Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups
- Autores
- Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
- Año de publicación
- 2009
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products.
Fil: Passamonti, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: de la Puente, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina - Materia
-
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Mat
Crec Riser Simulator
Catalyst Evaluation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57159
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_e7cb87474a4a0e20a4399708ca1eb9af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57159 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groupsPassamonti, Francisco Javierde la Puente, GabrielaSedran, Ulises AnselmoFluid Catalytic CrackingMatCrec Riser SimulatorCatalyst Evaluationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products.Fil: Passamonti, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaFil: de la Puente, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaFil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaAmerican Chemical Society2009-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/57159Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups; American Chemical Society; Energy & Fuels (print); 23; 3; 3-2009; 1358-13630887-0624CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/ef8008103info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:58:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57159instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:58:39.484CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups |
title |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups Passamonti, Francisco Javier Fluid Catalytic Cracking Mat Crec Riser Simulator Catalyst Evaluation |
title_short |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups |
title_full |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups |
title_sort |
Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Passamonti, Francisco Javier de la Puente, Gabriela Sedran, Ulises Anselmo |
author |
Passamonti, Francisco Javier |
author_facet |
Passamonti, Francisco Javier de la Puente, Gabriela Sedran, Ulises Anselmo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de la Puente, Gabriela Sedran, Ulises Anselmo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Fluid Catalytic Cracking Mat Crec Riser Simulator Catalyst Evaluation |
topic |
Fluid Catalytic Cracking Mat Crec Riser Simulator Catalyst Evaluation |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products. Fil: Passamonti, Francisco Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina Fil: de la Puente, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina Fil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina |
description |
A comparison was performed between the performances of a MAT-type reactor (flow fixed bed) and a CREC Riser Simulator reactor (batch fluidized bed) in the conversion of two VGO feedstocks (aromatic and paraffinic types) over three commercial equilibrium FCC catalysts under similar conditions. In both units the reaction temperatures were 500 and 550 °C. The catalyst to oil relationships were from 2.3 to 6.2 (cumulative) and 6.2, and the times were from 15 to 40 s (time on stream) and from 5 to 30 s (reaction time) in the MAT reactor and the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, respectively. A comparison of the product yield structure in each unit at the same conversion showed that they were very different due to the significant differences in the contact between reactants and catalyst and operative modes. Results were compared in terms of VGO conversion and the yields of the most important hydrocarbon groups LPG, gasoline, and coke. Some advantages were observed with data from the CREC Riser Simulator reactor, derived from the fact that yields are in general closer to commercial values, mainly concerning gasoline and coke. The yields of the main hydrocarbon groups also followed linear behaviors in this reactor, thus being easier to analyze, as selectivities did not depend on the conversion reached. On the contrary, yields showed a strong dependency on conversion in the MAT reactor, particularly in the case of gasoline and coke. The high coke yield in the first moments of the experiments in the MAT reactor could lead to modifications in the selectivities to certain reactions and products. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/57159 Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups; American Chemical Society; Energy & Fuels (print); 23; 3; 3-2009; 1358-1363 0887-0624 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/57159 |
identifier_str_mv |
Passamonti, Francisco Javier; de la Puente, Gabriela; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comparison between MAT flow fixed bed and batch fluidized bed reactors in the evaluation of FCC catalysts. 1. conversion and yields of the main hydrocarbon groups; American Chemical Society; Energy & Fuels (print); 23; 3; 3-2009; 1358-1363 0887-0624 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/ef8008103 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613746527305728 |
score |
13.070432 |