Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment

Autores
Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri; Hakkarainen, Viola; Eriksson, Max; Andrade, Riley; Horcea Milcu, Andra; Anderson, Christopher Brian; van Riper, Carena J.; Raymond, Christopher M.
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This longitudinal study explores evidence of learning and reflexivity among experts involved in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment from 2018 to 2022. As part of an online survey administered at yearly intervals, experts self-reported their views on: i) the aims they attributed to the Values Assessment, ii) their epistemic worldviews, iii) the definition of the multiple values of nature, and iv) their personal learning experiences in the assessment process. The represented epistemic worldviews corresponded to Constructivist, Transformative, Pragmatist, and Post-positivist. Across the three surveys, 59% of the respondents shifted their epistemic worldviews. However, these same experts did not change their core perspectives regarding the motivation behind the Values Assessment. At the same time, experts holding a Post-positivist worldview came to express more engagement-inclined themes and openness to dialogue with diverse knowledge systems. While enhanced reflexivity stimulated overall learning, cutting across all learning dimensions, it was itself a multilayered learning outcome. This study illustrates how diverse experts critically reflected and changed their own underlying assumptions during the inter- and transdisciplinary process of the Values Assessment. It further reveals that learning experiences in the Values Assessment were embedded in epistemic worldviews and connected to cognitive, relational, and transformative dimensions of learning. Our findings have broader implications for the design of inclusive and reflexive learning processes in future work of organisations aiming to facilitate inter- and transdisciplinary practices at the science-policy interface.
Fil: Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri. Universidad de Tampere; Finlandia
Fil: Hakkarainen, Viola. Helsingin Yliopisto; Finlandia
Fil: Eriksson, Max. No especifíca;
Fil: Andrade, Riley. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos
Fil: Horcea Milcu, Andra. University of Kassel; Alemania
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: van Riper, Carena J.. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos
Fil: Raymond, Christopher M.. No especifíca;
Materia
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
IPBES
LEARNING
REFLEXIVITY
TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/221307

id CONICETDig_d8993ac93ef1ebb50773592d4bf31072
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/221307
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values AssessmentMäkinen Rostedt, KatriHakkarainen, ViolaEriksson, MaxAndrade, RileyHorcea Milcu, AndraAnderson, Christopher Brianvan Riper, Carena J.Raymond, Christopher M.INTERDISCIPLINARITYIPBESLEARNINGREFLEXIVITYTRANSDISCIPLINARITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This longitudinal study explores evidence of learning and reflexivity among experts involved in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment from 2018 to 2022. As part of an online survey administered at yearly intervals, experts self-reported their views on: i) the aims they attributed to the Values Assessment, ii) their epistemic worldviews, iii) the definition of the multiple values of nature, and iv) their personal learning experiences in the assessment process. The represented epistemic worldviews corresponded to Constructivist, Transformative, Pragmatist, and Post-positivist. Across the three surveys, 59% of the respondents shifted their epistemic worldviews. However, these same experts did not change their core perspectives regarding the motivation behind the Values Assessment. At the same time, experts holding a Post-positivist worldview came to express more engagement-inclined themes and openness to dialogue with diverse knowledge systems. While enhanced reflexivity stimulated overall learning, cutting across all learning dimensions, it was itself a multilayered learning outcome. This study illustrates how diverse experts critically reflected and changed their own underlying assumptions during the inter- and transdisciplinary process of the Values Assessment. It further reveals that learning experiences in the Values Assessment were embedded in epistemic worldviews and connected to cognitive, relational, and transformative dimensions of learning. Our findings have broader implications for the design of inclusive and reflexive learning processes in future work of organisations aiming to facilitate inter- and transdisciplinary practices at the science-policy interface.Fil: Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri. Universidad de Tampere; FinlandiaFil: Hakkarainen, Viola. Helsingin Yliopisto; FinlandiaFil: Eriksson, Max. No especifíca;Fil: Andrade, Riley. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados UnidosFil: Horcea Milcu, Andra. University of Kassel; AlemaniaFil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: van Riper, Carena J.. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados UnidosFil: Raymond, Christopher M.. No especifíca;Elsevier2023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/221307Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri; Hakkarainen, Viola; Eriksson, Max; Andrade, Riley; Horcea Milcu, Andra; et al.; Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment; Elsevier; Environmental Science & Policy; 147; 9-2023; 215-2271462-9011CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.010info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901123001673info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T11:38:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/221307instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 11:38:38.52CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
title Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
spellingShingle Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
IPBES
LEARNING
REFLEXIVITY
TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
title_short Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
title_full Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
title_fullStr Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
title_sort Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri
Hakkarainen, Viola
Eriksson, Max
Andrade, Riley
Horcea Milcu, Andra
Anderson, Christopher Brian
van Riper, Carena J.
Raymond, Christopher M.
author Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri
author_facet Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri
Hakkarainen, Viola
Eriksson, Max
Andrade, Riley
Horcea Milcu, Andra
Anderson, Christopher Brian
van Riper, Carena J.
Raymond, Christopher M.
author_role author
author2 Hakkarainen, Viola
Eriksson, Max
Andrade, Riley
Horcea Milcu, Andra
Anderson, Christopher Brian
van Riper, Carena J.
Raymond, Christopher M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv INTERDISCIPLINARITY
IPBES
LEARNING
REFLEXIVITY
TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
topic INTERDISCIPLINARITY
IPBES
LEARNING
REFLEXIVITY
TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This longitudinal study explores evidence of learning and reflexivity among experts involved in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment from 2018 to 2022. As part of an online survey administered at yearly intervals, experts self-reported their views on: i) the aims they attributed to the Values Assessment, ii) their epistemic worldviews, iii) the definition of the multiple values of nature, and iv) their personal learning experiences in the assessment process. The represented epistemic worldviews corresponded to Constructivist, Transformative, Pragmatist, and Post-positivist. Across the three surveys, 59% of the respondents shifted their epistemic worldviews. However, these same experts did not change their core perspectives regarding the motivation behind the Values Assessment. At the same time, experts holding a Post-positivist worldview came to express more engagement-inclined themes and openness to dialogue with diverse knowledge systems. While enhanced reflexivity stimulated overall learning, cutting across all learning dimensions, it was itself a multilayered learning outcome. This study illustrates how diverse experts critically reflected and changed their own underlying assumptions during the inter- and transdisciplinary process of the Values Assessment. It further reveals that learning experiences in the Values Assessment were embedded in epistemic worldviews and connected to cognitive, relational, and transformative dimensions of learning. Our findings have broader implications for the design of inclusive and reflexive learning processes in future work of organisations aiming to facilitate inter- and transdisciplinary practices at the science-policy interface.
Fil: Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri. Universidad de Tampere; Finlandia
Fil: Hakkarainen, Viola. Helsingin Yliopisto; Finlandia
Fil: Eriksson, Max. No especifíca;
Fil: Andrade, Riley. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos
Fil: Horcea Milcu, Andra. University of Kassel; Alemania
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: van Riper, Carena J.. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos
Fil: Raymond, Christopher M.. No especifíca;
description This longitudinal study explores evidence of learning and reflexivity among experts involved in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Values Assessment from 2018 to 2022. As part of an online survey administered at yearly intervals, experts self-reported their views on: i) the aims they attributed to the Values Assessment, ii) their epistemic worldviews, iii) the definition of the multiple values of nature, and iv) their personal learning experiences in the assessment process. The represented epistemic worldviews corresponded to Constructivist, Transformative, Pragmatist, and Post-positivist. Across the three surveys, 59% of the respondents shifted their epistemic worldviews. However, these same experts did not change their core perspectives regarding the motivation behind the Values Assessment. At the same time, experts holding a Post-positivist worldview came to express more engagement-inclined themes and openness to dialogue with diverse knowledge systems. While enhanced reflexivity stimulated overall learning, cutting across all learning dimensions, it was itself a multilayered learning outcome. This study illustrates how diverse experts critically reflected and changed their own underlying assumptions during the inter- and transdisciplinary process of the Values Assessment. It further reveals that learning experiences in the Values Assessment were embedded in epistemic worldviews and connected to cognitive, relational, and transformative dimensions of learning. Our findings have broader implications for the design of inclusive and reflexive learning processes in future work of organisations aiming to facilitate inter- and transdisciplinary practices at the science-policy interface.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/221307
Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri; Hakkarainen, Viola; Eriksson, Max; Andrade, Riley; Horcea Milcu, Andra; et al.; Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment; Elsevier; Environmental Science & Policy; 147; 9-2023; 215-227
1462-9011
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/221307
identifier_str_mv Mäkinen Rostedt, Katri; Hakkarainen, Viola; Eriksson, Max; Andrade, Riley; Horcea Milcu, Andra; et al.; Engaging diverse experts in the global science-policy interface: Learning experiences from the process of the IPBES Values Assessment; Elsevier; Environmental Science & Policy; 147; 9-2023; 215-227
1462-9011
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.010
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901123001673
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1843606743769153536
score 13.001348