On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien
- Autores
- Charlin, Judith Emilce
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The use of ethnographic analogies to aid the interpretation of archaeological remains is an important theoretical and methodological tool in archaeological research. Historic records, folklore, ethnographic reports and the most archaeological-driven actualistic research like ethnoarchaeology are the main sources to develop a wide range of analogies, from the function or production techniques of particular objects to activity areas and discard patterns, as well as broader models of socio-political and economical organization (see Binford 1994, 2001; Sillar and Joffré 2016, among others). Native material culture stored in museums provides core material for analogies since only a fraction of the artefacts used in the past are preserved in the archaeological record. Many organic materials, such as baskets, textiles, leathers, woods, among others, do not leave any trace, excepting unusual situations of very good preservation. Prehistoric weapons offer a clear example of these conservation problems. In general the overall technical system, which is mostly composed of perishable materials -such as wooden bows and arrow shafts- is rarely preserved in the archaeological record. The weapon points, mainly the lithic ones, are typically the only remains recovered by archaeologists and according to their morphometric attributes form the base of overall weapon system reconstruction. For this reason, ethnographic weapons from museum collections are a very valuable source of information for the study of technical and functional traits of prehistoric weapons since often preserve the overall technical system. This line of research was the frame of reference in my study of Weltmuseum Wien weapon collections from South America (department in charge of Dr. Claudia Augustat), North America (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gerard van Bussel) and Oceania and Australia (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gabriele Weiss). My interests are focused in size and shape variation among weapon systems, especially in their points, according to function and raw material. Here I will present the main results obtained from the morphometric analysis of Tierra del Fuego arrow collections surveyed at Weltmuseum Wien, including also some other Fuegian collections with comparative purposes.
Fil: Charlin, Judith Emilce. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina - Materia
-
ETHNOGRAPHIC WEAPONS
TIERRA DEL FUEGO ARROWS
GUSINDE COLLECTION
WELTMUSEUM WIEN - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/87838
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_f63c2777b39958f113d96c8c6d682d99 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/87838 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum WienCharlin, Judith EmilceETHNOGRAPHIC WEAPONSTIERRA DEL FUEGO ARROWSGUSINDE COLLECTIONWELTMUSEUM WIENhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The use of ethnographic analogies to aid the interpretation of archaeological remains is an important theoretical and methodological tool in archaeological research. Historic records, folklore, ethnographic reports and the most archaeological-driven actualistic research like ethnoarchaeology are the main sources to develop a wide range of analogies, from the function or production techniques of particular objects to activity areas and discard patterns, as well as broader models of socio-political and economical organization (see Binford 1994, 2001; Sillar and Joffré 2016, among others). Native material culture stored in museums provides core material for analogies since only a fraction of the artefacts used in the past are preserved in the archaeological record. Many organic materials, such as baskets, textiles, leathers, woods, among others, do not leave any trace, excepting unusual situations of very good preservation. Prehistoric weapons offer a clear example of these conservation problems. In general the overall technical system, which is mostly composed of perishable materials -such as wooden bows and arrow shafts- is rarely preserved in the archaeological record. The weapon points, mainly the lithic ones, are typically the only remains recovered by archaeologists and according to their morphometric attributes form the base of overall weapon system reconstruction. For this reason, ethnographic weapons from museum collections are a very valuable source of information for the study of technical and functional traits of prehistoric weapons since often preserve the overall technical system. This line of research was the frame of reference in my study of Weltmuseum Wien weapon collections from South America (department in charge of Dr. Claudia Augustat), North America (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gerard van Bussel) and Oceania and Australia (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gabriele Weiss). My interests are focused in size and shape variation among weapon systems, especially in their points, according to function and raw material. Here I will present the main results obtained from the morphometric analysis of Tierra del Fuego arrow collections surveyed at Weltmuseum Wien, including also some other Fuegian collections with comparative purposes.Fil: Charlin, Judith Emilce. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; ArgentinaWeltmuseum Wien2018-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/87838Charlin, Judith Emilce; On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien; Weltmuseum Wien; Archiv Weltmuseum Wien; 67; 12-2018; 74-93978-3-643-99767-80066-6513CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.weltmuseumwien.at/eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.uni-press.de/isbn/3-643-99767-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:23:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/87838instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:23:07.585CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien |
title |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien |
spellingShingle |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien Charlin, Judith Emilce ETHNOGRAPHIC WEAPONS TIERRA DEL FUEGO ARROWS GUSINDE COLLECTION WELTMUSEUM WIEN |
