Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976
- Autores
- Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial.
Fil: Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina - Materia
-
HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
PSYCHOANALYSIS
UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS
ARGENTINA
FRENCH THOUGHT - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155454
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_efa31cc282ede3ca45dbf85eb8ffcab4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155454 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976Dagfal, Alejandro AntonioHISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPYPSYCHOANALYSISUNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMSARGENTINAFRENCH THOUGHThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial.Fil: Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; ArgentinaAmerican Psychological Association2018-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/155454Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio; Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976; American Psychological Association; History of Psychology; 21; 3; 8-2018; 254-2721093-45101939-0610CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/hop0000071info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/hop0000071info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:08:42Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155454instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:08:42.849CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 |
title |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 |
spellingShingle |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOANALYSIS UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS ARGENTINA FRENCH THOUGHT |
title_short |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 |
title_full |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 |
title_fullStr |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 |
title_sort |
Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976 |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio |
author |
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio |
author_facet |
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOANALYSIS UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS ARGENTINA FRENCH THOUGHT |
topic |
HISTORY OF PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOANALYSIS UNIVERSITY PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS ARGENTINA FRENCH THOUGHT |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial. Fil: Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología. Instituto de Investigaciones; Argentina |
description |
The hegemonic place acquired by psychoanalysis in the Argentinean psychotherapeutic field is recognized by friend and foe alike. Nevertheless, the historical process leading to this situation is less well known. In this article, I focus on 2 periods crucial to understanding the unusual scope of Freudian ideas and practices in that country. The first one (1955–1966) corresponds to the professionalization of psychology and was marked by projects such as those of Bleger and Pichon-Rivière. Their ideas involved an alliance between psychology and psychoanalysis within a larger synthesis whose philosophical framework was French existential phenomenology. This eclectic “psychoanalytic psychology” found an amazing sounding board in the newly created university psychology programs, in which it was adopted by future psychologists who took psychoanalysis as their primary theoretical and practical reference. The second period (1966 –1976), however, after the reception of French structuralism (mainly via Jacques Lacan and his local interpreters, such as Oscar Masotta), implied an exclusive disjunction: either psychoanalysis or psychology. Psychoanalysis was presented as a return to the Freudian sources. Therefore, it was supposed to replace a psychology that “ignored” unconscious determinism. Thus, paradoxically, Lacanianism, which found its main audience in psychology programs, invited psychologists to relinquish their own professional identity to become psychoanalysts. My hypothesis is that the prominent position that psychoanalysis still holds in Argentina can be best understood by considering the history of its relationship with academic psychology and situating that connection in an intellectual and political context in which French thought has always been crucial. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155454 Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio; Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976; American Psychological Association; History of Psychology; 21; 3; 8-2018; 254-272 1093-4510 1939-0610 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155454 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio; Psychology and psychoanalysis in Argentina: Politics, French thought, and the university connection, 1955–1976; American Psychological Association; History of Psychology; 21; 3; 8-2018; 254-272 1093-4510 1939-0610 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/hop0000071 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/hop0000071 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842980417348567040 |
score |
12.993085 |