Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”

Autores
Gago, Maria Veronica
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The current proletarian landscape in Argentina cannot be understood without tracing a genealogy in which the emergence of the piquetero movement at the beginning of this century stands out as a crucial moment of “insubordination.” Widely acknowledged in social movements themselves, the eruption of the piqueteros changed the terms of debate about work and dignity as necessarily tied to the wage, and also the nature of territorial location of worker political organization (see in particular Colectivo Situaciones and MTD de Solano, 2002). Such changes reflect the complex character of the so-called popular economy that prevails today in Argentina. The “popular economy” which incorporates forms work linked to self-management, work without a boss, and the invention of labor forms outside of the wage, a heterogeneous proletariat with diverse means of making a living has become a stabilize feature of the Argentine socio-economy. The emergence of such practices must be seen in historical terms as not being possible without the prior destabilization initiated by the social and popular protagonistic forces that fueled and sustained the crisis initiated in 2001.
Fil: Gago, Maria Veronica. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
POPULAR ECONOMIES
UNIONISM
CRISIS
SOCIAL MOVEMENT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121787

id CONICETDig_e4a77fac2439626ca8433fa16a14b542
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121787
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”Gago, Maria VeronicaPOPULAR ECONOMIESUNIONISMCRISISSOCIAL MOVEMENThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The current proletarian landscape in Argentina cannot be understood without tracing a genealogy in which the emergence of the piquetero movement at the beginning of this century stands out as a crucial moment of “insubordination.” Widely acknowledged in social movements themselves, the eruption of the piqueteros changed the terms of debate about work and dignity as necessarily tied to the wage, and also the nature of territorial location of worker political organization (see in particular Colectivo Situaciones and MTD de Solano, 2002). Such changes reflect the complex character of the so-called popular economy that prevails today in Argentina. The “popular economy” which incorporates forms work linked to self-management, work without a boss, and the invention of labor forms outside of the wage, a heterogeneous proletariat with diverse means of making a living has become a stabilize feature of the Argentine socio-economy. The emergence of such practices must be seen in historical terms as not being possible without the prior destabilization initiated by the social and popular protagonistic forces that fueled and sustained the crisis initiated in 2001.Fil: Gago, Maria Veronica. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaSpringer2019-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/121787Gago, Maria Veronica; Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”; Springer; Dialectical Anthropology; 44; 1; 22-4-2019; 79-810304-40921573-0786CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-019-09549-2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10624-019-09549-2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:33:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121787instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:33:52.984CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
title Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
spellingShingle Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
Gago, Maria Veronica
POPULAR ECONOMIES
UNIONISM
CRISIS
SOCIAL MOVEMENT
title_short Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
title_full Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
title_fullStr Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
title_full_unstemmed Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
title_sort Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gago, Maria Veronica
author Gago, Maria Veronica
author_facet Gago, Maria Veronica
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv POPULAR ECONOMIES
UNIONISM
CRISIS
SOCIAL MOVEMENT
topic POPULAR ECONOMIES
UNIONISM
CRISIS
SOCIAL MOVEMENT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The current proletarian landscape in Argentina cannot be understood without tracing a genealogy in which the emergence of the piquetero movement at the beginning of this century stands out as a crucial moment of “insubordination.” Widely acknowledged in social movements themselves, the eruption of the piqueteros changed the terms of debate about work and dignity as necessarily tied to the wage, and also the nature of territorial location of worker political organization (see in particular Colectivo Situaciones and MTD de Solano, 2002). Such changes reflect the complex character of the so-called popular economy that prevails today in Argentina. The “popular economy” which incorporates forms work linked to self-management, work without a boss, and the invention of labor forms outside of the wage, a heterogeneous proletariat with diverse means of making a living has become a stabilize feature of the Argentine socio-economy. The emergence of such practices must be seen in historical terms as not being possible without the prior destabilization initiated by the social and popular protagonistic forces that fueled and sustained the crisis initiated in 2001.
Fil: Gago, Maria Veronica. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description The current proletarian landscape in Argentina cannot be understood without tracing a genealogy in which the emergence of the piquetero movement at the beginning of this century stands out as a crucial moment of “insubordination.” Widely acknowledged in social movements themselves, the eruption of the piqueteros changed the terms of debate about work and dignity as necessarily tied to the wage, and also the nature of territorial location of worker political organization (see in particular Colectivo Situaciones and MTD de Solano, 2002). Such changes reflect the complex character of the so-called popular economy that prevails today in Argentina. The “popular economy” which incorporates forms work linked to self-management, work without a boss, and the invention of labor forms outside of the wage, a heterogeneous proletariat with diverse means of making a living has become a stabilize feature of the Argentine socio-economy. The emergence of such practices must be seen in historical terms as not being possible without the prior destabilization initiated by the social and popular protagonistic forces that fueled and sustained the crisis initiated in 2001.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121787
Gago, Maria Veronica; Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”; Springer; Dialectical Anthropology; 44; 1; 22-4-2019; 79-81
0304-4092
1573-0786
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121787
identifier_str_mv Gago, Maria Veronica; Forum response to “Building from heterogeneity: the decomposition and recomposition of the working class viewed from the ‘popular economy’ in Argentina”; Springer; Dialectical Anthropology; 44; 1; 22-4-2019; 79-81
0304-4092
1573-0786
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-019-09549-2
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10624-019-09549-2
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613044911472640
score 13.070432