
Gil, Gaston Julian
COLLABORATION
FIELDWORK
RECEPTION
REFLEXIVITY
title_short Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
title_full Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
title_fullStr Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
title_full_unstemmed Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
title_sort Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gil, Gaston Julian
author Gil, Gaston Julian
author_facet Gil, Gaston Julian
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COLLABORATION
FIELDWORK
RECEPTION
REFLEXIVITY
topic COLLABORATION
FIELDWORK
RECEPTION
REFLEXIVITY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Based on an analysis of how an ethnographic research project was received by ´experts´ in the field, a series of reflections will be put forward on ethnographic fieldwork and some aspects of anthropological knowledge. Developed on the assumption that the vicissitudes of ethnographic practice are central to the process of knowing the ´Other´, this reflexive exercise focuses on how informants may turn into either the ethnographer´s saboteurs or his/her contributors -and even co-authors. As spaces in the academic arena are shared -and somehow disputed- extremely conflictive relationships spring raising fears in the ethnographer, who may suffer direct sabotages in his experience on the field.
Fil: Gil, Gaston Julian. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
description Based on an analysis of how an ethnographic research project was received by ´experts´ in the field, a series of reflections will be put forward on ethnographic fieldwork and some aspects of anthropological knowledge. Developed on the assumption that the vicissitudes of ethnographic practice are central to the process of knowing the ´Other´, this reflexive exercise focuses on how informants may turn into either the ethnographer´s saboteurs or his/her contributors -and even co-authors. As spaces in the academic arena are shared -and somehow disputed- extremely conflictive relationships spring raising fears in the ethnographer, who may suffer direct sabotages in his experience on the field.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242476
Gil, Gaston Julian; Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field; SAGE Publications; Qualitative Research; 10; 1; 2-2010; 49-69
1741-3109
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242476
identifier_str_mv Gil, Gaston Julian; Ethnography among ‘experts’: notes on collaboration and sabotage in the field; SAGE Publications; Qualitative Research; 10; 1; 2-2010; 49-69
1741-3109
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468794109348682
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/1468794109348682
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083139278995456
score 12.891075

Publicaciones similares