A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle
- Autores
- Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet; Lloberas, Maria Mercedes; Luque, Sonia Elisabet; Bernat, Gisele; Riva, Eliana; Fiel, Cesar Alberto; Fernández, Alicia Silvina
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Anthelmintic resistance in beef cattle production is a well-known worldwide problem, contributing to the economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes. Resistance to ivermectin (IVM) is present in 93.5% of farms in Argentina, Cooperia spp. being the most prevalent genus (100%). Diagnosing AR under field conditions is currently done using the faecal egg count reduction test, which has been long used but lacks sensitivity to detect resistance in its early stages. In trying to improve this, in vitro techniques have been developed for different compounds and different parasites, and tested mainly in sheep parasites. As part of a large study on IVM-resistant populations of Cooperia spp. in beef farms, this assay was designed to evaluate two in vitro techniques, the micro-agar larval development test (MALDT) and the larval migration inhibition test (LMIT), on proven resistant (R) and susceptible (S) field populations. Both populations had been previously characterised by controlled-efficacy tests, showing that the efficacy of ivermectin against R and Se Cooperia was 66.3% and 99.5%, respectively. For the MALDT, eggs of both Cooperia isolates were exposed to twelve anthelmintic concentrations, from 4.7x10⁻¹⁰M to 2.18x10⁻¹¹M. The obtained EC50 values were: 6.93x10-9M (95%CI: 6.37x10⁻⁹M to 7.49x10⁻⁹M) for the R population and 8.33x10-10M (95%CI: 7.86x10⁻¹⁰M to 8.8x10⁻¹⁰M) for the S one, with correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.92 y 0.93, respectively; the resistance factor (RF) was 8.31. For the LMIT, ensheathed L3 were exposed to eight concentrations, from 10⁻⁵M a 5x10⁻⁹M. The EC50 values were 6.33x10-8M (95%CI: 5.30x10-8M to 7.49x10-8M) for the R population, and 8.03x10-8M (95%CI: 5.49x10-8M ? 1,19x10-7M) for the S population, with R² of 0.87 y 0.52, respectively; and a RF of 0.79. Based on these preliminary results, the MALDT would be a useful in vitro technique to detect field populations of IVM-resistant Cooperia nematodes.
Fil: Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Lloberas, Maria Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Luque, Sonia Elisabet. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Bernat, Gisele. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Riva, Eliana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Fiel, Cesar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Fernández, Alicia Silvina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology
Irlanda
University College Dublin
Trinity College Dublin
Queen’s University Belfast - Materia
-
IN VITRO TECHNIQUES
IVERMECTIN
RESISTANCE
COOPERIA
CATTLE
LARVAL DEVELOPMENT TEST
LARVAL MIGRATION INHIBITION TEST
GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155890
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_e6e4a8470f3e0be6aeb97ebdbf35b7da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155890 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattleFuentes, Mariana ElisabetLloberas, Maria MercedesLuque, Sonia ElisabetBernat, GiseleRiva, ElianaFiel, Cesar AlbertoFernández, Alicia SilvinaIN VITRO TECHNIQUESIVERMECTINRESISTANCECOOPERIACATTLELARVAL DEVELOPMENT TESTLARVAL MIGRATION INHIBITION TESTGASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Anthelmintic resistance in beef cattle production is a well-known worldwide problem, contributing to the economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes. Resistance to ivermectin (IVM) is present in 93.5% of farms in Argentina, Cooperia spp. being the most prevalent genus (100%). Diagnosing AR under field conditions is currently done using the faecal egg count reduction test, which has been long used but lacks sensitivity to detect resistance in its early stages. In trying to improve this, in vitro techniques have been developed for different compounds and different parasites, and tested mainly in sheep parasites. As part of a large study on IVM-resistant populations of Cooperia spp. in beef farms, this assay was designed to evaluate two in vitro techniques, the micro-agar larval development test (MALDT) and the larval migration inhibition test (LMIT), on proven resistant (R) and susceptible (S) field populations. Both populations had been previously characterised by controlled-efficacy tests, showing that the efficacy of ivermectin against R and Se Cooperia was 66.3% and 99.5%, respectively. For the MALDT, eggs of both Cooperia isolates were exposed to twelve anthelmintic concentrations, from 4.7x10⁻¹⁰M to 2.18x10⁻¹¹M. The obtained EC50 values were: 6.93x10-9M (95%CI: 6.37x10⁻⁹M to 7.49x10⁻⁹M) for the R population and 8.33x10-10M (95%CI: 7.86x10⁻¹⁰M to 8.8x10⁻¹⁰M) for the S one, with correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.92 y 0.93, respectively; the resistance factor (RF) was 8.31. For the LMIT, ensheathed L3 were exposed to eight concentrations, from 10⁻⁵M a 5x10⁻⁹M. The EC50 values were 6.33x10-8M (95%CI: 5.30x10-8M to 7.49x10-8M) for the R population, and 8.03x10-8M (95%CI: 5.49x10-8M ? 1,19x10-7M) for the S population, with R² of 0.87 y 0.52, respectively; and a RF of 0.79. Based on these preliminary results, the MALDT would be a useful in vitro technique to detect field populations of IVM-resistant Cooperia nematodes.Fil: Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Lloberas, Maria Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Luque, Sonia Elisabet. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Bernat, Gisele. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Riva, Eliana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Fiel, Cesar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, Alicia Silvina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary ParasitologyIrlandaUniversity College DublinTrinity College DublinQueen’s University BelfastUniversity College Dublin2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectConferenciaBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/155890A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle; 28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology; Irlanda; 2021; 1-2CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.waavp2021.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/WAAVP-2021-Abstract-book-22.07.21-FINAL.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.waavp2021.com/Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:15:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155890instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:15:07.256CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle |
title |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle |
spellingShingle |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet IN VITRO TECHNIQUES IVERMECTIN RESISTANCE COOPERIA CATTLE LARVAL DEVELOPMENT TEST LARVAL MIGRATION INHIBITION TEST GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES |
title_short |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle |
title_full |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle |
title_fullStr |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle |
title_sort |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet Lloberas, Maria Mercedes Luque, Sonia Elisabet Bernat, Gisele Riva, Eliana Fiel, Cesar Alberto Fernández, Alicia Silvina |
author |
Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet |
author_facet |
Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet Lloberas, Maria Mercedes Luque, Sonia Elisabet Bernat, Gisele Riva, Eliana Fiel, Cesar Alberto Fernández, Alicia Silvina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lloberas, Maria Mercedes Luque, Sonia Elisabet Bernat, Gisele Riva, Eliana Fiel, Cesar Alberto Fernández, Alicia Silvina |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
IN VITRO TECHNIQUES IVERMECTIN RESISTANCE COOPERIA CATTLE LARVAL DEVELOPMENT TEST LARVAL MIGRATION INHIBITION TEST GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES |
topic |
IN VITRO TECHNIQUES IVERMECTIN RESISTANCE COOPERIA CATTLE LARVAL DEVELOPMENT TEST LARVAL MIGRATION INHIBITION TEST GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Anthelmintic resistance in beef cattle production is a well-known worldwide problem, contributing to the economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes. Resistance to ivermectin (IVM) is present in 93.5% of farms in Argentina, Cooperia spp. being the most prevalent genus (100%). Diagnosing AR under field conditions is currently done using the faecal egg count reduction test, which has been long used but lacks sensitivity to detect resistance in its early stages. In trying to improve this, in vitro techniques have been developed for different compounds and different parasites, and tested mainly in sheep parasites. As part of a large study on IVM-resistant populations of Cooperia spp. in beef farms, this assay was designed to evaluate two in vitro techniques, the micro-agar larval development test (MALDT) and the larval migration inhibition test (LMIT), on proven resistant (R) and susceptible (S) field populations. Both populations had been previously characterised by controlled-efficacy tests, showing that the efficacy of ivermectin against R and Se Cooperia was 66.3% and 99.5%, respectively. For the MALDT, eggs of both Cooperia isolates were exposed to twelve anthelmintic concentrations, from 4.7x10⁻¹⁰M to 2.18x10⁻¹¹M. The obtained EC50 values were: 6.93x10-9M (95%CI: 6.37x10⁻⁹M to 7.49x10⁻⁹M) for the R population and 8.33x10-10M (95%CI: 7.86x10⁻¹⁰M to 8.8x10⁻¹⁰M) for the S one, with correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.92 y 0.93, respectively; the resistance factor (RF) was 8.31. For the LMIT, ensheathed L3 were exposed to eight concentrations, from 10⁻⁵M a 5x10⁻⁹M. The EC50 values were 6.33x10-8M (95%CI: 5.30x10-8M to 7.49x10-8M) for the R population, and 8.03x10-8M (95%CI: 5.49x10-8M ? 1,19x10-7M) for the S population, with R² of 0.87 y 0.52, respectively; and a RF of 0.79. Based on these preliminary results, the MALDT would be a useful in vitro technique to detect field populations of IVM-resistant Cooperia nematodes. Fil: Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Lloberas, Maria Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Luque, Sonia Elisabet. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Bernat, Gisele. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Riva, Eliana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Fiel, Cesar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Fernández, Alicia Silvina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina 28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology Irlanda University College Dublin Trinity College Dublin Queen’s University Belfast |
description |
Anthelmintic resistance in beef cattle production is a well-known worldwide problem, contributing to the economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes. Resistance to ivermectin (IVM) is present in 93.5% of farms in Argentina, Cooperia spp. being the most prevalent genus (100%). Diagnosing AR under field conditions is currently done using the faecal egg count reduction test, which has been long used but lacks sensitivity to detect resistance in its early stages. In trying to improve this, in vitro techniques have been developed for different compounds and different parasites, and tested mainly in sheep parasites. As part of a large study on IVM-resistant populations of Cooperia spp. in beef farms, this assay was designed to evaluate two in vitro techniques, the micro-agar larval development test (MALDT) and the larval migration inhibition test (LMIT), on proven resistant (R) and susceptible (S) field populations. Both populations had been previously characterised by controlled-efficacy tests, showing that the efficacy of ivermectin against R and Se Cooperia was 66.3% and 99.5%, respectively. For the MALDT, eggs of both Cooperia isolates were exposed to twelve anthelmintic concentrations, from 4.7x10⁻¹⁰M to 2.18x10⁻¹¹M. The obtained EC50 values were: 6.93x10-9M (95%CI: 6.37x10⁻⁹M to 7.49x10⁻⁹M) for the R population and 8.33x10-10M (95%CI: 7.86x10⁻¹⁰M to 8.8x10⁻¹⁰M) for the S one, with correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.92 y 0.93, respectively; the resistance factor (RF) was 8.31. For the LMIT, ensheathed L3 were exposed to eight concentrations, from 10⁻⁵M a 5x10⁻⁹M. The EC50 values were 6.33x10-8M (95%CI: 5.30x10-8M to 7.49x10-8M) for the R population, and 8.03x10-8M (95%CI: 5.49x10-8M ? 1,19x10-7M) for the S population, with R² of 0.87 y 0.52, respectively; and a RF of 0.79. Based on these preliminary results, the MALDT would be a useful in vitro technique to detect field populations of IVM-resistant Cooperia nematodes. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Conferencia Book http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
conferenceObject |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155890 A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle; 28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology; Irlanda; 2021; 1-2 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155890 |
identifier_str_mv |
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle; 28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology; Irlanda; 2021; 1-2 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.waavp2021.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/WAAVP-2021-Abstract-book-22.07.21-FINAL.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.waavp2021.com/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Internacional |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University College Dublin |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University College Dublin |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614085084184576 |
score |
13.070432 |