In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice

Autores
Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel; Munuce, María José; Bahamondes, Luis; Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara; Cohen, Debora Juana
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
study question: Does ulipristal acetate (UPA), a selective progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraception (EC), interfere with fertilization or early embryo development in vitro and in vivo? summary answer: At doses similar to those used for EC, UPA does not affect mouse gamete transport, fertilization or embryo development. what is known already: UPA acts as an emergency contraceptive mainly by inhibiting or delaying ovulation. However, there is little information regarding its effects on post-ovulatory events preceding implantation. study design, size, duration: This was an in vitro and in vivo experimental study involving the use of mouse gametes and embryos from at least three animals in each set of experiments. participants/materials, setting, methods: Forin vitro fertilization experiments, mouse epididymal spermatozoa capacitated in the presence of different concentrations of UPA (0–1000 ng/ml) were used to inseminate cumulus-intact or cumulus-free eggs in the presence or absence of UPA during gamete co-incubation, and the percentage of fertilized eggs was determined. For in vivo fertilization experiments, superovulated females caged with proven fertile males were injected with UPA (40 mg/kg) or vehicle just before or just after mating and the percentage of fertilized eggs recovered from the ampulla was determined. To investigate the effect of UPA on embryo development, zygotes were recovered from mated females, cultured in the presence of UPA (1000 ng/ml) for 4 days and the progression of embryo development was monitored daily. main results and the role of chance: In vitro studies revealed that the presence of UPA during capacitation and/or gamete coincubation does not affect fertilization. Whereas the in vivo administration of UPA at the same time as hCG injection produced a decrease in the number of eggs ovulated compared with controls (vehicle injected animals, P , 0.05), no effects on fertilization were observed when UPAwas administered shortly before or after mating. No differences were observed in either the percentage of cleaved embryos or the cleavage speed when UPA was present during in vitro embryo culture. limitations, reasons for caution: Considering the ethical and technical limitations inherent to the use of human gametes for fertilization studies, the mouse model was used as an approach for exploring the potential effects of UPA on in vivo sperm transport and fertilization. Nevertheless, the extrapolation of these results to humans requires further investigation. wider implications of the findings: This study presents new evidence on the lack of effect of UPA on gamete interaction and embryo development, providing new insights into the mechanism of action of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method with potential clinical implications. These new findings could contribute to increase the acceptability and proper use of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method. study funding/competing interest(s): This study was partially supported by a National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT), Argentina grants PICT 2011-061 to D.J.C. and PICT 2011-2023 to P.S.C. None of the authors has any competing interests to declare.
Fil: Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Munuce, María José. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas; Argentina
Fil: Bahamondes, Luis. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil
Fil: Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Cohen, Debora Juana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
Materia
EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT
EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION
FERTILIZATION
SPERM
ULIPRISTAL ACETATE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/112582

id CONICETDig_f4467c09e83639c610e354ea1736c94d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/112582
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in miceGómez Elías, Matías DanielMunuce, María JoséBahamondes, LuisCuasnicu, Patricia SaraCohen, Debora JuanaEMBRYO DEVELOPMENTEMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIONFERTILIZATIONSPERMULIPRISTAL ACETATEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1study question: Does ulipristal acetate (UPA), a selective progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraception (EC), interfere with fertilization or early embryo development in vitro and in vivo? summary answer: At doses similar to those used for EC, UPA does not affect mouse gamete transport, fertilization or embryo development. what is known already: UPA acts as an emergency contraceptive mainly by inhibiting or delaying ovulation. However, there is little information regarding its effects on post-ovulatory events preceding implantation. study design, size, duration: This was an in vitro and in vivo experimental study involving the use of mouse gametes and embryos from at least three animals in each set of experiments. participants/materials, setting, methods: Forin vitro fertilization experiments, mouse epididymal spermatozoa capacitated in the presence of different concentrations of UPA (0–1000 ng/ml) were used to inseminate cumulus-intact or cumulus-free eggs in the presence or absence of UPA during gamete co-incubation, and the percentage of fertilized eggs was determined. For in vivo fertilization experiments, superovulated females caged with proven fertile males were injected with UPA (40 mg/kg) or vehicle just before or just after mating and the percentage of fertilized eggs recovered from the ampulla was determined. To investigate the effect of UPA on embryo development, zygotes were recovered from mated females, cultured in the presence of UPA (1000 ng/ml) for 4 days and the progression of embryo development was monitored daily. main results and the role of chance: In vitro studies revealed that the presence of UPA during capacitation and/or gamete coincubation does not affect fertilization. Whereas the in vivo administration of UPA at the same time as hCG injection produced a decrease in the number of eggs ovulated compared with controls (vehicle injected animals, P , 0.05), no effects on fertilization were observed when UPAwas administered shortly before or after mating. No differences were observed in either the percentage of cleaved embryos or the cleavage speed when UPA was present during in vitro embryo culture. limitations, reasons for caution: Considering the ethical and technical limitations inherent to the use of human gametes for fertilization studies, the mouse model was used as an approach for exploring the potential effects of UPA on in vivo sperm transport and fertilization. Nevertheless, the extrapolation of these results to humans requires further investigation. wider implications of the findings: This study presents new evidence on the lack of effect of UPA on gamete interaction and embryo development, providing new insights into the mechanism of action of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method with potential clinical implications. These new findings could contribute to increase the acceptability and proper use of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method. study funding/competing interest(s): This study was partially supported by a National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT), Argentina grants PICT 2011-061 to D.J.C. and PICT 2011-2023 to P.S.C. None of the authors has any competing interests to declare.Fil: Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Munuce, María José. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas; ArgentinaFil: Bahamondes, Luis. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; BrasilFil: Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Cohen, Debora Juana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaOxford University Press2016-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/112582Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel; Munuce, María José; Bahamondes, Luis; Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara; Cohen, Debora Juana; In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice; Oxford University Press; Human Reproduction; 31; 1; 1-2016; 53-590268-1161CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/humrep/dev287info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/31/1/53/2380219info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T11:27:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/112582instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 11:27:51.012CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
title In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
spellingShingle In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel
EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT
EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION
FERTILIZATION
SPERM
ULIPRISTAL ACETATE
title_short In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
title_full In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
title_fullStr In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
title_sort In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel
Munuce, María José
Bahamondes, Luis
Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara
Cohen, Debora Juana
author Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel
author_facet Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel
Munuce, María José
Bahamondes, Luis
Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara
Cohen, Debora Juana
author_role author
author2 Munuce, María José
Bahamondes, Luis
Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara
Cohen, Debora Juana
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT
EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION
FERTILIZATION
SPERM
ULIPRISTAL ACETATE
topic EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT
EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION
FERTILIZATION
SPERM
ULIPRISTAL ACETATE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv study question: Does ulipristal acetate (UPA), a selective progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraception (EC), interfere with fertilization or early embryo development in vitro and in vivo? summary answer: At doses similar to those used for EC, UPA does not affect mouse gamete transport, fertilization or embryo development. what is known already: UPA acts as an emergency contraceptive mainly by inhibiting or delaying ovulation. However, there is little information regarding its effects on post-ovulatory events preceding implantation. study design, size, duration: This was an in vitro and in vivo experimental study involving the use of mouse gametes and embryos from at least three animals in each set of experiments. participants/materials, setting, methods: Forin vitro fertilization experiments, mouse epididymal spermatozoa capacitated in the presence of different concentrations of UPA (0–1000 ng/ml) were used to inseminate cumulus-intact or cumulus-free eggs in the presence or absence of UPA during gamete co-incubation, and the percentage of fertilized eggs was determined. For in vivo fertilization experiments, superovulated females caged with proven fertile males were injected with UPA (40 mg/kg) or vehicle just before or just after mating and the percentage of fertilized eggs recovered from the ampulla was determined. To investigate the effect of UPA on embryo development, zygotes were recovered from mated females, cultured in the presence of UPA (1000 ng/ml) for 4 days and the progression of embryo development was monitored daily. main results and the role of chance: In vitro studies revealed that the presence of UPA during capacitation and/or gamete coincubation does not affect fertilization. Whereas the in vivo administration of UPA at the same time as hCG injection produced a decrease in the number of eggs ovulated compared with controls (vehicle injected animals, P , 0.05), no effects on fertilization were observed when UPAwas administered shortly before or after mating. No differences were observed in either the percentage of cleaved embryos or the cleavage speed when UPA was present during in vitro embryo culture. limitations, reasons for caution: Considering the ethical and technical limitations inherent to the use of human gametes for fertilization studies, the mouse model was used as an approach for exploring the potential effects of UPA on in vivo sperm transport and fertilization. Nevertheless, the extrapolation of these results to humans requires further investigation. wider implications of the findings: This study presents new evidence on the lack of effect of UPA on gamete interaction and embryo development, providing new insights into the mechanism of action of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method with potential clinical implications. These new findings could contribute to increase the acceptability and proper use of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method. study funding/competing interest(s): This study was partially supported by a National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT), Argentina grants PICT 2011-061 to D.J.C. and PICT 2011-2023 to P.S.C. None of the authors has any competing interests to declare.
Fil: Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Munuce, María José. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas; Argentina
Fil: Bahamondes, Luis. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil
Fil: Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Cohen, Debora Juana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina
description study question: Does ulipristal acetate (UPA), a selective progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraception (EC), interfere with fertilization or early embryo development in vitro and in vivo? summary answer: At doses similar to those used for EC, UPA does not affect mouse gamete transport, fertilization or embryo development. what is known already: UPA acts as an emergency contraceptive mainly by inhibiting or delaying ovulation. However, there is little information regarding its effects on post-ovulatory events preceding implantation. study design, size, duration: This was an in vitro and in vivo experimental study involving the use of mouse gametes and embryos from at least three animals in each set of experiments. participants/materials, setting, methods: Forin vitro fertilization experiments, mouse epididymal spermatozoa capacitated in the presence of different concentrations of UPA (0–1000 ng/ml) were used to inseminate cumulus-intact or cumulus-free eggs in the presence or absence of UPA during gamete co-incubation, and the percentage of fertilized eggs was determined. For in vivo fertilization experiments, superovulated females caged with proven fertile males were injected with UPA (40 mg/kg) or vehicle just before or just after mating and the percentage of fertilized eggs recovered from the ampulla was determined. To investigate the effect of UPA on embryo development, zygotes were recovered from mated females, cultured in the presence of UPA (1000 ng/ml) for 4 days and the progression of embryo development was monitored daily. main results and the role of chance: In vitro studies revealed that the presence of UPA during capacitation and/or gamete coincubation does not affect fertilization. Whereas the in vivo administration of UPA at the same time as hCG injection produced a decrease in the number of eggs ovulated compared with controls (vehicle injected animals, P , 0.05), no effects on fertilization were observed when UPAwas administered shortly before or after mating. No differences were observed in either the percentage of cleaved embryos or the cleavage speed when UPA was present during in vitro embryo culture. limitations, reasons for caution: Considering the ethical and technical limitations inherent to the use of human gametes for fertilization studies, the mouse model was used as an approach for exploring the potential effects of UPA on in vivo sperm transport and fertilization. Nevertheless, the extrapolation of these results to humans requires further investigation. wider implications of the findings: This study presents new evidence on the lack of effect of UPA on gamete interaction and embryo development, providing new insights into the mechanism of action of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method with potential clinical implications. These new findings could contribute to increase the acceptability and proper use of UPA as an emergency contraceptive method. study funding/competing interest(s): This study was partially supported by a National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT), Argentina grants PICT 2011-061 to D.J.C. and PICT 2011-2023 to P.S.C. None of the authors has any competing interests to declare.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/112582
Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel; Munuce, María José; Bahamondes, Luis; Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara; Cohen, Debora Juana; In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice; Oxford University Press; Human Reproduction; 31; 1; 1-2016; 53-59
0268-1161
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/112582
identifier_str_mv Gómez Elías, Matías Daniel; Munuce, María José; Bahamondes, Luis; Cuasnicu, Patricia Sara; Cohen, Debora Juana; In vitro and in vivo effects of ulipristal acetate on fertilization and early embryo development in mice; Oxford University Press; Human Reproduction; 31; 1; 1-2016; 53-59
0268-1161
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/humrep/dev287
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/31/1/53/2380219
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1843606633294331904
score 13.001348