title_short |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien |
title_full |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien |
title_fullStr |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien |
title_sort |
On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Charlin, Judith Emilce |
author |
Charlin, Judith Emilce |
author_facet |
Charlin, Judith Emilce |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ETHNOGRAPHIC WEAPONS TIERRA DEL FUEGO ARROWS GUSINDE COLLECTION WELTMUSEUM WIEN |
topic |
ETHNOGRAPHIC WEAPONS TIERRA DEL FUEGO ARROWS GUSINDE COLLECTION WELTMUSEUM WIEN |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The use of ethnographic analogies to aid the interpretation of archaeological remains is an important theoretical and methodological tool in archaeological research. Historic records, folklore, ethnographic reports and the most archaeological-driven actualistic research like ethnoarchaeology are the main sources to develop a wide range of analogies, from the function or production techniques of particular objects to activity areas and discard patterns, as well as broader models of socio-political and economical organization (see Binford 1994, 2001; Sillar and Joffré 2016, among others). Native material culture stored in museums provides core material for analogies since only a fraction of the artefacts used in the past are preserved in the archaeological record. Many organic materials, such as baskets, textiles, leathers, woods, among others, do not leave any trace, excepting unusual situations of very good preservation. Prehistoric weapons offer a clear example of these conservation problems. In general the overall technical system, which is mostly composed of perishable materials -such as wooden bows and arrow shafts- is rarely preserved in the archaeological record. The weapon points, mainly the lithic ones, are typically the only remains recovered by archaeologists and according to their morphometric attributes form the base of overall weapon system reconstruction. For this reason, ethnographic weapons from museum collections are a very valuable source of information for the study of technical and functional traits of prehistoric weapons since often preserve the overall technical system. This line of research was the frame of reference in my study of Weltmuseum Wien weapon collections from South America (department in charge of Dr. Claudia Augustat), North America (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gerard van Bussel) and Oceania and Australia (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gabriele Weiss). My interests are focused in size and shape variation among weapon systems, especially in their points, according to function and raw material. Here I will present the main results obtained from the morphometric analysis of Tierra del Fuego arrow collections surveyed at Weltmuseum Wien, including also some other Fuegian collections with comparative purposes. Fil: Charlin, Judith Emilce. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina |
description |
The use of ethnographic analogies to aid the interpretation of archaeological remains is an important theoretical and methodological tool in archaeological research. Historic records, folklore, ethnographic reports and the most archaeological-driven actualistic research like ethnoarchaeology are the main sources to develop a wide range of analogies, from the function or production techniques of particular objects to activity areas and discard patterns, as well as broader models of socio-political and economical organization (see Binford 1994, 2001; Sillar and Joffré 2016, among others). Native material culture stored in museums provides core material for analogies since only a fraction of the artefacts used in the past are preserved in the archaeological record. Many organic materials, such as baskets, textiles, leathers, woods, among others, do not leave any trace, excepting unusual situations of very good preservation. Prehistoric weapons offer a clear example of these conservation problems. In general the overall technical system, which is mostly composed of perishable materials -such as wooden bows and arrow shafts- is rarely preserved in the archaeological record. The weapon points, mainly the lithic ones, are typically the only remains recovered by archaeologists and according to their morphometric attributes form the base of overall weapon system reconstruction. For this reason, ethnographic weapons from museum collections are a very valuable source of information for the study of technical and functional traits of prehistoric weapons since often preserve the overall technical system. This line of research was the frame of reference in my study of Weltmuseum Wien weapon collections from South America (department in charge of Dr. Claudia Augustat), North America (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gerard van Bussel) and Oceania and Australia (department in charge of Prof. Dr. Gabriele Weiss). My interests are focused in size and shape variation among weapon systems, especially in their points, according to function and raw material. Here I will present the main results obtained from the morphometric analysis of Tierra del Fuego arrow collections surveyed at Weltmuseum Wien, including also some other Fuegian collections with comparative purposes. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/87838 Charlin, Judith Emilce; On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien; Weltmuseum Wien; Archiv Weltmuseum Wien; 67; 12-2018; 74-93 978-3-643-99767-8 0066-6513 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/87838 |
identifier_str_mv |
Charlin, Judith Emilce; On the Importance of Museum Ethnographic Collections for Archaeological Research: the Case of Native Weapons from Tierra del Fuego at the Weltmuseum Wien; Weltmuseum Wien; Archiv Weltmuseum Wien; 67; 12-2018; 74-93 978-3-643-99767-8 0066-6513 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.weltmuseumwien.at/en info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.uni-press.de/isbn/3-643-99767-8 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Weltmuseum Wien |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Weltmuseum Wien |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614224767090688 |
score |
13.070432 |