Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies
- Autores
- Yahara, Tetsukazu; Javadi, Firouzeh; Onoda, Yusuke; Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano; Faith, Daniel P.; Prado, Darien Eros; Akasaka, Munemitsu; Kadoya, Taku; Ishihama, Fumiko; Davies, Stuart; Ferry Slik, J.W.; Yi, Tingshuang; Ma, Keping; Bin, Chen; Darnaedi, Dedy; Pennington, R.Toby; Tuda, Midori; Shimada, Masakazu; Ito, Motomi; Egan, Ashley N.; Buerki, Sven; Raes, Niels; Kajita, Tadashi; Vatanparast, Mohammad; Mimura, Makiko; Tachida, Hidenori; Iwasa, Yoh; Smith, Gideon; Victor, Janine E.; Nkonki, Tandiwe
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- While many plant species are considered threatened under anthropogenic pressure, it remains uncertain how rapidly we are losing plant species diversity. To fill this gap, we propose a Global Legume Diversity Assessment (GLDA) as the first step of a global plant diversity assessment. Here we describe the concept of GLDA and its feasibility by reviewing relevant approaches and data availability. We conclude that Fabaceae is a good proxy for overall angiosperm diversity in many habitats and that much relevant data for GLDA are available. As indicators of states, we propose comparison of species richness with phylogenetic and functional diversity to obtain an integrated picture of diversity. As indicators of trends, species loss rate and extinction risks should be assessed. Specimen records and plot data provide key resources for assessing legume diversity at a global scale, and distribution modeling based on these records provide key methods for assessing states and trends of legume diversity. GLDA has started in Asia, and we call for a truly global legume diversity assessment by wider geographic collaborations among various scientists
Fil: Yahara, Tetsukazu. Kyushu University; Japón
Fil: Javadi, Firouzeh. Kyushu University; Japón
Fil: Onoda, Yusuke. Kyoto University; Japón
Fil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana; Brasil
Fil: Faith, Daniel P.. The Australian Museum; Australia
Fil: Prado, Darien Eros. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Cátedra de Botánica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Akasaka, Munemitsu. University of Tokyo; Japón
Fil: Kadoya, Taku. National Institute for Environmental Studies; Japón
Fil: Ishihama, Fumiko. National Institute for Environmental Studies; Japón
Fil: Davies, Stuart. Smithsonian Institution; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ferry Slik, J.W.. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China
Fil: Yi, Tingshuang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China
Fil: Ma, Keping. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China
Fil: Bin, Chen. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China
Fil: Darnaedi, Dedy. Indonesian Institute of Sciences; Indonesia
Fil: Pennington, R.Toby. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Tuda, Midori. Kyushu University; Japón
Fil: Shimada, Masakazu. University of Tokyo; Japón
Fil: Ito, Motomi. University of Tokyo; Japón
Fil: Egan, Ashley N.. East Carolina University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Buerki, Sven. Royal Botanic Gardens; Reino Unido
Fil: Raes, Niels. Naturalis Biodiversity Center; Países Bajos. Leiden University; Países Bajos
Fil: Kajita, Tadashi. Chiba University; Japón
Fil: Vatanparast, Mohammad. Chiba University; Japón
Fil: Mimura, Makiko. Kyushu University; Japón
Fil: Tachida, Hidenori. Kyushu University; Japón
Fil: Iwasa, Yoh. Kyushu University; Japón
Fil: Smith, Gideon. South African National Biodiversity Institute; Sudáfrica. University of Pretoria; Sudáfrica. Universidad de Coimbra; Portugal
Fil: Victor, Janine E.. South African National Biodiversity Institute; Sudáfrica
Fil: Nkonki, Tandiwe. South African National Biodiversity Institute; Sudáfrica - Materia
-
Distribution Model
Extinction Risk
Fabaceae
Functional Diversity
Genetic Diversity
Phylogenetic Diversity
Species Loss - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29288
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_f4aa9dd36f8dca299be44d1a0b8086f2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29288 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategiesYahara, TetsukazuJavadi, FirouzehOnoda, YusukePaganucci de Queiroz, LucianoFaith, Daniel P.Prado, Darien ErosAkasaka, MunemitsuKadoya, TakuIshihama, FumikoDavies, StuartFerry Slik, J.W.Yi, TingshuangMa, KepingBin, ChenDarnaedi, DedyPennington, R.TobyTuda, MidoriShimada, MasakazuIto, MotomiEgan, Ashley N.Buerki, SvenRaes, NielsKajita, TadashiVatanparast, MohammadMimura, MakikoTachida, HidenoriIwasa, YohSmith, GideonVictor, Janine E.Nkonki, TandiweDistribution ModelExtinction RiskFabaceaeFunctional DiversityGenetic DiversityPhylogenetic DiversitySpecies Losshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1While many plant species are considered threatened under anthropogenic pressure, it remains uncertain how rapidly we are losing plant species diversity. To fill this gap, we propose a Global Legume Diversity Assessment (GLDA) as the first step of a global plant diversity assessment. Here we describe the concept of GLDA and its feasibility by reviewing relevant approaches and data availability. We conclude that Fabaceae is a good proxy for overall angiosperm diversity in many habitats and that much relevant data for GLDA are available. As indicators of states, we propose comparison of species richness with phylogenetic and functional diversity to obtain an integrated picture of diversity. As indicators of trends, species loss rate and extinction risks should be assessed. Specimen records and plot data provide key resources for assessing legume diversity at a global scale, and distribution modeling based on these records provide key methods for assessing states and trends of legume diversity. GLDA has started in Asia, and we call for a truly global legume diversity assessment by wider geographic collaborations among various scientistsFil: Yahara, Tetsukazu. Kyushu University; JapónFil: Javadi, Firouzeh. Kyushu University; JapónFil: Onoda, Yusuke. Kyoto University; JapónFil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana; BrasilFil: Faith, Daniel P.. The Australian Museum; AustraliaFil: Prado, Darien Eros. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Cátedra de Botánica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Akasaka, Munemitsu. University of Tokyo; JapónFil: Kadoya, Taku. National Institute for Environmental Studies; JapónFil: Ishihama, Fumiko. National Institute for Environmental Studies; JapónFil: Davies, Stuart. Smithsonian Institution; Estados UnidosFil: Ferry Slik, J.W.. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Yi, Tingshuang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Ma, Keping. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Bin, Chen. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Darnaedi, Dedy. Indonesian Institute of Sciences; IndonesiaFil: Pennington, R.Toby. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; Reino UnidoFil: Tuda, Midori. Kyushu University; JapónFil: Shimada, Masakazu. University of Tokyo; JapónFil: Ito, Motomi. University of Tokyo; JapónFil: Egan, Ashley N.. East Carolina University; Estados UnidosFil: Buerki, Sven. Royal Botanic Gardens; Reino UnidoFil: Raes, Niels. Naturalis Biodiversity Center; Países Bajos. Leiden University; Países BajosFil: Kajita, Tadashi. Chiba University; JapónFil: Vatanparast, Mohammad. Chiba University; JapónFil: Mimura, Makiko. Kyushu University; JapónFil: Tachida, Hidenori. Kyushu University; JapónFil: Iwasa, Yoh. Kyushu University; JapónFil: Smith, Gideon. South African National Biodiversity Institute; Sudáfrica. University of Pretoria; Sudáfrica. Universidad de Coimbra; PortugalFil: Victor, Janine E.. South African National Biodiversity Institute; SudáfricaFil: Nkonki, Tandiwe. South African National Biodiversity Institute; SudáfricaInternational Association for Plant Taxonomy2013-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/29288Yahara, Tetsukazu; Javadi, Firouzeh; Onoda, Yusuke; Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano; Faith, Daniel P.; et al.; Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies; International Association for Plant Taxonomy; Taxon; 62; 2; 4-2013; 249-2660040-02621996-8175CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.jstor.org/stable/taxon.62.2.249info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:41:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29288instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:41:07.337CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies |
title |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies |
spellingShingle |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies Yahara, Tetsukazu Distribution Model Extinction Risk Fabaceae Functional Diversity Genetic Diversity Phylogenetic Diversity Species Loss |
title_short |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies |
title_full |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies |
title_fullStr |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies |
title_sort |
Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Yahara, Tetsukazu Javadi, Firouzeh Onoda, Yusuke Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano Faith, Daniel P. Prado, Darien Eros Akasaka, Munemitsu Kadoya, Taku Ishihama, Fumiko Davies, Stuart Ferry Slik, J.W. Yi, Tingshuang Ma, Keping Bin, Chen Darnaedi, Dedy Pennington, R.Toby Tuda, Midori Shimada, Masakazu Ito, Motomi Egan, Ashley N. Buerki, Sven Raes, Niels Kajita, Tadashi Vatanparast, Mohammad Mimura, Makiko Tachida, Hidenori Iwasa, Yoh Smith, Gideon Victor, Janine E. Nkonki, Tandiwe |
author |
Yahara, Tetsukazu |
author_facet |
Yahara, Tetsukazu Javadi, Firouzeh Onoda, Yusuke Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano Faith, Daniel P. Prado, Darien Eros Akasaka, Munemitsu Kadoya, Taku Ishihama, Fumiko Davies, Stuart Ferry Slik, J.W. Yi, Tingshuang Ma, Keping Bin, Chen Darnaedi, Dedy Pennington, R.Toby Tuda, Midori Shimada, Masakazu Ito, Motomi Egan, Ashley N. Buerki, Sven Raes, Niels Kajita, Tadashi Vatanparast, Mohammad Mimura, Makiko Tachida, Hidenori Iwasa, Yoh Smith, Gideon Victor, Janine E. Nkonki, Tandiwe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Javadi, Firouzeh Onoda, Yusuke Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano Faith, Daniel P. Prado, Darien Eros Akasaka, Munemitsu Kadoya, Taku Ishihama, Fumiko Davies, Stuart Ferry Slik, J.W. Yi, Tingshuang Ma, Keping Bin, Chen Darnaedi, Dedy Pennington, R.Toby Tuda, Midori Shimada, Masakazu Ito, Motomi Egan, Ashley N. Buerki, Sven Raes, Niels Kajita, Tadashi Vatanparast, Mohammad Mimura, Makiko Tachida, Hidenori Iwasa, Yoh Smith, Gideon Victor, Janine E. Nkonki, Tandiwe |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Distribution Model Extinction Risk Fabaceae Functional Diversity Genetic Diversity Phylogenetic Diversity Species Loss |
topic |
Distribution Model Extinction Risk Fabaceae Functional Diversity Genetic Diversity Phylogenetic Diversity Species Loss |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
While many plant species are considered threatened under anthropogenic pressure, it remains uncertain how rapidly we are losing plant species diversity. To fill this gap, we propose a Global Legume Diversity Assessment (GLDA) as the first step of a global plant diversity assessment. Here we describe the concept of GLDA and its feasibility by reviewing relevant approaches and data availability. We conclude that Fabaceae is a good proxy for overall angiosperm diversity in many habitats and that much relevant data for GLDA are available. As indicators of states, we propose comparison of species richness with phylogenetic and functional diversity to obtain an integrated picture of diversity. As indicators of trends, species loss rate and extinction risks should be assessed. Specimen records and plot data provide key resources for assessing legume diversity at a global scale, and distribution modeling based on these records provide key methods for assessing states and trends of legume diversity. GLDA has started in Asia, and we call for a truly global legume diversity assessment by wider geographic collaborations among various scientists Fil: Yahara, Tetsukazu. Kyushu University; Japón Fil: Javadi, Firouzeh. Kyushu University; Japón Fil: Onoda, Yusuke. Kyoto University; Japón Fil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana; Brasil Fil: Faith, Daniel P.. The Australian Museum; Australia Fil: Prado, Darien Eros. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Cátedra de Botánica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Akasaka, Munemitsu. University of Tokyo; Japón Fil: Kadoya, Taku. National Institute for Environmental Studies; Japón Fil: Ishihama, Fumiko. National Institute for Environmental Studies; Japón Fil: Davies, Stuart. Smithsonian Institution; Estados Unidos Fil: Ferry Slik, J.W.. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China Fil: Yi, Tingshuang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China Fil: Ma, Keping. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China Fil: Bin, Chen. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China Fil: Darnaedi, Dedy. Indonesian Institute of Sciences; Indonesia Fil: Pennington, R.Toby. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; Reino Unido Fil: Tuda, Midori. Kyushu University; Japón Fil: Shimada, Masakazu. University of Tokyo; Japón Fil: Ito, Motomi. University of Tokyo; Japón Fil: Egan, Ashley N.. East Carolina University; Estados Unidos Fil: Buerki, Sven. Royal Botanic Gardens; Reino Unido Fil: Raes, Niels. Naturalis Biodiversity Center; Países Bajos. Leiden University; Países Bajos Fil: Kajita, Tadashi. Chiba University; Japón Fil: Vatanparast, Mohammad. Chiba University; Japón Fil: Mimura, Makiko. Kyushu University; Japón Fil: Tachida, Hidenori. Kyushu University; Japón Fil: Iwasa, Yoh. Kyushu University; Japón Fil: Smith, Gideon. South African National Biodiversity Institute; Sudáfrica. University of Pretoria; Sudáfrica. Universidad de Coimbra; Portugal Fil: Victor, Janine E.. South African National Biodiversity Institute; Sudáfrica Fil: Nkonki, Tandiwe. South African National Biodiversity Institute; Sudáfrica |
description |
While many plant species are considered threatened under anthropogenic pressure, it remains uncertain how rapidly we are losing plant species diversity. To fill this gap, we propose a Global Legume Diversity Assessment (GLDA) as the first step of a global plant diversity assessment. Here we describe the concept of GLDA and its feasibility by reviewing relevant approaches and data availability. We conclude that Fabaceae is a good proxy for overall angiosperm diversity in many habitats and that much relevant data for GLDA are available. As indicators of states, we propose comparison of species richness with phylogenetic and functional diversity to obtain an integrated picture of diversity. As indicators of trends, species loss rate and extinction risks should be assessed. Specimen records and plot data provide key resources for assessing legume diversity at a global scale, and distribution modeling based on these records provide key methods for assessing states and trends of legume diversity. GLDA has started in Asia, and we call for a truly global legume diversity assessment by wider geographic collaborations among various scientists |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/29288 Yahara, Tetsukazu; Javadi, Firouzeh; Onoda, Yusuke; Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano; Faith, Daniel P.; et al.; Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies; International Association for Plant Taxonomy; Taxon; 62; 2; 4-2013; 249-266 0040-0262 1996-8175 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/29288 |
identifier_str_mv |
Yahara, Tetsukazu; Javadi, Firouzeh; Onoda, Yusuke; Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano; Faith, Daniel P.; et al.; Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies; International Association for Plant Taxonomy; Taxon; 62; 2; 4-2013; 249-266 0040-0262 1996-8175 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.jstor.org/stable/taxon.62.2.249 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Association for Plant Taxonomy |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Association for Plant Taxonomy |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613299552911360 |
score |
13.070432 |