Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)

Autores
Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.
Año de publicación
2007
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in
several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth
homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and
dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the
generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most
megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes.
Fil: Giannini, Norberto Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Simmons, Nancy B.. American Museum of Natural History ; Estados Unidos
Materia
skull osteology
chiroptera
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83183

id CONICETDig_fb29a27192de41f73c856b4d2821e05a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83183
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)Giannini, Norberto PedroSimmons, Nancy B.skull osteologychiropterahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in<br />several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth<br />homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and<br />dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the<br />generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most<br />megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes.Fil: Giannini, Norberto Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; ArgentinaFil: Simmons, Nancy B.. American Museum of Natural History ; Estados UnidosAmerican Museum of Natural History2007-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/83183Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.; Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae); American Museum of Natural History; American Museum Novitates; 3559; 12-2007; 1-270003-0082CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/5849info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:15:03Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83183instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:15:03.552CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
title Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
spellingShingle Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
Giannini, Norberto Pedro
skull osteology
chiroptera
title_short Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
title_full Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
title_fullStr Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
title_full_unstemmed Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
title_sort Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Giannini, Norberto Pedro
Simmons, Nancy B.
author Giannini, Norberto Pedro
author_facet Giannini, Norberto Pedro
Simmons, Nancy B.
author_role author
author2 Simmons, Nancy B.
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv skull osteology
chiroptera
topic skull osteology
chiroptera
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in<br />several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth<br />homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and<br />dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the<br />generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most<br />megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes.
Fil: Giannini, Norberto Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Simmons, Nancy B.. American Museum of Natural History ; Estados Unidos
description Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in<br />several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth<br />homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and<br />dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the<br />generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most<br />megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83183
Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.; Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae); American Museum of Natural History; American Museum Novitates; 3559; 12-2007; 1-27
0003-0082
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83183
identifier_str_mv Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.; Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae); American Museum of Natural History; American Museum Novitates; 3559; 12-2007; 1-27
0003-0082
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/5849
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Museum of Natural History
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Museum of Natural History
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781578485694464
score 12.982451