Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile

Autores
Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres; Allaire, Ninon; Ginot, Samuel
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this report we compare two geometric morphometric methods (Outline-basedvs. Virtual Modeling-based) aiming to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile shape (designatedas whorl cross-section shape in previous contributions). A dataset including 50ammonoid whorl profiles is used to evaluate the two approaches, and the resultingmorphospaces are compared. The morphological variations depicted by PC1 and PC2are consistent across methods and are congruent with previously reported patterns(the predicted morphologies are similar). PC1 captures from 66% to 70% of the totalvariance; along this axis the morphological transformation is mainly associated with thedegree of conch compression. For PC2 the variation is associated with the elongation/compression of the whorl profile, and with the relative height of the imprint zone(degree of whorl overlap). The variation summarized across the first two principal componentsis about 88% for the Virtual Modeling Method (VMM) and about 94% for theOutline-based Method (OBM). The principal differences between the two approacheslie in the way they quantify the imprint zone. The transformations associated with theshape of this region are related to PC3 and are more specifically linked to the shapeand lateral dimensions of the umbilical walls. VMM allows a more accurate quantificationof the imprint zone shape, while OBM shows more limited performances for quantifyingthis specific zone of the whorl profile.
Fil: Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Allaire, Ninon. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra; Argentina
Fil: Ginot, Samuel. Universitat Bonn; Alemania
Materia
GEOMETRIC
MORPHOMETRICS
AMMONOID
LANDMARKS
SEMI-LANDMARKS
OUTLINE
AMMONITE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/262432
Acceder
id CONICETDig_f7622002fda41fcc4f3bed8fd129cc81
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/262432
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profileMoron Alfonso, Daniel AndresAllaire, NinonGinot, SamuelGEOMETRICMORPHOMETRICSAMMONOIDLANDMARKSSEMI-LANDMARKSOUTLINEAMMONITEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In this report we compare two geometric morphometric methods (Outline-basedvs. Virtual Modeling-based) aiming to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile shape (designatedas whorl cross-section shape in previous contributions). A dataset including 50ammonoid whorl profiles is used to evaluate the two approaches, and the resultingmorphospaces are compared. The morphological variations depicted by PC1 and PC2are consistent across methods and are congruent with previously reported patterns(the predicted morphologies are similar). PC1 captures from 66% to 70% of the totalvariance; along this axis the morphological transformation is mainly associated with thedegree of conch compression. For PC2 the variation is associated with the elongation/compression of the whorl profile, and with the relative height of the imprint zone(degree of whorl overlap). The variation summarized across the first two principal componentsis about 88% for the Virtual Modeling Method (VMM) and about 94% for theOutline-based Method (OBM). The principal differences between the two approacheslie in the way they quantify the imprint zone. The transformations associated with theshape of this region are related to PC3 and are more specifically linked to the shapeand lateral dimensions of the umbilical walls. VMM allows a more accurate quantificationof the imprint zone shape, while OBM shows more limited performances for quantifyingthis specific zone of the whorl profile.Fil: Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; ArgentinaFil: Allaire, Ninon. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra; ArgentinaFil: Ginot, Samuel. Universitat Bonn; AlemaniaCoquina Press2024-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/262432Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres; Allaire, Ninon; Ginot, Samuel; Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile; Coquina Press; Palaeontologia Electronica; 27; 3; 11-2024; 1-141935-39521094-8074CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2024/5365-gm-in-ammonoids-obm-vs-vmminfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.26879/1369info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:04:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/262432instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:04:27.114CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
title Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
spellingShingle Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres
GEOMETRIC
MORPHOMETRICS
AMMONOID
LANDMARKS
SEMI-LANDMARKS
OUTLINE
AMMONITE
title_short Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
title_full Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
title_sort Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres
Allaire, Ninon
Ginot, Samuel
author Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres
author_facet Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres
Allaire, Ninon
Ginot, Samuel
author_role author
author2 Allaire, Ninon
Ginot, Samuel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv GEOMETRIC
MORPHOMETRICS
AMMONOID
LANDMARKS
SEMI-LANDMARKS
OUTLINE
AMMONITE
topic GEOMETRIC
MORPHOMETRICS
AMMONOID
LANDMARKS
SEMI-LANDMARKS
OUTLINE
AMMONITE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this report we compare two geometric morphometric methods (Outline-basedvs. Virtual Modeling-based) aiming to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile shape (designatedas whorl cross-section shape in previous contributions). A dataset including 50ammonoid whorl profiles is used to evaluate the two approaches, and the resultingmorphospaces are compared. The morphological variations depicted by PC1 and PC2are consistent across methods and are congruent with previously reported patterns(the predicted morphologies are similar). PC1 captures from 66% to 70% of the totalvariance; along this axis the morphological transformation is mainly associated with thedegree of conch compression. For PC2 the variation is associated with the elongation/compression of the whorl profile, and with the relative height of the imprint zone(degree of whorl overlap). The variation summarized across the first two principal componentsis about 88% for the Virtual Modeling Method (VMM) and about 94% for theOutline-based Method (OBM). The principal differences between the two approacheslie in the way they quantify the imprint zone. The transformations associated with theshape of this region are related to PC3 and are more specifically linked to the shapeand lateral dimensions of the umbilical walls. VMM allows a more accurate quantificationof the imprint zone shape, while OBM shows more limited performances for quantifyingthis specific zone of the whorl profile.
Fil: Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina
Fil: Allaire, Ninon. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra; Argentina
Fil: Ginot, Samuel. Universitat Bonn; Alemania
description In this report we compare two geometric morphometric methods (Outline-basedvs. Virtual Modeling-based) aiming to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile shape (designatedas whorl cross-section shape in previous contributions). A dataset including 50ammonoid whorl profiles is used to evaluate the two approaches, and the resultingmorphospaces are compared. The morphological variations depicted by PC1 and PC2are consistent across methods and are congruent with previously reported patterns(the predicted morphologies are similar). PC1 captures from 66% to 70% of the totalvariance; along this axis the morphological transformation is mainly associated with thedegree of conch compression. For PC2 the variation is associated with the elongation/compression of the whorl profile, and with the relative height of the imprint zone(degree of whorl overlap). The variation summarized across the first two principal componentsis about 88% for the Virtual Modeling Method (VMM) and about 94% for theOutline-based Method (OBM). The principal differences between the two approacheslie in the way they quantify the imprint zone. The transformations associated with theshape of this region are related to PC3 and are more specifically linked to the shapeand lateral dimensions of the umbilical walls. VMM allows a more accurate quantificationof the imprint zone shape, while OBM shows more limited performances for quantifyingthis specific zone of the whorl profile.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/262432
Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres; Allaire, Ninon; Ginot, Samuel; Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile; Coquina Press; Palaeontologia Electronica; 27; 3; 11-2024; 1-14
1935-3952
1094-8074
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/262432
identifier_str_mv Moron Alfonso, Daniel Andres; Allaire, Ninon; Ginot, Samuel; Comparative assessment of outline-based vs. virtual modeling-based methods to analyze the ammonoid whorl profile; Coquina Press; Palaeontologia Electronica; 27; 3; 11-2024; 1-14
1935-3952
1094-8074
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2024/5365-gm-in-ammonoids-obm-vs-vmm
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.26879/1369
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Coquina Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Coquina Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269855369134080
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares