Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]

Autores
Bidabehere, Claudia María; Avila, Adolfo María; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In a letter by Kärger [1] about our paper on the assessment of the diffusivities in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts [2], it is mentioned that diffusivities calculated by different methods (macroscopic in one case, or from pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR technique in the other) are different. It is also pointed out that the results of diffusivities for a given compound obtained from different macroscopic techniques are not explained satisfactorily. Both facts are true. We understand that the letter is not only a valuable contribution to the field, considering its large and laborious data collection, but also an incentive for the search of a better comprehension of the mechanisms controlling the FCC process. Most importantly, the differences observed should not hamper experiments with macroscopic techniques nor lead to disregard results suspected of mass and/or heat transfer limitations. It is important to recognize them as enriched by other type of information, and that they become necessary as design tools. By these reasons, and considering that not too much can be added to the details depicted in Ref. [1], we believe it would be useful to clarify some issues, mainly pointing to a distinct approach in the interpretation of the data.
Fil: Bidabehere, Claudia María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales; Argentina
Fil: Avila, Adolfo María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Materia
Adsorption
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Hydrocarbons
Crec Riser Simulator
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65314
Acceder
id CONICETDig_bda3e2db440e9b7c244f8cbb528d455a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65314
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]Bidabehere, Claudia MaríaAvila, Adolfo MaríaSedran, Ulises AnselmoAdsorptionFluid Catalytic CrackingHydrocarbonsCrec Riser Simulatorhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2In a letter by Kärger [1] about our paper on the assessment of the diffusivities in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts [2], it is mentioned that diffusivities calculated by different methods (macroscopic in one case, or from pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR technique in the other) are different. It is also pointed out that the results of diffusivities for a given compound obtained from different macroscopic techniques are not explained satisfactorily. Both facts are true. We understand that the letter is not only a valuable contribution to the field, considering its large and laborious data collection, but also an incentive for the search of a better comprehension of the mechanisms controlling the FCC process. Most importantly, the differences observed should not hamper experiments with macroscopic techniques nor lead to disregard results suspected of mass and/or heat transfer limitations. It is important to recognize them as enriched by other type of information, and that they become necessary as design tools. By these reasons, and considering that not too much can be added to the details depicted in Ref. [1], we believe it would be useful to clarify some issues, mainly pointing to a distinct approach in the interpretation of the data.Fil: Bidabehere, Claudia María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales; ArgentinaFil: Avila, Adolfo María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaFil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; ArgentinaElsevier Science Sa2009-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/65314Bidabehere, Claudia María; Avila, Adolfo María; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]; Elsevier Science Sa; Chemical Engineering Journal; 145; 3; 1-2009; 525-5271385-8947CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cej.2008.09.017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:33:21Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65314instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:33:21.875CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
title Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
spellingShingle Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
Bidabehere, Claudia María
Adsorption
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Hydrocarbons
Crec Riser Simulator
title_short Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
title_full Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
title_fullStr Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
title_full_unstemmed Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
title_sort Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bidabehere, Claudia María
Avila, Adolfo María
Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
author Bidabehere, Claudia María
author_facet Bidabehere, Claudia María
Avila, Adolfo María
Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
author_role author
author2 Avila, Adolfo María
Sedran, Ulises Anselmo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Adsorption
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Hydrocarbons
Crec Riser Simulator
topic Adsorption
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Hydrocarbons
Crec Riser Simulator
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In a letter by Kärger [1] about our paper on the assessment of the diffusivities in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts [2], it is mentioned that diffusivities calculated by different methods (macroscopic in one case, or from pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR technique in the other) are different. It is also pointed out that the results of diffusivities for a given compound obtained from different macroscopic techniques are not explained satisfactorily. Both facts are true. We understand that the letter is not only a valuable contribution to the field, considering its large and laborious data collection, but also an incentive for the search of a better comprehension of the mechanisms controlling the FCC process. Most importantly, the differences observed should not hamper experiments with macroscopic techniques nor lead to disregard results suspected of mass and/or heat transfer limitations. It is important to recognize them as enriched by other type of information, and that they become necessary as design tools. By these reasons, and considering that not too much can be added to the details depicted in Ref. [1], we believe it would be useful to clarify some issues, mainly pointing to a distinct approach in the interpretation of the data.
Fil: Bidabehere, Claudia María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales; Argentina
Fil: Avila, Adolfo María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
Fil: Sedran, Ulises Anselmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera". Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Investigaciones en Catálisis y Petroquímica "Ing. José Miguel Parera"; Argentina
description In a letter by Kärger [1] about our paper on the assessment of the diffusivities in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts [2], it is mentioned that diffusivities calculated by different methods (macroscopic in one case, or from pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR technique in the other) are different. It is also pointed out that the results of diffusivities for a given compound obtained from different macroscopic techniques are not explained satisfactorily. Both facts are true. We understand that the letter is not only a valuable contribution to the field, considering its large and laborious data collection, but also an incentive for the search of a better comprehension of the mechanisms controlling the FCC process. Most importantly, the differences observed should not hamper experiments with macroscopic techniques nor lead to disregard results suspected of mass and/or heat transfer limitations. It is important to recognize them as enriched by other type of information, and that they become necessary as design tools. By these reasons, and considering that not too much can be added to the details depicted in Ref. [1], we believe it would be useful to clarify some issues, mainly pointing to a distinct approach in the interpretation of the data.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65314
Bidabehere, Claudia María; Avila, Adolfo María; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]; Elsevier Science Sa; Chemical Engineering Journal; 145; 3; 1-2009; 525-527
1385-8947
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65314
identifier_str_mv Bidabehere, Claudia María; Avila, Adolfo María; Sedran, Ulises Anselmo; Comment on the paper "Diffusion and adsorption selectivities of hydrocarbons over FCC catalysts" by A.M. Ávila, C.M. Bidabehere and U. Sedran [Chem. Eng. J. 132 (2007) 67-75]; Elsevier Science Sa; Chemical Engineering Journal; 145; 3; 1-2009; 525-527
1385-8947
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cej.2008.09.017
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science Sa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science Sa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614348620693504
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares