Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976

Autores
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial.
Fil: Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina
Materia
HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
PSYCHOANALYSIS
UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS
ARGENTINA
FRENCH THOUGHT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155454

id CONICETDig_efa31cc282ede3ca45dbf85eb8ffcab4
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155454
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976Dagfal, Alejandro AntonioHISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPYPSYCHOANALYSISUNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMSARGENTINAFRENCH THOUGHThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial.Fil: Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; ArgentinaAmerican Psychological Association2018-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/155454Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio; Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976; American Psychological Association; History of Psychology; 21; 3; 8-2018; 254-2721093-45101939-0610CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/hop0000071info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/hop0000071info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:08:42Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155454instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:08:42.849CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
title Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
spellingShingle Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
PSYCHOANALYSIS
UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS
ARGENTINA
FRENCH THOUGHT
title_short Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
title_full Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
title_fullStr Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
title_full_unstemmed Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
title_sort Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
author Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
author_facet Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
PSYCHOANALYSIS
UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS
ARGENTINA
FRENCH THOUGHT
topic HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
PSYCHOANALYSIS
UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS
ARGENTINA
FRENCH THOUGHT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial.
Fil: Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina
description The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155454
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio; Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976; American Psychological Association; History of Psychology; 21; 3; 8-2018; 254-272
1093-4510
1939-0610
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155454
identifier_str_mv Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio; Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976; American Psychological Association; History of Psychology; 21; 3; 8-2018; 254-272
1093-4510
1939-0610
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/hop0000071
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/hop0000071
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Psychological Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Psychological Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980417348567040
score 12.993085