Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars

Autores
Bertero, Hector Daniel; Ruiz, R. A.
Año de publicación
2008
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The identification of the critical period for seed determination is a central aspect for adequate crop management for higher yields. As important variability in the developmental stages associated to this critical period and its duration has been detected for several crops, results from one species cannot be extrapolated to other. The flowering period, from first anthesis to the end of flowering, appears as the most sensitive to the environment in quinoa; as results from experiments conducted under field conditions in the Argentinean pampas, using sea level quinoa cultivars adapted to temperate environments, suggest. Data from a combination of four cultivars, three densities and 2 years were used to estimate the association (adjusted R2) between crop biomass increment (g m-2) and seed number (seeds m-2) for four phases: vegetative, reproductive, flowering and seed filling. The strongest association was that detected for the flowering phase (R2 = 0.71), followed by seed filling (R2 = 0.64); associations for the two phases preceding first anthesis were low. Differences in biomass increment during flowering where strongly associated with crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1) during flowering (R2 = 0.86); crop growth rate was associated to differences in the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (MJ m-2 day-1) (R2 = 0.79) and radiation use efficiency (R2 = 0.71). Significant differences between cultivars were detected for reproductive efficiencies (seeds per gram of panicle biomass at the end of flowering or seeds per gram of panicle biomass increment during flowering) in 1 year, but differences in biomass partitioning to the inflorescence during flowering were not significant. A negative association between reproductive efficiencies and panicle biomass was observed, and possible determinants of this association are discussed in the light of available knowledge for the species. As in several other crop species, maximization of growth during the late reproductive period appears as the main target for crop management. As radiation interception efficiencies were usually below 0.95 this variable explained most variation in growth during flowering; but even crops managed for maximum radiation interception could exhibit differences in biomass increment associated to variability in radiation use efficiency and perhaps the duration of flowering.
Fil: Bertero, Hector Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Ruiz, R. A.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
Materia
CHENOPODIUM QUINOA
CRITICAL PERIOD
QUINOA
SEED NUMBER
YIELD DETERMINATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/131244

id CONICETDig_e26dfdd63ffce7b1884a904190db3a2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/131244
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivarsBertero, Hector DanielRuiz, R. A.CHENOPODIUM QUINOACRITICAL PERIODQUINOASEED NUMBERYIELD DETERMINATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4The identification of the critical period for seed determination is a central aspect for adequate crop management for higher yields. As important variability in the developmental stages associated to this critical period and its duration has been detected for several crops, results from one species cannot be extrapolated to other. The flowering period, from first anthesis to the end of flowering, appears as the most sensitive to the environment in quinoa; as results from experiments conducted under field conditions in the Argentinean pampas, using sea level quinoa cultivars adapted to temperate environments, suggest. Data from a combination of four cultivars, three densities and 2 years were used to estimate the association (adjusted R2) between crop biomass increment (g m-2) and seed number (seeds m-2) for four phases: vegetative, reproductive, flowering and seed filling. The strongest association was that detected for the flowering phase (R2 = 0.71), followed by seed filling (R2 = 0.64); associations for the two phases preceding first anthesis were low. Differences in biomass increment during flowering where strongly associated with crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1) during flowering (R2 = 0.86); crop growth rate was associated to differences in the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (MJ m-2 day-1) (R2 = 0.79) and radiation use efficiency (R2 = 0.71). Significant differences between cultivars were detected for reproductive efficiencies (seeds per gram of panicle biomass at the end of flowering or seeds per gram of panicle biomass increment during flowering) in 1 year, but differences in biomass partitioning to the inflorescence during flowering were not significant. A negative association between reproductive efficiencies and panicle biomass was observed, and possible determinants of this association are discussed in the light of available knowledge for the species. As in several other crop species, maximization of growth during the late reproductive period appears as the main target for crop management. As radiation interception efficiencies were usually below 0.95 this variable explained most variation in growth during flowering; but even crops managed for maximum radiation interception could exhibit differences in biomass increment associated to variability in radiation use efficiency and perhaps the duration of flowering.Fil: Bertero, Hector Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; ArgentinaFil: Ruiz, R. A.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; ArgentinaElsevier Science2008-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/131244Bertero, Hector Daniel; Ruiz, R. A.; Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars; Elsevier Science; European Journal of Agronomy; 28; 3; 4-2008; 186-1941161-0301CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.002info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030107000895info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:04:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/131244instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:04:48.197CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
title Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
spellingShingle Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
Bertero, Hector Daniel
CHENOPODIUM QUINOA
CRITICAL PERIOD
QUINOA
SEED NUMBER
YIELD DETERMINATION
title_short Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
title_full Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
title_fullStr Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
title_sort Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bertero, Hector Daniel
Ruiz, R. A.
author Bertero, Hector Daniel
author_facet Bertero, Hector Daniel
Ruiz, R. A.
author_role author
author2 Ruiz, R. A.
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CHENOPODIUM QUINOA
CRITICAL PERIOD
QUINOA
SEED NUMBER
YIELD DETERMINATION
topic CHENOPODIUM QUINOA
CRITICAL PERIOD
QUINOA
SEED NUMBER
YIELD DETERMINATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The identification of the critical period for seed determination is a central aspect for adequate crop management for higher yields. As important variability in the developmental stages associated to this critical period and its duration has been detected for several crops, results from one species cannot be extrapolated to other. The flowering period, from first anthesis to the end of flowering, appears as the most sensitive to the environment in quinoa; as results from experiments conducted under field conditions in the Argentinean pampas, using sea level quinoa cultivars adapted to temperate environments, suggest. Data from a combination of four cultivars, three densities and 2 years were used to estimate the association (adjusted R2) between crop biomass increment (g m-2) and seed number (seeds m-2) for four phases: vegetative, reproductive, flowering and seed filling. The strongest association was that detected for the flowering phase (R2 = 0.71), followed by seed filling (R2 = 0.64); associations for the two phases preceding first anthesis were low. Differences in biomass increment during flowering where strongly associated with crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1) during flowering (R2 = 0.86); crop growth rate was associated to differences in the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (MJ m-2 day-1) (R2 = 0.79) and radiation use efficiency (R2 = 0.71). Significant differences between cultivars were detected for reproductive efficiencies (seeds per gram of panicle biomass at the end of flowering or seeds per gram of panicle biomass increment during flowering) in 1 year, but differences in biomass partitioning to the inflorescence during flowering were not significant. A negative association between reproductive efficiencies and panicle biomass was observed, and possible determinants of this association are discussed in the light of available knowledge for the species. As in several other crop species, maximization of growth during the late reproductive period appears as the main target for crop management. As radiation interception efficiencies were usually below 0.95 this variable explained most variation in growth during flowering; but even crops managed for maximum radiation interception could exhibit differences in biomass increment associated to variability in radiation use efficiency and perhaps the duration of flowering.
Fil: Bertero, Hector Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
Fil: Ruiz, R. A.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Producción Vegetal; Argentina
description The identification of the critical period for seed determination is a central aspect for adequate crop management for higher yields. As important variability in the developmental stages associated to this critical period and its duration has been detected for several crops, results from one species cannot be extrapolated to other. The flowering period, from first anthesis to the end of flowering, appears as the most sensitive to the environment in quinoa; as results from experiments conducted under field conditions in the Argentinean pampas, using sea level quinoa cultivars adapted to temperate environments, suggest. Data from a combination of four cultivars, three densities and 2 years were used to estimate the association (adjusted R2) between crop biomass increment (g m-2) and seed number (seeds m-2) for four phases: vegetative, reproductive, flowering and seed filling. The strongest association was that detected for the flowering phase (R2 = 0.71), followed by seed filling (R2 = 0.64); associations for the two phases preceding first anthesis were low. Differences in biomass increment during flowering where strongly associated with crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1) during flowering (R2 = 0.86); crop growth rate was associated to differences in the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (MJ m-2 day-1) (R2 = 0.79) and radiation use efficiency (R2 = 0.71). Significant differences between cultivars were detected for reproductive efficiencies (seeds per gram of panicle biomass at the end of flowering or seeds per gram of panicle biomass increment during flowering) in 1 year, but differences in biomass partitioning to the inflorescence during flowering were not significant. A negative association between reproductive efficiencies and panicle biomass was observed, and possible determinants of this association are discussed in the light of available knowledge for the species. As in several other crop species, maximization of growth during the late reproductive period appears as the main target for crop management. As radiation interception efficiencies were usually below 0.95 this variable explained most variation in growth during flowering; but even crops managed for maximum radiation interception could exhibit differences in biomass increment associated to variability in radiation use efficiency and perhaps the duration of flowering.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/131244
Bertero, Hector Daniel; Ruiz, R. A.; Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars; Elsevier Science; European Journal of Agronomy; 28; 3; 4-2008; 186-194
1161-0301
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/131244
identifier_str_mv Bertero, Hector Daniel; Ruiz, R. A.; Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars; Elsevier Science; European Journal of Agronomy; 28; 3; 4-2008; 186-194
1161-0301
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.002
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030107000895
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980162894823424
score 12.993085