Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)
- Autores
- Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.
- Año de publicación
- 2007
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in
several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth
homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and
dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the
generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most
megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes.
Fil: Giannini, Norberto Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Simmons, Nancy B.. American Museum of Natural History ; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
skull osteology
chiroptera - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83183
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_fb29a27192de41f73c856b4d2821e05a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83183 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae)Giannini, Norberto PedroSimmons, Nancy B.skull osteologychiropterahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in<br />several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth<br />homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and<br />dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the<br />generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most<br />megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes.Fil: Giannini, Norberto Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; ArgentinaFil: Simmons, Nancy B.. American Museum of Natural History ; Estados UnidosAmerican Museum of Natural History2007-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/83183Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.; Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae); American Museum of Natural History; American Museum Novitates; 3559; 12-2007; 1-270003-0082CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/5849info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:15:03Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83183instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:15:03.552CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) |
title |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) |
spellingShingle |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) Giannini, Norberto Pedro skull osteology chiroptera |
title_short |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) |
title_full |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) |
title_fullStr |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) |
title_sort |
Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae) |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Giannini, Norberto Pedro Simmons, Nancy B. |
author |
Giannini, Norberto Pedro |
author_facet |
Giannini, Norberto Pedro Simmons, Nancy B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Simmons, Nancy B. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
skull osteology chiroptera |
topic |
skull osteology chiroptera |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in<br />several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth<br />homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and<br />dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the<br />generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most<br />megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes. Fil: Giannini, Norberto Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina Fil: Simmons, Nancy B.. American Museum of Natural History ; Estados Unidos |
description |
Variation in dental formulae observed in megachiropteran bats poses element homology problems. Identity of individual teeth has been controversial, with authors differing in their assessment of individual tooth homology, particularly with respect to incisors and premolars, in<br />several taxa. Also, newly described taxa exhibit dental formulae whose implications for tooth<br />homology have been little discussed. We compared crown morphology, tooth replacement, and<br />dental anomalies in representatives of all megachiropteran genera. Our observations confirm the<br />generalized megachiropteran dental formula (34 teeth represented by I1, I2, C, P1, P3, P4, M1, M2, i1, i2, c, p1, p3, p4, m1, m2, and m3) and establishes the homology of each tooth in most<br />megachiropteran taxa in which reduction in tooth number has taken place. Some of our conclusions confirm presumed homologies postulated by previous authors, but in other cases new homology assignments are proposed. Uncorroborated assignments are reduced to just two taxa, Harpyionycteris and Nyctimeninae, both of which remain problematic with respect to homologies of the incisor dentition. Mapping tooth presence/absence on previously published phylogenetic trees reveals modest levels of ambiguity and homoplasy in patterns of tooth reduction in Pteropodidae, and indicates that reversals involving the reappearance of an ancestrally lost tooth may have taken place. Our results are consistent with dental field theory, which explains both reversals and anomalies as a regulatory variation that does not affect element homology because the latter is supported by structural genes. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83183 Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.; Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae); American Museum of Natural History; American Museum Novitates; 3559; 12-2007; 1-27 0003-0082 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83183 |
identifier_str_mv |
Giannini, Norberto Pedro; Simmons, Nancy B.; Element homology and the evolution of dental formulae in Megachiropteran bats (mammalia: chiroptera: pteropodidae); American Museum of Natural History; American Museum Novitates; 3559; 12-2007; 1-27 0003-0082 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/5849 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Museum of Natural History |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Museum of Natural History |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846781578485694464 |
score |
12.982451 |