Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation

Autores
Durand, Guillermo Andrés; Manenti, Flavio; Bandoni, Jose Alberto; Díaz, María Soledad; Buzzi Ferraris, Guido
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The chemical engineer has nowadays a wide choice of tools, numerical libraries, and programming languages to perform computations. Actually, it is possible to use several well established commercial packages, implement dedicated solvers into specific programming languages, or use existing numerical libraries. Also, it is possible to combine these possibilities to get either superior performances or more robustness, according to the problem features through the so-called mixed-language approach, which is increasingly spreading in the scientific communities. Since there is no full clarity on their benefits in handling numerical problems and their performances have not been yet compared in the literature, this paper is aimed at analyzing efficiency and robustness of some of the most widespread methodologies adopted for numerical computations: the conventional methods, the implementation of numerical libraries, the mixed-language, and the commercial tools. Specifically, the common case of differential systems is selected as comparison field.
Fil: Durand, Guillermo Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Manenti, Flavio. Politecnico di Milano; Italia
Fil: Bandoni, Jose Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Díaz, María Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Buzzi Ferraris, Guido. Politecnico di Milano; Italia
Materia
DYNAMIC SIMULATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43272
Acceder
id CONICETDig_ef4e61fc8eef993386ca5f4c73083ead
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43272
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic SimulationDurand, Guillermo AndrésManenti, FlavioBandoni, Jose AlbertoDíaz, María SoledadBuzzi Ferraris, GuidoDYNAMIC SIMULATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The chemical engineer has nowadays a wide choice of tools, numerical libraries, and programming languages to perform computations. Actually, it is possible to use several well established commercial packages, implement dedicated solvers into specific programming languages, or use existing numerical libraries. Also, it is possible to combine these possibilities to get either superior performances or more robustness, according to the problem features through the so-called mixed-language approach, which is increasingly spreading in the scientific communities. Since there is no full clarity on their benefits in handling numerical problems and their performances have not been yet compared in the literature, this paper is aimed at analyzing efficiency and robustness of some of the most widespread methodologies adopted for numerical computations: the conventional methods, the implementation of numerical libraries, the mixed-language, and the commercial tools. Specifically, the common case of differential systems is selected as comparison field.Fil: Durand, Guillermo Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; ArgentinaFil: Manenti, Flavio. Politecnico di Milano; ItaliaFil: Bandoni, Jose Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; ArgentinaFil: Díaz, María Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; ArgentinaFil: Buzzi Ferraris, Guido. Politecnico di Milano; ItaliaAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.2012-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/43272Durand, Guillermo Andrés; Manenti, Flavio; Bandoni, Jose Alberto; Díaz, María Soledad; Buzzi Ferraris, Guido; Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation; AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS; 29; 10-2012; 241-2461974-9791CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3303/CET1229041info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.aidic.it/cet/12/29/041.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:30:17Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43272instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:30:17.616CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
title Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
spellingShingle Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
Durand, Guillermo Andrés
DYNAMIC SIMULATION
title_short Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
title_full Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
title_fullStr Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
title_sort Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Durand, Guillermo Andrés
Manenti, Flavio
Bandoni, Jose Alberto
Díaz, María Soledad
Buzzi Ferraris, Guido
author Durand, Guillermo Andrés
author_facet Durand, Guillermo Andrés
Manenti, Flavio
Bandoni, Jose Alberto
Díaz, María Soledad
Buzzi Ferraris, Guido
author_role author
author2 Manenti, Flavio
Bandoni, Jose Alberto
Díaz, María Soledad
Buzzi Ferraris, Guido
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DYNAMIC SIMULATION
topic DYNAMIC SIMULATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The chemical engineer has nowadays a wide choice of tools, numerical libraries, and programming languages to perform computations. Actually, it is possible to use several well established commercial packages, implement dedicated solvers into specific programming languages, or use existing numerical libraries. Also, it is possible to combine these possibilities to get either superior performances or more robustness, according to the problem features through the so-called mixed-language approach, which is increasingly spreading in the scientific communities. Since there is no full clarity on their benefits in handling numerical problems and their performances have not been yet compared in the literature, this paper is aimed at analyzing efficiency and robustness of some of the most widespread methodologies adopted for numerical computations: the conventional methods, the implementation of numerical libraries, the mixed-language, and the commercial tools. Specifically, the common case of differential systems is selected as comparison field.
Fil: Durand, Guillermo Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Manenti, Flavio. Politecnico di Milano; Italia
Fil: Bandoni, Jose Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Díaz, María Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Fil: Buzzi Ferraris, Guido. Politecnico di Milano; Italia
description The chemical engineer has nowadays a wide choice of tools, numerical libraries, and programming languages to perform computations. Actually, it is possible to use several well established commercial packages, implement dedicated solvers into specific programming languages, or use existing numerical libraries. Also, it is possible to combine these possibilities to get either superior performances or more robustness, according to the problem features through the so-called mixed-language approach, which is increasingly spreading in the scientific communities. Since there is no full clarity on their benefits in handling numerical problems and their performances have not been yet compared in the literature, this paper is aimed at analyzing efficiency and robustness of some of the most widespread methodologies adopted for numerical computations: the conventional methods, the implementation of numerical libraries, the mixed-language, and the commercial tools. Specifically, the common case of differential systems is selected as comparison field.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43272
Durand, Guillermo Andrés; Manenti, Flavio; Bandoni, Jose Alberto; Díaz, María Soledad; Buzzi Ferraris, Guido; Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation; AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS; 29; 10-2012; 241-246
1974-9791
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43272
identifier_str_mv Durand, Guillermo Andrés; Manenti, Flavio; Bandoni, Jose Alberto; Díaz, María Soledad; Buzzi Ferraris, Guido; Performance Assessment of Existing Methodologies for Chemical Process Dynamic Simulation; AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS; 29; 10-2012; 241-246
1974-9791
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3303/CET1229041
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.aidic.it/cet/12/29/041.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781895599194112
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares