From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment

Autores
Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro; Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel; Macello, Franco; Gabrielli, Oliverio; Greco, Ricardo
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This comprehensive review explores the evolving epistemological foundations of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA), tracing its transition from a practical, applied field to a scientific discipline. The paper critically examines the philosophical assumptions that underlie prominent HRA models, emphasizing their impact on both scientific validity and practical application. Organized into five sections, the paper begins by articulating its primary aim in Section 1: to uncover and scrutinize the philosophical assumptions within HRA models. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 delve into reductionist and holistic paradigms. Section 2.4 focuses on the shift toward holistic theories, emphasizing the integration of human, technical, and organizational elements in modern socio-technical systems. Section 3 concludes by examining systemic approaches, capturing the paradigm shift from reductionism to a broader, interdependent view of accidents and reliability. Section 4 sheds light on the contemporary HRA models, emphasizing the prevalence of systemism in recent research. Notable models, such as SoTeRiA and FRAM, undergo scrutiny for their systemic approach, revealing interrelationships crucial for understanding accidents in complex operations. In Section 5, the paper explores the practical implications of the epistemological insights gained, emphasizing their potential impact on the development and enhancement of HRA models. The conclusion advocates for a paradigm shift in HRA that involves rethinking the epistemological bases of models. It underscores the need for ongoing philosophical scrutiny to drive the discipline´s progress, ultimately enhancing our understanding, prediction, and improvement of human performance and system safety.
Fil: Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro. Instituto Universitario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Macello, Franco. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Gabrielli, Oliverio. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Greco, Ricardo. Instituto Universitario; Argentina
Materia
HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS
SYSTEMIC APPROACHES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/236008
Acceder
id CONICETDig_ed9b75bf7ae4ecfdece555998da00064
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/236008
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability AssessmentBaziuk, Pedro AlejandroLeiva Butti, Juan ManuelMacello, FrancoGabrielli, OliverioGreco, RicardoHUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSISEPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONSSYSTEMIC APPROACHEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This comprehensive review explores the evolving epistemological foundations of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA), tracing its transition from a practical, applied field to a scientific discipline. The paper critically examines the philosophical assumptions that underlie prominent HRA models, emphasizing their impact on both scientific validity and practical application. Organized into five sections, the paper begins by articulating its primary aim in Section 1: to uncover and scrutinize the philosophical assumptions within HRA models. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 delve into reductionist and holistic paradigms. Section 2.4 focuses on the shift toward holistic theories, emphasizing the integration of human, technical, and organizational elements in modern socio-technical systems. Section 3 concludes by examining systemic approaches, capturing the paradigm shift from reductionism to a broader, interdependent view of accidents and reliability. Section 4 sheds light on the contemporary HRA models, emphasizing the prevalence of systemism in recent research. Notable models, such as SoTeRiA and FRAM, undergo scrutiny for their systemic approach, revealing interrelationships crucial for understanding accidents in complex operations. In Section 5, the paper explores the practical implications of the epistemological insights gained, emphasizing their potential impact on the development and enhancement of HRA models. The conclusion advocates for a paradigm shift in HRA that involves rethinking the epistemological bases of models. It underscores the need for ongoing philosophical scrutiny to drive the discipline´s progress, ultimately enhancing our understanding, prediction, and improvement of human performance and system safety.Fil: Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro. Instituto Universitario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Macello, Franco. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; ArgentinaFil: Gabrielli, Oliverio. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; ArgentinaFil: Greco, Ricardo. Instituto Universitario; ArgentinaScientific Research Publishing2024-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/236008Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro; Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel; Macello, Franco; Gabrielli, Oliverio; Greco, Ricardo; From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment; Scientific Research Publishing; Open Journal of Philosophy; 14; 02; 4-2024; 315-3392163-94342163-9442CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?doi=10.4236/ojpp.2024.142021info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4236/ojpp.2024.142021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:58:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/236008instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:58:30.284CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
title From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
spellingShingle From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro
HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS
SYSTEMIC APPROACHES
title_short From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
title_full From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
title_fullStr From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
title_full_unstemmed From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
title_sort From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro
Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel
Macello, Franco
Gabrielli, Oliverio
Greco, Ricardo
author Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro
author_facet Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro
Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel
Macello, Franco
Gabrielli, Oliverio
Greco, Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel
Macello, Franco
Gabrielli, Oliverio
Greco, Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS
SYSTEMIC APPROACHES
topic HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS
SYSTEMIC APPROACHES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This comprehensive review explores the evolving epistemological foundations of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA), tracing its transition from a practical, applied field to a scientific discipline. The paper critically examines the philosophical assumptions that underlie prominent HRA models, emphasizing their impact on both scientific validity and practical application. Organized into five sections, the paper begins by articulating its primary aim in Section 1: to uncover and scrutinize the philosophical assumptions within HRA models. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 delve into reductionist and holistic paradigms. Section 2.4 focuses on the shift toward holistic theories, emphasizing the integration of human, technical, and organizational elements in modern socio-technical systems. Section 3 concludes by examining systemic approaches, capturing the paradigm shift from reductionism to a broader, interdependent view of accidents and reliability. Section 4 sheds light on the contemporary HRA models, emphasizing the prevalence of systemism in recent research. Notable models, such as SoTeRiA and FRAM, undergo scrutiny for their systemic approach, revealing interrelationships crucial for understanding accidents in complex operations. In Section 5, the paper explores the practical implications of the epistemological insights gained, emphasizing their potential impact on the development and enhancement of HRA models. The conclusion advocates for a paradigm shift in HRA that involves rethinking the epistemological bases of models. It underscores the need for ongoing philosophical scrutiny to drive the discipline´s progress, ultimately enhancing our understanding, prediction, and improvement of human performance and system safety.
Fil: Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro. Instituto Universitario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Macello, Franco. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Gabrielli, Oliverio. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Greco, Ricardo. Instituto Universitario; Argentina
description This comprehensive review explores the evolving epistemological foundations of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA), tracing its transition from a practical, applied field to a scientific discipline. The paper critically examines the philosophical assumptions that underlie prominent HRA models, emphasizing their impact on both scientific validity and practical application. Organized into five sections, the paper begins by articulating its primary aim in Section 1: to uncover and scrutinize the philosophical assumptions within HRA models. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 delve into reductionist and holistic paradigms. Section 2.4 focuses on the shift toward holistic theories, emphasizing the integration of human, technical, and organizational elements in modern socio-technical systems. Section 3 concludes by examining systemic approaches, capturing the paradigm shift from reductionism to a broader, interdependent view of accidents and reliability. Section 4 sheds light on the contemporary HRA models, emphasizing the prevalence of systemism in recent research. Notable models, such as SoTeRiA and FRAM, undergo scrutiny for their systemic approach, revealing interrelationships crucial for understanding accidents in complex operations. In Section 5, the paper explores the practical implications of the epistemological insights gained, emphasizing their potential impact on the development and enhancement of HRA models. The conclusion advocates for a paradigm shift in HRA that involves rethinking the epistemological bases of models. It underscores the need for ongoing philosophical scrutiny to drive the discipline´s progress, ultimately enhancing our understanding, prediction, and improvement of human performance and system safety.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/236008
Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro; Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel; Macello, Franco; Gabrielli, Oliverio; Greco, Ricardo; From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment; Scientific Research Publishing; Open Journal of Philosophy; 14; 02; 4-2024; 315-339
2163-9434
2163-9442
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/236008
identifier_str_mv Baziuk, Pedro Alejandro; Leiva Butti, Juan Manuel; Macello, Franco; Gabrielli, Oliverio; Greco, Ricardo; From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Epistemological Threads in Human Reliability Assessment; Scientific Research Publishing; Open Journal of Philosophy; 14; 02; 4-2024; 315-339
2163-9434
2163-9442
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?doi=10.4236/ojpp.2024.142021
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4236/ojpp.2024.142021
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Research Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Research Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269524267630592
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares