Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii)
- Autores
- González Castro, Mariano; Ibañez, Ana Laura; Heras, Sandra; Roldán, María Inés; Cousseau, María Berta
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Meristic and different morphometric approaches were employed to assess the discrimination of 7 species of Mugilidae fishes (Mugil cephalus, M. liza, M. curema, M. hospes, Liza aurata, L. ramada, and Chelon labrosus), but also to contribute to a better understanding of body-shape differences among this valuable species group. Three types of variables and their corresponding morphometric approaches were employed: 1) linear morphometrics measurements (LMMs); 2) interlandmark distances (IlDs); and 3) coordinate data (landmarks). Before the analyses, data exhibiting allometric growth were normalized. Data analysis included a one-way ANOVA (meristic data), a principal component analysis (PCA), and a cross-validated discriminant analysis (DA). The ANOVA showed significant differences in both lateral and transverse series scales. The PCA based on LMMs allowed the characterization of 6 groups, although some overlap between them was detected. The DA correctly classified 68.4% of the fishes according to their LMMs. The centroids of the 8 groups were separated for both the 1st and 2nd discriminant functions. The morphometric analysis based on IlDs yielded the best discrimination rates of the 3 approaches employed (96% for the DA). In the geometric morphometric analysis, the DA correctly classified 83.8% of the fishes according to their body shape. Although 8 groups were defined, some overlap among samples was detected. Mugil hospes was the best defined and most isolated species as observed in both the PCA and DA. Interestingly, the 3 morphometrics approaches employed separated M. curema specimens in 2 groups (Argentinean and Mexican samples). Moreover, European and Mexican samples of M. cephalus plotted separately in the PCA of the LMM- and IlD-based approaches. These shape differences among M. curema of Argentina/Mexico and M. cephalus of Europe/Mexico reinforce the current hypothesis of a species complex, or even undescribed species as previously suggested by the authors.
Fil: González Castro, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina
Fil: Ibañez, Ana Laura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; México
Fil: Heras, Sandra. Universidad de Girona; España
Fil: Roldán, María Inés. Universidad de Girona; España
Fil: Cousseau, María Berta. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias Marinas; Argentina - Materia
-
Mugilidae
Landmarks
Geometric morphometrics
Multivariate analysis - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/71790
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_83699b7c76b373de3477f2b7ef085e15 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/71790 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii)González Castro, MarianoIbañez, Ana LauraHeras, SandraRoldán, María InésCousseau, María BertaMugilidaeLandmarksGeometric morphometricsMultivariate analysishttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Meristic and different morphometric approaches were employed to assess the discrimination of 7 species of Mugilidae fishes (Mugil cephalus, M. liza, M. curema, M. hospes, Liza aurata, L. ramada, and Chelon labrosus), but also to contribute to a better understanding of body-shape differences among this valuable species group. Three types of variables and their corresponding morphometric approaches were employed: 1) linear morphometrics measurements (LMMs); 2) interlandmark distances (IlDs); and 3) coordinate data (landmarks). Before the analyses, data exhibiting allometric growth were normalized. Data analysis included a one-way ANOVA (meristic data), a principal component analysis (PCA), and a cross-validated discriminant analysis (DA). The ANOVA showed significant differences in both lateral and transverse series scales. The PCA based on LMMs allowed the characterization of 6 groups, although some overlap between them was detected. The DA correctly classified 68.4% of the fishes according to their LMMs. The centroids of the 8 groups were separated for both the 1st and 2nd discriminant functions. The morphometric analysis based on IlDs yielded the best discrimination rates of the 3 approaches employed (96% for the DA). In the geometric morphometric analysis, the DA correctly classified 83.8% of the fishes according to their body shape. Although 8 groups were defined, some overlap among samples was detected. Mugil hospes was the best defined and most isolated species as observed in both the PCA and DA. Interestingly, the 3 morphometrics approaches employed separated M. curema specimens in 2 groups (Argentinean and Mexican samples). Moreover, European and Mexican samples of M. cephalus plotted separately in the PCA of the LMM- and IlD-based approaches. These shape differences among M. curema of Argentina/Mexico and M. cephalus of Europe/Mexico reinforce the current hypothesis of a species complex, or even undescribed species as previously suggested by the authors.Fil: González Castro, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; ArgentinaFil: Ibañez, Ana Laura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; MéxicoFil: Heras, Sandra. Universidad de Girona; EspañaFil: Roldán, María Inés. Universidad de Girona; EspañaFil: Cousseau, María Berta. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias Marinas; ArgentinaAcademia Sinica2012-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/71790González Castro, Mariano; Ibañez, Ana Laura; Heras, Sandra; Roldán, María Inés; Cousseau, María Berta; Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii); Academia Sinica; Zoological Studies; 51; 8; 12-2012; 1515-15281810-522XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/51.8/1515.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:48:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/71790instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:48:39.232CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) |
title |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) |
spellingShingle |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) González Castro, Mariano Mugilidae Landmarks Geometric morphometrics Multivariate analysis |
title_short |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) |
title_full |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) |
title_fullStr |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) |
title_sort |
Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii) |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
González Castro, Mariano Ibañez, Ana Laura Heras, Sandra Roldán, María Inés Cousseau, María Berta |
author |
González Castro, Mariano |
author_facet |
González Castro, Mariano Ibañez, Ana Laura Heras, Sandra Roldán, María Inés Cousseau, María Berta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ibañez, Ana Laura Heras, Sandra Roldán, María Inés Cousseau, María Berta |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Mugilidae Landmarks Geometric morphometrics Multivariate analysis |
topic |
Mugilidae Landmarks Geometric morphometrics Multivariate analysis |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Meristic and different morphometric approaches were employed to assess the discrimination of 7 species of Mugilidae fishes (Mugil cephalus, M. liza, M. curema, M. hospes, Liza aurata, L. ramada, and Chelon labrosus), but also to contribute to a better understanding of body-shape differences among this valuable species group. Three types of variables and their corresponding morphometric approaches were employed: 1) linear morphometrics measurements (LMMs); 2) interlandmark distances (IlDs); and 3) coordinate data (landmarks). Before the analyses, data exhibiting allometric growth were normalized. Data analysis included a one-way ANOVA (meristic data), a principal component analysis (PCA), and a cross-validated discriminant analysis (DA). The ANOVA showed significant differences in both lateral and transverse series scales. The PCA based on LMMs allowed the characterization of 6 groups, although some overlap between them was detected. The DA correctly classified 68.4% of the fishes according to their LMMs. The centroids of the 8 groups were separated for both the 1st and 2nd discriminant functions. The morphometric analysis based on IlDs yielded the best discrimination rates of the 3 approaches employed (96% for the DA). In the geometric morphometric analysis, the DA correctly classified 83.8% of the fishes according to their body shape. Although 8 groups were defined, some overlap among samples was detected. Mugil hospes was the best defined and most isolated species as observed in both the PCA and DA. Interestingly, the 3 morphometrics approaches employed separated M. curema specimens in 2 groups (Argentinean and Mexican samples). Moreover, European and Mexican samples of M. cephalus plotted separately in the PCA of the LMM- and IlD-based approaches. These shape differences among M. curema of Argentina/Mexico and M. cephalus of Europe/Mexico reinforce the current hypothesis of a species complex, or even undescribed species as previously suggested by the authors. Fil: González Castro, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina Fil: Ibañez, Ana Laura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; México Fil: Heras, Sandra. Universidad de Girona; España Fil: Roldán, María Inés. Universidad de Girona; España Fil: Cousseau, María Berta. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ciencias Marinas; Argentina |
description |
Meristic and different morphometric approaches were employed to assess the discrimination of 7 species of Mugilidae fishes (Mugil cephalus, M. liza, M. curema, M. hospes, Liza aurata, L. ramada, and Chelon labrosus), but also to contribute to a better understanding of body-shape differences among this valuable species group. Three types of variables and their corresponding morphometric approaches were employed: 1) linear morphometrics measurements (LMMs); 2) interlandmark distances (IlDs); and 3) coordinate data (landmarks). Before the analyses, data exhibiting allometric growth were normalized. Data analysis included a one-way ANOVA (meristic data), a principal component analysis (PCA), and a cross-validated discriminant analysis (DA). The ANOVA showed significant differences in both lateral and transverse series scales. The PCA based on LMMs allowed the characterization of 6 groups, although some overlap between them was detected. The DA correctly classified 68.4% of the fishes according to their LMMs. The centroids of the 8 groups were separated for both the 1st and 2nd discriminant functions. The morphometric analysis based on IlDs yielded the best discrimination rates of the 3 approaches employed (96% for the DA). In the geometric morphometric analysis, the DA correctly classified 83.8% of the fishes according to their body shape. Although 8 groups were defined, some overlap among samples was detected. Mugil hospes was the best defined and most isolated species as observed in both the PCA and DA. Interestingly, the 3 morphometrics approaches employed separated M. curema specimens in 2 groups (Argentinean and Mexican samples). Moreover, European and Mexican samples of M. cephalus plotted separately in the PCA of the LMM- and IlD-based approaches. These shape differences among M. curema of Argentina/Mexico and M. cephalus of Europe/Mexico reinforce the current hypothesis of a species complex, or even undescribed species as previously suggested by the authors. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71790 González Castro, Mariano; Ibañez, Ana Laura; Heras, Sandra; Roldán, María Inés; Cousseau, María Berta; Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii); Academia Sinica; Zoological Studies; 51; 8; 12-2012; 1515-1528 1810-522X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71790 |
identifier_str_mv |
González Castro, Mariano; Ibañez, Ana Laura; Heras, Sandra; Roldán, María Inés; Cousseau, María Berta; Assesment of lineal versus landmarks- based morphometry for discriminating species of Mugilidae (Actinopterygii); Academia Sinica; Zoological Studies; 51; 8; 12-2012; 1515-1528 1810-522X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/51.8/1515.html |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Sinica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Sinica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268933477892096 |
score |
13.13397 |