Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups

Autores
Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products.
Fil: Passamonti, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: de la Puente, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Materia
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Mat
Crec Riser Simulator
Catalyst Evaluation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57159

id CONICETDig_e7cb87474a4a0e20a4399708ca1eb9af
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57159
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groupsPassamonti, Francisco Javierde la Puente, GabrielaSedran, Ulises AnselmoFluid Catalytic CrackingMatCrec Riser SimulatorCatalyst Evaluationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products.Fil: Passamonti, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaFil: de la Puente, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaFil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaAmerican Chemical Society2009-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/57159Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups; American Chemical Society; Energy & Fuels (print); 23; 3; 3-2009; 1358-13630887-0624CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/ef8008103info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:58:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57159instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:58:39.484CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
title Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
spellingShingle Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
Passamonti, Francisco Javier
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Mat
Crec Riser Simulator
Catalyst Evaluation
title_short Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
title_full Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
title_fullStr Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
title_sort Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Passamonti, Francisco Javier
de la Puente, Gabriela
Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
author Passamonti, Francisco Javier
author_facet Passamonti, Francisco Javier
de la Puente, Gabriela
Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
author_role author
author2 de la Puente, Gabriela
Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Mat
Crec Riser Simulator
Catalyst Evaluation
topic Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Mat
Crec Riser Simulator
Catalyst Evaluation
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products.
Fil: Passamonti, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: de la Puente, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
description A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/57159
Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups; American Chemical Society; Energy & Fuels (print); 23; 3; 3-2009; 1358-1363
0887-0624
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/57159
identifier_str_mv Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups; American Chemical Society; Energy & Fuels (print); 23; 3; 3-2009; 1358-1363
0887-0624
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/ef8008103
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Chemical Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Chemical Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613746527305728
score 13.070432