Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina
- Autores
- Scursoni, Julio Alejandro; Satorre, Emilio Horacio
- Año de publicación
- 2010
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- From their introduction in 1996, glyphosate resistant (GR) soybean cultivars have been rapidly adopted by farmers in Argentina and in other countries in the world. The high rate of adoption of this technology seems to be based on the simplicity of use provided by a single herbicide (glyphosate), its high efficacy to control many weeds and, the low costs of the technology relative to that used in conventional crops. During 2001e2002, 2002e2003 and 2003e2004 soybean growing seasons, field surveys and field experiments were performed with the aim of studying the effect of different glyphosate management strategies on the diversity of soybean weed communities, weed control, individual survival, fecundity and crop yield. In addition, the emergence pattern of three important weeds, Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus rotundus and Anoda cristata, was also studied. Both field surveys and field experiments were carried out on no-till soybean crops sown immediately after wheat or barley harvest (double cropped system). Experiments were set up in commercial soybean crops and consisted of different times of a single glyphosate application, two glyphosate applications and also the application of glyphosate plus a residual herbicide imazethapyr. A. cristata, D. sanguinalis, Stellaria media, Chenopodium album and Cyperus sp. were the most prevalent weeds recorded at pre-harvest of the soybean crops, showing regional constancy higher than 80% in both years. In three out of four field experiments, crop yield was not increased when glyphosate was applied twice compared with a single application of the herbicide. In addition there was a lower negative effect on weed species richness when glyphosate was applied once during the crop cycle than with two applications of glyphosate or glyphosate plus imazethapyr. D. sanguinalis escaped the glyphosate early treatment because of the long weed emergence period, while A. cristata and C. rotundus survived treatments due to their high individual tolerance. The results suggest that it is possible to manage glyphosate application to get high crop yield with a low impact on weed diversity, depending on the weed species and their abundance.
Fil: Scursoni, Julio Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Satorre, Emilio Horacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina - Materia
-
HERBICIDE- RESISTANT SOYBEAN
GLYPHOSATE MANAGEMENT
LARGE CRABGRASS
SPURRED ANODA - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280179
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_e571e3504a4117a1b0156f2f0dd8ba09 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280179 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in ArgentinaScursoni, Julio AlejandroSatorre, Emilio HoracioHERBICIDE- RESISTANT SOYBEANGLYPHOSATE MANAGEMENTLARGE CRABGRASSSPURRED ANODAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4From their introduction in 1996, glyphosate resistant (GR) soybean cultivars have been rapidly adopted by farmers in Argentina and in other countries in the world. The high rate of adoption of this technology seems to be based on the simplicity of use provided by a single herbicide (glyphosate), its high efficacy to control many weeds and, the low costs of the technology relative to that used in conventional crops. During 2001e2002, 2002e2003 and 2003e2004 soybean growing seasons, field surveys and field experiments were performed with the aim of studying the effect of different glyphosate management strategies on the diversity of soybean weed communities, weed control, individual survival, fecundity and crop yield. In addition, the emergence pattern of three important weeds, Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus rotundus and Anoda cristata, was also studied. Both field surveys and field experiments were carried out on no-till soybean crops sown immediately after wheat or barley harvest (double cropped system). Experiments were set up in commercial soybean crops and consisted of different times of a single glyphosate application, two glyphosate applications and also the application of glyphosate plus a residual herbicide imazethapyr. A. cristata, D. sanguinalis, Stellaria media, Chenopodium album and Cyperus sp. were the most prevalent weeds recorded at pre-harvest of the soybean crops, showing regional constancy higher than 80% in both years. In three out of four field experiments, crop yield was not increased when glyphosate was applied twice compared with a single application of the herbicide. In addition there was a lower negative effect on weed species richness when glyphosate was applied once during the crop cycle than with two applications of glyphosate or glyphosate plus imazethapyr. D. sanguinalis escaped the glyphosate early treatment because of the long weed emergence period, while A. cristata and C. rotundus survived treatments due to their high individual tolerance. The results suggest that it is possible to manage glyphosate application to get high crop yield with a low impact on weed diversity, depending on the weed species and their abundance.Fil: Scursoni, Julio Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; ArgentinaFil: Satorre, Emilio Horacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaElsevier2010-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/280179Scursoni, Julio Alejandro; Satorre, Emilio Horacio; Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina; Elsevier; Crop Protection; 29; 9; 9-2010; 957-9620261-2194CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219410001183info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-06T12:14:10Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280179instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-06 12:14:11.073CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina |
| title |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina |
| spellingShingle |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina Scursoni, Julio Alejandro HERBICIDE- RESISTANT SOYBEAN GLYPHOSATE MANAGEMENT LARGE CRABGRASS SPURRED ANODA |
| title_short |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina |
| title_full |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina |
| title_fullStr |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina |
| title_sort |
Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Scursoni, Julio Alejandro Satorre, Emilio Horacio |
| author |
Scursoni, Julio Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Scursoni, Julio Alejandro Satorre, Emilio Horacio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Satorre, Emilio Horacio |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
HERBICIDE- RESISTANT SOYBEAN GLYPHOSATE MANAGEMENT LARGE CRABGRASS SPURRED ANODA |
| topic |
HERBICIDE- RESISTANT SOYBEAN GLYPHOSATE MANAGEMENT LARGE CRABGRASS SPURRED ANODA |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
From their introduction in 1996, glyphosate resistant (GR) soybean cultivars have been rapidly adopted by farmers in Argentina and in other countries in the world. The high rate of adoption of this technology seems to be based on the simplicity of use provided by a single herbicide (glyphosate), its high efficacy to control many weeds and, the low costs of the technology relative to that used in conventional crops. During 2001e2002, 2002e2003 and 2003e2004 soybean growing seasons, field surveys and field experiments were performed with the aim of studying the effect of different glyphosate management strategies on the diversity of soybean weed communities, weed control, individual survival, fecundity and crop yield. In addition, the emergence pattern of three important weeds, Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus rotundus and Anoda cristata, was also studied. Both field surveys and field experiments were carried out on no-till soybean crops sown immediately after wheat or barley harvest (double cropped system). Experiments were set up in commercial soybean crops and consisted of different times of a single glyphosate application, two glyphosate applications and also the application of glyphosate plus a residual herbicide imazethapyr. A. cristata, D. sanguinalis, Stellaria media, Chenopodium album and Cyperus sp. were the most prevalent weeds recorded at pre-harvest of the soybean crops, showing regional constancy higher than 80% in both years. In three out of four field experiments, crop yield was not increased when glyphosate was applied twice compared with a single application of the herbicide. In addition there was a lower negative effect on weed species richness when glyphosate was applied once during the crop cycle than with two applications of glyphosate or glyphosate plus imazethapyr. D. sanguinalis escaped the glyphosate early treatment because of the long weed emergence period, while A. cristata and C. rotundus survived treatments due to their high individual tolerance. The results suggest that it is possible to manage glyphosate application to get high crop yield with a low impact on weed diversity, depending on the weed species and their abundance. Fil: Scursoni, Julio Alejandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; Argentina Fil: Satorre, Emilio Horacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina |
| description |
From their introduction in 1996, glyphosate resistant (GR) soybean cultivars have been rapidly adopted by farmers in Argentina and in other countries in the world. The high rate of adoption of this technology seems to be based on the simplicity of use provided by a single herbicide (glyphosate), its high efficacy to control many weeds and, the low costs of the technology relative to that used in conventional crops. During 2001e2002, 2002e2003 and 2003e2004 soybean growing seasons, field surveys and field experiments were performed with the aim of studying the effect of different glyphosate management strategies on the diversity of soybean weed communities, weed control, individual survival, fecundity and crop yield. In addition, the emergence pattern of three important weeds, Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus rotundus and Anoda cristata, was also studied. Both field surveys and field experiments were carried out on no-till soybean crops sown immediately after wheat or barley harvest (double cropped system). Experiments were set up in commercial soybean crops and consisted of different times of a single glyphosate application, two glyphosate applications and also the application of glyphosate plus a residual herbicide imazethapyr. A. cristata, D. sanguinalis, Stellaria media, Chenopodium album and Cyperus sp. were the most prevalent weeds recorded at pre-harvest of the soybean crops, showing regional constancy higher than 80% in both years. In three out of four field experiments, crop yield was not increased when glyphosate was applied twice compared with a single application of the herbicide. In addition there was a lower negative effect on weed species richness when glyphosate was applied once during the crop cycle than with two applications of glyphosate or glyphosate plus imazethapyr. D. sanguinalis escaped the glyphosate early treatment because of the long weed emergence period, while A. cristata and C. rotundus survived treatments due to their high individual tolerance. The results suggest that it is possible to manage glyphosate application to get high crop yield with a low impact on weed diversity, depending on the weed species and their abundance. |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-09 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/280179 Scursoni, Julio Alejandro; Satorre, Emilio Horacio; Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina; Elsevier; Crop Protection; 29; 9; 9-2010; 957-962 0261-2194 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/280179 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Scursoni, Julio Alejandro; Satorre, Emilio Horacio; Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina; Elsevier; Crop Protection; 29; 9; 9-2010; 957-962 0261-2194 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219410001183 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.001 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1856402905581486080 |
| score |
13.106097 |